This is what happens. They think they can get away with anything.
So is this the "a Democrat was involved in something somewhat similar decades ago so I shouldn't be concerned about it now" defense?
Oh I’m not defending anyone. Just laughing at all of the libs setting themselves on fire over Trump.So is this the "a Democrat was involved in something somewhat similar decades ago so I shouldn't be concerned about it now" defense?
Maybe you should care more about governmental ethics and the rule of law?Oh I’m not defending anyone. Just laughing at all of the libs setting themselves on fire over Trump.
When did you start caring about these things?Maybe you should care more about governmental ethics and the rule of law?Oh I’m not defending anyone. Just laughing at all of the libs setting themselves on fire over Trump.
Always have. When will you?When did you start caring about these things?
And you voted for Bill and Hillary?Always have. When will you?When did you start caring about these things?
Completely false equivalence. Or are you one of those people that think the Clinton's have left a trail of bodies in their wake? I know that's a favorite topic on the spam sites that right wingers frequent.And you voted for Bill and Hillary?
Completely false equivalence. Or are you one of those people that think the Clinton's have left a trail of bodies in their wake? I know that's a favorite topic on the spam sites that right wingers frequent.
This is where I disagree. Trump sucks as a person but has been a good president thus far.Completely false equivalence. Or are you one of those people that think the Clinton's have left a trail of bodies in their wake? I know that's a favorite topic on the spam sites that right wingers frequent.
I've never understood trying to leverage who someone voted for as a debate point. Voting for someone doesn't lock you in to allegiance for the entirety of their time in office. I am comfortable saying I voted for Hillary. I am also comfortable saying I do not have malice or judge people solely based on voting for Trump. One of the two was going to be president, so I like many voted for the one hat best aligned with my policy wants.
Hillary sucks, and it is OK for some of you to admit that Trump, as a President, sucks as well. His administration is full of abusers and crooks, and they should be held accountable. Same goes for any D.
I felt the same about Clinton. Sucked as a person but was a good president.Completely false equivalence. Or are you one of those people that think the Clinton's have left a trail of bodies in their wake? I know that's a favorite topic on the spam sites that right wingers frequent.
I've never understood trying to leverage who someone voted for as a debate point. Voting for someone doesn't lock you in to allegiance for the entirety of their time in office. I am comfortable saying I voted for Hillary. I am also comfortable saying I do not have malice or judge people solely based on voting for Trump. One of the two was going to be president, so I like many voted for the one hat best aligned with my policy wants.
Hillary sucks, and it is OK for some of you to admit that Trump, as a President, sucks as well. His administration is full of abusers and crooks, and they should be held accountable. Same goes for any D.
I've never understood trying to leverage who someone voted for as a debate point. Voting for someone doesn't lock you in to allegiance for the entirety of their time in office. I am comfortable saying I voted for Hillary. I am also comfortable saying I do not have malice or judge people solely based on voting for Trump. One of the two was going to be president, so I like many voted for the one hat best aligned with my policy wants.
Hillary sucks, and it is OK for some of you to admit that Trump, as a President, sucks as well. His administration is full of abusers and crooks, and they should be held accountable. Same goes for any D.
lol. Sometimes you have to wonder if Trump isn't just sitting around trying to think of stupid things to say to see how far he can go and still have these people defend him.
He creates a new low every week. Yet they are still there.
So many of us here who have voted for years have liked everything about the people we voted for?Go past the allegiance part. Voting for someone or either something does not mean one likes everything about the person or topic. That is not understood by many and maybe a handful at most here.
So many of us here who have voted for years have liked everything about the people we voted for?
Of course people understand they may not like everything about the person they vote for.........they experience it themselves.The only ones who don't are the true believers who don't think for themselves.
Sounds like you're trying to run cover for the Trump supporters who used to defend his every word and action while denying his character issues and ineptitude. Revisionist history is popping up everywhere. If his voters had issues with him when he was elected they sure didn't talk about it.
"Ok Alex, I'll take the category of 'No Respect for Rule of Law' for $200."["There are many other reasons to not support him (...no respect for rule of law..)"]
A lot of accusations, can we show a little proof of the above.
Actually no proof Trump caused any of this. Pulling out of the Paris Accord did nothing but save the US tax payer money. China wasn't going to reduce emissions. If the environmentalists had any gonads they would boycott China goods instead of bashing Trump.
"Ok Alex, I'll take the category of 'No Respect for Rule of Law' for $200."
"Very well. And the answer is...
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...nne-conway-s-hatch-act-violations-ncna1017471"
"No, I’m not going to fire her. I think she's a terrific person... I think you’re entitled to free speech in this country."I didn't realize Kellyanne Conway was named Donald Trump. All POTUS have had persons in their administrations mess up. This IMO is pretty minor. Do you think if it was in the Obama administration It would be newsworthy?
Post a link to that.....please.So where is the line drawn. Conway can't make positive comments for Trump but FBI officials, involved in a collusion investigation, are allowed to donate to the HRC campaign? All 15 of them?
I don't have a link to the not so festive HRC after the election non celebration. But if I did you would find a number of these public officials in attendance.Post a link to that.....please.
And stop deflecting for freaking sake.
So where is the line drawn. Conway can't make positive comments for Trump but FBI officials, involved in a collusion investigation, are allowed to donate to the HRC campaign? All 15 of them?
One was there.....one. Andrew Weissman. You are nothing but a Trump hack who believes all the BS he spouts.I don't have a link to the not so festive HRC after the election non celebration. But if I did you would find a number of these public officials in attendance.
One was there.....one. Andrew Weissman. You are nothing but a Trump hack who believes all the BS he spouts.
Link your accusations or STFU. I'm tired of all the lies and the dipsticks that repeat them religiously without authentication.
Mueller and his team cleared Trump of collusion. So either they were smart enough and non partisan enough to do so or they are all liberal hacks. You don't get to have it both ways.
The Mueller commission didn't spy on anybody you incompetent boob. You've got them mixed up with the evil FBI, among other things.I don't agree with what Kellyanne did, I just do t think its a big deal.
And Weissman was more than an investigator, he was a supervisor who directed agents.
And I am entitled to my opinion about the Mueller partisan hacks. I can have it both ways and I do. The agents were very partisan, falsified information to obtain warrants, spied on only one candidate to find collusion, inserted opinions on their findings yet found no crimes.
Those are two entirely different issues that have no relationship to each other.So where is the line drawn. Conway can't make positive comments for Trump but FBI officials, involved in a collusion investigation, are allowed to donate to the HRC campaign? All 15 of them?