ADVERTISEMENT

White armed Portage man batters cop. Arrested, not killed by police.

That is my point in all of this. This white dude was armed and scuffling with the cop that he INJURED. Why didn't the cop fear for his life in this instance?
Why you asking me? I wasn't the cop in the situation. But, what you're insinuating is that had the perp been black, he would have been shot. Maybe that's true, maybe not.
Then, the story would have changed to him being shot BECAUSE he was black, not because he was assaulting a cop. (and again, just to be clear, all white people who assault a cop deserve to be shot).

Do you realize how many interactions cops have with black people on a daily basis where nobody is shot?
 
Ebullient. Cool, nice word. No I wouldn't be ebullient. I'm just trying to prove my point that cops value the lives of whites they encounter than blacks. Also, trying to prove my point that unarmed blacks are killed more than unarmed whites. This dude in Portage was armed and he wasn't killed. Or tuned up as bonefish1 would put it.
He definitely deserved to get tuned up. Had he been shot for assaulting a cop, I'm good with that as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
It appears that, as with the rest, you are whining that a white guy did not die at the hands of police. The difference is that we dont try to put a halo on our criminals.

Yeah and if he would have been killed, our response would be exactly the same as if he was black or brown or purple... play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
Previous similar situations. Martin family, Brown family (mom bought a new car with GoFundMe burial contributions), to name a couple. Yes, I triggered you, bobbie, but the chances are quite good.
Oh yeah. You site a whole two other occurrences and and don't show that they ran through all their cash. You don't even prove your statement and your evidence is weak. Maybe their car was old and they needed another one.....or didn't have one. Must have been a Ferrari to go through all the money.

What's similar about the situations is you made a generalization about a group of people. The black familes got a bunch of money from a lawsuit and went and blew it all. That was your immediate reaction based on two other examples that don't make your point. So I guess I get to draw a conclusion about you based on a similar amount of evidence.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
Oh yeah. You site a whole two other occurrences and and don't show that they ran through all their cash. You don't even prove your statement and your evidence is weak. Maybe their car was old and they needed another one.....or didn't have one. Must have been a Ferrari to go through all the money.

What's similar about the situations is you made a generalization about a group of people. The black familes got a bunch of money from a lawsuit and went and blew it all. That was your immediate reaction based on two other examples that don't make your point. So I guess I get to draw a conclusion about you based on a similar amount of evidence.
When Rittenhouse blows through all of the money he may get, these folks on here will be so quiet that you can hear a mouse piss on cotton.
 
Yeah and if he would have been killed, our response would be exactly the same as if he was black or brown or purple... play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
This 100%.

Why is it that Democrats defend criminals and criminalize law enforcement?
( I know, I know, January 6th, blah blah blah).
 
When Rittenhouse blows through all of the money he may get, these folks on here will be so quiet that you can hear a mouse piss on cotton.
Where's all that money going that Bob donated to BLM?

 
When Rittenhouse blows through all of the money he may get, these folks on here will be so quiet that you can hear a mouse piss on cotton.
Everyone in the Brown family just trying to make a buck (and apparently brawling over it. Including hitting grammy with a pipe!) i love this $hit.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: SKYDOG
When Rittenhouse blows through all of the money he may get, these folks on here will be so quiet that you can hear a mouse piss on cotton.
Rittenhouse will be able to buy his own island once CNN, MSNBC and even Biden settle with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goboilers2
Oh yeah. You site a whole two other occurrences and and don't show that they ran through all their cash. You don't even prove your statement and your evidence is weak. Maybe their car was old and they needed another one.....or didn't have one. Must have been a Ferrari to go through all the money.

What's similar about the situations is you made a generalization about a group of people. The black familes got a bunch of money from a lawsuit and went and blew it all. That was your immediate reaction based on two other examples that don't make your point. So I guess I get to draw a conclusion about you based on a similar amount of evidence.
I know youre still taking a knee for Floyd, bobbie, but prove me wrong and show me one example of a family using a large payout to better the community.
 
This 100%.

Why is it that Democrats defend criminals and criminalize law enforcement?
( I know, I know, January 6th, blah blah blah).
Yeah, you are the one that brought up Jan 6. Speaking of defending criminals. Who the ones defending a woman that was killed breaking the law at the Capitol? Who are the ones defending 2,000 crazed cult following lunatics beating the crap out of Capitol and Metro police officers? Who are ones that said that those lunatics were tourists. Or they stood behind the rope? Give me a break.
 
Yeah, you are the one that brought up Jan 6. Speaking of defending criminals. Who the ones defending a woman that was killed breaking the law at the Capitol? Who are the ones defending 2,000 crazed cult following lunatics beating the crap out of Capitol and Metro police officers? Who are ones that said that those lunatics were tourists. Or they stood behind the rope? Give me a break.
The reason I brought up Jan 6th was a preemptive strike because I know that's basically you, Bob and the other lefty/libs go-to when it comes to any discussion of white people breaking the law.

And, correct me if I'm wrong, but who on here has defended them. I think most everyone on here has condemned that behavior and said it was wrong. How much more plainly does it need to be explained to you?
 
I proudly donated to Kyle's defense fund.
So did I. He's an American Hero.
Yet the numbnuts in Minneapolis put up a statue honoring a violent, multiple time, drug dealing felon. What's wrong with this picture?
 
The reason I brought up Jan 6th was a preemptive strike because I know that's basically you, Bob and the other lefty/libs go-to when it comes to any discussion of white people breaking the law.

And, correct me if I'm wrong, but who on here has defended them. I think most everyone on here has condemned that behavior and said it was wrong. How much more plainly does it need to be explained to you?
I know the reason that you did.

Most of the conservatives on this board defends them. Definitely don’t want to talk about it. Deflect to something else when I bring it up. Conservative law makers that have called them just tourists and naturally Faux News.
 
I once was at a party underage in Portage during the Bulls first championship run, it was game 3 against the Lakers, they don’t mess around, they were throwing people against walls, I skated because this night I wasn’t drinking, they tested me. Not the nicest of guys back in those days.
What lesson(s) did you learn that night?
 
I know youre still taking a knee for Floyd, bobbie, but prove me wrong and show me one example of a family using a large payout to better the community.
Prove you wrong? You haven't even remotely come close to proving your statement in the first place. You made the claim.......should be easy enough to Google and show how these black families blew their lawsuit money. I'm not saying you're wrong, but to make a claim like that you should probably know what the hell you're talking about.

I don't know. Did the families claim they were going to use all the money to better the community? Part of the money? Can we fuss about them using the money to make their lives better?

Making fun of my name really doesn't strengthen your argument.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
I know the reason that you did.

Most of the conservatives on this board defends them. Definitely don’t want to talk about it. Deflect to something else when I bring it up. Conservative law makers that have called them just tourists and naturally Faux News.
Let's name names. Who are the conservatives on this board defended the actions of Jan 6th?

There's a difference between not condemning it and not believing it was the national disaster many libs make it out to be.

But, how much more strongly does someone have to make their point that they disagree with and condemn the actions of those who took part in Jan 6th to satisfy you?
 
Let's name names. Who are the conservatives on this board defended the actions of Jan 6th?

There's a difference between not condemning it and not believing it was the national disaster many libs make it out to be.

But, how much more strongly does someone have to make their point that they disagree with and condemn the actions of those who took part in Jan 6th to satisfy you?
Pretty much all of of y'all said that Ashii Bobbitt was unjustly killed by the cop. At the same time saying nothing about the cops getting their butts whooped inside and outside by the Chump cult lunatics.
 
Pretty much all of of y'all said that Ashii Bobbitt was unjustly killed by the cop. At the same time saying nothing about the cops getting their butts whooped inside and outside by the Chump cult lunatics.
Again, I just said nearly every conservative on this board condemned the actions on Jan 6th. Almost to a person, we said they were in the wrong and shouldn't have done that.

Again, I think your problem isn't that we condemn it, it's that we're not jumping up and down screaming about it, therefore, you don't think we condemn it strongly enough.

Maybe that's one of the differences between libs and conservatives? Libs have to get hysterical, scream, cry, and lash out, while conservatives don't feel the need to get all emotional.
 
Again, I just said nearly every conservative on this board condemned the actions on Jan 6th. Almost to a person, we said they were in the wrong and shouldn't have done that.

Again, I think your problem isn't that we condemn it, it's that we're not jumping up and down screaming about it, therefore, you don't think we condemn it strongly enough.

Maybe that's one of the differences between libs and conservatives? Libs have to get hysterical, scream, cry, and lash out, while conservatives don't feel the need to get all emotional.
Y'all are sure having hissy fits over Hunter Biden and his transgressions.
 
That is my point in all of this. This white dude was armed and scuffling with the cop that he INJURED. Why didn't the cop fear for his life in this instance?

Back to the original topic ... did you ONLY read the headline?

From the article ...

"Jillson reportedly resisted being taken into custody, during which time the officer's hand was injured. Jillson was also found with a loaded pistol in his sweatshirt, police said."

1. The gun was apparently found on him during, or likely after, the arrest. The fact that they said they found it in his sweatshirt leads me to believe it was the later.
2. Is an officer having their hand injured while attempting to subdue someone resisting arrest something uncommon?

If anything the headline is misleading and the info provided incomplete. We don't know how much he was resisting, if the cop even knew he was armed at the time, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
Again, I just said nearly every conservative on this board condemned the actions on Jan 6th. Almost to a person, we said they were in the wrong and shouldn't have done that.

