ADVERTISEMENT

Don't we need another Guard?

Why do you make stuff up? We lost to 3 double digit seeds but one of those was in Sweet 16.
For some arcane reason, our loss in the first round this year has propelled Bonefish into a posting frenzy. He has posted almost non-stop since the loss, and it's always the same exaggerated made-up nonsense. If you just read his posts, you would think Purdue basketball is the Titanic and the band has just started to play "Nearer, my God, to Thee".

News flash #1: We are coming into the 2023-24 season as a top ten team, with players good enough to justify and defend that ranking.
News flash #2: No matter how good your players are, you can still lose in the NCAA. Year after year good teams fall to lesser seeds with lesser players, every year.
 
News flash #1: We are coming into the 2023-24 season as a top ten team, with players good enough to justify and defend that ranking.
News flash #2: No matter how good your players are, you can still lose in the NCAA. Year after year good teams fall to lesser seeds with lesser players, every year.

For sure.

But to bone's credit CMP has done a bang up job of #2 of late.
 
I would bet significant money that Braden will outplay half of those guys this season. EDIT: that list was from last season

As an aside, I can't stand those lists that make you click through.
Do you expect Smith to be on the preseason Cousy watch list this year?
 
For some arcane reason, our loss in the first round this year has propelled Bonefish into a posting frenzy. He has posted almost non-stop since the loss, and it's always the same exaggerated made-up nonsense. If you just read his posts, you would think Purdue basketball is the Titanic and the band has just started to play "Nearer, my God, to Thee".

News flash #1: We are coming into the 2023-24 season as a top ten team, with players good enough to justify and defend that ranking.
News flash #2: No matter how good your players are, you can still lose in the NCAA. Year after year good teams fall to lesser seeds with lesser players, every year.

You don't know me very well. I've been on this posting frenzy well before our historically bad loss this past tourney.

And what exactly am I making up? What facts am I ignoring?
I know you're probably the type that think making the tourney is the goal and everything after that is gravy, but most Purdue fans understand that deep tourney runs are what matter.

And by the way, thanks Mr. Obvious for pointing out that good teams and players lose in the tourney. The difference is, they just don't do it with the consistency of a Matt Painter coached team.
 
Do you expect Smith to be on the preseason Cousy watch list this year?
No idea but I would expect that some of the players who are on that list will underperform relative to expectations and if Braden is not on that list that he'll be close to that level by year end (top 15 to 30 pg's in the country).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
The same reason you make up that we made 5 S16s in a row.....
Bone,
You do know we have been in 4 of last 6 Sweet 18's with one of those being an Elite 8, where if not for a missed FT and/or a fluke play, we go to Final 4. We have also won 3 Big Titles in last 7 years and 1 Big Ten tourney. So sky is falling?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Bone,
You do know we have been in 4 of last 6 Sweet 18's with one of those being an Elite 8, where if not for a missed FT and/or a fluke play, we go to Final 4. We have also won 3 Big Titles in last 7 years and 1 Big Ten tourney. So sky is falling?
PU, you do know that we've lost to double digit seeds in 4 of the last 4 years, including the worse lost in NCAA tournament history last year.
So, is the sky falling? I'm not sure, but the trend certainly isn't going in the right direction.
 
PU, you do know that we've lost to double digit seeds in 4 of the last 4 years, including the worse lost in NCAA tournament history last year.
So, is the sky falling? I'm not sure, but the trend certainly isn't going in the right direction.
You've posted this twice, where do you get losses to double digit seeds four years in a row? NTU, SPU, FDU
 
PU, you do know that we've lost to double digit seeds in 4 of the last 4 years, including the worse lost in NCAA tournament history last year.
So, is the sky falling? I'm not sure, but the trend certainly isn't going in the right direction.

It's been bad.......real bad, but let's correct the record here - it's the last three years (with two in the first round).....now carry on with the regularly scheduled fun.......

pitchforks.gif


doc-holiday-western.gif
 
PU, you do know that we've lost to double digit seeds in 4 of the last 4 years, including the worse lost in NCAA tournament history last year.
So, is the sky falling? I'm not sure, but the trend certainly isn't going in the right direction.
Incorrect!
Lost to (16)FDU round 1 2023
Lost to (15)S Peters sweet 16 2022
Lost to (13)North Texas round 1 2021
2020 canceled
Lost to (1)Virginia elite eight 2019
Lost to (3)Texas Tech sweet 16 2018
Lost to (1)Kansas sweet 16 2017
Lost to (12)Arkansas Little Rock round 1 2016
 
Incorrect!
Lost to (16)FDU round 1 2023
Lost to (15)S Peters sweet 16 2022
Lost to (13)North Texas round 1 2021
2020 canceled
Lost to (1)Virginia elite eight 2019
Lost to (3)Texas Tech sweet 16 2018
Lost to (1)Kansas sweet 16 2017
Lost to (12)Arkansas Little Rock round 1 2016
Another sobering (disappointing?) fact about those last 7 appearances, is that Painter only once beat a higher seed, and that was only a 3v2 against Tenn.
 
For some arcane reason, our loss in the first round this year has propelled Bonefish into a posting frenzy. He has posted almost non-stop since the loss, and it's always the same exaggerated made-up nonsense. If you just read his posts, you would think Purdue basketball is the Titanic and the band has just started to play "Nearer, my God, to Thee".

News flash #1: We are coming into the 2023-24 season as a top ten team, with players good enough to justify and defend that ranking.
News flash #2: No matter how good your players are, you can still lose in the NCAA. Year after year good teams fall to lesser seeds with lesser players, every year.
And as usual, he's being dishonest. But if you follow his posts over the years, that part isn't new.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
Another sobering (disappointing?) fact about those last 7 appearances, is that Painter only once beat a higher seed, and that was only a 3v2 against Tenn.
In 8 years 3 sweet 16 and an elite eight appearance…seems more respectable than many teams and definitely better than the picture you attempt to paint imo!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
In 8 years 3 sweet 16 and an elite eight appearance…seems more respectable than many teams and definitely better than the picture you attempt to paint imo!
If that's "IMO", then that's fine. IMO, not being able to get past the S16, other than 1 time despite a lot of opportunities, is concerning.
That, coupled with the fact that 2 years ago, we had a lottery pick and lost to a 15, and last year, we had the consensus POY and lost to a 16.
So, what picture am I missing?

Hey, if you're happy with a S16 appearance and to you, that constitutes a successful tourney run, then that's OK. But a lot of Purdue fans expect more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TooPoorToBleedGold
Smith had the best freshman season of any point guard under Painter, but he needs to keep improving and I expect that he will. Point guard is a difficult position to play as a freshman because it is the position responsible for advancing the ball and initiating the offense. I am excited to see what he can do as a sophomore.
 
Smith had the best freshman season of any point guard under Painter, but he needs to keep improving and I expect that he will. Point guard is a difficult position to play as a freshman because it is the position responsible for advancing the ball and initiating the offense. I am excited to see what he can do as a sophomore.
Make a top 5 list of pg’s under painter. It’s not pretty. Smith did play better than expected, but we should never have been in the position we were in last year where he had to start and play major minutes. Guard play was why we lost to fdu.
 
Make a top 5 list of pg’s under painter. It’s not pretty. Smith did play better than expected, but we should never have been in the position we were in last year where he had to start and play major minutes. Guard play was why we lost to fdu.
Smith played poorly against FDU, but he was trying to do too much instead of letting the game come to him. I think it’s very correctable.

As far as the comment about the list of Purdue’s top 5 point guards not looking pretty, it will look a lot prettier when Smith is done with his career at Purdue.
 
Another sobering (disappointing?) fact about those last 7 appearances, is that Painter only once beat a higher seed, and that was only a 3v2 against Tenn.
That's because we've had such high seeds...if you go back the 7 or 8 years prior we upset 8 Arizona, 7 st Mary's, and 4 seed Washington...did painter forget how to coach now or did we get better seeds?....answer is obvious....
 
Smith played poorly against FDU, but he was trying to do too much instead of letting the game come to him. I think it’s very correctable.

As far as the comment about the list of Purdue’s top 5 point guards not looking pretty, it will look a lot prettier when Smith is done with his career at Purdue.
If he’s able to make even 3rd team all big ten I would consider that a massive success.
 
Make a top 5 list of pg’s under painter. It’s not pretty. Smith did play better than expected, but we should never have been in the position we were in last year where he had to start and play major minutes. Guard play was why we lost to fdu.
I would add forwards, did not play well also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnboiler123
If he’s able to make even 3rd team all big ten I would consider that a massive success.
I can’t argue with that, but I won’t be at all surprised if he pulls it off.

There are a lot of good point guards in the conference returning next season. Buie and Young will be tough to beat out for the top two spots (but frankly they may both be first team all Big Ten).
 
I can’t argue with that, but I won’t be at all surprised if he pulls it off.

There are a lot of good point guards in the conference returning next season. Buie and Young will be tough to beat out for the top two spots (but frankly they may both be first team all Big Ten).
And to be clear I just meant at any point in his career, next year I don’t see him with any chance at 3rd team.
 
That's because we've had such high seeds...if you go back the 7 or 8 years prior we upset 8 Arizona, 7 st Mary's, and 4 seed Washington...did painter forget how to coach now or did we get better seeds?....answer is obvious....
Man, you're really reaching. Painter has only 1 time in his NCAA tourney career at Purdue, beaten a team seeded more that 1 seed higher and that was a 10 v 7 against....Not Duke, UNC, Kansas or Kentucky, but rather against that perennial national powerhouse.....St. Mary's.
Statistically, it can be argued that beating St. Mary's is Painter's greatest NCAA tourney win as HC of Purdue.

The other two "upsets" you reference were a 9 v 8 and a 5 v 4, which are essentially toss up games.

This is just additional supporting evidence for the crowd who doesn't believe Painter is a good tourney coach.
 
Man, you're really reaching. Painter has only 1 time in his NCAA tourney career at Purdue, beaten a team seeded more that 1 seed higher and that was a 10 v 7 against....Not Duke, UNC, Kansas or Kentucky, but rather against that perennial national powerhouse.....St. Mary's.
Statistically, it can be argued that beating St. Mary's is Painter's greatest NCAA tourney win as HC of Purdue.

The other two "upsets" you reference were a 9 v 8 and a 5 v 4, which are essentially toss up games.

This is just additional supporting evidence for the crowd who doesn't believe Painter is a good tourney coach.
So your goal every year is get a crappy seed in the tournament so we have a chance for an “upset” ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnelk
So your goal every year is get a crappy seed in the tournament so we have a chance for an “upset” ?
No. The goal is to get as high a seed as possible, not to get beat by lower seeds and beat higher seeds on the way to a FF and NC. (because if you're going to advance deep into the tourney, you're going to have to beat some really good teams, likely 1 or 2 seeds.
Painter is failing at 2/3 of that equation.
 
No. The goal is to get as high a seed as possible, not to get beat by lower seeds and beat higher seeds on the way to a FF and NC. (because if you're going to advance deep into the tourney, you're going to have to beat some really good teams, likely 1 or 2 seeds.
Painter is failing at 2/3 of that equation.
If you get a 1 seed, how are you going to “beat higher seeds” ?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Schnelk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT