ADVERTISEMENT

Purdue at Michigan State: MASTER DISCUSSION THREAD

Guts......We'll see what this team has on Sunday. A fun season has turned belly up real quick.

Say what you want about bench, portal, defense etc.....This team has lost because they were out toughed/hustled 3 games in a row. No fight out there.
 
I get that Painter trusts process over results but at some point you have to be willing to admit you need to tweak the process a bit.

Loyer was not a factor tonight and once again all three of our Big 3 aren't playing well we don't have anyone else stepping up.

For the folks who don't think we need portal help next season, I'm sorry but you are dead wrong.
How can you honestly say Loyer wasn't a factor tonight?
 
Still wrong.

We went away from over the screen no matter what with big drop coverage to doing it again and the same awful defense as always when using this.

Painter is a weak ass X and O coach and has been his entire tenure
I am amazed you will root for a Painter coached team?
 
Tell me we don't need big guards that can attack the rim. We just are small at every position.
I would prefer the 3 position be filled with a 6'8 scoring small forward and have the 4 being a guy in the paint defending and getting rebounds. . painter prefers filling the 3 with a third guard. That creates a lot of height mismatches. I was hoping Catchings or Sisley would come to Purdue and force Painter to change his mind and put a real forward at the three instead of playing his usual small ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler8285
MSU has been terrible against zones all year but Painter just won’t do it.

To be honest, though, this is the team I expected to see all year. January gave us some false hope and raised the expectations. I don’t feel like they’re going to stop this skid in Bloomington either unfortunately.
 
Time to start playing the nil/transfer portal game. A lot of room to upgrade talent. We’re a top tier B1G basketball program. Would like to see more high level recruits/ incoming transfers.
we actually did have a lot of high level recruits come to Purdue. unfortunately, they played the same position as Loyer and Smith.

when you talk about portal transfers, what position do you think we need the most help at ? center ? the 4 ? the 3 ? maybe a small forward at the 3that can score ? a 4 that can play defense ? maybe a center that can grab rebounds, block shots and also stuff an alley oop pass?

at this point, all we have arriving for next year is a combo guard. I believe we already have enough combo guards.

Maybe the portal is the answer. or maybe finding a small forward or another big man to play the 4 would help. nothing against TKR, but when he sits we have nobody to replace him. Jacobson will be an improvement over Berg/Burgess/Furst
 
My God we are so bad on dumb fouls
I’m sitting here thinking of all careless things on offense as they sped Purdue up and all their bigs uncontested dunks, all their run outs where even when Purdue could set the D they still scored. The lack of offensive help that let them key on Braden, Trey and Fletcher at key times and I’m unsure how it was so close. Caleb shot a right handed jump hook when he was able to get in the lane for a left handed jump hook.

Purdue needs more scoring outside of the three or teams will continue to sell out on keying on Braden and Trey mostly. The IU game will not be easy at all
 
I don't think you've ever liked him a lot. He hit his shots, had 8 pts., 5 assists, and 5 boards. Who you going to put in his place? Harris? Myles? Cox?
It's not about who are you going to put into his place, it's about him being involved and playing the whole game, not just in bursts. Maybe you think 1/2 in a half is just fine, I don't and I bet he doesn't either.

The very fact that we don't have anyone else doing anything is exactly the reason why he needs to step up and play more consistently because we can't win if it's just the "Big Two."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler8285
I’m sitting here thinking of all careless things on offense as they sped Purdue up and all their bigs uncontested dunks, all their run outs where even when Purdue could set the D they still scored. The lack of offensive help that let them key on Braden, Trey and Fletcher at key times and I’m unsure how it was so close. Caleb shot a right handed jump hook when he was able to get in the lane for a left handed jump hook.

Purdue needs more scoring outside of the three or teams will continue to sell out on keying on Braden and Trey mostly. The IU game will not be easy at all
Was it me or did it seem like they gave up on Burgess pretty quickly?
 
It's not about who are you going to put into his place, it's about him being involved and playing the whole game, not just in bursts. Maybe you think 1/2 in a half is just fine, I don't and I bet he doesn't either.

The very fact that we don't have anyone else doing anything is exactly the reason why he needs to step up and play more consistently because we can't win if it's just the "Big Two."
I've said it before and I'll say it again, without Loyer this team loses another five games this season. And his play last year counted a bunch in making the final game. Take time and look at what he does that's not in the stat book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerMaker P
I've said it before and I'll say it again, without Loyer this team loses another five games this season. And his play last year counted a bunch in making the final game. Take time and look at what he does that's not in the stat book.
Agree. He often keeps his composure much better than Smith and Painter came to him to be a leader on the floor for a reason. Watch those “movies” that the Purdue basketball X account does after big wins. It is often Loyer who is vocal and leading in the huddle and locker room. Remember the clip of him saying he could throw the lob because Braden’s guy was “up in his shit” last year? Loyer gets undervalued way too much.
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again, without Loyer this team loses another five games this season. And his play last year counted a bunch in making the final game. Take time and look at what he does that's not in the stat book.
With Loyer we just lost three in a row.

I have no idea why your response to Loyer needs to play better is there's no one better so shut up.

So basically doesn't matter how he plays to you. He can't play bad in your eyes no matter what.
 
Somebody has a man crush on Loyer !! And wearing Loyer goggles. When he is scoring 15 a game he is a factor, when he has 5 ( and yes I’m not counting the one at the buzzer ) he is not. And don’t tell me his defense is good cause even Robbie brings that up about teams isolating him
 
Somebody has a man crush on Loyer !! And wearing Loyer goggles. When he is scoring 15 a game he is a factor, when he has 5 ( and yes I’m not counting the one at the buzzer ) he is not. And don’t tell me his defense is good cause even Robbie brings that up about teams isolating him
No man crush. But I do love players who put the team ahead of their own glory. So, as I've asked before, who's going to take his place?
 
Last edited:
With Loyer we just lost three in a row.

I have no idea why your response to Loyer needs to play better is there's no one better so shut up.

So basically doesn't matter how he plays to you. He can't play bad in your eyes no matter what.
So is it Loyer's fault that we lost those three? That's too easy a scapegoat. Smith's turnovers hurt tonight, the bench players hurt us tonight and most of the season, and was it Loyer's job to defend the lobs and dunks tonight or were most of those on lazy D by TKR
?
His assists means he saw the open man and got the ball to them.

How they all play matters to all of us, but CMP is running the show. Not you, me, or anyone else. He thinks Loyer is good enough, so I'll defer to CMP because I like what Loyer means to the team.
 
MSU has been terrible against zones all year but Painter just won’t do it.

To be honest, though, this is the team I expected to see all year. January gave us some false hope and raised the expectations. I don’t feel like they’re going to stop this skid in Bloomington either unfortunately.
You don’t play zone if you don’t practice it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
So is it Loyer's fault that we lost those three? That's too easy a scapegoat. Smith's turnovers hurt tonight, the bench players hurt us tonight and most of the season, and was it Loyer's job to defend the lobs and dunks tonight or were most of those on lazy D by TKR
?
His assists means he saw the open man and got the ball to them.

How they all play matters to all of us, but CMP is running the show. Not you, me, or anyone else. He thinks Loyer is good enough, so I'll defer to CMP because I like what Loyer means to the team.
Ffs I didn't say it was solely Loyers fault. I said he played poorly tonight. You're the one who loses his mind at the slightest criticism of Loyer for whatever reason.

No one said Loyer shouldn't be on the team. You're creating crazy strawmen and I'm not interested in engaging that nonsense further.
 
I didn’t say I don’t like Loyer , I said he isn’t a factor unless he is scoring. You seem to think he adds something when he doesn’t score and I disagree. He needs to shoot 3s when open , drive and dish or spot up ( no more layups or whatever you call those shots). His defense never has nor will be a strength
No man crush. But I do love players who put the team ahead of their own glory. So, as I've asked before, who's going to take his place?
 
But I do have one question. Why didn’t we go under the screens instead of switching and creating lobs against our guards. Scouting report should have been Michigan St’s biggest weakness is shooting the 3, let them shoot 3s they are like one of the worst on college basketball
 
So by my count its either 8 pts or 10 pts from easy lobs we have given up playing drop coverage going over every screen vs the WORST 3 pt shooting team in the big ten.

For as good a coach as painter is overall he is one of the dumbest when it comes to PnR coverage if not THE dumbest.

During our great run of defense we were going under or switching all high screens. Now we have reverted and we wonder why the defense has been trash again.

If I can see this, why the **** cant painter or any assistant coaches
Would have been nice to go to portal and get a rim protector.
When was the last time you saw so many dunks against Purdue?
 
You don’t play zone if you don’t practice it.
Give me a break. Every kid who’s played any level of organized basketball knows how to play a basic 2-3 zone. It’s not like it’s some wild concept that only a few teams can do because they spend hours at practice on it. IU plays mostly man to man but threw on a 2-3 at MSU and won.
 
TTTJ! That's Twin Towers, TJ! :)
FWIW, I thought he did fine the few minutes he was in there, but maybe Matt got him out in time? I hate seeing so many scoring in the lane and would prefer to switch less and have more people fighting through screens. People score at will inside and outside and just wonder how many games Purdue would have lost with less worry about the other team's 3 ball and more about giving less easy ones in the lane or causing rotation problems. One time Berg knocked the ball out of a players hands accidently as he just got into it with his chest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
I mean not a great idea but I'll say this,nif there's a team that Berg could match up with the bigs it might be MSU better than most others.
I can Ballo who doesn't seem particularly skilled, but a physical presence. Not sure how long Bergs endurance would last?
 
Was it me or did it seem like they gave up on Burgess pretty quickly?
Truthfully, he struggled early having no recent experience...fouls in particular, quickness in another... I think it was more of an evaluation that he had too far to go for how good they had to be in the upcoming schedule and made the move. Last night he played Burgess for a possession or two until a guy drove on the left hand side down the lane for a score and was quickly taken out. Why, we will not know. It was reported that Burgess was in a boot prior to Wisconsin and maybe he tweaked something since he never went in and Berg did...or he missed badly an emphasis...
 
Truthfully, he struggled early having no recent experience...fouls in particular, quickness in another... I think it was more of an evaluation that he had too far to go for how good they had to be in the upcoming schedule and made the move. Last night he played Burgess for a possession or two until a guy drove on the left hand side down the lane for a score and was quickly taken out. Why, we will not know. It was reported that Burgess was in a boot prior to Wisconsin and maybe he tweaked something since he never went in and Berg did...or he missed badly an emphasis...

The few minutes Burgess was in last night, he was being totally outmuscled/worked in the paint from Kohler and co. Big time struggle.....Berg could at least somewhat hold his own for the short time he was in. Right now, the Boilers need a reboot of the operating system and elimination of all malware (lack of confidence). Hopefully they get it right starting in Bloomington - somebody has to start getting mad and kicking behinds.....
 
The few minutes Burgess was in last night, he was being totally outmuscled/worked in the paint from Kohler and co. Big time struggle.....Berg could at least somewhat hold his own for the short time he was in. Right now, the Boilers need a reboot of the operating system and elimination of all malware (lack of confidence). Hopefully they get it right starting in Bloomington - somebody has to start getting mad and kicking behinds.....
Well IU has more size at every spot and unless Purdue can turn them over they will get in the lane as they have already shown. They have enough size that they can spread the court a bit and see over for skip passes to Mgbako on the weakside all alone and the screens on the wings still put a height disadvantage when Purdue switches. Can Purdue NOT switch that and still keep the defender on the guy you want? Soften the D on the screener and let the Purdue defender slide through and if the screen dives to the rim, Purdue's defender on him goes with him. Make them beat Purdue from the outside, because we know they can on the inside AND the inside also opens up the outside.

Lately, teams are really focusing on Braden a lot, trying to corral him and cut the head off the snake because they like us, know he is the key to Purdue. Perhaps they play Purdue like others recently or maybe they still play in drop fearful that Ballo is not quick enough to help corral Braden. Woodson has a history with his bigger guards getting into the lane
 
Well IU has more size at every spot and unless Purdue can turn them over they will get in the lane as they have already shown. They have enough size that they can spread the court a bit and see over for skip passes to Mgbako on the weakside all alone and the screens on the wings still put a height disadvantage when Purdue switches. Can Purdue NOT switch that and still keep the defender on the guy you want? Soften the D on the screener and let the Purdue defender slide through and if the screen dives to the rim, Purdue's defender on him goes with him. Make them beat Purdue from the outside, because we know they can on the inside AND the inside also opens up the outside.

Lately, teams are really focusing on Braden a lot, trying to corral him and cut the head off the snake because they like us, know he is the key to Purdue. Perhaps they play Purdue like others recently or maybe they still play in drop fearful that Ballo is not quick enough to help corral Braden. Woodson has a history with his bigger guards getting into the lane
The only way they hung with us at Mackey was Mbako going off and Goode shooting well. Their three point percentage was above their norm against us. I just don’t see them shooting as well this time around. They also don’t really drive the lane the way MSU does. They mostly post up Ballo or have Reneau short roll like TKR.

I really do look for the team to come out mad as hell and focused on turning this bad spell around much like after the Auburn game.
 
The only way they hung with us at Mackey was Mbako going off and Goode shooting well. Their three point percentage was above their norm against us. I just don’t see them shooting as well this time around. They also don’t really drive the lane the way MSU does. They mostly post up Ballo or have Reneau short roll like TKR.

I really do look for the team to come out mad as hell and focused on turning this bad spell around much like after the Auburn game.
...and they shot VERY well and I don't expect that again. However, they were able to get inside and when help came lob to Ballo and Purdue was not able to shut that down and so I still have some concerns even if I don't think they shoot was well. Oh, I think Purdue comes out ready, but I expect it to not be easy and would LOVE to be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinDegrees2
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT