If you find fault in the ncaa rules committee then how can you use their judgement as evidence of no wrong doing? I can sure you that penalties were handed down on the universities for cheating. In both cases, there was one man sitting at the helm of those two teams.
You seem to get your kicks out of defending a coach that only one fanbase -- maybe -- in this nation thinks is on the up-and-up. Since it seems to be your life's mission, here's what I'm going to do for you. Go to the link below and tell them that the Purdue message board is demeaning the ethics of poor Coach Calipari.
Was Haas charged with a crime? Was he found liable of anything?
Yes, same rules apply. I never said anything for or against Haas. You did. My last statement about your own character is accurate.
See this is where you are clearly spinning things. The question on Rose and his eligibility came up before the season started and Rose chose to not cooperate with the SAT testing security agency for an entire year. Calipari knew this was going on. It’s hilarious that you are acting like, no punishment, no crime. Calipari knew, Memphis knew, Rose knew. They all chose to ignore the issue ana when the hammer started to drop Calipari jumped ship.
I think you need to better explain why his statements are hypocritical and use smaller words.
No. That's not what you wrote. So let's add dishonesty to your character traits.
While you're passing out judgment about " reading comprehension" you might want to revisit the FACTS about Mr. Haas: Isaac was reported to have AN std - singular, not std's - plural. The civil suit did NOT accuse the coaching staff with knowingly suppressing the facts, thereby endangering anyone with future contact. Privacy laws would possibly have been a factor, in any case. B-4 you might be tempted to compare the Calapari catalog of ?able decisions with Painter's reputation....bang your head against the wall a couple of times.
You're wasting your time, he isn't capable of comprehending simple things let alone anything factual.
For one, you wrote:
John Calapari's reputation, such as it is, has and does NOT begin and end with the NCAA's consideration of sanctions levied against Mass & Memphis. Mr. Calapari's career has swung through a much wider path than that, as you surely know. Since you posture as knowledgeable about Mr. Haas' suit, why don't you share the settlement details with us all, the court-ordered non-disclosure decree notwithstanding ?? Bring it on.
A little off topic but Isaac Haas is looking good during practices at Spiece. His conditioning is really coming along, dribbling is getting much better and seems to be getting stronger with the ball in the paint. Goodie has been a big influence with some of our players and I like the potential influence of Fort Wayne talent that could sway our way.
That is very good to hear. There is some good talent in the Fort so what you said should only benefit us in the long run.
You are leaving out vital information here. Rose failed the ACT 3 times in Chicago where he lived. It was well know that he had a relationship with WWW. WWW was based in Detroit and somehow, after failing the ACT 3 times, Rose was able to pass the SAT when he took it in Detroit. This of course raised red flags long before Rose ever suited up for Cal. The school knew this as well and their reply to Rose refusing to cooperate with the investigation was that, “they didn't know”.
That's your second deflection by changing what you actually wrote. 3 lies.
Are you really this dense? The NCAA cleared Rose to play based on false information. The test was in question and Rose, Cal and Memphis all had a chance to clear that up and chose to not cooperate. Why wouldn’t they cooperate?
What metric makes Calipari the “best of the best”?
