ADVERTISEMENT

Antisemitic Hate March held at Purdue University

Over 200 gathered where chants of from the "River to the Sea" which call for the extinction of Israel were heard at Purdue University earlier in Oct.

One of 52 protests at colleges nationwide sponsored by the Antisemitic hate group Students for Justice in Palestine.

The group happened "by chance", according to participants, to March by the Jewish Center on Campus.

Campuses nationwide have been a center of activity for the antisemitic hate group, SJP. A few of the reasons are.......

1. Colleges have International students that don't necessarily hold American values, one of them being our bond to our ally Isreal.
2. Many students are unaware that Israelis were the original owner of the land thousands of years ago and that is their homeland, and thus are taken in by the false "colonization" argument of the SJP.
3. Gullible students are taken in by the word "Justice" as it is a buzzword used in many protests they join in. But Justice in this case calls for the extermination of Israel. Not sure that is fully understood by those not strongly linked to the SJP.
4. BLM has acted as a hate group glorifying the terrorists paragliders. Many college age identity with BLM and their interests and are taken in by the organization's interests.
5. Students don't understand how Hamas is using the population as a human shield. Isreal has given them ample time to leave the war zone.


Don't be taken in.
🟦

Are you also aware that far right militant Jewish settlers frequently kill West Bank Palestinians for no reason and face no repercussions for their actions. It is well documented if you would like to look into it.
 
I’ll clear up the Trump thing now going forward. I once again didn’t vote for him or Biden the last time. If Trump is the nominee this time, I’m voting for him.

BLM former protests are not the reason people shop from home. People are shopping from home for convenience and many are afraid from all the crime. Crime currently is democratic issue they won’t or refuse to deal with. Voting for democrats is a vote for crime. I’m willing to give the other side a chance to fix it. If they don’t, I won’t be voting for them the next time around.
I worry more about what will happen if Trump loses again as opposed to if he wins.
 
Are you also aware that far right militant Jewish settlers frequently kill West Bank Palestinians for no reason and face no repercussions for their actions. It is well documented if you would like to look into it.

Are you aware the Jewish people are God's chosen? There is a good side and an evil side here. And all that is happening has been laid out in the Bible generations before. Thus that is my perspective and that's not changing.

But for conversation sake, I am aware there are bad people in any population, even in God's chosen, including those that would do others harm. Just like there are those in other populations who would document, even falsely, a variety of incidents, (true, untrue or partly true).....to pull in dupes as they did with the Gaza hospital "bombing" not to long ago. Many in this world are easily taken in by such evil. Good luck to you, if you are one of them.
 
I’ll clear up the Trump thing now going forward. I once again didn’t vote for him or Biden the last time. If Trump is the nominee this time, I’m voting for him.

BLM former protests are not the reason people shop from home. People are shopping from home for convenience and many are afraid from all the crime. Crime currently is democratic issue they won’t or refuse to deal with. Voting for democrats is a vote for crime. I’m willing to give the other side a chance to fix it. If they don’t, I won’t be voting for them the next time around.
What crimes are you talking about? Do you know what crimes increased this year or last year? Decreased? Or do you see people stealing TVs from target on Newsmax and think all crime is up? Maybe because of the BLM protests?



 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
Most black people, including myself don't know much about the organization at all. ....... Most of the folks causing the damage doing those riots were not members of this so called BLM organization. The black folks looting, destroying, and setting fires to the businesses are members of the BLM organization. The white Antifah causing a lot of the havoc during these riots,m burning and destroying property, ain't members of the BLM organization.

Now as far as the Jan 6 folks. 99% of them are bonafide MAGA cult members trying to stop democracy of certifying the 2020 election.


LOL.....the first sentence does not jive with the rest of your diatribe. In fact they are opposites.

As far as J6.....thanks for adding it to your post......keep that meaningless day alive. You can tell your next President - Trump how special the day was to you....I am sure T will take your thoughts in hand. LOL. Perhaps if you and your parties judicial hate squad did not decide to go after him & keep him in the media.....we could of had a halfway decent person as our next President. But the Dem actions in the WH & court are almost insuring that big spender is the next President. SAD
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
What crimes are you talking about? Do you know what crimes increased this year or last year? Decreased? Or do you see people stealing TVs from target on Newsmax and think all crime is up? Maybe because of the BLM protests?



I guess you don’t have access to the Chicago news. Car jackings, murders, robberies, crash vehicles into businesses every day on the news. If they are arrested it’s catch and release. Mobs of teenagers stealing out of stores. People getting their cars stolen at gun point in front of their homes. You can’t be oblivious to what’s happening around the country every day.
 
