Of course wealthy people should also be concerned about their
relative net wealth, how much government gets, and how government gets it.
For instance, Florida has no state income tax, but crazy high hotel/tourism taxes, above normal sales taxes, and pretty high property taxes. That's not a complaint - that's Florida's reality. Oregon? Very high state income tax and zero sales tax. Some places, such as Manhattan, are 'net' much, much higher. So if I moved to Manhattan, I'd need a higher income to sustain my current lifestyle.
For me? I'm concerned with a comparison of
- costs to
- my ability to earn and produce income (in my case, from employment and from investments).
If inflation happens but both my income and investment appreciation more than compensates for it? That's a relative net gain. If inflation happens while wages go down or investments don't appreciate? That's a problem.
Finally, anyone who has generated their own high net worth (versus inherited it) and can afford luxuries like a boat is likely a strategic financial person that gets this.