Well. You are entitled to your opinion.Without a doubt. 16 is a great number. No byes. No need for auto seeds. And it'd be incredibly difficult to win a national championship. Home field for the Top 8. Neutral sites after.
Well. You are entitled to your opinion.Without a doubt. 16 is a great number. No byes. No need for auto seeds. And it'd be incredibly difficult to win a national championship. Home field for the Top 8. Neutral sites after.
Doesn't sound like a great reason to make it bigger.You make it seem like the 4 team playoff was super competitive. I'll give you a hint, it wasn't.
18 team Big Ten. Not a 10, 11, 12 or even 14 team conference. When you don't play nearly half the conference, you have to consider the teams you played and beat.We’re being ridiculous.
Of Course they deserved to be in as an 11-1 (8-1) B1G team…
Accept your premise, BUT they also deserve total ridicule for playing some of the worst football I’ve ever seen and wasting their one shot (they wont be back). And it was against a suspect ND team that basically put their offense (Love) on the sidelines after the longest td run in playoff history to rest his knee.
Note: I would have said that IU crapped the bed, but that topic seems to have been well covered elsewhere on these threads
Regardless of strength of schedule?We’re being ridiculous.
Of Course they deserved to be in as an 11-1 (8-1) B1G team…
You played the worst opponent by far on that list, and unless you’re just lying to yourself only scored 3 points…face it, you wasted your only chance at the playoffs as I see 7 likely losses on your schedule next year with 2 toss ups, and 3 non conference jv gamesPenn State 38, SMU 10,
Texas 38, Clemson 24
Ohio State 42, Tennessee 17
Notre Dame 27, Indiana 17
What's even more deserving of your ridicule than "total ridicule? The performance of every other team that lost in the first round, each by more than IU did.
.
Now there are more teams with a shot at a national championship in theory. Which ends spreading out talent. That's a good thing. You get more smaller brands like an Indiana who have a shot at a playoff spot. That's a good thing.Doesn't sound like a great reason to make it bigger.
Did Indiana play the worst opponent? I mean they were ranked ahead of Ohio State.You played the worst opponent by far on that list, and unless you’re just lying to yourself only scored 3 points…face it, you wasted your only chance at the playoffs as I see 7 likely losses on your schedule next year with 2 toss ups, and 3 non conference jv games
You played the worst opponent by far on that list, and unless you’re just lying to yourself only scored 3 points…face it, you wasted your only chance at the playoffs as I see 7 likely losses on your schedule next year with 2 toss ups, and 3 non conference jv games
You’re right IU will likely lose a couple of the jv games too, so let’s say 2-10 as the high mark next year.Why is ND "the worst opponent by far?"
And IU "only scored three points;" are you proposing that the fourth quarter doesn't count? That teams that play hard until the final whistle are somehow inferior? Because if that's the case, under your theory SMU lost 35-3 and Tennessee lost 35-10. In fact, if you eliminate the fourth quarter IU/ND was still the closest first round playoff game.
Finally, you have IU most likely going 1-8 in conference next year (7 likely losses and two 50/50 games).
This IU staff took a team with an 0-9 conference record from the year before and went 8-1 with six months to put a program together. And now, with an established culture and roster returns three 1st team all-B1G defenders and already has another top 25 portal haul.
Hey... your subjective opinions are all yours to have.
.
That ND ranking is another demo, like IU, that the committee did not truly account for strength of schedule. Pretty obvious.Did Indiana play the worst opponent? I mean they were ranked ahead of Ohio State.
Why? Because you are an Indiana fan?Now there are more teams with a shot at a national championship in theory. Which ends spreading out talent. That's a good thing. You get more smaller brands like an Indiana who have a shot at a playoff spot. That's a good thing.
LOL...Not “everyone.” And IU didn’t “only” lose by ten. They just plain lost by ten; 27-17.
They also won 11 games and had an extraordinary season. Those writers and his coaching peers overwhelming voted him as national coach of the year. I think he’d sleep just fine knowing that your opinion of him matters… to you.
And then he’ll be up at 4:30 am to work towards making it happen again next year. It’s no fluke and it’s no accident that the man and his staff win, win, win.
Nope. Felt this way beforehand. 16 was always the best solution.Why? Because you are an Indiana fan?
I've always felt 8 was the best.Nope. Felt this way beforehand. 16 was always the best solution.