You right wingers are so infatuated with guns that y'all keep saying that it wasn't an insurrection because there were no guns involved. Below is the Merrium-Webster definition of an insurrection. Says nothing about guns.

insurrection​

noun

in·sur·rec·tion ˌin(t)-sə-ˈrek-shən
Synonyms of insurrection
: an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government
The violence was against the police that were using non lethal explosives on them. They were probably chasing the guy up the stairs because they found out who was doing that shit for all I know.

The reason we bring up guns is because in order to overturn a government, it will take guns, so obviously that was not the intent.
What do you mean almost no violence inside the building? Every time that you post something you reveal that you are a young whippersnapper. Anyhow, it was violence that got that cult member chick shot by the police. They were breaking through a glass door. They were chasing cops up stairwells. A cop got mashed inside a revolving door. For the sake of argument that there was almost no violence inside the building. Does that matter? Again, this is exactly what I'm talking about minimizing the maximum, maximizing the minimum. There was extreme violence on the outside that you have just completely ignored. The extreme violence on the outside is how they got inside in the first place, particularly after most the deplorables came over from the Chump WH rally. It was like a scene from a typical zombie movie like "Resident Evil" or something. Not necessarily guns, but there were plenty of weapons being used, some stolen from the police and used against them. It was hand to hand combat outside the Capitol.

Then y'all keep saying that the deplorables left on their own. BS. They left after the police finally took control of the situation.
The guy that broke the glass on the door was a BLM member. After he was identified, BLM had to come out and denounce him to distance themselves. Babbitt was no threat. Very prominent police officers have looked at the video and declared it a bad shoot and that he should have been investigated and removed from duty at the least.

Is it not telling at all to you that the man in charge of the Capitol Police was asked to resign simply because his facts didn't line up with what Pelosi and others wanted him to say? FFS, even Pelosi's daughter has been caught on secret camera saying that J6 was a sham and nothing like it's been made out to be. SHE WAS THERE!

I'm wasting my time. You're willfully ignorant on just about every single topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerHuff3
Ditto. I don’t understand how a seemingly intelligent person would argue the BLM protests are a reason people shop from home……….or are a cause for higher prices, COMPLETELY ignoring Covid and inflation. You exaggerate and lie to make things fit your narrative, over and over. You call yourself an independent and try to distance yourself from trump……..right up until the point when you DON’T……..which is reflected in every post you make. I would have more respect for you if you just told the truth and were honest about your positions……and actually give some thought to your answers before posting.
So Covid and inflation is why complete stores are under lock and key? How does that make sense to you at all?


 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: Boiler Buck
What crimes are you talking about? Do you know what crimes increased this year or last year? Decreased? Or do you see people stealing TVs from target on Newsmax and think all crime is up? Maybe because of the BLM protests?



Since you seem to not be aware. Here's just a sampling.















 
LOL.....the first sentence does not jive with the rest of your diatribe. In fact they are opposites.

As far as J6.....thanks for adding it to your post......keep that meaningless day alive. You can tell your next President - Trump how special the day was to you....I am sure T will take your thoughts in hand. LOL. Perhaps if you and your parties judicial hate squad did not decide to go after him & keep him in the media.....we could have had a halfway decent person as our next President. But the Dem actions in the WH & court are almost insuring that big spender is the next President. SAD
What are we up to……..8 times for “meaningless” Jan 6? You just can’t help yourself. There’s no one left here to brainwash.

You need to push more on the “blame the dems if trump gets elected” bullshit. Hasn’t caught on yet.
It’s good for you. You will vote for trump and blame somebody else when he inevitably fcks something up. But you’ll also appear to reluctantly say he’s doing a great job. What a tool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
I guess you don’t have access to the Chicago news. Car jackings, murders, robberies, crash vehicles into businesses every day on the news. If they are arrested it’s catch and release. Mobs of teenagers stealing out of stores. People getting their cars stolen at gun point in front of their homes. You can’t be oblivious to what’s happening around the country every day.
Look at the STATISTICS and less at Fox News. Some types of crime have gone up and some have gone down. But because you see a smash and grab every morning on Fox and friends you believe all crime is skyrocketing
 
Look at the STATISTICS and less at Fox News. Some types of crime have gone up and some have gone down. But because you see a smash and grab every morning on Fox and friends you believe all crime is skyrocketing
estimated $100 Billion in losses from the uptick in smash and grabs.

