ADVERTISEMENT

☆☆☆☆OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY THREAD☆☆☆☆

oh well thank baby jesus the GAO is here! its still civil...fine trump if you want.
Ya' know, TSB...….ya' got a point !!
Nothing criminal about what the GAO found that the (President's) OMB was doing, in it's waylaying of the Congressionally approved $$'s for the Ukrainian appropriation !! It was just "ethically" wrong.
Sooooooo…...at such time as a Democratic president takes office...….let's just have a neverending
breaching of every single ethical standard known.... to a Republican house in Congress....
And let YOU explain to them, that the new President will just need the "FINE" $ amount..... to be paid by the Executive Branch !!

All good...no problemo !!
 
The argument always seems to be trump didn't break any law......that has been your (trumpers) threshold.
Now it's no big deal because it's only civil.

The Cult of Trump creed:

He didn't commit a crime
He might have committed a crime
He committed a crime, but so what ?

He didn't lie
He might have lied
What He meant to say was
He lied, but so what ?
 
BOMBSHELL!!!!

Oh if I had a $ for every time a lib uttered those words in the past 3 years.
If Republicans has an ounce of integrity left they’d feel the same. You wouldn’t have accepted a fraction of this from Obama. Just because you choose to ignore and bury your head doesn’t mean this isn’t really happening. These are bombshells, our country has never seen something like this before, someone so blatantly corrupt and criminal and the party protecting him.
 
Last edited:
Lev is in deep shit in the NY District courts. He's going to sing any song he thinks will help him.

He's gonna sing with texts, e-mails, and other documents that so far corroborate what the hearing said Trump and Rudy were up to. Dudes like Lev always cover their ass. Lev knows where the skeletons are, knows where the bodies are burried.
 
If Republicans has an ounce of integrity left they’d feel the same. You wouldn’t have accepted a fraction of this from Obama. Just because you choose to ignore and bury your head doesn’t mean this isn’t really happening.
I love you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
If Republicans has an ounce of integrity left they’d feel the same. You wouldn’t have accepted a fraction of this from Obama. Just because you choose to ignore and bury your head doesn’t mean this isn’t really happening. These are bombshells, our country has never seen something like this before, someone so blatantly corrupt and criminal and the party protecting him.
WTF are you even talking about in your liberal dreamland? You cuddling W since he lost his bet?
 
Ya' know, TSB...….ya' got a point !!
Nothing criminal about what the GAO found that the (President's) OMB was doing, in it's waylaying of the Congressionally approved $$'s for the Ukrainian appropriation !! It was just "ethically" wrong.
Sooooooo…...at such time as a Democratic president takes office...….let's just have a neverending
breaching of every single ethical standard known.... to a Republican house in Congress....
And let YOU explain to them, that the new President will just need the "FINE" $ amount..... to be paid by the Executive Branch !!

All good...no problemo !!
Do you have a speech impediment that shows up when you try and type bullsh!t?
 
The Cult of Trump creed:

He didn't commit a crime
He might have committed a crime
He committed a crime, but so what ?

He didn't lie
He might have lied
What He meant to say was
He lied, but so what ?
Or they just say all politicians lie.

The most ridiculous line came from @BoilerMadness a few days ago. Don't pay attention to what trump says, just what he does. Like what the President of the United States says doesn't matter, doesn't affect anything.
It shows a limited understanding of the power of the presidency and is a piss poor rationalization for a weak man's behavior.
 
You can tell when the right wingers on the board know things are bad, they ignore what’s happening like it’s the plague. I don’t think Hannity has been able to spin it yet so they don’t know what to say.

Wait, how could this be a scandal when there’s also been all those other scandals? Checkmate liberals.
Just rock solid mental acuity from hunkgolden.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: miksta and Mr_Scott
Or they just say all politicians lie.

The most ridiculous line came from @BoilerMadness a few days ago. Don't pay attention to what trump says, just what he does. Like what the President of the United States says doesn't matter, doesn't affect anything.
It shows a limited understanding of the power of the presidency and is a piss poor rationalization for a weak man's behavior.
Or the classic claim by another right-winger, here, who -when confronted by the equivalence of Trump's cataloged & fact-checked 13,000+ lies...... to the half-dozen/dozen that can be identified as belonging to anyone on the left....

" A liar is a liar".

Mind-numbing.
 
Or the classic claim by another right-winger, here, who -when confronted by the equivalence of Trump's cataloged & fact-checked 13,000+ lies...... to the half-dozen/dozen that can be identified as belonging to anyone on the left....

" A liar is a liar".

Mind-numbing.
Mind numbed pretty much sums your whole existence up W
 
Oh.
The Armistice is OFF ??
Just let me know.
It was when you were back on hiring a hitman to take me out and after the FU ? You lost its over you couldnt keep your big mouth shut for even a day. I have yet to call you a nasty name , swear at you or threaten to kill you as you have done to me so yeah I guess thats over.
 
It was when you were back on hiring a hitman to take me out and after the FU ? You lost its over you couldnt keep your big mouth shut for even a day. I have yet to call you a nasty name , swear at you or threaten to kill you as you have done to me so yeah I guess thats over.

The f'g DUMBEST PERSON WALKING GOD'S GREEN EARTH WOULD KNOW THAT THE god___n
HITMAN COMMENT WAS A JOKE. ABSOLUTELY NOBODY CAN POSSIBLY BE THAT STUPID.
NOBODY.

If it's throwdown time again.....just confirm it.
Last request for peace. Last.
 
Ya' know, TSB...….ya' got a point !!
Nothing criminal about what the GAO found that the (President's) OMB was doing, in it's waylaying of the Congressionally approved $$'s for the Ukrainian appropriation !! It was just "ethically" wrong.
Sooooooo…...at such time as a Democratic president takes office...….let's just have a neverending
breaching of every single ethical standard known.... to a Republican house in Congress....
And let YOU explain to them, that the new President will just need the "FINE" $ amount..... to be paid by the Executive Branch !!

All good...no problemo !!
classic w post. 2 air quotes, 8 unnecessary exclamation points, 3 unnecessary dollar signs, 33 unnecessary periods.
 
classic w post. 2 air quotes, 8 unnecessary exclamation points, 3 unnecessary dollar signs, 33 unnecessary periods.
classic TSB post: Ignorance to the 8th power. Unresearched material. Completely bogus claims.
Utter incapability of providing even a semblance of a rebuttal to posts that spit him out like a 2-dollar steak.

But !! / " "/ $ / ….. etc.
THAT's your reaction to your opportunity to make a credible reply.
Whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
Ya' know, TSB...….ya' got a point !!
Nothing criminal about what the GAO found that the (President's) OMB was doing, in it's waylaying of the Congressionally approved $$'s for the Ukrainian appropriation !! It was just "ethically" wrong.
Sooooooo…...at such time as a Democratic president takes office...….let's just have a neverending
breaching of every single ethical standard known.... to a Republican house in Congress....
And let YOU explain to them, that the new President will just need the "FINE" $ amount..... to be paid by the Executive Branch !!

All good...no problemo !!

Correct, there was nothing criminal. There may not have even been a civil vilolation. The constitutionality of the ICA is a coin toss.
Waylay?

No, the statutory remedy for violations of the ICA are clearly laid out. First, it involves an action by the comptroller. Nothing to do with impeachment. Again, history didn't being in 2016.

Go read the technicalities of what the GAO found. Hint: it involves reporting deadlines. I agree with the GAO's findings, but at the end of the day, this is absolutely nothing.

I would also recommend researching the recent findings of the GAO. Guess what? We would never have a president if we impeached based on GAO findings.

This was a quibble between branches. Exactly how it is supposed to be. Did the comptroller file suit? No? Why?
 
Last edited:
The reaction to the GAO report is a good indicator of who understands what is going on and who just reads headlines.

Yup. Obstruction.

"We consider a reluctance to provide a fulsome response to have constitutional significance. GAO’s role under the ICA—to provide information and legal analysis to Congress as it performs oversight of executive activity—is essential to ensuring respect for and allegiance to Congress’ constitutional power of the purse. All federal officials and employees take an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution and its core tenets, including the congressional power of the purse. We trust that State and OMB will provide the information needed."

https://www.gao.gov/products/B-331564
 
Yup. Obstruction.

"We consider a reluctance to provide a fulsome response to have constitutional significance. GAO’s role under the ICA—to provide information and legal analysis to Congress as it performs oversight of executive activity—is essential to ensuring respect for and allegiance to Congress’ constitutional power of the purse. All federal officials and employees take an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution and its core tenets, including the congressional power of the purse. We trust that State and OMB will provide the information needed."

https://www.gao.gov/products/B-331564

It literally can't be obstruction. Please. Read the statutory remedy.

Fun fact, Mitch is a proponent of Presidential impoundment. So was Thomas Jefferson and Barak Obama. 43 governors have the power to impound, but not the president. Why? Clinton, FDR, JFK....all used the power of impoundment.

History didn't begin in 2016 :)
 
Correct, there was nothing criminal. There may not have even been a civil vilolation. The constitutionality of the ICA is a coin toss.
Waylay?

No, the statutory remedy for violations of the ICA are clearly laid out. First, it involves an action by the comptroller. Nothing to do with impeachment. Again, history didn't being in 2016.

Go read the technicalities of what the GAO found. Hint: it involves reporting deadlines. I agree with the GAO's findings, but at the end of the day, this is absolutely nothing.

I would also recommend researching the recent findings of the GAO. Guess what? We would never have a president if we impeached based on GAO findings.

This was a quibble between branches. Exactly how it is supposed to be. Did the comptroller file suit? No? Why?
Let's just all take the non-stop flight to the destination, here.
The Impoundment Control Act is law that, here, comes into play in ruling on the OMB's decision to hold up the Congressionally authorized appropriation of the Ukrainian military funds.
Forget Impeachment.
Forget the questions that GOP Senators might have after reading the GAO ruling on the hold-up.

Like I said: No problem, here !! At such time as a future Democratic president orders the OMB to put a hold on Congressionally authorized funding......that President will just tell the GOP to go f___ themselves......no laws broken/indeterminant authority of the GAO to deal with matters as such !!
"Absolutely nothing" NOW... ".absolutely nothing " LATER.
 
Let's just all take the non-stop flight to the destination, here.
The Impoundment Control Act is law that, here, comes into play in ruling on the OMB's decision to hold up the Congressionally authorized appropriation of the Ukrainian military funds.
Forget Impeachment.
Forget the questions that GOP Senators might have after reading the GAO ruling on the hold-up.

Like I said: No problem, here !! At such time as a future Democratic president orders the OMB to put a hold on Congressionally authorized funding......that President will just tell the GOP to go f___ themselves......no laws broken/indeterminant authority of the GAO to deal with matters as such !!
"Absolutely nothing" NOW... ".absolutely nothing " LATER.

I'm not sure what is going on here.
 
TSB and Mr. Scott have also posted commentary on the GAO ruling. So not sure what form your confusion is taking.( 70 just posted a Lev Parnas clip.)

You do realize that Lev Parnas has nothing to do with the GAO statment...correct? The GAO statement has do with compliance. Do you understand that?

If you don't, ask 70.
 
I'm not sure what is going on here.
He's telling you that Trump did indeed break the law, however minor it was.

This has nothing to do with impeachment, just another example of Trump doing what he wants regardless of the guidelines or norms.......or laws. It also is more evidence of his total disregard for the responsibilities of Congress under the constitution to be a check on the executive branch.

He's also saying that when the next dem president wants to divert congressionally appropriated funds from defense to Medicare for all you'll be one of the first to see your pants.

It's also trump's first proven and clear violation of the law. You can't use that excuse anymore.........and you can hope it goes unnoticed and trump can continue to act like a monarch.
Not likely. The deep state is pushing back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miksta
He's telling you that Trump did indeed break the law, however minor it was.

This has nothing to do with impeachment, just another example of Trump doing what he wants regardless of the guidelines or norms.......or laws. It also is more evidence of his total disregard for the responsibilities of Congress under the constitution to be a check on the executive branch.

He's also saying that when the next dem president wants to divert congressionally appropriated funds from defense to Medicare for all you'll be one of the first to see your pants.

It's also trump's first proven and clear violation of the law. You can't use that excuse anymore.........and you can hope it goes unnoticed and trump can continue to act like a monarch.
Not likely. The deep state is pushing back.

I keep forgetting history began in 2016. :)

You can't divert defense to medicare. That isn't ICA. Come on bob. At least do the reading. This is 101. And you got an F.
 
Oh yeah. The comptroller is in 15 years of service and an Obama appointee.

For those that read...
 
You do realize that Lev Parnas has nothing to do with the GAO statment...correct? The GAO statement has do with compliance. Do you understand that?

If you don't, ask 70.

I never mentioned Lev Parnas. The GAO believes the administration obstructed their investigation. Noncompliance. Obstruction. Unconstitutional. Funny how often those words are used these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miksta
I never mentioned Lev Parnas. The GAO believes the administration obstructed their investigation. Noncompliance. Obstruction. Unconstitutional. Funny how often those words are used these days.

Okay buddy.

Sometimes its best to walk away. :)

Other posters...do you guys realize he is making things up? Literal gaslight.

As much as you love or hate the current administration you have to object to this spreading of lies.
 
Last edited:
I keep forgetting history began in 2016. :)

You can't divert defense to medicare. That isn't ICA. Come on bob. At least do the reading. This is 101. And you got an F.
Lol. If the president declares a national emergency, like Trump did with his wall, he/she can direct congressionally approved funds wherever the hell they want to. You don't know much about this works.

And BTW, when you idiots pull your "what about Obama" BS you don't seem to realize you're saying that when Obama did something wrong or broke the rules it was wrong.......but that it makes ok for trump to break the rules too. Not that Trump is better, more lawful, or has more integrity. Just that its ok because Obama did it too.
"Republicans. We're not better than the dems. We just use them as an excuse to break the rules too."
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT