Whaaaat? No liberals say "reasonable" gun control laws will fix gun violence? Then what are these so called "reasonable" gun control laws supposed to do? Everytime there is a shooting, liberals say we need more gun control. So they're saying it won't solve anything, but we need it anyways? Thanks for explaining liberal logic to me.
We do have DUI laws and it doesn't stop everything. We do have gun control laws and it doesnt stop everything. It's when you start taking liberties away from law abiding citizens to justify your liberal "solutions" to problems that can't be fixed that I have a problem with. If gun control laws fix anything, how's come all these mass killings are done in "no gun zones"? Do laws do anything to stop those that dont care about the law?
I'm trying to deciphre this word salad, so tell me where I went wrong:
1. You think if it doesn't solve something 100%, then it isn't necessary.
2. We have laws against DUIs, but since it doesn't "stop everything" it's a waste of time.
3. Thus, since people will still use guns to kill, we shouldn't have laws on gun control because they can't stop all killing.
Oh and I guess 4. would be that you think "liberal" are saying that something (in that case gun control law) won't solve everything, but we need it anyways is "liberal logic."
One assumes you feel the same way about all criminal laws...murder, rape, larceny, etc...because there isn't a law in existence that stops all crime it is designed to address.
That would seem to be just plain old logic to me. You pass laws with the understanding that you won't stop every last person but that you will stop some, or make it harder for some, which would thereby reduce the occurrence of the crime you are seeking to reduce.
But apparently you think it's "liberal logic."