8 in 10 retailers are having major issues with theft.

 
So Covid and inflation is why complete stores are under lock and key? How does that make sense to you at all?


NO. CAN YOU READ?

Under lock and key? Does it actually say that in your article? Did you actually read the article you linked?

What does the data say?​

Some of the data pointing to a rise in theft has been contested, with critics questioning if retailers are mistakenly blaming too great a share of their losses on organized crime.

A 2022 report from the NRF found $94.5 billion in losses in 2021 because of shrink, up from $90.8 billion in 2020.

But the average shrink rate actually dropped from 1.6% to 1.4%, according to their findings, meaning the dollar figure spike could be attributed to higher prices because of inflation rather than a spike in shrink or theft.

Johnston told USA TODAY that while NRF believes 37% of 2021’s shrink loss was related to external theft, those estimates are “not scientific.”

Cohen of Columbia Business School said that while anecdotal evidence suggests theft is on the rise and he has no reason to doubt the issue is as serious as companies suggest, he described accounting for theft as “somewhat of an ambiguous determination.”

We're in a period of inflation, and there's tremendous pressure on P&L (profit and loss) coming out of two and a half years of chaos and COVID, and a lot of companies are using theft as a reason why their performance is less than what they had hoped it would be,” he said. “Whether they're using it as an excuse, or as a valid reason, it's difficult to know.”

At least one retailer has already walked back its concerns over theft. After blaming a rise of theft for a number of store closures, Walgreens CFO James Kehoe in January said the company may have “cried too much last year” over shrink and has since stabilized its shrink figures.

During the company’s latest earnings call in June, executives said they planned to close an additional 150 U.S. stores “to further simplify the business.” Executives made no mention of shrink or theft during the call.


Smash and grab is certainly a thing and a trend. But the idea that it has more to do with increased prices than Covid and the resulting supply chain issues and inflation demonstrates you watch too many videos and apparently have a problem grasping the immense size of our economy outside of these types of robberies
 
When I ask what types of crimes he’s referring to it’s because there are lots of crime besides smash and grab you freakin idiot. You just wasted 10 minutes of your life on a big problem I do know about.

But apparently you and yours believe that because retail theft is up it means all crime is up……be cause your choices of news show them to you every day. Simple conclusions by simple people.
 
Look at the STATISTICS and less at Fox News. Some types of crime have gone up and some have gone down. But because you see a smash and grab every morning on Fox and friends you believe all crime is skyrocketing
It’s on the NBC news at 10:00 in Chicago every night. Car jacking is way up in Chicago and burbs. Smash and grab is up in Chicago. I know it’s hard to believe.
 
The violence was against the police that were using non lethal explosives on them. They were probably chasing the guy up the stairs because they found out who was doing that shit for all I know.

The reason we bring up guns is because in order to overturn a government, it will take guns, so obviously that was not the intent.

The guy that broke the glass on the door was a BLM member. After he was identified, BLM had to come out and denounce him to distance themselves. Babbitt was no threat. Very prominent police officers have looked at the video and declared it a bad shoot and that he should have been investigated and removed from duty at the least.

Is it not telling at all to you that the man in charge of the Capitol Police was asked to resign simply because his facts didn't line up with what Pelosi and others wanted him to say? FFS, even Pelosi's daughter has been caught on secret camera saying that J6 was a sham and nothing like it's been made out to be. SHE WAS THERE!

I'm wasting my time. You're willfully ignorant on just about every single topic.
So which one of these folks in this video are BLM members. I see no black dude breaking the glass. Try again cuz.


The officer that shot the cult member was investigated and cleared of any wrong doing in the shooting. She was breaking the law so she deserved to be shot. Am I correct Mr. Boneman?
 
It’s on the NBC news at 10:00 in Chicago every night. Car jacking is way up in Chicago and burbs. Smash and grab is up in Chicago. I know it’s hard to believe.
Yeah since Chicago is representative of the entire country I can see how you would reach your conclusions. Ignore actual statistics.
 
NO. CAN YOU READ?

Under lock and key? Does it actually say that in your article? Did you actually read the article you linked?

What does the data say?​

Some of the data pointing to a rise in theft has been contested, with critics questioning if retailers are mistakenly blaming too great a share of their losses on organized crime.

A 2022 report from the NRF found $94.5 billion in losses in 2021 because of shrink, up from $90.8 billion in 2020.

But the average shrink rate actually dropped from 1.6% to 1.4%, according to their findings, meaning the dollar figure spike could be attributed to higher prices because of inflation rather than a spike in shrink or theft.

Johnston told USA TODAY that while NRF believes 37% of 2021’s shrink loss was related to external theft, those estimates are “not scientific.”

Cohen of Columbia Business School said that while anecdotal evidence suggests theft is on the rise and he has no reason to doubt the issue is as serious as companies suggest, he described accounting for theft as “somewhat of an ambiguous determination.”

We're in a period of inflation, and there's tremendous pressure on P&L (profit and loss) coming out of two and a half years of chaos and COVID, and a lot of companies are using theft as a reason why their performance is less than what they had hoped it would be,” he said. “Whether they're using it as an excuse, or as a valid reason, it's difficult to know.”

At least one retailer has already walked back its concerns over theft. After blaming a rise of theft for a number of store closures, Walgreens CFO James Kehoe in January said the company may have “cried too much last year” over shrink and has since stabilized its shrink figures.

During the company’s latest earnings call in June, executives said they planned to close an additional 150 U.S. stores “to further simplify the business.” Executives made no mention of shrink or theft during the call.


Smash and grab is certainly a thing and a trend. But the idea that it has more to do with increased prices than Covid and the resulting supply chain issues and inflation demonstrates you watch too many videos and apparently have a problem grasping the immense size of our economy outside of these types of robberies
CAN YOU READ?

I didn't say anything about rising prices. I was referring to how a lot of things are being locked up, mostly due to theft.
 
When I ask what types of crimes he’s referring to it’s because there are lots of crime besides smash and grab you freakin idiot. You just wasted 10 minutes of your life on a big problem I do know about.

But apparently you and yours believe that because retail theft is up it means all crime is up……be cause your choices of news show them to you every day. Simple conclusions by simple people.
Again, I'm not responding to you in the claim that ALL crime is up. I'm responding because you suggested that things were being locked up in stores due to Covid. Which is dumb. So, no, I'm not the "freaking idiot" here.
 
So which one of these folks in this video are BLM members. I see no black dude breaking the glass. Try again cuz.


The officer that shot the cult member was investigated and cleared of any wrong doing in the shooting. She was breaking the law so she deserved to be shot. Am I correct Mr. Boneman?
Maybe do a google search first before you come at me cuz.


"John Earle Sullivan (born July 18, 1994),[1] also known as Activist John,[2] is an American political activist and self-identified photojournalist who participated in the January 6, 2021 United States Capitol attack. Due to his involvement, in November 2023, he was convicted by a jury of felony obstruction of an official proceeding, civil disorder, and five misdemeanors.[3]

Before the January 6 attack, Sullivan organized and participated in protests relating to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, though a few other BLM organizers explicitly disavowed him, even expelling Sullivan from rallies and warning fellow activists to avoid associating with Sullivan.[4][5]

On January 6, Sullivan entered the Capitol and accidentally broke a window. He repeatedly shouted encouragement to fellow rioters. Sullivan captured footage of the attack, his own interactions with law enforcement, and the shooting of Ashli Babbitt.[6]"

The officer was investigated by those that were involved in the setup, so it's no surprise he was cleared. You are 100% wrong. Just because someone is breaking the law, doesn't mean they deserve to be shot. In fact, there is no legal means for her to be shot unless she was a clear threat to the officer. She was a tiny woman with no weapons. She wasn't even through the window when he shot her. He should be in prison.


"Under the Constitution, when may police officers use deadly force? As Professor Rachel Harmon explains, generally, police officers can use lethal force under two circumstances: when they have probable cause to believe a suspect poses an imminent threat of serious bodily harm and when a dangerous suspect of a crime involving the infliction of serious physical injury is attempting to flee."

Ashli Babbitt posed neither of those things.
 
Yeah since Chicago is representative of the entire country I can see how you would reach your conclusions. Ignore actual statistics.
BNIBoiler keeps telling us that crime is bad in Alaska. Must be bad everywhere if those stats are right.
 
Maybe do a google search first before you come at me cuz.


"John Earle Sullivan (born July 18, 1994),[1] also known as Activist John,[2] is an American political activist and self-identified photojournalist who participated in the January 6, 2021 United States Capitol attack. Due to his involvement, in November 2023, he was convicted by a jury of felony obstruction of an official proceeding, civil disorder, and five misdemeanors.[3]

Before the January 6 attack, Sullivan organized and participated in protests relating to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, though a few other BLM organizers explicitly disavowed him, even expelling Sullivan from rallies and warning fellow activists to avoid associating with Sullivan.[4][5]

On January 6, Sullivan entered the Capitol and accidentally broke a window. He repeatedly shouted encouragement to fellow rioters. Sullivan captured footage of the attack, his own interactions with law enforcement, and the shooting of Ashli Babbitt.[6]"

The officer was investigated by those that were involved in the setup, so it's no surprise he was cleared. You are 100% wrong. Just because someone is breaking the law, doesn't mean they deserve to be shot. In fact, there is no legal means for her to be shot unless she was a clear threat to the officer. She was a tiny woman with no weapons. She wasn't even through the window when he shot her. He should be in prison.


"Under the Constitution, when may police officers use deadly force? As Professor Rachel Harmon explains, generally, police officers can use lethal force under two circumstances: when they have probable cause to believe a suspect poses an imminent threat of serious bodily harm and when a dangerous suspect of a crime involving the infliction of serious physical injury is attempting to flee."

Ashli Babbitt posed neither of those things.
First of all, are you saying that the BLM dude broke the window that Babbitt and her cohorts were trying to climb through? If so, unless I missed it, I don't see him in the video breaking the glass that Babbitt was trying to get through. Perhaps the BLM dude broke some window in another part of the Capitol, if so I'm not disputing that.

I've said this before. I find it odd that when unarmed blacks get killed by police, the police are justified. But when an unarmed white woman gets killed by police, the police are not justified. According to the Boneman's sick logic, she deserved to be "tuned" up as he puts it all the time.

Now according to your definition of deadly force, were the cops justified to shoot the hundreds of deplorables fighting them inside and outside the Capitol? The lives of the deplorables mattered that day. Cops being beaten by flag poles, should they have used lethal force? The cops being mashed in a revolving door should have used lethal force. The cops being beaten by their own police clubs use lethal force. The cop being chased alone by a mob up the stairs use lethal force? The cops being beaten by steel barriers use lethal force?
 
First of all, are you saying that the BLM dude broke the window that Babbitt and her cohorts were trying to climb through? If so, unless I missed it, I don't see him in the video breaking the glass that Babbitt was trying to get through. Perhaps the BLM dude broke some window in another part of the Capitol, if so I'm not disputing that.
The video doesn't show what happened before that right? The link I gave you said that he broke a window. I don't know what's so hard to understand about that.
I've said this before. I find it odd that when unarmed blacks get killed by police, the police are justified. But when an unarmed white woman gets killed by police, the police are not justified. According to the Boneman's sick logic, she deserved to be "tuned" up as he puts it all the time.
Because most of the time the person is either reaching for a weapon, or attacking and overwhelming the police officer. Those two scenarios are justified under the Constitution as I demonstrated to you and a vast majority of people, not just blacks, that get shot when they were unarmed.

What you can't understand is that when facts come out about a case that prove the shoot was justified, you want to believe the original false story that it wasn't. You and others like you need to learn to hold judgement until all of the facts are released. Unfortunately, our media benefits from running stories about blacks being "unjustly" killed, therefore they aren't worried about the facts, just their clicks.
Now according to your definition of deadly force, were the cops justified to shoot the hundreds of deplorables fighting them inside and outside the Capitol? The lives of the deplorables mattered that day. Cops being beaten by flag poles, should they have used lethal force? The cops being mashed in a revolving door should have used lethal force. The cops being beaten by their own police clubs use lethal force. The cop being chased alone by a mob up the stairs use lethal force? The cops being beaten by steel barriers use lethal force?
Maybe in a few of the scenarios, I don't really know for sure. Since it didn't happen, we don't have details to sift through to tell if it was justified or not.

The Babbitt shooting however, absolutely not.
 
The video doesn't show what happened before that right? The link I gave you said that he broke a window. I don't know what's so hard to understand about that.

Because most of the time the person is either reaching for a weapon, or attacking and overwhelming the police officer. Those two scenarios are justified under the Constitution as I demonstrated to you and a vast majority of people, not just blacks, that get shot when they were unarmed.

What you can't understand is that when facts come out about a case that prove the shoot was justified, you want to believe the original false story that it wasn't. You and others like you need to learn to hold judgement until all of the facts are released. Unfortunately, our media benefits from running stories about blacks being "unjustly" killed, therefore they aren't worried about the facts, just their clicks.

Maybe in a few of the scenarios, I don't really know for sure. Since it didn't happen, we don't have details to sift through to tell if it was justified or not.

The Babbitt shooting however, absolutely not.
You are just throwing crap out there and hoping it sticks. Most are not reaching for a weapon because they don’t have a weapon to reach for. In Memphis, did Tyree Nichols have a weapon? Did he overwhelm 8 cops?

As far as Jan 6, we kinda sorta agree as you say a few scenarios. Then you say you really don’t know because it did not happen. Dude according to the definition that you posted, not me, hundreds of folks should have been shot. There were cops knocked out cold that day. A female cop testified before congress of that fact.
 
It wasn’t 12 months. It was a few weeks. Not even close. If your position is so strong why do have to lie?
Murder? You mean BLM protesters were just murdering people as they protested? Most of the people killed were protestors and looters. The details and circumstances of the deaths don’t come close to BLM murder.


So you’re all about the duration too? You’re actually questioning my critical thinking? How long does it take for a bomb to explode or an assassin to kill his target? The result or the intended result is what’s important…….along with the consequences.
What a typical lefty lib response.
Next thing your going to tell me is that the BLM protests were "Mostly peaceful"......

By the way, what return have you seen from your financial contributions to BLM (besides their leadership laughing as they watch their banks accounts soar).
 
  • Love
Reactions: SKYDOG
You are just throwing crap out there and hoping it sticks. Most are not reaching for a weapon because they don’t have a weapon to reach for. In Memphis, did Tyree Nichols have a weapon? Did he overwhelm 8 cops?
Jesus H. Yes, most are. Knowing you, you probably just mentioned the one case in which it isn't true because you argue dishonestly. One case, doesn't prove you right or me wrong. The vast majority of cases are not like that one. BTW, Tyree Nichols was killed by 5 Black cops.
As far as Jan 6, we kinda sorta agree as you say a few scenarios. Then you say you really don’t know because it did not happen. Dude according to the definition that you posted, not me, hundreds of folks should have been shot. There were cops knocked out cold that day. A female cop testified before congress of that fact.
No, I said the shootings did not happen. That's what I said.
 
Jesus H. Yes, most are. Knowing you, you probably just mentioned the one case in which it isn't true because you argue dishonestly. One case, doesn't prove you right or me wrong. The vast majority of cases are not like that one. BTW, Tyree Nichols was killed by 5 Black cops.

No, I said the shootings did not happen. That's what I said.
Black cops, white cops. Even though it happens more with white cops, it don’t matter. A cop is a cop. Tyree Nichols’ life did not matter. 3 out of the 6 cops that killed Freddie Gray in Baltimore were black. Gray is handcuffed in the back of the police transport and they purposely drive erratic killing him. How were the lives of the cops endangered then? Tell me how. Some of these cops are sadistic.
 
Meaning it is not a race issue, right ?
Actually it is. That’s why it’s more from the white cops. With the black cops, there is a small minority that don’t value the lives of black suspects. I bet you they never roughed up any white suspects like they did Tyree Nichols.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
There were cops knocked out cold that day. A female cop testified before congress of that fact.
One female officer testified she was knocked unconscious after being pushed down and hitting her head on some steps. Who are the others among the "cops" plural you are stating. I cannot find any.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Actually it is. That’s why it’s more from the white cops. With the black cops, there is a small minority that don’t value the lives of black suspects. I bet you they never roughed up any white suspects like they did Tyree Nichols.
Could it possibly be more from white cops because there are many more white cops than black cops? Could that have anything to do with it?
 
Black cops, white cops. Even though it happens more with white cops, it don’t matter. A cop is a cop. Tyree Nichols’ life did not matter. 3 out of the 6 cops that killed Freddie Gray in Baltimore were black. Gray is handcuffed in the back of the police transport and they purposely drive erratic killing him. How were the lives of the cops endangered then? Tell me how. Some of these cops are sadistic.
Hard to understand why you are concerned about a drug dealer. I’m more concerned about the lives he affected by drug distribution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
Hard to understand why you are concerned about a drug dealer. I’m more concerned about the lives he affected by drug distribution.
So you are ok with someone getting the crap beat out of them by police and dying for no reason? So you are ok with cops purposely driving erratic killing a hand cuffed dude in the back of the police transport? You, the Boneman and others are some sadistic people.
 
So you are ok with someone getting the crap beat out of them by police and dying for no reason? So you are ok with cops purposely driving erratic killing a hand cuffed dude in the back of the police transport? You, the Boneman and others are some sadistic people.
I am concerned about innocent victims and not so much with criminals. If that makes me sadistic in your mind then so be it. You seem to be concerned about the well being of criminals. You are supporting the wrong people. Keep up the good fight.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT