dailycaller.com
www.johnlocke.org
A lot of women and girly men are much more driven emotionally. How else would one define their passion defying logical reasoning? If the polls are correct...how does anyone reconcile ole Joe getting over a percent...his policies?It's almost funny that the very DEI that these college women have bought into resulted in this admin's new woke DEI regulations that have kept things from getting done. For example they only have 7 or 8 EV charging stations complete after budgeting tons of $ for thousands of them a couple years ago. Couple of articles on this below.
"2004+ Female effect".... as seen, Younger college women have been poling heavy for Dems since around then. Easily manipulated in the victim-victimizer Marxist DEI training in college.
Children especially, paying taxes and the wisdom of age seem to gradually shift priorities slightly in older women who don't poll as heavy for Dems.
‘It’s All A Mess’: Internal Documents Reveal How DEI Requirements Are Hamstringing Biden’s EV Agenda
President Joe Biden's goal of building half a million electric vehicle charging stations across the United States by 2030 is being delayed by DEI requirements.
Biden’s ‘Equity’ Rules Holding Back EV Charging Stations
Joseph Simonson of the Washington Free Beacon explains how one bad Biden administration policy is thwarting another bad Biden administration policy. In 2021, the Biden administration pledged it would build 500,000 electric vehicle charging stations by 2030. So far, it’s built seven. Last month...
Just out of curiosity, do you believe one can logically prefer a circumstance that costs them more money due to factors other than money? Or does logic dictate that money must be the only factor in all decisions?
I'm not sure the specifics really matter that much, as people could have different sets of things they would put before money. I was just wondering if you felt it was possible to choose, for logical reasons, an outcome that costs more money. So, since you've identified some of those possible reasons yourself, I'd suggest that your statement "it certainly isn't based on logic when Biden policies have cost every family $7-12,000 per year" can't actually be true. It COULD, in fact, be based on logic.
I mean, your statement that Republicans are mostly logical and Democrats are mostly emotional is simply your opinion. Were I to say the opposite, it would just be my opinion. And, both of those positions ignore that people can be logical, but fall victim to fallacies or lack of sufficient knowledge to make and informed decision (see Dunning-Kruger), thus resulting in a voting position that is NOT based on emotion, and yet still is not supported by reality. Humans are flawed thinkers, even when trying not to be. We also do not have access to the minds of the people we'd be talking about. We might think someone is making an emotional decision when they're not, or think someone is making a logical decision when they're not. So, I don't see much point in having an argument in which neither side of it could possibly be demonstrated to actually be true.
Examples that you can't demonstrate are actually emotional (you just THINK they are), or that someone couldn't arrive at those positions logically. That was my point.
It doesn't matter one iota to the idea that you've already acknowledged that logic could lead someone to hold a position that is more expensive for them.
I'll gladly demonstrate being NON-emotional by rejecting your attempt to bait me into your desired response by calling me a coward. I have no emotional (nor logical or intellectual, for that matter) need to prove my courage, or whatever, to you.
There are WAYYYYYYY too many reasons to not push the button for Biden. Rather, reduce the list by asking what reason (maybe more than one?) someone would vote for Biden...just don't read it while drinking or eating something.
there are idiots on both sides. No question about that, but look at the people that are elected and it is easy to see the dems hold the majority of idiots. We also know that women typically are more emotional than men. We know women prefer things of interest that deal with people and men prefer things more than people. AGain, A Conflict of Visions lays out each side pretty well.
one day when you get out in the real world your thoughts might grow rather than the indoctrination you've had.
By naming factors that you'd put above money, you've agreed with me that people might legitimately put other factors above money. Not sure what's difficult to understand about that.
But they could be. It's hyperbolic, but let's say one party wants to raise your taxes but the other wants to imprison your family. You'd choose the taxes, right? Or one party wants to raise your taxes but the other wants to outlaw religion. Same deal, yes?
