Can’t wait to see how the Chumptowners defend this. This man cannot help himself. He falls right in line with typical narcissists. He runs his businesses and his presidential administration like a cosa nostra. His lawyers like Giuliani, Cohn, Cohen, and others were no more than consiglieres. And they want this man to be president again. Unbelievable.
What do you expect from someone who's on what, his 4th or 5th political persecution where the case they bring against him has no teeth? Not to mention two bogus impeachments. Not the right thing for him to say at all, but I 100% understand where he's coming from.
Right on cue, here come the Chump apologists. What makes it worse is folks on here claim that they don’t like him but defend him to no end. The man y’all support is a child that never grew up. I bet you he had no friends growing up. Probably got bullied all the time. Chump proves that he is very unfit for president everytime he opens his mouth. Please, republicans, y’all can do better than this.
You know you hit a nerve when the name calling comes. Just like another old saying. When you throw a rock at a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one you hit
You think the classified documents case has no teeth? The new one either? I would about agree the NY case……..they are reaching with regard to the law and it seems political. The only chance he has in Florida is a friendly judge and the jury is coming from a trump district. How’s that for persecution?
The ONLY case they remotely had are the classified documents, but even that was a reach. This one is just as political as the NY case. 100%. They are prosecuting him essentially for political speech and what they think he believed. The burden of proof will be near impossible and this will be a MASSIVE smack to free speech if some idiotic left wing jury decides to convict.
They are not. You obviously are getting you information from the MAGA media. That’s exactly what they are saying. Read it yourself.
You clearly haven't read the indictment. It has nothing to do with his speech, it has to do with his actions. There is a clear delineation in the indictment.
@BuilderBob6 His actions based on what he believed. They are asserting that he knew what he was doing was wrong. That's the issue. There is no way they can prove that Trump didn't truly believe the election was stolen.
No, I don't listen to any MAGA media.
The usual suspects, right wing media radio stations. There are a whole bunch of terrestrial right wing radio stations thanks to Reagan or Bush that got rid of the fairness doctrine. Then there is the “Patriot” channel 126 on SiriusXM. I take a peek at that station from time to time until Hannity and Mark Levin come on. Then of course you have Faux News. The evening line up is unwatchable with Watters, Ingraham, Hannity, and Gutfeld. They try to out jackass each other every night. They are full tilt MAGA.
You mean testimony from people around him saying he knew he lost the election wouldn’t be proof? Members of his admin, WH counsel and others telling him he lost but he chooses to believe Powell, who he called a crackpot. Willful blindness is also an issue.
Looks like you prefer the KAASHA networks. You know Biden and Obama's Keep America A Shithole Always agenda.
You're still saying that after ducking my reply to you on the other thread?
No, that wouldn't be proof, because they cannot possibly know what Trump was thinking. Trump absolutely thought the election was stolen. That's different than knowing the vote totals weren't in his favor.
A phone call to a state official in itself is not illegal. What the conversation entailed to that state official was also not illegal. Liberal media wanted to twist it into something it wasn't, but there was nothing wrong with the phone call.
Again, I think there was precedent on the alternate electors in 1960.
Again, you're condemning his words. There's no action taken here. He said he liked something, but if he didn't do it, then there's no legal action possible.
Based on substantial prior evidence, I certainly believe Hunter and Joe's business partner Devon Archer per his sworn testimony last week. Don't you, Bob?
Since you don't watch them, how do you know that?
Which means Pence will be able to testify that Trump's lawyers were advising him that what he wanted to do was legal. More proof that Trump truly believed the election was stolen from him.
The charge is, as I understand it, that he broke the law because he knew that what he was saying was false and that what he was trying to do was illegal. But according to Turley (supported indirectly by Pense), "What the indictment says is lots of people told Trump that the election wasn't stolen and that the challenge, the certification was invalid. Well, fine. I was one of those people saying that. But he had other people saying the opposite. He had attorneys, not a small number saying, ‘No, you can make these challenges"
Faux News is the most watched network on TV. I find it amazing that no one that appears to be conservative will admit that they watch this network or listen to conservative radio. Some one is watching and listening.
Have any examples of Ingraham spreading lies? Since you say she is, you must have some examples? What are they?
Do you believe ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN also lies daily to their viewership?
On what basis are you saying the facts are not in dispute?
You can't even break the law based on what you know if you're a Democrat. Hillary knew she set up the whole Russia thing but insisted Trump didn't legitimately win because he had Russian assistance.
Just one of many. Just watch sometime.
There you go again, posting something you either haven't read or don't understand.Just one of many. Just watch sometime.
Fox News hosts thought Trump’s election fraud claims were ‘total BS’, court filings show
Comments by Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham revealed in $1.6bn Dominion defamation lawsuitwww.theguardian.com
You are missing the point. The opposite is what happened. Behind the scenes, the Faux News hosts did not agree with Sydney Powell. But on air they would spread the Chump lies that the Dominion machines were changing votes. That’s what got Faux News in trouble and the reason they lost the law suit. This case is just a very small sample size of the many whoppers they told. Hence the reason I’ve been calling them Faux News for years. Again I used to like that network and watched all the time. Not no mo.
