That 2-3 zone we threw at them in the 2nd half was money. We held the 5th most efficient offense in the country to 29 second half points.
It's almost as if you can change your defense while still staying man-2-man. Imagine the ND 2-man game is working extremely well plus they are killing you when you rotate off your man to try and help. What if you stay in man-2-man, but you change the personnel and philosophy to stick with your guy instead of being so quick to help?
Farrell & Colson in 1st half: 22 pts on 9 made FGs
Farrell & Colson in 2nd half: 23 pts on 10 made FGs
Everyone else on ND:
1st half: 30pts on 11 made FGs (starters: Beachem - 10pts, Vasturia - 3pts, Geben - 9pts)
2nd half: 6pts on 3 made FGs (starters: Beachem - 0pts, Vasturia - 0pts, Geben - 0pts)
Carsen is much better on the ball and away than what I thought he would be this early. Yes, athleticism is the edge to be good on D adn he has that, but his mental understanding is farther than what I tought it would be since he was such a scorer in high school. I remember watching Woody Austin at Logansport in an intrasquad game before his freshman year and thinking how did he get through high school playing D so poorly...Carsen's on-ball defense on Farrel was the key. I always knew that given his athleticism, he can easily become a great one-on-one defender if he just commits to it. Team defense on the other hand takes some time getting used to, is more mental, knowing what to do and where to be and relies less on athleticism.