That wasn't the question, as you know.I noticed without exception legitimate intelligence memos to the Infragard community.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That wasn't the question, as you know.I noticed without exception legitimate intelligence memos to the Infragard community.
That was exactly the questionThat wasn't the question, as you know.
Here is the question. Notice how the words are different from the question you think you answered.That was exactly the question
You’re doing it again. I answer exactly what you asked, which was do. I think those voter fraud warnings were slanted. I responded that every one of them appears to be legitimate.
1) Where are you getting that “98%” number from?Here is the question. Notice how the words are different from the question you think you answered.
'You didn't notice that about 98% of the 'protection' was protection of the Biden campaign?'
'About 98%' is what I said. I got it from you.Where are you getting that “98%” number from?
So you pulled it straight out of your ass.'About 98%' is what I said. I got it from you.
I appreciate your honesty in equating yourself with an ass. I don't use that kind of childish language, but I will not disagree with you.So you pulled it straight out of your ass.
Understood
Good lord you have some mental illness issues. The only time you calmed the hell down was when we were calling you CrackeyHunterGuy.I appreciate your honesty in equating yourself with an ass. I don't use that kind of childish language, but I will not disagree with you.
You gave two examples from the NY Post piece of the FBI flagging tweets, one of which you thought indicated fairness by the gov agents who were telling Twitter execs what to delete. So I was being polite to you by giving you credit for finding one instance where you think the police state was being impartial by saying 'about 98%'.
In fact, the item you pointed out was obviously a satire that only a dim wit would take seriously, such that someone who is not a self-described ass might wonder why the FBI was involved in this at all?
Someone who is not a self-described ass might also wonder why the FBI was monitoring Twitter for violations of Twitter's terms of service. Don't they have anything better to do, like track down the mysterious pipe bomber on Jan. 6?
Sweet burn CrackeyHunterGuyOf course I don't agree that DeSantis is a pedophile. Does that make Trump a worse president than one was caused the deaths of 55,000 US troops and hundreds of thousands of others?
Do you agree that Biden is a pedophile if what his daughter wrote in her diary about him taking showers with her is true?
Can't think of a good reason why the fbi was monitoring Twitter for violations of Twitter's terms of service?Good lord you have some mental illness issues. The only time you calmed the hell down was when we were calling you CrackeyHunterGuy.
So you go on being a silly lil’ CRACKEYHUNTERGUY child and have a super sweet dose of those meds that your relatives say you should NEVER skip.
Purdue lost today. Isn't there a party of clownpants wearing Leoosiers you are missing out on back on your native forum? They will enjoy your childish language, I am sure.Sweet burn CrackeyHunterGuy
Will you be blaming the loss on:Purdue lost today. Isn't there a party of clownpants wearing Leoosiers you are missing out on back on your native forum? They will enjoy your childish language, I am sure.
Neither.Will you be blaming the loss on:
1) “Rigging” or
2) Law Enforcement
lol yes Rupert Murdoch is a political outsider and "non-regime." Good joke.Neither.
btw, if you don't read WSJ, what do you read? (Trying to help you with your confusion.)
WSJ is the only non-regime national newspaper I know of.
You think WSJ is a tool of the dem party, Ted?lol yes Rupert Murdoch is a political outsider and "non-regime." Good joke.
Lol -- I'm not confused. I like the WSJ.Neither.
btw, if you don't read WSJ, what do you read? (Trying to help you with your confusion.)
WSJ is the only non-regime national newspaper I know of.
Instead of making up your own definitions, try looking in a dictionary to see what a word means before you misuse it, as you did here.Lol -- I'm not confused. I like the WSJ.
Don't have a digital subscription though.
By the way, the use of the word "regime" to describe the USG is an easy tell that one is a conspiracy theory kinda guy.
There are the three categories of people that use the term "regime" to describe the USG: The far left conspiracy theorists, the far right conspiracy theorists, and the just plain crazy conspiracy theorists
HAHAHAHAHAInstead of making up your own definitions, try looking in a dictionary to see what a word means before you misuse it, as you did here.
Regime is a common synonym for government. I use 'regime media' for those media outlets that covered up the Hunter laptop prior to the election, resulting in what was obviously an unfair election except to those who are blinded by their hatred of Trump.
Yes, I am serious. I am fully in favor of using accepted definitions for words like 'regime', instead of faux definitions made up by police state fans and the like.HAHAHAHAHA
oh...wait...are you serious? You are?!? Oh my. You are like "The Laptop Pillow Guy!"
#LaptopPillowGuyRiveting
The laptop story came out 3 weeks before the election…….from Rudy. The WSJ, Fox News, and most other media refused to run with the story. Rudy refused to give access to the information to the media that requested it. And we were supposed to believe Hunter dropped off a laptop at a repair shop in Jersey and forgot about it…….and it contained all sorts of comprising information. No wonder no one wanted to run with the story. It sounded ridiculous and there was no way to verify it in a few weeks, especially when Rudy wasn’t being cooperative. You cry wolf enough and no one believes you. That’s Rudy.I was countering your use of 'fair'. If you prefer 'rigged", then next time you post foolish statements about the 2022 election, use the word 'unrigged' and I will counter with 'rigged'.
All major news orgs that I know of, even CBS, have now admitted they were wrong about the laptop, meaning it was information that citizens should have had a chance to know about before the election. Thus, your statement about limited, anecdotal examples is characteristically absurd.
No, it came out in the NY Post, which had verified key emails to Bobulinski and so forth. They had done their homework and they "wanted to run with the story". The thing about Rudy was a red herring that Uncle Joe used as one of his lies to the public in a Trump debate and that apparently you swallowed whole, not surprisingly.The laptop story came out 3 weeks before the election…….from Rudy. The WSJ, Fox News, and most other media refused to run with the story. Rudy refused to give access to the information to the media that requested it. And we were supposed to believe Hunter dropped off a laptop at a repair shop in Jersey and forgot about it…….and it contained all sorts of comprising information. No wonder no one wanted to run with the story. It sounded ridiculous and there was no way to verify it in a few weeks, especially when Rudy wasn’t being cooperative. You cry wolf enough and no one believes you. That’s Rudy.
Turns out it was true and all of you want to forget about the circumstances at the time. You also want to forget about how the FBI and the Obama admin kept the Russia investigation secret before the 2016 campaign. That could have been leaked and kept trump out of office. Or that the FBI was so much in favor of Hillary becoming president that they opened a new investigation into her days before the election. Your selective outrage is impressive.
Your worldview is so limited it's laughable.You think WSJ is a tool of the dem party, Ted?
Then what do think wapo and nyt are - tools of antifa and blm?
What do you read, Ted, that gives you such a vast worldview?Your worldview is so limited it's laughable.
100% no.If not, here’s why ( hint …Bozo Biden)
How Biden torched the Trump recovery
One bad decision after another, compounded, to be sure, by certain events beyond his control, have scuttled the turnaround that was well underway the day Biden became president.thehill.com
You're delusional. Obama was in office during our weakest recovery ever. The economy did it's thing despite Obama. Trump got things rolling again with deregulation and tax cuts among other things. YOU just fail to recognize the truth.What do you mean the US Economy survived idiots in office……To a lesser extent Obama. Obama was the President that rescued the US from a depression that Bush, as you forgot to add to your list, got us in. Obama handed Chump a good economy that Chump takes Credit for. Obama got the unemployment down to 4% ish from 9%. Black unemployment from 16% down to 6%. Positive job growth for 7 out of the 8 years in office. Saved the auto industry.
No, they didn't. They took out another loan to pay the government back so they could claim they paid off their debt. In reality, all they did was take money from one pocket and put it into another. They are still in massive debt. The auto industry is in trouble again, because the "save of the auto industry" was just kicking the can down the road.So, enlighten me. How did Obama not rescue the auto industry? Didn’t GM payback the loan with interest and became the biggest selling automaker?
I see what he wrote went totally over your head.Let me get this straight. So when I tout the low unemployment rate that Obama achieved, the unemployment rate is bogus. Obama cooked the books. I heard it all, particularly from Faux News. But when the republicans tout the low unemployment rate, thanks to Obama, under Chump, he is the greatest president ever.
He's literally pointing out the obvious and you still can't see it. Sad.Dude, your disdain for so called liberals has tainted your mind so much that you are putting way more into the show than you should.
I see that you have problems with a racist TV show like “All in the Family”. That show proves my point I’ve been making on this site all the time on how conservatives/republicans like Archie Bunker became the party of racism since the 60s.
No... You're just blind and can't see what's right in front of your face.Y’all got some serious issues.
Because of Covid. One year literally is the reason why. Don't be ignorant.No mentioned of the record deficit Trump ran up in office.
Free and fair huh.That’s a fair, measured response, but you’re not me, and your speculation about me is flat out wrong.
Trump supported the overthrow of free and fair elections. Hell, he still does!
There is no other issue that needs to also be considered when someone is that anti-American and deranged.
You're either blind, an idiot or just refused to pay attention if you truly believe this. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say it was the last one. Please don't say anything dumb to prove it could be either of the first two.Other than random, very limited, anecdotal examples, there is absolutely no evidence. NO evidence whatsoever that the 2020 election was in any way “unfair”.
Damnit, I just gave you the benefit, and now you just shown that you're stupid.And there you have it!
You think a national election was “rigged” “unfair” —whatever you want to call it, because a private company decided to restrict stuff about Hunter Biden, who everyone already knew is a dirtbag.
My god. Do have any concept of how ridiculous that is?
I think I now understand where you stand, and while that’s your opinion, I’m not gonna back and forth on this utter nonsense.
Have you not been paying attention to the congressional hearings? Have you not heard of the many (15+) FBI whistleblowers? Get your head out of the CNN/MSNBC asshole.If that is true, link an article that
1) isn’t behind a pay wall
2) isn’t an opinion piece that begins with the word “If.”
In other words, link something credible that ACTUALLY SAYS SOMETHING HAPPENED
and by the way, because I fully expect to see this coming, not a general warning from the Bureau briefing social media companies about foreign and election related disinformation campaigns.
Because the FBI is FULL of conservatives. There oughta be at least one whistleblower who can state with first hand knows that something actually happened
The FBI had the laptop for over 2 years before Rudy came out with the info. Rudy knew this and might have been part of the reason why he was being "tight" with his info.The laptop story came out 3 weeks before the election…….from Rudy. The WSJ, Fox News, and most other media refused to run with the story. Rudy refused to give access to the information to the media that requested it. And we were supposed to believe Hunter dropped off a laptop at a repair shop in Jersey and forgot about it…….and it contained all sorts of comprising information. No wonder no one wanted to run with the story. It sounded ridiculous and there was no way to verify it in a few weeks, especially when Rudy wasn’t being cooperative. You cry wolf enough and no one believes you. That’s Rudy.
Are you seriously comparing a fake story (Russia investigation) and a real story (Biden laptop) in this way? Really?Turns out it was true and all of you want to forget about the circumstances at the time. You also want to forget about how the FBI and the Obama admin kept the Russia investigation secret before the 2016 campaign. That could have been leaked and kept trump out of office. Or that the FBI was so much in favor of Hillary becoming president that they opened a new investigation into her days before the election. Your selective outrage is impressive.
What did the “15+ FBI whistleblowers” say? LolHave you not been paying attention to the congressional hearings? Have you not heard of the many (15+) FBI whistleblowers? Get your head out of the CNN/MSNBC asshole.
Invented a reason yet why the FBI was monitoring Twitter for violations of Twitter's terms of service?What did the “15+ FBI whistleblowers” say? Lol
Oh yeah … you’ve got NOTHING. Have you ever met an FBI Agent? Do you have any basis for contradicting any of the SWORN testimony of what happened? You only cite conspiracy theories and opinionated “questions.” Then you name call and respond with smiley emojis. But never refute anything or add anything.
Or, you can believe every state’s election officials, Republican and Democrat, that say elections are free and fair.