What does this have to do with the expanded child tax credit, which you no doubt opposed as just another government handout? This is what they call a "whataboutism."
What does this have to do with the expanded child tax credit, which you no doubt opposed as just another government handout? This is what they call a "whataboutism."
In this thread, you're criticizing Biden and the Democrats because a program that they created that significantly reduced child poverty expired (largely thanks to a lack of Republican support), thus, the number of children in poverty returned to something more like its previous levels. But, you wouldn't have supported the program in the first place, so those kids would've just STAYED in poverty rather than moving out of it for a few months. If you don't support the expanded child tax credit, then you have absolutely no leg to stand on here. And if you DO support the expanded child tax credit, then you should be criticizing Manchin, Sinema, and every Republican who opposed its continuation, not the folks who created it in the first place.
In reality, I suspect that when your initial post was so easily proven false, you had to desperately seek out something, anything, that would support that post's underlying message -- that Joe Biden causes poverty -- lest you actually be forced to admit that you were wrong, that you hastily found this article and didn't bother to give it any thought. There's plenty of things to criticize the current administration for, but the expiration of a program (that you didn't agree with in the first place) thanks to the opposition party can't possibly be one of them, right? I mean, if you called on Joe Biden to reinstate the expanded child tax credit and get kids out of poverty, which party do you think would agree with you and which party do you think would disagree with you?