Not when it's the enemy and supporters of terrorism. Too bad we didn't just drop a few bombs on the whole protest parade.I openly criticize laughing at people being killed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not when it's the enemy and supporters of terrorism. Too bad we didn't just drop a few bombs on the whole protest parade.I openly criticize laughing at people being killed.
I look for him to thump his chest, declare victory and move on......
I expect Trump to have a strong response to yesterdays rocket attacks. If Iran is testing him, they'll soon regret it.
WHAT F'g UNIVERSE DO YOU LIVE IN ??!! Do you not understand that there are another SEVEN BILLION people on Planet Earth, besides YOU ??
READ something, for Christ's sake !!! Presidential historians - those with decades of journalistic credentials, credibility and professional reputations.....HAVE ALREADY WEIGHED IN ON THIS SUBJECT !! UNDERSTAND. No more " time is needed, for the most part, for the consideration.
You and I don't count - UNDERSTAND ?? CAN YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU AND I AREN'T GOING TO BE RANKING THE WORLD'S MATHEMATICIANS OR PHYSICISTS ??
AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE RANKING THIS COUNTRY'S PRESIDENTS, EITHER !!
THEY are.
GET IT ??
You despise #44 and every thing he ever said or did. Whatever, Dude.
You're opinion is worth no more than all the other people in this country who don't have 1/1,000th of the
required background to ever be consulted about this.
ARE
WE
CLEAR
???
That's the same bullshit conservatives spouted in creating the Iraq War. If you don't support reckless military action then you actually support terrorists. It's lazy dishonest bullshit.What a surprise....you're taking the side of the enemy. Are you still mourning the death of Solemani? That poor bastard. Just dirt surfin now.
I love it when Israel bombs the hell out of the Hezbollah and Hamas after they launch an attack. I'd like to see the response be 20X, instead of 10X. Disproportionate..my ass. Teach them a lesson that there's a huge price to be paid.
I expect Trump to have a strong response to yesterdays rocket attacks. If Iran is testing him, they'll soon regret it.
You, me and no one else has any idea what our military and intelligence department knows. We just go off what we see in the news. Period. Then we form an opinion as to what we personally believe the response should or shouldn't be.That's the same bullshit conservatives spouted in creating the Iraq War. If you don't support reckless military action then you actually support terrorists. It's lazy dishonest bullshit.
Which is exactly what he should do - minus the chest thumping part. But he will because that's what he does.I look for him to thump his chest, declare victory and move on...
I look for him to thump his chest, declare victory and move on...
Trump has a chance to come out smelling like a rose on this.
You, me and no one else has any idea what our military and intelligence department knows.
Killing scores of civilians.Not when it's the enemy and supporters of terrorism. Too bad we didn't just drop a few bombs on the whole protest parade.
Killing scores of civilians.
Yeah, too bad.
We haven't been able to enjoy a World War and world condemnation in SUCH a long time, now !!!
You made one correct statement there, the market part, not a bad ratio for your typical posts.I realize this is a bad day for you...you know, Trump with another international victory, markets hitting new highs, Trump's approval rating growing again.
Don't worry, maybe someone will make a racist claim against him next week to take some of this shine off.
"Taking the side of the enemy"What a surprise....you're taking the side of the enemy. Are you still mourning the death of Solemani? That poor bastard. Just dirt surfin now.
I love it when Israel bombs the hell out of the Hezbollah and Hamas after they launch an attack. I'd like to see the response be 20X, instead of 10X. Disproportionate..my ass. Teach them a lesson that there's a huge price to be paid.
I expect Trump to have a strong response to yesterdays rocket attacks. If Iran is testing him, they'll soon regret it.
The Market has hit hundreds upon hundreds of "new highs" throughout the last eleven years. Hardly news. And hardly the result of Trump's one-of-a-kind economic stewardship..I realize this is a bad day for you...you know, Trump with another international victory, markets hitting new highs, Trump's approval rating growing again.
Don't worry, maybe someone will make a racist claim against him next week to take some of this shine off.
As luck would have it, I saw an interview with Mr. Lieberman this evening wherein he indicates he is still registered to vote as a Democrat and is one.I know the linked article describes Mr. Lieberman as a Democrat, but my recollection is that since 2006 when he became an Independent he has never rejoined the Democrats and has continually floated toward Republican affiliation despite caucusing with Democrats in the Senate, although never actually affiliating. I would appreciate any information you have that might update my mentioned recollections.
I know it absolutely grinds on you to see Trump having success internationally, but like I said before, I think even you might have enough intelligence to believe that Trump consulted a lot of experts before giving the OK to drop the bomb on Solemani's head.
He probably got a bunch of different opinions, evaluated them with his closest advisors, weighed the options and consequences, and then made a decision that he felt was best in America's interest.
That's called strength. That's called leadership.
thats some fake news. ap already reported on how it happened.Actually, he got angry watching tv. Blowing up Solemani was considered the most extreme option.
"After initially rejecting the Suleimani option on Dec. 28 and authorizing airstrikes on an Iranian-backed Shiite militia group instead, a few days later Mr. Trump watched, fuming, as television reports showed Iranian-backed attacks on the American Embassy in Baghdad, according to Defense Department and administration officials. By late Thursday, the president had gone for the extreme option. Top Pentagon officials were stunned."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/04/us/politics/trump-suleimani.html
Particularly a bad idea when there is a cell phone video seeming to show something that would be very hard to accept as an incident of engine failure occurring.apparently part of the response was to shoot a surface to air missile into a passenger plane. oops. then blame engine failure on a plane that can fly with one engine...
oh wow is there really a video? lol...those idiotsParticularly a bad idea when there is a cell phone video seeming to show something that would be very hard to accept as an incident of engine failure occurring.
Dub....that would be "God's sake"."Taking the side of the enemy"
You're just not "all there", bone. I did NO such thing, for Godssake.
Hell, for all we know...you'd actually prefer to send 150 ICBM's to Iranian targets, engaging Russia in potential thermonuclear engagement for both of OUR countries.
Settle down, Cowboy. The US does not have the legal or moral authority to engage Iran in a 10x, much less a 20x response to events THAT DON"T INVOLVE UNITED STATES TERRITORY OR ITS CIVILIANS !!
Know even a rudimentary amount of International Law ?? You know,...….7th grade-level stuff ??
Easy, now.
It was claimed that a student was outside with his cell phone and captured a bit of it. It's difficult to determine what is exactly going on but the light of the plane moves across the dark. There appears perhaps to be some movement, a bright flash than after a brief time a fireball at the crash site. It may well have been a fake or something else because I haven't been able to locate it since it was aired earlier.oh wow is there really a video? lol...those idiots
oh wow is there really a video? lol...those idiots
Here it is...It was claimed that a student was outside with his cell phone and captured a bit of it. It's difficult to determine what is exactly going on but the light of the plane moves across the dark. There appears perhaps to be some movement, a bright flash than after a brief time a fireball at the crash site. It may well have been a fake or something else because I haven't been able to locate it since it was aired earlier.
Oh, thanks, Mr. Merriam-Webster . Godsake or Godssake are slang combinations of two words. If I had to correct all of your spelling, punctuation and usage errors...……my hard drive would be shot....Dub....that would be "God's sake".
And...BTW, how did our sources know where those Iranian missiles were going to land with enough time to get folks out of harm's way? Think the Iranians decided to show a bit of bluster and informed us where they were aimed for to keep the wrath of Trump Hell from falling on their heads.
Suck me, you arrogant prick. Just because you were an end user in the Navy, especially related to boats and ship-related mission systems doesn't mean you know much about how most IRAD is done especially for other services or how company-funded IRAD works. It's NOT considered IRAD if the government pays for it directly. IRAD is company-funded internal research and development. CRAD is contract research and development. IRAD is not refunded directly by the government - it can be refunded via rates (indirectly), but that's only a fraction of the dollar.I'm painting with the proper brush. Yes, our acquisitions professionals are detached from the actual needs of field commanders, and make poor decisions based on shotty information usually informed by the contractors selling them proposals. More often than you apparently think, needs are written around proposals in order to funnel work to defense contractors. These are essentially sales calls. I am not accusing the acquisition corps of being dirty or underhanded. I am accusing them of being out of touch with what commanders actually need.
You are right. Defense contractors spend money on R&D, but it's more often than not funded by the government, and often results in limited practical utility to the military. There are only loose controls on this, and like everything else, are subject to political lobbies and sales pitches to politicians on the appropriate committees. The government shouldn't subsidize idiotic R&D ventures, but right now, those big contractors know that all they have to do is throw some stuff at the wall, and someone will buy it if they can produce a good enough sales pitch to the right politician. I'm speaking on this from personal experience. I have worked on mission systems which were purchased without a matching need, and then massaged into areas where maybe they could fit, until after about 20 years and billions of dollars spent it was determined that they were obsolete and did not fulfill the need. This happens all. the. time.
You're a conservative. You know about the importance of private industry. And you probably believe that private industry should be held to account for poor risk decisions... except, apparently, in defense, where you believe they should be given a blank check to do with as they please. Just yet another one of the great hypocrisies of conservatism these days...
We make ship building choices based on providing work to the shipyards that have the right politicians lobbying for them. We shoehorn systems developed by contractors at the risk of the contractor into defense uses in order to ensure that contractor doesn't lose too much money because they invested their own funds into it. In short - and you allude to this - we make acquisitions choices to keep the military-industrial complex running, not based on needs in the field. That's not right.
Do you know what a UONS is? Do you know how expensive it is to execute that? Are you aware that that's how we've fielded the majority of our active mission systems in the major theaters recently in order to react to threats we've known about for literally decades?
No, I don't think you have the first ****ing clue what you're talking about. But we can continue to do this if you want, and I can start listing systems and expenditures as examples while you spout off about generalities and other nonsense that has nothing to do with the acquisitions process because you're trying to equate it to a $1000 hammer. The system is broken. Period. McCain was right, but few other politicians are interested in fixing it because it's not in their best political or financial interest. Instead, the taxpayers pay for shit we don't need, add to the government debt, and idiots run around touting how great Trump is because he's given the DOD a blank check to continue burning tax dollars at a ridiculous rate because MAGA.
Come at me with your Wikipedia research and something you read on Fox News or talked to someone at the American Legion about, bro. You're out of your element.
Dub....that would be "God's sake".
And...BTW, how did our sources know where those Iranian missiles were going to land with enough time to get folks out of harm's way? Think the Iranians decided to show a bit of bluster and informed us where they were aimed for to keep the wrath of Trump Hell from falling on their heads.
Little bit touchy today? Since you need proof and links, here's proof.Oh, thanks, Mr. Merrium-Webster . Godsake or Godssake are slang combinations of two words. If I had to correct all of your spelling, punctuation and usage errors...……my hard drive would be shot....
Dude, quit posting material that is so full of demonstrable crap that it demands rebuttal.Dude...quit yelling. You're hurting my ears.
Can you READ ???!!!Little bit touchy today? Since you need proof and links, here's proof.
From Grammarist:
SPELLING
For God’s sake
By the usual standards of English grammar, the irreverent utterance of exasperation should be for God’s sake, with an apostrophe to show that god’s is possessive and with sake in the singular form, but the phrase appears idiomatically in several other forms—for example:
hmm hard to tell. but if that is the plane, that's the world's craziest engine failure...i'm gonna stay with shot down by iran...Here it is...
hmm hard to tell. but if that is the plane, that's the world's craziest engine failure...i'm gonna stay with shot down by iran...
hmm hard to tell. but if that is the plane, that's the world's craziest engine failure...i'm gonna stay with shot down by iran...
It almost sardonic given Iran's regular taking America to task over the Navy's terrible erroneous shoot down of Iran Air 655 by the USS Vincennes.Yup, that's how it's looking. Crazy sad and unnecessary.
He's frustrated Bone. He thinks you're not paying attention to him.Dude...quit yelling. You're hurting my ears.
You f'd it up Dubs. Plain and simple. You f'd it up. And now your lying Democrat side is trying to cover it up.Can you READ ???!!!
I'm DAMN sure I was aware of the correct usage of "God's sake" when I knowingly and deliberately used a slang, bastardized version of the expression.
Got it ?? Again, ….if you're having trouble reading these posts....there's a Junior High School within driving distance for you...….FULL of 7th-graders who can give you a hand !!!
You f'd it up Dubs. Plain and simple. You f'd it up. And now you're lying Democrat side is trying to cover it up.