ADVERTISEMENT

Two tiered justice system




But, as @Boilermaker03 said, it’s probably because he knew the media wouldn’t report on it honestly. I guess the media would doctor the interview tape or delete what they didn’t want to people to hear right?

So Tony says the media wont put him on but when they offer to he doesn’t accept and makes excuses. Then the echo chamber blames the media when all they were trying to do was grant his request. It couldn’t be that the non Fox/Newsmax interviewers might hold his feet to the fire when questioning him.

Btw, the Oversight committee is holding hearings today about Hunter. WHY DIDN'T THEY CALL TONY?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
If it’s true, absolutely. If he was paid on any of these deals Hunter while he was VP, prosecute him. Personally I think if he was paid when he wasn’t in office it’s pretty slimy too but not against the law as I understand it.

But here’s the thing. Read slowly so you can understand AND retain this. This is what someone said was said. In an email or whatever. That’s it. I know you reallyreallyreally want it to be true. But there is zero evidence Joe got paid. Rudy looked for it for a year a half. When Barr was still a trump stooge, he investigated it. His copilot during that time, Lev Parnas, apparently sent a letter yesterday to the committee saying this is all BS.

As of now, there is nothing. But right wing media is HUNTERHUNTERHUNTER everyday. Your soul sister MTG actually held up nude photos of Hunter in the US House of Representatives today. Classy. Just what we expect from our elected officials. Doing the people’s business. She thinks like you do. Because Hunter is a scumbag, his Dad must be guilty.

The sad thing is, you and your party are acting EXACTLY like the dems did on RussiaRussiaRussia…….except there was a ton more evidence with that investigation. You’re no better than the people you have vilified for years. You have NO proof, but that doesn’t stop you. Just like trump.
Read slowly and try to understand and retain what I told you yesterday. There is strong evidence in the form of subpoenaed financial records that the Biden family received millions from foreign entities. They have refused to state what those payments were for. There is zero evidence anyone in that dysfunctional family has any business talent or otherwise that foreign entities or anyone else would be interested in. While it is believable when you play dumb, you are going way overboard on this one, Bob.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03


But, as @Boilermaker03 said, it’s probably because he knew the media would
Now you seem to be equating media interviews with testifying under oath to a grand jury, as Tony was willing to do.
 
Last edited:
Read slowly and try to understand and retain what I told you yesterday. There is strong evidence in the form of subpoenaed financial records that the Biden family received millions from foreign entities. They have refused to state what those payments were for. There is zero evidence anyone in that dysfunctional family has any business talent or otherwise that foreign entities or anyone else would be interested in. While it is believable when you play dumb, you are going way overboard on this one, Bob.

Biden FAMILY! You understand? Not a person in the planet denies Hunter and his uncle traded on their name. That means NOTHING unless Joe took money when he was in office.
Tell me you understand before posting more links that don’t prove anything about Joe.
 
Biden FAMILY! You understand? Not a person in the planet denies Hunter and his uncle traded on their name. That means NOTHING unless Joe took money when he was in office.
Wrong you are. Joe didn't have to take the money "when he was in office" to be part of the influencing peddling. Why would you think that?
 
Now you seem to be equating media interviews with testifying under oath to a grand jury, as Tony was willing to do.
TONY ASKED TO DO MEDIA INTERVIEWS YOU MORON.

Tony’s attorney said the grand jury didn’t ask them to appear. Maybe they did and he didn’t because he had nothing to offer. Maybe they already knew he had nothing to offer because it had already been investigated.

Tony is leading all you dimwits around by the nose for his 14 minutes.

Why is he not testifying at the Republican controlled oversight committee today? Cause, you know, republicans get to call the witnesses. Why hasn’t Jordan brought him before the Judiciary committee? He brings everybody in.
Where is Tony?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Wrong you are. Joe didn't have to take the money "when he was in office" to be part of the influencing peddling. Why would you think that?
No. Lol.

When one of you acknowledges that the Biden family doesn’t mean Joe Biden maybe I’ll answer your questions. You are the king of ignoring replies that show you’re an idiot…….and just move in to the next question. Go lead your wife or dog around to get your jollies.
 
TONY ASKED TO DO MEDIA INTERVIEWS YOU MORON.

Tony’s attorney said the grand jury didn’t ask them to appear. Maybe they did and he didn’t because he had nothing to offer. Maybe they already knew he had nothing to offer because it had already been investigated.

Tony is leading all you dimwits around by the nose for his 14 minutes.

Why is he not testifying at the Republican controlled oversight committee today? Cause, you know, republicans get to call the witnesses. Why hasn’t Jordan brought him before the Judiciary committee? He brings everybody in.
Where is Tony?
You are really rude and childish, Bob. You are setting a bad example for bni, Ted and the other libs.

So he asked to do media interviews and then didn't do them. Maybe he didn't like the editing schemes of the regime media types.

I expect Tony to show up in the hearings. Why are you so impatient? The dems ignored and covered up this obvious corruption for two years. There is a lot of corruption to cover.
 
No. Lol.

When one of you acknowledges that the Biden family doesn’t mean Joe Biden maybe I’ll answer your questions. You are the king of ignoring replies that show you’re an idiot…….and just move in to the next question. Go lead your wife or dog around to get your jollies.
You're saying it would be fine for payment to Joe to be delayed until after he was out of office.
 
The Mueller report could not find Chump of any wrongdoing. That does not mean that he did anything wrong. The report failed to exonerate him.
Unlike OJ, he had not been charged with any crimes, nor did he undergo a trial by jury.

Thus, to say he was not 'exonerated' is meaningless, yet you keep saying it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
If it’s true, absolutely. If he was paid on any of these deals Hunter while he was VP, prosecute him. Personally I think if he was paid when he wasn’t in office it’s pretty slimy too but not against the law as I understand it.

But here’s the thing. Read slowly so you can understand AND retain this. This is what someone said was said. In an email or whatever. That’s it. I know you reallyreallyreally want it to be true. But there is zero evidence Joe got paid. Rudy looked for it for a year a half. When Barr was still a trump stooge, he investigated it. His copilot during that time, Lev Parnas, apparently sent a letter yesterday to the committee saying this is all BS.

As of now, there is nothing. But right wing media is HUNTERHUNTERHUNTER everyday. Your soul sister MTG actually held up nude photos of Hunter in the US House of Representatives today. Classy. Just what we expect from our elected officials. Doing the people’s business. She thinks like you do. Because Hunter is a scumbag, his Dad must be guilty.

The sad thing is, you and your party are acting EXACTLY like the dems did on RussiaRussiaRussia…….except there was a ton more evidence with that investigation. You’re no better than the people you have vilified for years. You have NO proof, but that doesn’t stop you. Just like trump.
You think there was a ton more evidence on Russia than Hunter???? OMFG that's hilarious!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Biden FAMILY! You understand? Not a person in the planet denies Hunter and his uncle traded on their name. That means NOTHING unless Joe took money when he was in office.
Tell me you understand before posting more links that don’t prove anything about Joe.
Their name means nothing without Joe. They have no political power. They have no business experience. What do you think they were being paid for?
 
The Mueller report could not find Trump of any wrongdoing. That does not mean that he did anything wrong. The report failed to exonerate him.
They looked for years and found nothing. What is it going to take for you to finally say Trump did nothing wrong? Nevermind, you won't ever, because you're TDS is almost as bad as Bob's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
They looked for years and found nothing. What is it going to take for you to finally say Trump did nothing wrong? Nevermind, you won't ever, because you're TDS is almost as bad as Bob's.
I bet you believe that OJ committed the killings of his ex-wife and friend, don't you?
 
You think there was a ton more evidence on Russia than Hunter???? OMFG that's hilarious!
No. Lol. I think there was a ton more evidence on trump than JOE……..cause you have nothing at this point. That’s what said.

You mean we’re having congressional investigations into the foreign deals a private citizen was into?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Their name means nothing without Joe. They have no political power. They have no business experience. What do you think they were being paid for?
They were being paid because their name was Biden. I’m sure these people thought they were getting something for their money. What did they get? See, that’s part of the proof you need………along with Joe getting paid while he was in office.
 
They were being paid because their name was Biden. I’m sure these people thought they were getting something for their money. What did they get? See, that’s part of the proof you need………along with Joe getting paid while he was in office.
Great talking point, except it's not valid. If his family received payment while he was in office and Joe provided something in exchange the timing of the payment has no effect on his guilt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Great talking point, except it's not valid. If his family received payment while he was in office and Joe provided something in exchange the timing of the payment has no effect on his guilt.
So the new position is that Joe didn’t make money on Hunter’s deals. But he took some action as an elected official that benefited the entity that made the deal with Hunter. In other words, he took the action so his son could make money. Haven’t heard that one yet.

But to your point, I agree the timing of the payment is irrelevant.

Your scenario would be like when Ivanka got 5 Chinese trademarks a few days before her father did a U turn and saved Chinese telecommunications giant ZYE from bankruptcy. The were blacklisted from selling products in the US after violating sanctions by selling products that contained US parts to Iran and North Korea.
 
So the new position is that Joe didn’t make money on Hunter’s deals. But he took some action as an elected official that benefited the entity that made the deal with Hunter. In other words, he took the action so his son could make money. Haven’t heard that one yet.

“I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter raged to his daughter Naomi in January 2019. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary.”

(He should have added, ..."nor take showers with me"...)

 
They were being paid because their name was Biden. I’m sure these people thought they were getting something for their money. What did they get? See, that’s part of the proof you need………along with Joe getting paid while he was in office.
Amazing how the Russians are so inept at so many things, but yet so skilled at setting up Joe by planting fake stories like this.

 
Amazing how the Russians are so inept at so many things, but yet so skilled at setting up Joe by planting fake stories like this.

The Russians are inept?

This was in Barr’s lap for years. Nothing.
The FBI said the allegations are unverified.
Grassley and Comer are releasing this now cause they have nothing else. This was all over the news weeks ago.
Burisma was a crooked company in a corrupt Nazi country run by a Russian puppet but we’re going to simply believe an informant’s claims that the Burisma CEO made all the accusations and has tapes.

Bring on the tapes. Bring on the witnesses. Stop fckin around. This is just a flood of accusations that keep getting repeated over and over until half wits like you and others here simply then treat as facts. Bone does it all the time. It’s your reason for living. Trump repeats this stuff every time he opens his mouth and it becomes gospel to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
I have zero doubt Joe spoke to Hunter about his business dealings at some point and he lied about it.

Start the impeachment proceedings.

What you fail to grasp is the real point Goldman was making. When Hunter allegedly told Joe at the lunch, according to Scott Walker, that he may be trying to start a business with these guys it clearly showed that Joe was not involved. Why would Hunter tell him that if Joe was involved? He would have already known that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
So the new position is that Joe didn’t make money on Hunter’s deals. But he took some action as an elected official that benefited the entity that made the deal with Hunter. In other words, he took the action so his son could make money. Haven’t heard that one yet.

But to your point, I agree the timing of the payment is irrelevant.

Your scenario would be like when Ivanka got 5 Chinese trademarks a few days before her father did a U turn and saved Chinese telecommunications giant ZYE from bankruptcy. The were blacklisted from selling products in the US after violating sanctions by selling products that contained US parts to Iran and North Korea.
Didn't the Big Guy threaten Ukraine, not give them the money Congress had appropriated, unless they fired the prosecutor investigating Burisma. You know the Company Hunter was getting 1.2 million a year from?

This just out!!

 
Didn't the Big Guy threaten Ukraine, not give them the money Congress had appropriated, unless they fired the prosecutor investigating Burisma. You know the Company Hunter was getting 1.2 million a year from?

This just out!!

Yes he did but not for those reasons. Amazing that at this point that you folks either don’t know the truth or are still knowingly pushing the lie.


Ring on the recordings and put the accusers under oath and have them testify.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
I don't think I'll be around another 30 years but when we're under Chairman Zi's rule, Bob will still rebut every statement with "Yeah, but Trump".
When all you goose steppers believing everything he says, I’ll be happy to stop.

Are you another of those who is not going to vote for him because of the mean tweets? Another who loved the policies but don’t care for the man……like separating the two makes any sense…....but whom you continue to defend?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
I have zero doubt Joe spoke to Hunter about his business dealings at some point and he lied about it.

Start the impeachment proceedings.

What you fail to grasp is the real point Goldman was making. When Hunter allegedly told Joe at the lunch, according to Scott Walker, that he may be trying to start a business with these guys it clearly showed that Joe was not involved. Why would Hunter tell him that if Joe was involved? He would have already known that.
For each influence peddling scheme Hunter cooked up, there had to be a first time he told Joe about it.

If you can't follow that, think about yourself. For each ignorant idea you have had on this board - for example, saying there was no harm in closing Bagram air base before our people were out -- there had to be a first time you posted it on the board and embarrassed yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
They were being paid because their name was Biden. I’m sure these people thought they were getting something for their money. What did they get? See, that’s part of the proof you need………along with Joe getting paid while he was in office.
So if their name is Biden, yet they have no political power themselves and no experience in the area's of business they were in, then you tell me what they were being paid for.
 
