Faux News not covering prime time Jan 6 hearings
- Thread starter BNIBoiler
- Start date
You called me a racist to begin with and I was honest enough to not deny it. I don't want to spend the time and effort to go through all the messages you have posted over the years but if I find one will you promise to never post on this board ever again?
My Grandfather lived on a farm in Illinois and slept with a handgun under his pillow during tough times and also had shotgun(s). I'm the only one in my family that lived on an island but with that being said, you'd be surprised of the amount of gun owners on Kauai
Put up or shut up. I said I would look for your posts accusing others of being racist if you agreed to never post on this board if I find them. Agree to that condition and I will try to find them otherwise go pound sand.
Yet FOX allowed it to be aired on FOX Business, so they did make it available to their audience.
I believe Pelosi said, "We're going to give you OUR narrative." and that's what they're doing. They're giving you the Dem spin on the events and hoping they can create enough outrage among their sheep, that they'll be fired up enough to vote in the mid term elections. Obviously, there's NOTHING the Dems have done to improve the lives of their constituents, since the last election, so they have to use misdirection to get them to vote. It's all a ploy to fire up emotions and distract you from the shambles the Dems have created, during their rule.
Things to consider:
-- If Pelosi really wanted to get to the truth, why did she reject the Reps that the Minority Leader offered to the committee? You usually want people with different perspectives to look at the situation from all angles, yet Pelosi selected Cheney & Kinzinger, who were staunchly anti-Trump. It appears she wanted everyone singing from the same sheet of anti-Trump music. Welcome to the Dem Political Theater, where never a contradictory word will be heard.
-- There was intel available, for weeks, indicating that there was potential for violence on the 6th. Several people have come forward, saying that on Jan 3rd Trump had authorized calling up 20,000 National Guard troops, based on that intel. Cheney admitted in the hearing that Congress was aware of that intel. Why didn't Pelosi or Mayor Bowser deploy those troops as a precaution? That would have eliminated the possibility that any demonstration could get out of control. Perhaps Pelosi was hoping the demonstration would get out of control, so she could finally drive a stake through Trump's political heart? It's not hard to believe that someone, who despised Trump enough to Impeach him twice, wouldn't resort to something this despicable either.
When they have Pelosi & Bowser testifying under oath, before that committee, explaining why they didn't request the National Guard, due to potential violence, then I may start to believe that they are really looking for the truth. But who would ask that question? Certainly none of her toadies, who she selected for the committee...
Another in a series of Dem Theatrical Productions on The Killing of the Big Orange Monster.
Your TDS must have you tingling all over Bob. That whole production was nothing but Dem Propaganda, which is music to your ears.
It's funny to see a Biden supporter calling anyone else a grifter. You're also not too observant, if you haven't noticed that Biden is well on his way to destroying our country. You'd really have to be a nitwit to NOT realize that.
The hearings were on FOX Business, so they're not afraid of anything the Dems put out. If Pelosi had nothing to hide, she would have accepted the Reps that the Minority Leader offered her, rather than picking Cheney & Kinzinger. Keep believing in your delusions.
They'll try to drag this hearing out, until the end of October...LOL
The Dems seldom deal in facts. They usually deal in saying whatever it takes to further their agenda. They thrive on emotions and evoking emotional reactions from their drones. If a few facts sneak into the dialog, it's purely coincidental. Biden just said that we have the fastest growing economy in the world. A couple economists on FOX Business said that we were a lot closer to 10th and rattled off the names of the countries and rate of growth of those that were ahead of us. I could write several pages of NON-Facts that have come from Biden's mouth.
Nobody on this committee is going to ask any hard questions about FBI involvement or why the National Guard wasn't deployed. It's political theater for the Dems to attack Trump and the Republicans. Nothing more and nothing less.
Gosh Bob, why would the Republicans not want to vote for an independent commission, when the Mueller Commission did such an admirable job? We spent $40Million and they never found the origins of Russian Collusion that Durham easily uncovered. Are you really that excited about wasting another $40Million to get nothing but propaganda and innuendo.
Jordan was selected, because he has a sharp mind and he wouldn't have been intimidated by anyone on that committee. Precisely why Pelosi did NOT want him there.
It's funny about how you Dems keep talking about Trump trying to overthrow the election. How, exactly, was he going to do that? I realize it's a great talking point for the Dems, but it's really an absurd concept. Too many checks and balances for that to ever happen.
He probably should have taken the time to teach you gun safety and how to shoot.
I've had guns, since I was about 10 years old. I taught both of my sons gun safety and how to shoot, when they were 7 years old. The first thing I did was show them a .22 LR bullet, which is tiny and innocuous. Then I had them stand behind me, as I shot a gallon milk jug full of water. Their eyes got as big as saucers, when the milk jug exploded. They immediately had a lot of respect for what a little bullet can do.
I figured it was smarter to teach them to understand and respect guns in a controlled environment, than to have them get introduced to a gun at a friend's house, with no adults around.
The Speaker of the House and the Mayor of DC have no authority over the DC National Guard nor the ability to turn down the guy that commands it. Trump had troops guarding the Lincoln Memorial earlier in the year but needed Nancy and Bowser's permission to deploy the troops he commands on January 6? That makes a ton of sense.
President Chump had the only authority to invoke the National Guard. He failed to do so because he liked what he was seeing.
Last edited:
It’s typical Bob whataboutism. He gets pissed when others do it but it’s ok when he does it
All I did was say you "sound" like a racist. You replied that you are a racist, proving I was correct in saying you sound like one.
However, in hopes of ridding a racist from this board, I will agree to your latest condition if you agree to these conditions:
a. does not include posts made in jest, like calling faux Purdue grad a racist.
b. deduct one for each post in which I told people that calling faux Purdue grad 'boy' was racist (I sent you two last night) or otherwise objected to racist language from posters.
c. does not include posts accusing Brandon, RKKKB, and other well-known racists not on this board of being racists.
d. you agree never to post on this board again if you fail in your own latest condition as posted, while observing the additional conditions I am posting here.
There you go, racist. Time for you put up or shut up.
I had guns later but certainly wasn't encouraged to have them. I had a pellet gun then a .22 when I was 10 and bought a M-1 carbine from the catalog when I was in the 9th grade. I doubt that I would have been permitted the same luxury of gun ownership by my parents if I lived in a city. I don't think I missed out on anything by having to wait to get them.
So you finally admit you do have a lot of race baiting posts which is what I remembered and found with very little effort. I was hoping to rid this board of you but you remembered that you have plenty of posts alleging someone is a racist. You now want to qualify what you have said that shouldn't count.
Trump helped instigate her being in that place with his rally, but the cop pulled the trigger. They’re both culpable.
Your original claim was "I have seen you pull the racist card out of your belt several times on this board to disparage other people."
Now you are saying 'race-baiting' . What is that you, as an admitted racist, are trying to claim in your latest confused post, if you know?
I know you like to throw the race card out about as much as Al Sharpton but I doubt very much you are a BLM type.
Still confused, I see. First it was the racist card, then race-baiting, and now the race card.
Maybe Faux Purdue grad can help you with the terminology. @BNIBoiler ?
You won't even admit you are a racist which kind of limits the discussion. There is no one anywhere that doesn't have some sort of feelings about race and is racist to some degree. At least I'm honest enough to admit it.
What limits the discussion is your confusion over the meanings of the various insults you are using - racist card, racist, race card. That is why I called on an expert, FPG @BNIBoiler , to help you out.
If he is not available, maybe @IndySouthsider can help you since he believes he is able to explain what bni feels as a black man.
Number one, i don't know what y'all are discussing. Number two, you are the faux Purdue grad.
Bill is confused over the meanings of these insults he is directing at me: racist card, racist, race card.
I am hoping you can help him understand the distinctions.
I don't have time to go back in the threads. Distinctions between what? All I know racists rarely admit they are racist. Then they will flip and call the person that called them one a racist.
Good insight because that is what happened in this case - with qualification.
I said Bill sounded like a racist, he replied that he is a racist, so I referred to him as a racist - after which he launched the various insults.
What are your definitions of a racist and of 'playing the racist card', btw? Bill really needs you help so don't let him down.
A racist is someone who uses their prejudice/bigotry AND power to discriminate against another person or group of people because of their race, ethnicity, or religious background.
Or religious background?
Sure about that, FPG? I fear you are making Bill even more confused.
Riveting wants to call others racist when he won't admit he is one himself. We all are to some degree is my contention. By your definition I am not a racist BNI.
I save time by not watching phony hearings on tv, relying on others to alert me to any signs of a legitimate investigation.
I would think you would be happy to learn from an expert that you are not a racist, but that does not seem to be the case.
Is that because you enjoy being a quasi-martyr and admitting your self-defined racism, helping assuage your guilt from white male privilege?
Are you one of those guilty whites who kneel before blacks to apologize for your racism? If so, could you post a photo if you have one so we could all admire your virtue?
I suppose that is good news but I think everyone has their own prejudices. It really depends on how you want to define a term but I think we all have deep seated fears, values and prejudices-thus to me everyone is a racist to some degree. I guess he who is without sin shall cast the first stone and that is apparently you.
Bill, you cast the first stone by calling yourself a racist to signal your virtue, and another by accusing me of being a racist, or 'playing the racist card,' or whatever you were struggling to say.
Others like Bob and on puf, who must have passed out from heavy breathing.
Did you watch and, if so, did you hear anything that would indicate it was more than a partisan prime-time political circus run by the same media hacks who blacked out and covered up Hunter's laptop fiasco before the election to help Brandon win?
Latest posts
-
Purdue announces home-and-home with Iowa State- Latest: Purdue Grad in Texas
-
-
-
Does anyone know if the refs ever review game films?- Latest: DwaynePurvis00