Again, I think your problem isn't that we condemn it, it's that we're not jumping up and down screaming about it, therefore, you don't think we condemn it strongly enough.

Maybe that's one of the differences between libs and conservatives? Libs have to get hysterical, scream, cry, and lash out, while conservatives don't feel the need to get all emotional.
And nearly every "conservative" here has tried to diminish and minimize 1/6 by trying to equate it with the BLM protests.

You don't condemn it strongly enough......which is clearly demonstrated when you compare it to BLM or anything else. It's clear now there was a conspiracy by trump admin personnel, members of Congress, and right wing activists to stop the certification process and the transfer of power. It's clear now that the Oath keepers and other right wing groups were organized, there was a plan, there were weapons brought to DC.
Yeah, most here admit there were violent acts that day and have called for the punishment of those involved. Kudos. But if you can't admit to the reasoning behind the violence, the intent of those involved, and the significance of trying to alter the results of a democratic election, the other stuff doesn't mean much.
 
And nearly every "conservative" here has tried to diminish and minimize 1/6 by trying to equate it with the BLM protests.

You don't condemn it strongly enough......which is clearly demonstrated when you compare it to BLM or anything else. It's clear now there was a conspiracy by trump admin personnel, members of Congress, and right wing activists to stop the certification process and the transfer of power. It's clear now that the Oath keepers and other right wing groups were organized, there was a plan, there were weapons brought to DC.
Yeah, most here admit there were violent acts that day and have called for the punishment of those involved. Kudos. But if you can't admit to the reasoning behind the violence, the intent of those involved, and the significance of trying to alter the results of a democratic election, the other stuff doesn't mean much.
It's so god damn funny for you to lecture people about altering a democratic election after what the dems tried to pull in 2016. When you admit the scale and scope of what was attempted I might give you an ounce of credibility. Until then.... LOL. You're bitchin about oath keepers and guys dressed like buffalos. I'm talking about submitting false information to the FBI, tweeting about it, and then using secrets courts to spy on your political opponents.
 
It's so god damn funny for you to lecture people about altering a democratic election after what the dems tried to pull in 2016. When you admit the scale and scope of what was attempted I might give you an ounce of credibility. Until then.... LOL. You're bitchin about oath keepers and guys dressed like buffalos. I'm talking about submitting false information to the FBI, tweeting about it, and then using secrets courts to spy on your political opponents.
I guess I forgot to include Russia Russia Russia as another false comparison that pinheads like you keep bringing up.......... saying it was all made up and a witch hunt. No reason for the investigation right? Who was spyed on BTW? How did anybody try to alter the 2016 election? Your memory failing or just making stuff up?

So your position is.........you're going to ignore or or mischaracterize 1/6 until you get.........what.......another investigation of the investigation? A different outcome than Mueller? A pound of flesh from Strzok? Or you want me to admit to what, exactly? Why don't we wait another 3 years for Durham to tell us?
 
And nearly every "conservative" here has tried to diminish and minimize 1/6 by trying to equate it with the BLM protests.

You don't condemn it strongly enough......which is clearly demonstrated when you compare it to BLM or anything else. It's clear now there was a conspiracy by trump admin personnel, members of Congress, and right wing activists to stop the certification process and the transfer of power. It's clear now that the Oath keepers and other right wing groups were organized, there was a plan, there were weapons brought to DC.
Yeah, most here admit there were violent acts that day and have called for the punishment of those involved. Kudos. But if you can't admit to the reasoning behind the violence, the intent of those involved, and the significance of trying to alter the results of a democratic election, the other stuff doesn't mean much.
Just for you and others let’s put signs in our yards condemning the insurrection on January 6th. I’ll get some bumper stickers and T-shirts made up and sell them on a website with the proceeds going to all the illegal immigrants coming into the country daily. Might help them pay for the shortage of baby formula.
 
Just for you and others let’s put signs in our yards condemning the insurrection on January 6th. I’ll get some bumper stickers and T-shirts made up and sell them on a website with the proceeds going to all the illegal immigrants coming into the country daily. Might help them pay for the shortage of baby formula.
That would be great. Appreciate it.
 
Just for you and others let’s put signs in our yards condemning the insurrection on January 6th. I’ll get some bumper stickers and T-shirts made up and sell them on a website with the proceeds going to all the illegal immigrants coming into the country daily. Might help them pay for the shortage of baby formula.

ha ha. Bob's response is pretty much what I expected. We didn't condemn it "strongly" enough.

So, saying something was wrong, that we didn't agree with it and there should be punishment wasn't enough? I guess we were supposed to burn, loot, murder (BLM) in the streets to show a much stronger condemnation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT