No, your TDS has shifted into overdrive.Well now you’re just flat out making shit up.
No, your TDS has shifted into overdrive.Well now you’re just flat out making shit up.
The success of the mission isn't relevant........unless you're trying to deflect.21. Nothingburger. No harm was cause by the leak. The attack was carried out successfully.
Government officials use it all the time. Did they call for the use of Signal for classified info?CIA Director Ratcliffe testified yesterday that the CIA loaded Signal onto his devices on his first day. And I posted the 2024 CISA "best practice" yesterday that calls for the use of Signal.
Not that you should let those facts detract your from your hyperventilation, which is always entertaining.
It's also concerning that not one Republican senator took issue with what happened when Tulsi and Ratcliffe testified yesterday.It's not really the media that's concerning. It's what Republicans are saying about it. The invasion is a complete non-sequitur, as it has been discussed ad-nauseum for decades by the media.
TBH, this was a human error that people can make. Nobody is perfect, and I'm sure many people have accidentally copied the wrong person on an email or text thread. Much higher stakes here, obviously, but it is understandable. And there were not any American casualties, so it's fine.
But it still really is concerning how Republicans are saying sharing military war plans is okay because it's not confidential information. And this is after the messages were published showing the contents. It's either they are just idiotic and should not be in power, or they are absolute liars. Not really an in-between. I think it's the latter. Anyone who tries to justify it should lose all credibility I think, because it was objectively a mistake and not one to take lightly.
This is NOT a policy issue, but an honesty issue for both our leaders and the press.
I'll ignore whether Signal is considered a secure messaging source for devices located in Russia for the purposes of this post.
Any Leak to anyone that wasn't supposed to be involved in the meeting is concerning.It's not really the media that's concerning. It's what Republicans are saying about it. The invasion is a complete non-sequitur, as it has been discussed ad-nauseum for decades by the media.
TBH, this was a human error that people can make. Nobody is perfect, and I'm sure many people have accidentally copied the wrong person on an email or text thread. Much higher stakes here, obviously, but it is understandable. And there were not any American casualties, so it's fine.
But it still really is concerning how Republicans are saying sharing military war plans is okay because it's not confidential information. And this is after the messages were published showing the contents. It's either they are just idiotic and should not be in power, or they are absolute liars. Not really an in-between. I think it's the latter. Anyone who tries to justify it should lose all credibility I think, because it was objectively a mistake and not one to take lightly.
This is NOT a policy issue, but an honesty issue for both our leaders and the press.
I'll ignore whether Signal is considered a secure messaging source for devices located in Russia for the purposes of this post.
If Goldgerg is supposed to be this ultra-liberal hack then why would anyone in the Chump administration have Goldberg's phone number, assumingly in their phone's contact. I have a theory, call it a conspiracy theory if you want. But whoever had Goldberg's number, perhaps Waltz or whoever added Goldberg to the text, had his number to leak specific inside information to Goldberg in other matters.Any Leak to anyone that wasn't supposed to be involved in the meeting is concerning.
Thank goodness no damage was done and the strike was successful, with no US casualties.
So the SS uploaded this app on the cell phones of the persons participating in the meeting.
How the fk did the Liberal Atlantic Hack Goldberg's cell phone # get added to any of the security teams contacts.
I find it hard to believe any of the security team just had his number in their contact list.
I'm sure he is best friends with Tulsie, Pete and the gang.
You may be right on this. There were so many leakers in the first Trump administration and with democrats on every front trying to make him look bad daily, it would be no surprise that some insiders may do it again. Obviously it’s all conjecture.If Goldgerg is supposed to be this ultra-liberal hack then why would anyone in the Chump administration have Goldberg's phone number, assumingly in their phone's contact. I have a theory, call it a conspiracy theory if you want. But whoever had Goldberg's number, perhaps Waltz or whoever added Goldberg to the text, had his number to leak specific inside information to Goldberg in other matters.
I do not know what info qualifies as classified or not, but the message did not include specific location of the attack or the individual terrorist being targeted in the attack - who is now no more.I mean that's just not true. The message includes timestamps..
Any Leak to anyone that wasn't supposed to be involved in the meeting is concerning.
Thank goodness no damage was done and the strike was successful, with no US casualties.
So the SS uploaded this app on the cell phones of the persons participating in the meeting.
How the fk did the Liberal Atlantic Hack Goldberg's cell phone # get added to any of the security teams contacts.
I find it hard to believe any of the security team just had his number in their contact list.
I'm sure he is best friends with Tulsie, Pete and the gang.
If Goldgerg is supposed to be this ultra-liberal hack then why would anyone in the Chump administration have Goldberg's phone number, assumingly in their phone's contact. I have a theory, call it a conspiracy theory if you want. But whoever had Goldberg's number, perhaps Waltz or whoever added Goldberg to the text, had his number to leak specific inside information to Goldberg in other matters.
You may be right on this. There were so many leakers in the first Trump administration and with democrats on every front trying to make him look bad daily, it would be no surprise that some insiders may do it again. Obviously it’s all conjecture.
It 1,000,000% was classified at the highest of the highest levels. Hell, some of the most mundane stuff about travel schedules of intell officials is 100% classified. This is about as SCIF-worthy as information could possibly be.I do not know what info qualifies as classified or not, but the message did not include specific location of the attack or the individual terrorist being targeted in the attack - who is now no more.
Here’s the strategy of the far-left news media and the Democrats: If they keep on squealing and ranting and going apeshit over this nothingburger security breach and don’t mention anything else, then they won’t have to talk about Trump’s fabulous success with stopping illegal immigration, ending DEI racism and cutting government waste.All of this seems overwhelmingly likely. Per last night's Der Speigel publication of all of these knuckleheads' cell phone contacts (which were likely gathered because they use the Signal app), Waltz has Brianna Keilar and Kristen Holmes of CNN on his Venmo friends list, along with an MSNBC producer.
PRIMARY TAKEAWAY? The Trump cult member masses think that these people that suck up to Trump are true believers in his competence and at times f'd up priorities. In reality? They tell Trump and his cult masses what they think they want to hear publicly, but in private they largely understand, and stay in touch with reality. And they use opposition media to keep Trump in check to a certain degree.
The same goes for Democrats who knew that Biden was was over the hill, and privately whispered as such to reporters from the other political side of the aisle.
So you have no problem in the future if we give our adversaries a 2 1/2 hour head's up that we are about to attack them?Here’s the strategy of the far-left news media and the Democrats: If they keep on squealing and ranting and going apeshit over this nothingburger security breach and don’t mention anything else, then they won’t have to talk about Trump’s fabulous success with stopping illegal immigration, ending DEI racism and cutting government waste.
Do you consider Fox News' Senior National Security Reporter to be "far-left news media?"Here’s the strategy of the far-left news media and the Democrats: If they keep on squealing and ranting and going apeshit over this nothingburger security breach and don’t mention anything else, then they won’t have to talk about Trump’s fabulous success with stopping illegal immigration, ending DEI racism and cutting government waste.
Chump doesn't need any help whatsoever to look bad from the democrats. He does a good job of looking bad on his own. Any help looking bad that he does get is from his own jacked up people that he appoints. This is what happens when you select unqualified, ring kissing ne'er do wells in your administration. Since you can't blame this security breach on DEI. What would you call this?You may be right on this. There were so many leakers in the first Trump administration and with democrats on every front trying to make him look bad daily, it would be no surprise that some insiders may do it again. Obviously it’s all conjecture.
How do you know they didn't tip them off?It 1,000,000% was classified at the highest of the highest levels. Hell, some of the most mundane stuff about travel schedules of intell officials is 100% classified. This is about as SCIF-worthy as information could possibly be.
The primary takeaway is that the Russians and Chinese knew about our Houthi attacks that day, and decided to let us bomb the shit out of the Houthis without tipping them off.
I would call it a serious mistake that will no doubt result in someone being fired if it happens again.Chump doesn't need any help whatsoever to look bad from the democrats. He does a good job of looking bad on his own. Any help looking bad that he does get is from his own jacked up people that he appoints. This is what happens when you select unqualified, ring kissing ne'er do wells in your administration. Since you can't blame this security breach on DEI. What would you call this?
I said it in an earlier thread that someone needs to get canned.Chump doesn't need any help whatsoever to look bad from the democrats. He does a good job of looking bad on his own. Any help looking bad that he does get is from his own jacked up people that he appoints. This is what happens when you select unqualified, ring kissing ne'er do wells in your administration. Since you can't blame this security breach on DEI. What would you call this?
First I have heard of the Feb guidance. If it was properly distributed (always a big if with NSA - see npr link), then someone should be reprimanded or even fired for its use. If it was not properly distributed, someone should be fired for that.No! It’s to be used for scheduling—NOT classified attack plans. And there was February additional guidance that is is susceptible to monitoring by foreign adversaries.
I didn't realize that the editor of The Atlantic had immediately called Yeman and notified the Houthis rebels that an attack was underway.“If you are revealing who is going to be attacked (Houthis – the name of the text chain), it still gives the enemy warning. When you release the time of the attack – all of that is always ‘classified’.”
The leak didn't go to our adversaries. The leak went to the editor of The Atlantic and he said nothing until the next day when the attack was over. A nothingburger.So you have no problem in the future if we give our adversaries a 2 1/2 hour head's up that we are about to attack them?
Dude. What part of adversaries hacking into private citizen phones don't you understand? What part of adversaries receiving confidential information from a jive reporter don't you understand.The leak didn't go to our adversaries. The leak went to the editor of The Atlantic and he said nothing until the next day when the attack was over. A nothingburger.
.I would call it a serious mistake that will no doubt result in someone being fired if it happens again.
Thinking back, what did you call it when Biden's Secretary of Defense was out of action due to surgery but your hero Joe Crow didn't know about it?
Now let me get this straight. The Houthis rebels, in the third world country of Yemen, knew to hack into the phone of the editor of The Atlantic because they were aware he was going to get an accidental leak from the Trump administration about a military attack on their terrorist and pirate assets. Is that what I should understand?Dude. What part of adversaries hacking into private citizen phones don't you understand? What part of adversaries receiving confidential information from a jive reporter don't you understand.
That was my immediate question! Who had the cell number of someone that hates Trump's and his team? Who actually loaded the group chat...THAT is very important! Although it needs reviewed to prevent any potential problems, it in no way approaches the security problems in the past like HIllary's server and/or emails deleted and the Clinton Foundation or Hunter's paintings and kickbacks for the big guy, nor the millions of illegals invited into the country that I can't recall those against this potential problem being concerned with the real problems. Shoot, I imagine some countries were notified in advance this was going to happen like in the past. WE know the dems and their media were not concerned for security then or lying about Biden's state of fit for the office other than the time of being fit for office, but unfit for the courts. It needs studied starting with who input the names into the group chat.Any Leak to anyone that wasn't supposed to be involved in the meeting is concerning.
Thank goodness no damage was done and the strike was successful, with no US casualties.
So the SS uploaded this app on the cell phones of the persons participating in the meeting.
How the fk did the Liberal Atlantic Hack Goldberg's cell phone # get added to any of the security teams contacts.
I find it hard to believe any of the security team just had his number in their contact list.
I'm sure he is best friends with Tulsie, Pete and the gang.
That was the purpose of my post.If Goldgerg is supposed to be this ultra-liberal hack then why would anyone in the Chump administration have Goldberg's phone number, assumingly in their phone's contact. I have a theory, call it a conspiracy theory if you want. But whoever had Goldberg's number, perhaps Waltz or whoever added Goldberg to the text, had his number to leak specific inside information to Goldberg in other matters.
Lol. What countries support the Houthis?Now let me get this straight. The Houthis rebels, in the third world country of Yemen, knew to hack into the phone of the editor of The Atlantic because they were aware he was going to get an accidental leak from the Trump administration about a military attack on their terrorist and pirate assets. Is that what I should understand?
Who handed his ass to him, to use your cell block lingo?.
Not sure Biden not knowing what was going on should be the standard lol.
Austin got his ass handed to him for not informing about the surgery.
.
Ah, that's probably what happened. Iranian hackers knew to hack into the phone of the editor of The Atlantic because they were aware he was going to get an accidental leak from the Trump administration about a military attack on the Houthis. So the Iranian hackers could then have notified the Houthis rebels, in the third world country of Yemen, who would then have activated their sophisticated air and sea defense systems to slaughter the American pilots in the air and send the US sailors and their ships to Davy Jones' Locker.Lol. What countries support the Houthis?
So the media pounded him, but independent investigations found that there was no deliberate misconduct nor punishable policy violations?Who handed his ass to him, to use your cell block lingo?
![]()
Pentagon finds no one to blame for keeping Secretary Austin's hospital stays secret
The Pentagon on Monday released more details on Secretary Austin's secret hospital stays and why Congress and the White House weren't notified.abcnews.go.com
Lol. Who supports Iran?Ah, that's probably what happened. Iranian hackers knew to hack into the phone of the editor of The Atlantic because they were aware he was going to get an accidental leak from the Trump administration about a military attack on the Houthis. So the Iranian hackers could then have notified the Houthis rebels, in the third world country of Yemen, who would then have activated their sophisticated air and sea defense systems to slaughter the American pilots in the air and send the US sailors and their ships to Davy Jones' Locker.
Lots of worrisome “what if” stuff but the reality is that this great hand-wringing is about a leak to a magazine editor that happened simultaneously with the attack on the other side of the world. It was a nothingburger.Lol. Who supports Iran?
If our top notch defense and intel officials were using Signal before this event they very likely were hacked before this this text. They didn't have to know the event or the text we're coming. They were already tapped into the system.
Are you aware of the technology of some of the Houthi weapons? Do you know how quickly information can get passed on? Do you know which large Asian country who is trying to hack into our systems every freakin day and is allied with Iran? Jfc man.
Reminds me of John abd Bobby Kennedy.He hired his completely over qualified brother.
This is exactly why we needed affirmative action or now DEI. Why men for decades and within all industries will hire brothers, sons, friends, or just plain white men regardless of qualifications. BS Legacy admissions in colleges. White nationalists like Chump and the MAGA bs want to go back to that crap.
If you think Biden's DEI policies slowed legacy admissions in colleges, you got it completely back-asswards. It was the Supreme Court’s move to end affirmative action in 2023 that put legacy admissions under pressure. Two worst offenders: Baylor and Notre Dame.BS Legacy admissions in colleges.
This is exactly why we needed affirmative action or now DEI. Why men for decades and within all industries will hire brothers, sons, friends, or just plain white men regardless of qualifications. BS Legacy admissions in colleges. White nationalists like Chump and the MAGA bs want to go back to that crap.