ADVERTISEMENT

Chump Anti-DEI strikes again: Arlington Cemetery strips content on black and female veterans from website

I’m don’t see how dead people can make America great again from Arlington Cemetery. I think you’re really reaching on this one.
Do you actually support removing references to black military personnel from Arlington National Cemetery? Or, the Pentagon? Or, removing the civil rights division of the DOJ?
 
Do you actually support removing references to black military personnel from Arlington National Cemetery? Or, the Pentagon? Or, removing the civil rights division of the DOJ?
No I don’t support any of that. I also don’t support removing statues in various locations around the country. I believe these tell the history of the country and it’s a good educational reminder.
 
No I don’t support any of that. I also don’t support removing statues in various locations around the country. I believe these tell the history of the country and it’s a good educational reminder.
Statues of individuals are erected to honor that individual. Therefore, take racism out of this for a second, do you support erecting statues of a defeated enemy soldier that killed US soldiers in battle? History books are what story telling is for. Naming schools after Robert E. Lee is absolutely ridiculous.
 
I’m don’t see how dead people can make America great again from Arlington Cemetery. I think you’re really reaching on this one.
Now who would have thunk the BBC would be biased based upon it's history as well?

Here is their info on Charles Rogers https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/E...al-of-Honor-Recipients/Vietnam-MoH-recipients.

Here is my uncle and his wife https://www.vlm.cem.va.gov/LARRYLARUEHAWKINS/12DE9 .

However, when you search https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/Search?q=larry hawkins it does not show my uncle and aunt. Can you imagine a website doing some cleanup? Oh how the media is trying to stir up things, but of course the BBC has a bit of a history of such. The wording of so many articles provides the narrative sought in so much of the media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
Now who would have thunk the BBC would be biased based upon it's history as well?

Here is their info on Charles Rogers https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/E...al-of-Honor-Recipients/Vietnam-MoH-recipients.

Here is my uncle and his wife https://www.vlm.cem.va.gov/LARRYLARUEHAWKINS/12DE9 .

However, when you search https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/Search?q=larry hawkins it does not show my uncle and aunt. Can you imagine a website doing some cleanup? Oh how the media is trying to stir up things, but of course the BBC has a bit of a history of such. The wording of so many articles provides the narrative sought in so much of the media.
BBC is not the only source I found. I sourced them because they did not require a subscription. I found several articles on this topic like The NY Times, Washington Post among others. Need a subscription for these.
 
BBC is not the only source I found. I sourced them because they did not require a subscription. I found several articles on this topic like The NY Times, Washington Post among others. Need a subscription for these.
I'm not surprised at all that other publication drinking from the same trough would have similar AP articles and such. MY point is that I believe they were pushing a narrative, and showed such with the links I provided as well as the misdirection that was ran when they discussed the error code 404. I don't believe any of this is racist, but do believe there could also be in play the accomplishments as accomplishments without any qualifier such as DEI and such that taints the accomplishments as the labeling outside of any accomplishment with a qualifiers as though the accomplishment is not good enough on its own. I don't know that any of this is going on, but Charles Rogers accomplishments should stand on its own without the bigotry of lower expectations and only worthy should it be a black, hispanic, Asian or female.

So, I'm a bit familiar with the lives of the six people that lifted the "second flag" on Mount Surbachi. One of those that actually lived after the war, but died drunk was Ira Hayes. When the USA tried to raise money through bonds they counted on those that raised the flag to help. Initially Harlon Block was misidentified as one of the flag raisers. Harlon's mother had stated that she knew his behind as she had diapered it enough to know it. She was correct and Ira Hayes tracked a 1000 miles to give her the news meeting her in a field where she was working I seem to recall that is was her son in the picture. Ira was noted as a Pima native Indian by many publications as there were not a lot of indian enlistments. Out of memory I believe there are three buried in Arlington as I visited the graves of all as well as Audie Murphy whose site is right beside the tomb of the unknown soldier. Arlington is but another site that everyone should visit at least once...as well as the Arlington House. Here is a video I cropped a to learn a bit if unfamiliar about Ira Hayes. He and the three alive were paraded around as heroes to raise money for the war through bond...something they didn't feel comfortable doing.



The lives of those six were detailed in and the book is MUCH better than the movie
71xVPlSQzeL._SL1500_.jpg

Normally I charge for this, but since we're all friends here I try to help out at times. I did a search for Ira and some site showed a 404 error, but was able to locate it in the Arlington website as well. Here is the URl I had a couple of decades ago on education with all kind of info on it. I dropped it a few years ago since I didn't have time to keep all the links current since authors or managers of the URLs I referenced them would move things. It was www.indianaeducation.org. That domain at the time I realized would be worth something in the future, but Brad Jewell (Mr Hoops) paid for it and today that domain is $4000.00. Let's see if there is a desire to reduce the bigotry of low expectations or things are just bein g moved around...
 
Statues of individuals are erected to honor that individual. Therefore, take racism out of this for a second, do you support erecting statues of a defeated enemy soldier that killed US soldiers in battle? History books are what story telling is for. Naming schools after Robert E. Lee is absolutely ridiculous.
When I’ve traveled around the country and visit a battlefield where war took place, I’m interested in the plaques on the statues that explained some history. I don’t carry a history book with me so it’s very informative. You and I sure look at things at a totally different perspective.
 
When I’ve traveled around the country and visit a battlefield where war took place, I’m interested in the plaques on the statues that explained some history. I don’t carry a history book with me so it’s very informative. You and I sure look at things at a totally different perspective.
You darn right we look at things at a total different perspective. That's why I participate in this forum. To give a point of view of the topics from the average black person.

I like to read the plaques of historical places that I have been. However, naming several schools after Robert E. Lee is not the same as visiting a historical site. Naming these schools after US military traitors is nor learning about history. Several of these confederate statues and monuments are not on historical battle sites. Even if they were, why have a six, seven, eight foot statue/monument of the confederate soldier? A plaque describing the battle is good enough. Similar with naming Fort Bragg , Fort Benning, Fort Lee and a whole lot of other military bases after these traitors. Why? I'll tell you why. It is all about hate and promoting white supremacy. Lot of these statues and monuments were erected during the height of Jim Crow. Even in Indianapolis there is a confederate soldiers monument in Garfield Park. Why?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT