BoilerDaddy said:

The game has changed and while Burgess may very well be a four at Purdue, he has the build of a five in the way that the game has evolved.

Click to expand...

I don’t know that it’s the build as much as the guard skills. I think a lot of people here would like to see a Robbie or a Vince type at the four, but it’s all about fit.

We’ve seen guys like Gillis and Eifert, who didn’t have guard skills, be hugely impactful because they can shoot the ball and neither had near the length or physical gifts of RB.

We might finish with over 200 yards in penalties.

qazplm said:

Yeah bud you're not worth responding to anymore.

Click to expand...

lol. This is good defense to you?

You need to watch some real football sometime.

RDGBoiler92 said:

Yes porath is the freshman kicker 1-2 today

Click to expand...

thanx

Yes porath is the freshman kicker 1-2 today

pboiler18 said:

The defense played OK. Which is a stark contrast from what it was before.

It’s still not good. It’s still not where it should be.

The offense…this makes the shoopfense look like like The Drew Brees Saints.

Click to expand...

Yeah bud you're not worth responding to anymore.

pboiler18 said:

The defense played OK. Which is a stark contrast from what it was before.

It’s still not good. It’s still not where it should be.

The offense…this makes the shoopfense look like like The Drew Brees Saints.

Click to expand...

checking in on the Mich game, they only have 51 yds passing so far in 3rd quarter, that's going to catch up on them vs a good team

Big help for the D using up that clock.

Purdue Grad in Texas said:

Purdue leads - FG breaks the scoreless tie, fittingly I suppose.

Click to expand...

who's doing the kicking today? the FR?

qazplm said:

If you want Walters gone, feel free to argue. If you want the OC gone, I'm right there with you.

If you can't admit the defense played a very good first half then you're just being contrarian.

Click to expand...

The defense played OK. Which is a stark contrast from what it was before.

It’s still not good. It’s still not where it should be.

The offense…this makes the shoopfense look like like The Drew Brees Saints.

Purdue leads - FG breaks the scoreless tie, fittingly I suppose.

A Purdue lead!!!!!!!!

Stop the count!!!

I do not like those short side runs....darn it.

This playcalling on O

Purdue offense - on the move......hand me some oxygen!

SIBoiler2 said:

I bet more people will vote for Harris because they don't like Trump than will vote for Harris because they believe that she's competent.

Click to expand...

Well either way, both scenarios speak of the jacked up nature of Chump and that he should be no where near the White House.

Roeder said:

Click to expand...

I hope they’re not still testing for PID’s!

Another successful 3rs down play. Go Mock!

Now the usual, lose 5 yards immediately on first play..

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Now a 100 yards of penalties.

Purdue Grad in Texas said:

I hear you - gotta find a way over the next 30 minutes - make some plays - dig deep, find inspiration......whatever.

Now, would I wager on it? I elect to defer on that.....haha.

Click to expand...

Whatever happens, the defense gets steak and lobster, unless there's a serious turnaround, the offense gets expired Saltines, no water.

Boiler Buck said:

I gave you a holistic view of his vision for tariffs. Does a holistic look only count for Dems.? I understand it's all the rage. You know....holisticly

Apparently, you disagree with T on tariffs. Since you are not voting for him why are you so concerned?

Scenario 1 ....I'm correct on what he is planning.
Scenario 2 ....I'm wrong.

Either way you're not voting for him under either scenario.....and under both you are going to believe what lib media tells you anyway . That's my holistic look at it you know. LOL

Click to expand...

Is this the way it's gonna be now? That's three times you've been asked to offer some kind of link or factual explanation for your statements and you've replied with a post mocking Harris. It almost seems like you have no answer, nothing to back up your statement, and are deflecting to making fun of a democrat. That's just like trump........only you have no audience to laugh and cheer at your childish remarks that would help them forget you didn't answer the question.

Why am I concerned that the possible future president didn't answer the policy question? UHHHHHHHH. Lol. Could you be more hypocritical? You and the other MAGA geniuses say the same thing about Harris multiple times EVERY DAY on this board.

You're not going to vote for Harris. Why do you care so much about her policies or whether she explains them? Could you be more clueless.......or have less self awareness? Unbelievable that you would post such garbage without realizing you are contradicting yourself. Never ceases to amaze me.

qazplm said:

I don't expect the defense to not collapse. It's almost impossible to spend as long as they have on the field and not give up a couple of touchdowns in the second half.

If this offense were just below average, I'd agree with you, but it's gotta be one of the worst in the nation and the defense can't be expected to hold up all game without the offense doing something.

Click to expand...

I hear you - gotta find a way over the next 30 minutes - make some plays - dig deep, find inspiration......whatever.

Now, would I wager on it? I elect to defer on that.....haha.