No he’s not. It’s the Boneman.You've got to be freakin kidding me.
No he’s not. It’s the Boneman.You've got to be freakin kidding me.
Naw. Still goes on.Historically true.
Great thing though, it's long in the past. Irrelevant to today's job market and hirings. Hopefully you recognize that??
Naw. Still goes on.
Maybe they don’t want to hire any blacks.Hiring is subjective, because “qualified “ is subjective. Maybe people didn’t interview well.
DEI became a political tool used by the right to create a wedge for their advantage at the polls. Kamala never talked about DEI. But Trump, Elon, and the boys sure did.DEI is a political tool used by the Dems to continue to drive wedges for their advantage at the polls.
DEI offices, when done correctly, actually serve to protect workers and students against potential bias.
Given that she was a DEI pick, of course she didn't talk about it.DEI became a political tool used by the right to create a wedge for their advantage at the polls. Kamala never talked about DEI. But Trump, Elon, and the boys sure did.
DEI offices, when done correctly, actually serve to protect workers and students against potential bias.
You don't think hiring involves a large element of subjectivity?You've got to be freakin kidding me.
If you have 2 guys trying out for a wide receiver position, 1 black, 1 white. They're both 6'2, 210#, have the same experience level, same 40 time, same vertical, same shuttle time, same 225lb bench reps, But, there's only room for one more scholarship, who you giving it to?You've got to be freakin kidding me.
Should the NBA have more white players?Maybe they don’t want to hire any blacks.
Shocker. Kamala, who fit the requirement of being a (sort of) black woman that Joe stated was a requirement for his VP hire, doesn't talk about DEI?DEI became a political tool used by the right to create a wedge for their advantage at the polls. Kamala never talked about DEI. But Trump, Elon, and the boys sure did.
DEI offices, when done correctly, actually serve to protect workers and students against potential bias.
Should the NHL have more black players?Should the NBA have more white players?
Dude, no one is discriminating against white players in the NBA.Should the NBA have more white players?
If you have 2 guys trying out for a wide receiver position, 1 black, 1 white. They're both 6'2, 210#, have the same experience level, same 40 time, same vertical, same shuttle time, same 225lb bench reps, But, there's only room for one more scholarship, who you giving it to?
Of course subjectivity comes into play. But are you SERIOUSLY arguing it's that subjectivity, NOT racism or misogyny or a multitude of other biases, that's responsible for qualified minorities being passed over in favor of white people? wtf? Yeah, 150 years of racism isn't the reason. It's because the qualifications were close or identical and the white guy just happened to be the subjective choice..........over and over and over. Get a clue or admit the truth.You don't think hiring involves a large element of subjectivity?
Have you ever hired anyone?
No, I was simply responding to your comment that seemed to be saying that subjectivity is not involved in hiring. SERIOUSLY.Of course subjectivity comes into play. But are you SERIOUSLY arguing it's that subjectivity, NOT racism or misogyny or a multitude of other biases, that's responsible for qualified minorities being passed over in favor of white people? wtf? Yeah, 150 years of racism isn't the reason. It's because the qualifications were close or identical and the white guy just happened to be the subjective choice..........over and over and over. Get a clue or admit the truth.
@Boiler Buck Only in America is the term oriental considered racist. Someone several years ago in America decided this totally innocuous word was suddenly offensive. “A rug is Oriental, not a person!” And it stuck.Only racist people would call an ethnic group, oriental. Oriental is a rug. When referred to the people in that region, Asian is the proper term.
If there were no such thing as racism in America, we would never need to have affirmative action or DEI. White folks have historically hired or admitted into schools other whites regardless of qualifications. DEI gives other ethnic groups an equal chance in gaining employment or entry to college that they normally would not have. I see DEI as a form of reparations for past injustices in hiring practices in this country.
That's not what people on the right believe at all. You're just pulling shlt out of your azz. Nobody on the right cares the color of the skin of the person that is hired.That’s the thing that I have trying to convey. They are conditioned to believe that blacks and other minorities are not smart enough and good enough to be hired for the same positions as whites. But since in their minds, white women are smart enough and they say absolutely nothing about them benefitting from affirmative action/DEI more than any other minority.
How do you know? Their representation in the NBA isn't the same as the population. That MUST mean they are being discriminated against.Dude, no one is discriminating against white players in the NBA.
Don't give me this crap that because of the number of whites in the NBA is lower than blacks it’s because of racism. Particularly with 99% of the NBA owners ann GMs are white.How do you know? Their representation in the NBA isn't the same as the population. That MUST mean they are being discriminated against.
JFC, did this just go right over your head or what? I was trying to give you some self awareness, but you completely missed it.Don't give me this crap that because of the number of whites in the NBA is lower than blacks it’s because of racism. Particularly with 99% of the NBA owners ann GMs are white.
Self-awareness? What are you talking about?JFC, did this just go right over your head or what? I was trying to give you some self awareness, but you completely missed it.
Yes, I am arguing that it's subjectivity, not racism. There's lots of reasons why a person might not get a job. "Biases", as you state it, can be any number of things, most importantly, "how does this hire represent me, our company and how we are perceived by our customers. Is this person going to help us or hurt us? Do I trust them?"Of course subjectivity comes into play. But are you SERIOUSLY arguing it's that subjectivity, NOT racism or misogyny or a multitude of other biases, that's responsible for qualified minorities being passed over in favor of white people? wtf? Yeah, 150 years of racism isn't the reason. It's because the qualifications were close or identical and the white guy just happened to be the subjective choice..........over and over and over. Get a clue or admit the truth.
Indian...Native American.....whatever. If someone gets offended, that's their problem.@Boiler Buck Only in America is the term oriental considered racist. Someone several years ago in America decided this totally innocuous word was suddenly offensive. “A rug is Oriental, not a person!” And it stuck.
But, in other English speaking countries, it’s not offensive. Because…. it’s not offensive. An offensive word is a word that is either coined to be offensive or misused on purpose to be offensive. Oriental is neither. It means ‘eastern’. “Oooh, I’m so offended! You called that person whose background is eastern, eastern!”
Americans prefer to use the word “Asian” to refer to people of the Far East. But in the UK “Asian” means people from South Asia (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh). Oriental is used for the East Asia and Southeast Asia. And nobody is offended.
But these things aren’t limited to America. British people mistakenly think “Eskimo” is pejorative (because Canadian Inuit don’t like being called Eskimos anymore, even though they are, but Alaskan Eskimos do because they are and are not Inuit, but Iñupiat) and use “Inuit”. But if you want to insult an Alaskan Eskimo? Call him an Inuit. It’s the same as calling a Scot English.
Just like with “Oriental”, it’s not an insult. People just think it is out of ignorance or misdirected anger.
Or maybe your idiot DEI candidate gave Trump his advantage at the polls:DEI became a political tool used by the right to create a wedge for their advantage at the polls.
Wow!! Never thought I would get a Bishop Andrew Grutka at Holy Angels in Gary reference when I started reading this post!! This made me laugh!! He was Bishop when I was a kid and for his 20th anniversary in ‘77, all Gary Diocese kids got half a day off!! We used to play Holy Angels in CYO football.Who’s Andrew G? Holy Angels school in Gary?
It was too bad that Bishop Grutka made sure Bishop Noll and Andrean did not play each other during the regular season during those days. Not sure if his reason. The rivalry in sports between the 2 schools could have been epic.Wow!! Never thought I would get a Bishop Andrew Grutka at Holy Angels in Gary reference when I started reading this post!! This made me laugh!! He was Bishop when I was a kid and for his 20th anniversary in ‘77, all Gary Diocese kids got half a day off!! We used to play Holy Angels in CYO football.
Never knew he didn’t let them play. Had plenty of grade school friends go to AHS and some of my cousins went to BNI.It was too bad that Bishop Grutka made sure Bishop Noll and Andrean did not play each other during the regular season during those days. Not sure if his reason. The rivalry in sports between the 2 schools could have been epic.
BNI? Doesn't sound like a name that should apply to a school.Never knew he didn’t let them play. Had plenty of grade school friends go to AHS and some of my cousins went to BNI.
Thought by the 80’s they were playing in football and basketball?
Bishop Grutka passed away in the late 80s or early 90s. Not sure if it was towards the end of his life or if the new Gary Diocese Bishop allowed the 2 schools to schedule regular season games against each other in all sports.Never knew he didn’t let them play. Had plenty of grade school friends go to AHS and some of my cousins went to BNI.
Thought by the 80’s they were playing in football and basketball?
Really? How is the general population only 13% black but the NBA is 80%?Dude, no one is discriminating against white players in the NBA.
This is one of your most intellectually insufficient arguments that you have made in the forum and you have made some whoppers. 80% black NBA participation just means that more blacks play basketball. Almost 100% of the NBA majority owners are white. No one is preventing white ball players to play in the NBA. And y'all call me a race baiter.Really? How is the general population only 13% black but the NBA is 80%?
Personally, I could care less what % of the NBA is black. I just like to bring it up to people who love to lean on the DEI argument.This is one of your most intellectually insufficient arguments that you have made in the forum and you have made some whoppers. 80% black NBA participation just means that more blacks play basketball. Almost 100% of the NBA majority owners are white. No one is preventing white ball players to play in the NBA. And y'all call me a race baiter.
There in lies the problem. Y'all assume immediately that because they are black that they are not qualified for corporate of political office (unless republican) or whatever. Where is/was the outrage when qualified blacks were passed up over non-qualified whites in colleges or corporate America. There is a such thing as qualified blacks you know.Personally, I could care less what % of the NBA is black. I just like to bring it up to people who love to lean on the DEI argument.
The assumption being, NBA players make the NBA based on talent and being better than the competition, not their skin color.
Why shouldn't this same philosophy be used in corporate America?
Define "qualified"?There in lies the problem. Y'all assume immediately that because they are black that they are not qualified for corporate of political office (unless republican) or whatever. Where is/was the outrage when qualified blacks were passed up over non-qualified whites in colleges or corporate America. There is a such thing as qualified blacks you know.
Isn't that what white folks have been doing in the US for 3 over 3 centuries now?The problem is when you give someone preferential treatment because of their skin color or gender.
Do you like country music? What about heavy metal?Isn't that what white folks have been in the US for 3 over 3 centuries now?
Dude. You must have some extra time on your hands this morning. I guess I do also since I'm foolin' with you.Do you like country music? What about heavy metal?
Do you like RnB? How about rap?