So the new position is that Joe didn’t make money on Hunter’s deals. But he took some action as an elected official that benefited the entity that made the deal with Hunter. In other words, he took the action so his son could make money. Haven’t heard that one yet.

But to your point, I agree the timing of the payment is irrelevant.

Your scenario would be like when Ivanka got 5 Chinese trademarks a few days before her father did a U turn and saved Chinese telecommunications giant ZYE from bankruptcy. The were blacklisted from selling products in the US after violating sanctions by selling products that contained US parts to Iran and North Korea.
No I think Joe did make money off of the deals. They just moved the money in many different ways. Like renting a house from Joe for $50k a month. Sounds legit to me.
 
I have zero doubt Joe spoke to Hunter about his business dealings at some point and he lied about it.

Start the impeachment proceedings.

What you fail to grasp is the real point Goldman was making. When Hunter allegedly told Joe at the lunch, according to Scott Walker, that he may be trying to start a business with these guys it clearly showed that Joe was not involved. Why would Hunter tell him that if Joe was involved? He would have already known that.
Or that Joe knew what they planned to do but not with who yet.
 
Yes he did but not for those reasons. Amazing that at this point that you folks either don’t know the truth or are still knowingly pushing the lie.


Ring on the recordings and put the accusers under oath and have them testify.
So why did he threaten to with hold the money if the investigation into Burisma continued?
Why should Joe give a $hit about the new Ukrainian President trying to uncover corruption within in his Country?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
So why did he threaten to with hold the money if the investigation into Burisma continued?
Why should Joe give a $hit about the new Ukrainian President trying to uncover corruption within in his Country?
Jfc. The Ukraine investigation into Burisma was before Hunter was even on the board.

Biden threatened to hold the aid if Shokin wasn’t fired because he wasn’t investigating corruption as promised. Shokin wasn’t investigating Burisma at the time, nor anything else.

Why should the US care about Ukraine investigating corruption……..when we were about to give them a BILLION dollars in aid? In that a serious question?

 
Jfc. The Ukraine investigation into Burisma was before Hunter was even on the board.

Biden threatened to hold the aid if Shokin wasn’t fired because he wasn’t investigating corruption as promised. Shokin wasn’t investigating Burisma at the time, nor anything else.

Why should the US care about Ukraine investigating corruption……..when we were about to give them a BILLION dollars in aid? In that a serious question?

So now you agree that the newly elected President of Ukraine should look into corruption.
So why did the Big Guy stop the investigation?
And where did you hear the investigator wasn't looking into Burisma?
And explain to me, if what you say is true, why would the Big Guy give a $hit about firing an investigator?
 
So now you agree that the newly elected President of Ukraine should look into corruption.
So why did the Big Guy stop the investigation?
And where did you hear the investigator wasn't looking into Burisma?
And explain to me, if what you say is true, why would the Big Guy give a $hit about firing an investigator?
If you’re going to ignore what I post or aren’t willing to accept the truth I’m going to stop.

“Ukrainian investigation of gas company Burisma is focused solely on activity that took place before Hunter Biden, son of former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, was hired to sit on its board, Ukraine’s anti-corruption investigation agency said.”


Biden’s ultimatum was because Ukraine wasn’t looking into corruption. Like 10 years ago. Where do you get that I was ever against it?

Biden never stopped an investigation. Where did you get that from?

Btw, who is the investigator you keep referring to? You should at least be able to name some names if you are gonna act like you have a damn clue about the topic.

Where did I hear? Where did you hear he was?

Shokin was not investigating corruption……which was a condition of the aid. Read slowly. IF WE WERE GOING TO GIVE THEM AID WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT WOULDNT END UP IN THE POCKETS OF RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS. Does that make sense to you?

No more questions until you read the link dimwit.
 
Jfc. The Ukraine investigation into Burisma was before Hunter was even on the board.

Biden threatened to hold the aid if Shokin wasn’t fired because he wasn’t investigating corruption as promised. Shokin wasn’t investigating Burisma at the time, nor anything else.

Why should the US care about Ukraine investigating corruption……..when we were about to give them a BILLION dollars in aid? In that a serious question?

Hunter was hired by Burisma in May of 2014. Good Ol Joe held the money from Ukraine to get Shokin fired in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting-
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT