Jan 6 discovery by defense

[Boilermaker03]

says that at least 20 FBI agents had infiltrated groups such as the Oathkeepers prior to Jan 6. Will be interesting, if it is true, to see if they can find out to the extent the FBI informants were involved in pushing it to happen ala the Michigan kidnapping incident.

 

[Boiler Buck]

says that at least 20 FBI agents had infiltrated groups such as the Oathkeepers prior to Jan 6. Will be interesting, if it is true, to see if they can find out to the extent the FBI informants were involved in pushing it to happen ala the Michigan kidnapping incident.

View embedded media

Didn't you know that is the FBI version of expressing their activist side. Libs gotta be crazy wacko libs even in the FBI.

 

[PurdueFan1]

If Dinesh D’Souza, a convicted felon, is all you’ve got, then you should probably delete this thread.

 

[BoilerJS]

If Dinesh D’Souza, a convicted felon, is all you’ve got, then you should probably delete this thread.

Dinesh D’Souza Sentenced in Manhattan Federal Court to Five Years of Probation for Campaign Finance Fraud — FBI

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that DINESH DSOUZA was sentenced in Manhattan federal court to five years of probation, with eight months during the first year to be served in a community confinement center, after having pled...

www.fbi.gov

Bad, Bad Man!

 

[Boilermaker03]

If Dinesh D’Souza, a convicted felon, is all you’ve got, then you should probably delete this thread.

Listen, I did say IF it was true, so I haven't completely taken his word on it. Wouldn't surprise me one bit though considering the agent that was in charge of the Michigan fiasco was also in charge of Jan 6. We will see how things go.

You state that he's a felon like he did some hard crime or something. You also make it sound that once you're convicted of something, you're never correct again. Is that so PuF1?

 

[PurdueFan1]

Listen, I did say IF it was true, so I haven't completely taken his word on it. Wouldn't surprise me one bit though considering the agent that was in charge of the Michigan fiasco was also in charge of Jan 6. We will see how things go.

You state that he's a felon like he did some hard crime or something. You also make it sound that once you're convicted of something, you're never correct again. Is that so PuF1?

No need to fangirl so hard for Dinesh on my account, 03. I know you think he’s a great, reputable source of information. His stellar background obviously says so. And he dated Laura Ingraham, so I mean he’s for sure on the up and up.

 

[Joetboiler]

No need to fangirl so hard for Dinesh on my account, 03. I know you think he’s a great, reputable source of information. His stellar background obviously says so. And he dated Laura Ingraham, so I mean he’s for sure on the up and up.

And how many times did you and your news sources reference and believe information from convicted felon Michael Avenatti?

 

[PurdueFan1]

And how many times did you and your news sources reference and believe information from convicted felon Michael Avenatti?

Zero.

Next….

 

[Joetboiler]

Zero.

Next….

So you believed zero ig the Stormy Daniels and you don’t read NYT WAPO Huffington Post Atlantic Vox Dauly Kos or watch MSNBC CNN or or the 3 major networks.

Please do tell me your news sources.

 

[PurdueFan1]

So you believed zero ig the Stormy Daniels and you don’t read NYT WAPO Huffington Post Atlantic Vox Dauly Kos or watch MSNBC CNN or or the 3 major networks.

Please do tell me your news sources.

Sigh, so here comes the goalpost moving, huh? What does where I get my news have to do with Michael Avenatti and Stormy Daniels? Lmao. Did that stretch pull any muscles?

 

[Riveting-]

No need to fangirl so hard for Dinesh on my account, 03. I know you think he’s a great, reputable source of information. His stellar background obviously says so. And he dated Laura Ingraham, so I mean he’s for sure on the up and up.

Consistent with what this Pulitzer Prize winning NYT 'reporter' said about Jan. 6 -- after writing lies about it.

BREAKING: NYT reporter says there were ‘a ton of FBI informants’ at Capitol on Jan 6, suggests colleagues exaggerated danger

“They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

thepostmillennial.com

 

[PurdueFan1]

Consistent with what this Pulitzer Prize winning NYT 'reporter' said about Jan. 6 -- after writing lies about it.

BREAKING: NYT reporter says there were ‘a ton of FBI informants’ at Capitol on Jan 6, suggests colleagues exaggerated danger

“They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

thepostmillennial.com

Really, dude? This is a “source”? Lmaoooo. They make Dinesh look good. I mean when I click the link, a pop up appears asking for a donation so they can keep fighting the “far left”. Fukk off with this lol.

 

[Crayfish57]

No need to fangirl so hard for Dinesh on my account, 03. I know you think he’s a great, reputable source of information. His stellar background obviously says so. And he dated Laura Ingraham, so I mean he’s for sure on the up and up.

You stay up nights dreaming about Mayor Pete don't you?

 

[Riveting-]

Really, dude? This is a “source”? Lmaoooo. They make Dinesh look good. I mean when I click the link, a pop up appears asking for a donation so they can keep fighting the “far left”. Fukk off with this lol.

The guy is on video regardless of the source.

Which 'sources' do you consider legit, puf?

 

[indy35]

No need to fangirl so hard for Dinesh on my account, 03. I know you think he’s a great, reputable source of information. His stellar background obviously says so. And he dated Laura Ingraham, so I mean he’s for sure on the up and up.

Looks like Boilermaker03 when down the Youtube rabbit hole again. The algorithm has him completely in its grasp.

 

[PurdueFan1]

The guy is on video regardless of the source.

Which 'sources' do you consider legit, puf?

Well for starters, I’m not going to use something that says they’re going to fight the radical left/right as a source. Maybe consider that before you use your “sources”

 

[Riveting-]

Well for starters, I’m not going to use something that says they’re going to fight the radical left/right as a source. Maybe consider that before you use your “sources”

Still not saying what you would use. And still not addressing the issue at hand, which is FBI corruption (right @BuilderBob6 ?).

All you do, puf, is deny the sources but not the content. So, do you believe anything Brandon says, since he is a proven repeat plagiarist and liar?