ADVERTISEMENT

Jacobsen to announce friday

Wing players play on the 'wing', outside the paint. That describes both 2's and 3's for most teams. Also why both positions often referred to as swingmen, as for many teams the positions are interchangeable. At least offensively. i think if he can guard 2's, he'd be quite the force at that position, but if he can help with rebounding, (remember that need, pre-Zachen) playing the 3 is fine too.
I agree and almost posted the same thing ... A "2" is more of an outside shooter/penetrator (guard) and a "3" is more of a rebounder/penetrator (forward) ... IMHO>
 
FWLIW, I went to high school with Jacobsen's dad and he was and is a terrific guy. He's been sharing video on facebook of his sons (Daniel has a younger brother who I think is 6'8") working on their games since they were in 5th or 6th grade.

It may take some time for Daniel to get B1G ready but you guys got a kid that has length (obviously), skill and genuine work ethic.
 
Why would it? What’s the incentive for the AD to get rid of him because he loses to a high seed again? This isn’t the pros…think about the whole picture. Purdue continues to sell out its season, be ranked top 10 nationally, be top in its conf and consistently make the tournament and make 4 of 6 S16.

I am super disappointed and embarrassed with the losses, it makes it very tough to talk any trash to other college teams haha. But be realistic here…he would have to have 3-4 really disappointing seasons where they miss the tourney and finish middle of the road to lower end of the B1G for him to be on the hot seat.
Because people are getting sick of them not doing anything in March. So some money will stop coming in and recruits will stop coming. That's why.
 
im not satisfied with it…tbh, I could care less if we win the big ten for the next ten years or win 25 games (although that helps for better seeding). I want to see a F4 and I think the window to potentially do so is the next 1-3 years with the team we have and the recruits coming in for Painters style. The only other time that the expectations coming into the season were like this may have been when Hummel, Etwaun and JJ were around…and even then I don’t think they were this high.
Speaking strictly for myself, my expectations were highest for Purdue basketball (and I am a BSChE 1972) at the start of that game in Minnesota. That was the only time in my life, til then or since, that I was CERTAIN that we were the best team in the country. No doubt. I am a pretty rational individual and don't exaggerate my teams status in my head, but I honestly thought no one was going to beat us the rest of the way that year. Of course, being a Purdue fan, that belief did not make it to halftime. Losing Robbie like that was probably the single biggest tragedy for Purdue sports that I can think of (setting aside that guy from Kent State, of course) because I believe that cost us a very real chance at a national championship, that we are still waiting on all these years later.
 
Speaking strictly for myself, my expectations were highest for Purdue basketball (and I am a BSChE 1972) at the start of that game in Minnesota. That was the only time in my life, til then or since, that I was CERTAIN that we were the best team in the country. No doubt. I am a pretty rational individual and don't exaggerate my teams status in my head, but I honestly thought no one was going to beat us the rest of the way that year. Of course, being a Purdue fan, that belief did not make it to halftime. Losing Robbie like that was probably the single biggest tragedy for Purdue sports that I can think of (setting aside that guy from Kent State, of course) because I believe that cost us a very real chance at a national championship, that we are still waiting on all these years later.
That team was the hottest team in the country at that point and they for sure were getting to the final four. Hate the Barn…wish they’d build a new stadium….too much bad juju in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
Because people are getting sick of them not doing anything in March. So some money will stop coming in and recruits will stop coming. That's why.
Looool. 58 straight games of selling out and the home games this year are all sold out. And there’s a wait list for season tickets. Recruiting has been going pretty well. Doesn’t look like the “money” or recruits are going anywhere…
 
Looool. 58 straight games of selling out and the home games this year are all sold out. And there’s a wait list for season tickets. Recruiting has been going pretty well. Doesn’t look like the “money” or recruits are going anywhere…
Then why has there been story after story this year about Painters non success in March?
 
Then why has there been story after story this year about Painters non success in March?
You are equating success in March with financial success. That’s the error in your thinking. It wasn’t that long ago that this was not an issue. We were a rebound/foul shot away from a final four. The single elimination format creates all sorts of randomness in results.
 
CJ Cox is the only current commit that has yet to sign. It's still early,(in the day, and early signing period) but I have to wonder if there is anything to that?
i would be led to believe his commitment was a conditional one. at the time he committed, his other offers were not from Duke. I have to believe Painter is waiting for a decision fromHarris. Cox may end up a preferred walkon with a lot of NIL money or wait until the second signing period after somebody transfers out.
 
Well Cox signed! This creates a dilemma for signing Harris. I take it Perry is gone.
 
Well Cox signed! This creates a dilemma for signing Harris. I take it Perry is gone.

He gone, Wole.

images
 
Because people are getting sick of them not doing anything in March. So some money will stop coming in and recruits will stop coming. That's why.
Hasn't happened, obviously. No one is happy with the early exits, but people thinking that the solution is to dump painter need to explain how that will fix the problem.
 
Hasn't happened, obviously. No one is happy with the early exits, but people thinking that the solution is to dump painter need to explain how that will fix the problem.
BeCAUSE there COULD be someone better…there has to be someone that wants to coach at Purdue that could keep up the recruiting we have currently and the regular season success and not miss a beat and deliver us instantly to the NC right…right!!!?? Right?!??
 
  • Love
Reactions: northside100
I have read his posts for years. He's a broken record, until proven wrong. Then he moves the goal posts, denies his own words.

Are you Bonefish's mom, trying to defend him?
Your lashing out at me (and him) for your own inability to read words was entirely predictable. Has nothing to do with me "being his mom" or even agreeing with what he said. And in fact I did not try to defend him in any way. In your emotionally heightened state, you inferred things that were not said or even implied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
Hasn't happened, obviously. No one is happy with the early exits, but people thinking that the solution is to dump painter need to explain how that will fix the problem.
Because Painter is not John Wooden or Coach K or even Izzo.
Some people (you) believe Painter is the absolute best Purdue could possibly hope for. Other think there might be others out there who can do as well or better.
We wont' know until Painter is gone (retires or moves on).
What we do know: Painter is really good in the regular season and making the tourney.
We also know his teams struggle once there. That's been proven.
 
Hasn't happened, obviously. No one is happy with the early exits, but people thinking that the solution is to dump painter need to explain how that will fix the problem.
Tons of coaches that have had way less talent keep beating out Purdue and Painter year after year. I've said it before. I would rather lose the B1G regular season and tournament and make a deep March run.
 
Tons of coaches that have had way less talent keep beating out Purdue and Painter year after year. I've said it before. I would rather lose the B1G regular season and tournament and make a deep March run.
A shocking and surprising desire?? Look we all think your perspective is one which we all would agree with. Yes, the players, the coach, and almost every Purdue fan I know wants to do better in the tournament than we have the last three years. Not sure why you need to post something this obvious, but more power to you if it helps you deal with the rocky road to success. You do realize that getting beaten by a lesser talented team is pretty much normal for this single elimination tourney. It happens every year to a good many schools, besides Purdue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
Tons of coaches that have had way less talent keep beating out Purdue and Painter year after year. I've said it before. I would rather lose the B1G regular season and tournament and make a deep March run.
Where are those coaches now? They get promoted to a P5/6 school or maybe the NBA?
 
  • Love
Reactions: northside100
Your lashing out at me (and him) for your own inability to read words was entirely predictable. Has nothing to do with me "being his mom" or even agreeing with what he said. And in fact I did not try to defend him in any way. In your emotionally heightened state, you inferred things that were not said or even implied.
Lashing out at you? Where? In your "emotionally heightened state", you seem to have taken offense at me pointing out your boy's dishonesty.

Having a welcher for a son is shameful. You should have done a better job raising him so that you wouldn't need to defend him. Maybe more spankings?
 
Because people are getting sick of them not doing anything in March. So some money will stop coming in and recruits will stop coming. That's why.
That’s an extremely uninformed and illogical take. If Painter keeps winning at a high-level in the regular season the majority of fans will continue to support and hope for the best in March.
 
Some people (you) believe Painter is the absolute best Purdue could possibly hope for.
Why do you keep posting this when you know it’s not true? Only a small percentage of fans think that Purdue could never do better than Painter. The majority recognize that while there’s an outlier chance of landing that perfect coach the odds are much higher that the next guy who comes in will be like successful.
 
A shocking and surprising desire?? Look we all think your perspective is one which we all would agree with. Yes, the players, the coach, and almost every Purdue fan I know wants to do better in the tournament than we have the last three years. Not sure why you need to post something this obvious, but more power to you if it helps you deal with the rocky road to success. You do realize that getting beaten by a lesser talented team is pretty much normal for this single elimination tourney. It happens every year to a good many schools, besides Purdue.
It's not the fact that a lesser talented team beats a more talented team. The issue is that it happens with freakish regularity to Painter coached teams in the tourney. In fact, historical regularity.
Once, maybe even twice over some period of time is an anomaly, 4 times in a row is a trend, and a bad one.
The other disturbing fact about Painter and his tourney teams is that they have only 1 time, beat a seed ranked more than 1 seed higher (the 1 seed differences are essentially pick-ems anyway).
 
Why do you keep posting this when you know it’s not true? Only a small percentage of fans think that Purdue could never do better than Painter. The majority recognize that while there’s an outlier chance of landing that perfect coach the odds are much higher that the next guy who comes in will be like successful.
I disagree. I think there's a large contingent, especially posters here, who are kept up at night at the thought of Purdue getting a new basketball coach and the scary "what ifs" that scenario presents.
 
Because Painter is not Izzo
Thank God.
The other disturbing fact about Painter and his tourney teams is that they have only 1 time, beat a seed ranked more than 1 seed higher (the 1 seed differences are essentially pick-ems anyway).
Literally no one cares about this. If anyone did, they’d be rooting for us to lose a bunch of regular season games so we can get a 10 or 11 seed.
 
Thank God.

Literally no one cares about this. If anyone did, they’d be rooting for us to lose a bunch of regular season games so we can get a 10 or 11 seed.
Perhaps you don't care because you struggle to make the correlation.
But here, I'll help: It basically means that Painter can win a high % of games against evenly matched teams, he rarely (almost never) wins against teams that are more talented, and, unfortunately, has shown a disturbing propensity to be upset by very low seeds.
What all this translates to is March struggles and a lack of deep runs.
 
Perhaps you don't care because you struggle to make the correlation.
But here, I'll help: It basically means that Painter can win a high % of games against evenly matched teams, he rarely (almost never) wins against teams that are more talented, and, unfortunately, has shown a disturbing propensity to be upset by very low seeds.
What all this translates to is March struggles and a lack of deep runs.
Or maybe it means that we routinely get over seeded due to his ability to get the most out of his teams every year.

Or maybe it means that schools like Kansas cheat and have an unfair advantage.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT