Why didn’t the GOP fix the the border problem when y’all had control of the WH, Senate, and Congress in 2017?
Trump attending black journalists meeting in Chicago
- Thread starter bonefish1
- Start date
Ok, it was still a non-sequitur with respect to the conversation we were having. And good on you for ignoring the subject of our conversation altogether now that you've been shown to have been misrepresenting (purposefully or otherwise) what you had said.
I know not of who you speak. I personally see homosexual behavior as abnormal...a personal flaw as we all have in different things. What was his or her policies for others? BTW I have a nephew that is a homosexual. He probably has a conservative lean after living in San Francisco. He is now in Mexico. He knows I don't approve, but he also knows I would be there to help him in times of need. You can disapprove of personal behavior and not compromise your beliefs. MLK's love life was a personal flaw, but his dream wasn't
it was not misrepresenting as much as an error on a phone I made. It's okay. The joke on the border was in reference to Purdue95grad using the race card when I talked about the border ...which by the way was discussed as Muslims having 10 times the birth rate in England recently. I'm going to leave for a while as I need to take a shower after being on this forum off and on for a while...
Why did the Democrats mess up the border so badly when Biden took office?
According to BNI, if you're white and like a black person, it's because that black person is a grifter and promotes white supremacy.
White people can also like a black person if the person is a self-hating black.
Otherwise, no white person is a allowed to like a black person....Again, according to BNI.
Because using any more than a single quote would be extremely confusing for lefty libs like yourself.
That quote, while lefty libs and dems hate it, is pretty powerful. Too bad lefty libs don't understand it.
MLK would likely be a Republican today.
So, are you saying that a person's skin color should be taken into consideration for things like employment, school admission, etc?
You mean Anthony Weiner? He wasn't GOP. He was a dem sending dick pix to young girls.
There would be a lot of dems that loved the country back then that would side with Trump today. My deceased brother-in-law would be one...as would my father.
Unless you can justify that his views would have changed, that's quite laughable.
King supported lower military funding and greater spending on social programs:
“A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”
King referred to capitalism as "evil" and supported redistribution of wealth:
“The evils of capitalism are as real as the evils of militarism and racism. The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power."
He also told his wife to be he welcomed the day when “there will be a nationalization of industry … and a better distribution of wealth.”
King thought white people needed to "reeducate" themselves if black people were ever to become truly equal:
“Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn. The reality of substantial investment to assist Negroes into the twentieth century, adjusting to Negro neighbors and genuine school integration, is still a nightmare for all too many white Americans…These are the deepest causes for contemporary abrasions between the races. Loose and easy language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall pleasantly on the ear, but for the Negro there is a credibility gap he cannot overlook. He remembers that with each modest advance the white population promptly raises the argument that the Negro has come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to backlash.”
King supported what we'd now call either Affirmative Action or DEI, perhaps even reparations:
“A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, in order to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis.”
and
“If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas”
King supported Democratic Socialism and Universal Basic Income:
“Something is wrong with capitalism. Maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism. We must develop programs that will drive the nation to the realization of the need for a guaranteed annual income.”
and
“I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic.”
King supported ending the filibuster:
“I think the tragedy is that we have a Congress with a Senate that has a minority of misguided senators who will use the filibuster to keep the majority of people from even voting.”
Perhaps his second-most famous quote, showing preference for helping the working class over, say, tax cuts for the rich:
“This country has socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for the poor.”
King recognized disproportionate policy brutality and unequal justice in the courts for black people:
“I had seen police brutality with my own eyes and watched Negroes receive the most tragic injustice in the court. All of these things had done something to my growing personality.”
King supported universal healthcare and quality public education:
“In both Norway and Sweden, whose economies are literally dwarfed by the size of our affluence and the extent of our technology, they have no unemployment and no slums. There, men, women and children have long enjoyed free medical care and quality education. This contrast to the limited, halting steps taken by our rich nation deeply troubled me.”
Which of the above positions do you believe are in line with current Republican policy?
Last edited:
This is how misinformed you are. MLK, Medger Evers as well as most blacks in those days were Republican. Perhaps today MLK would still be Republican. I know for sure he wouldn’t vote for Chump or any of the MAGA repubs.
Oh...so now you don't like skin color being the determining factor?
You're learning grasshopper. Continue on your journey of seeking knowledge and truth.
Yes, because we know how much Trump likes to surround himself with people who disagree with him.
Wrong. Racism has always existed for all races. Where's the AA and DEI for Jews, Irishman, Japanese, Indians, etc?
The problem is that liberals are "into" abortion but don't religiously practice it. If they did, liberals would fade from existence.
Wait... so the conclusion is that liberals legalize abortion knowing that conservatives will be the ones who take advantage of it and have fewer babies?
Now that's a 3D chess political strategy.
Don't be silly, JM. You know that the real 3D chess is played by libs who support Planned Parenthood's racist assault on the hood.
Abortion is Killing the Black Community | Ohio Senate
ohiosenate.gov
If a person were to actually have open eyes in companies, schools and such they "could" notice the DEI means black, not Hispanic, Indian or Asian. If a group were upset about Asians doing too well and not getting into Harvard so an inferior minority student could go around the Asian minority student it appeared it was noticed by whites as unfair. Racism as you correctly stated can be found everywhere and might have died out without race hustlers making a living growing racism or democrats pitting one group against another in their Intersectionality platform to divide people
Yep deliberately set up to kill black babiesDon't be silly, JM. You know that the real 3D chess is played by libs who support Planned Parenthood's racist assault on the hood.
Abortion is Killing the Black Community | Ohio Senate
I think it also takes some indoctrination from less substantive outlets like the media and some in education particularly. Those softer courses where things are subjective and students are immersed into favored ideology without the requisite background to discriminate properly with discernment are fertile grounds. What student doesn't want to believe what they hear from a teacher and so questioning possibly discouraged by herd mentality takes effect.
