Voting Irregularities
- Thread starter Boilermaker03
- Start date
As has Trump. There were multiple key states in 2016 that Hillary was closer than Trump is now.
What was the % of mail in votes in 2016? How many dead people walked into the voting booth in 2016?
Stop listening to Rudy ... seriously. I mean i understand there are some legitimate reasons to question things, but Rudy is a complete mess.Real Clear Politics pulled the Pennsylvania call for Biden bringing him under 270.
2020 President Election - Live Results | RealClearPolitics
Latest Election 2020 Results • President • United States • Tuesday November 3rd • Presidential Election Detailswww.realclearpolitics.com
lol you are off the rails and really embarrassing yourself.
Trump lost. Move on.
Trump loves dumb guys. Go get some new bs to spew from Rudy. This day old crap has already spoiled.Real Clear Politics pulled the Pennsylvania call for Biden bringing him under 270.
2020 President Election - Live Results | RealClearPolitics
Latest Election 2020 Results • President • United States • Tuesday November 3rd • Presidential Election Details
Last edited:
She did do that. Then essentially retracted that concession by spending the next 4 years questioning the legitimacy of the election and claiming the election was stolen from her. The mainstream media and many prominent democrats played along and spent years trying to prove Hilary's claims.
Agree ... she didn’t behave well after the fact, but it doesnt change the fact she didn’t stand in the way of the transitoin.
I’d be shocked if Trump doesn’t make Hillary look graceful in comparison.
I don't care about punishing people who did or didn't lie on affidavits. Why are you deflecting to an irrelevant issue?
You're assuming a court is only legit if they agree with your position. Are you privy to the all the information the courts are seeing? Are you a lawyer or judge?
It's what you guys always do. Your accusations are facts and anyone that disagrees is compromised because they are biased or a different color or hate trump or are closet Dems.
As I said before, you and trump will not accept the results of the courts unless you get what you want. If you don't the court is somehow illegitimate or biased. Appeal.
The Clinton's have never taken responsibility for anything negative in ~40 years of public life--does "vast right wing conspiracy" ring any bells? As such, your attempt to defend Donald's behavior on the basis of Hillary's behavior misses the mark rather badly.
Plus, you must get your news exclusively from the right wing echo chamber. Set aside the question of whether the Trump campaign knowingly interacted with Russian intelligence, there is clear and incontrovertible evidence that Russia engaged in widespread efforts to disrupt the 2016 election. The Senate Intelligence Committee's report laid this out in incredible detail. The committee is chaired by a Republican not a Democrat so the report would not have been released without Republican approval. I know Donald and his enablers have so chummed the water with BS that people don't know what is true from what is false, but the facts are his own party concluded that Russia interfered with the 2016 election. So you can caste aspersions at the intelligence community, the Democrats, whomever else you want, but the simple truth is his own party concluded that beyond a shadow of a doubt Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Ergo, whatever else you believe about the Clintons, Hillary does have a legitimate gripe about Russia's role in 2016. Not a judgment on the merits or a defense of Hillary, but this attempt to whitewash 2016 and pretend Russia did nothing because Mueller did not find direct evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign does not mean that Russia did not act independently.
Umm . . . small issue with your argument. The GOP has spent the last three months bragging about how many new voters it registered from March to May, which was when there were actual lockdowns. Ergo, if that is proof of fraud, the GOP has a much bigger issue than the Dems do.
The above is misleading. Yes, the constitution does specifically use the word "legislature", but the Supreme Court has previously held multiple times that "legislature" in this context does not literally mean legislative body it means the process of governing. This is not even a close call. The USSC reasserted this view as recently as the 2015 term when it struck down the AZ legislature's attempt to invalidate a redistricting referendum adopted by the voters not the legislature. The court upheld the referendum because it was adopted and approved within the context of the legal process created by the AZ constitution, which is consistent with the USSC's interpretation of such clause. There is a reason none of the big name Republican election lawyers are involved in this process, specifically, they know that at present there is no basis for asserting a legally cognizable claim and they do not want to spend their time defending against a 12(b)(6) motion to make a man child feel better about himself.
Where did the Steele Dossier come from again? Which campaign paid for it? I'd say that impacted Trump team just a bit.
Uh I said yesterday when asked that Russia tried to interfere with 2016 election. They tried to interfere with 2020 election. It won't be a story in 2020, because democrats won the presidency. Foreign governments have been trying to influence our elections forever.
Russia isn't the reason Hilary lost the 2016 election. She lost because her unfavorable rating was almost as high as Trumps. She lost because she was lazy on the campaign trail, and thought she could coast to victory.....based on flawed polling data.
There's more evidence for vote fraud than there was for Russian collusion which FBI leadership knew was fake from the word go. I'm gonna need a special counsel and a year of investigations to make sure our votes were not effected by Russian meddling.
WINDY INDY and MIKSTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DONT LEAVE OUT PURDUEFAN1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DEMOCRATS
Looks like Trump's Nevada fraud claims are falling apart pretty rapidly. 170 of the supposed "irregularities" are tied to addresses on military bases where the underlying voter can continue to use the address even if they do not live there pursuant to federal law. I guess we will need to throw out VP Pence's vote in Indiana because he uses the Governor's mansion as his address to vote in Indiana under the related law applicable to politicians.
news3lv.com
Military wife accused in GOP voter fraud claim speaks out
The Trump Campaign this week called out what they claim to be "criminal voter fraud" here in the Silver State. "We are also confident that there are thousands of people whose votes have been counted that have moved out of Clark County during the pandemic,” said Adam Laxalt, Nevada’s former...
news3lv.com
WINDY INDY and MIKSTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DONT LEAVE OUT PURDUEFAN1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DEMOCRATS
CAPS
EMOJIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just as a reminder, the dossier was paid for by both Democrats AND Republicans. Not that it is really going to affect your argument, but the initial opposition research was paid to Fusion GPS by the conservative Washington Free Beacon.
IF there's no fraud. You forget that there's a ton of accusations of fraud. SO, let's just let it play out for ****s sake.
There are 0 credible accusations. Just saying there's fraud, doesn't make it so. Your entire list starting this thread is complete bullshit.
NO, a court is only legit if they follow the law. Lying under oath is bad enough, especially in a case such as this.
Depends on the age group. Were these record voter registrations in just the 90+ year old group? If so, I'd agree with you. Otherwise you're missing the argument here.
Every accusation thus far has been either debunked, or makes absolutely no sense to begin with. Your entire thinking is backwards. You've decided there's fraud, but don't know who, how, or where.
Problem is that in 2016 the media was all saying, Russia hacked the election. NOW they all say, the election is basically impossible to hack. Which is it?
LOL, no they haven't. I know that the MSM is telling you this, but that's not true at all.
Last edited:
And now we get back to the biggest issue our country faces, right wing people living in an alternate fact free reality. Every lawsuit keeps getting rejected, because they have no evidence whatsoever.
Hahaha "the biggest issue our country faces", how dramatic!
The only reality is the Democrat party is perfect reality, amirite?
Reality is based on evidence. Something that none of the right wing claims have. Of course it's the biggest issue. How can we ever solve the problems the country faces when the right wing is filled with unstable morons that can't understand the most basic information?
No, the biggest issue we face is a media that is constantly shaping the narrative by ignoring some stories for others.
Yes, you've droned on about "reality" hundreds of times here. You're the only one who lives in "reality" and all "right wingers" live in an alternate reality. We've heard the spiel before.
Democrats = perfect
Right wingers = evil in an alternate reality
Got it.
Actually. Yep. Read something beyond extreme right propaganda you potato.
Sorry, missed your edit and question. Can't understand the most basic information? Unstable morons?
We'll start simple. There are two sexes, male and female and the Democrat party is far from perfect.
Why can't left wingers like yourself understand this basic information? I'm not sure the right wing is the problem. It's of course the problem to you because the right wing gets in the way of you advancing the left wing agenda.
You got the 2nd part right. Mark Levin talking about the legislature overturning the will of the people, that's evil. Lawsuits getting thrown out because they don't have a shred of evidence, that's reality.
So when you say 900,000 people in Wisconsin registered to vote the day of the election, you have to prove that. Or that dead people voted, you have to show who the dead people are. That's how evidence works.
So far, the claims in Nevada of people voting that didn't live in the state have all been military members that were transferred to live/work somewhere else, they are allowed to vote in their home state. Did you realize that? Guessing none of your Youtube channels told you that.
WTF, Obama had Trump come to the White House to spread false information and keep him off track while he had the FBI lay the foundation for impeachment.
He than met with Biden and Rice and un masked anyone associated with Trump.
