ADVERTISEMENT

Two tiered justice system

The Bonenman always deflects and brings up the OJ trial to insinuate that OJ was acquitted because of his so called black privilege.
Wrong. OJ was acquitted because of mistakes by the prosecution. Being super wealthy didn't hurt.
He was acquitted in a court of law, but that doesn't mean he didn't commit the crime. (which he did, 100%).
 
I wasn't changing the subject, it was all intertwined with a common end point.

But, At least we find common ground on that topic. Good job.
The common end point being what? The Hunter/OJ connection? Or was it just a transparent test of my political affiliation? I’m sure you expected me to think OJ was innocent because you paint me as a flaming liberal.
Your next independent thought will be your first. You see everything through a right/left political prism.
 
Sounds like you don’t know what you believe.

I don’t think it’s BS. Hunter wasn’t there. The logistics are pretty freakin simple.

I’m disappointed they didn’t find out who it was. I have no reason to believe they are lying. What do they have to gain if it wasn’t Hunter?

You don’t trust any government institution that doesn’t see things your way……..unless your party is in the WH. I get it.
And you question nothing when the party you voted for is in the WH. We get it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herrli
Purported crimes? That means alleged. You want Joe to prove he didn’t commit the crimes that have zero basis in fact because the MAGA goons in congress are making accusations. No evidence. None. Either you’re too stupid to know the rules of evidence or you think the rules are different for your opponents. This is gibberish.

Why don’t you get your tickets now for the next rally and you can bond with those who think like you.

LMFAO!!!! This is all the left can do. They literally seek out the most crazy person they can find and then claim this is main stream. You do recognize that right?
 
LMFAO!!!! This is all the left can do. They literally seek out the most crazy person they can find and then claim this is main stream. You do recognize that right?
Lololol so true. Bob sees it on left wing Twitter and runs with it saying “see! See! This is the Republican Party because of Trump! Oh my god! Trump Trump Trump!!!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: herrli
LMFAO!!!! This is all the left can do. They literally seek out the most crazy person they can find and then claim this is main stream. You do recognize that right?
I never said anything about that woman being mainstream republican. I said she thinks like the poster.

The point of the post is that he thinks people who have been accused of a crime with no supporting evidence should prove the accusations false………or they are guilty. They should provide their accusers with any information necessary to prove their innocence. Do you agree with that approach?

Why didn’t trump do that with his taxes? Why did he take the fifth 400 times in the NY case? Why did he instruct his staff to ignore subpoenas in the 1/6 hearings? In all the cases or accusations against him he should have just told his lawyers to open the books and release all the documents and emails and prove his innocence.

It’s a ridiculous argument isn’t it? But that’s what happens when people get so obsessed with their politics they completely forget about basic tenants of right and wrong, logic and the law.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: herrli
  • Haha
Reactions: herrli
The point of the post is that he thinks people who have been accused of a crime with no supporting evidence should prove the accusations false………or they are guilty. They should provide their accusers with any information necessary to prove their innocence. Do you agree with that approach?
Problem is that there is WAY more supporting evidence than anything Trump has done so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Problem is that there is WAY more supporting evidence than anything Trump has done so far.
You say this sh/t with nothing to back it up. Like if you capitalize way it means something. Lol

What evidence? You can fill a swimming pool with evidence Hunter cashed in on his name and did drugs and didn’t pay his taxes. BUT TO THIS POINT there is zero evidence Joe got paid. All these hearings are big on accusations but empty on facts.

Evidence that trump stored documents insecurely, hid them from the government, lied about giving them all back, showed them to people who had no clearance, and obstructed the investigation into retrieving them is damning, at best.

Just stay in your bubble.
 
You say this sh/t with nothing to back it up. Like if you capitalize way it means something. Lol

What evidence? You can fill a swimming pool with evidence Hunter cashed in on his name and did drugs and didn’t pay his taxes. BUT TO THIS POINT there is zero evidence Joe got paid. All these hearings are big on accusations but empty on facts.

Evidence that trump stored documents insecurely, hid them from the government, lied about giving them all back, showed them to people who had no clearance, and obstructed the investigation into retrieving them is damning, at best.

Just stay in your bubble.
What is it like in your world @BuilderBob6 ?

I mean seriously , does anyone you know ever listen or take you seriously? You are out there so far NASA is going to be picking you up soon
 
You say this sh/t with nothing to back it up. Like if you capitalize way it means something. Lol

What evidence? You can fill a swimming pool with evidence Hunter cashed in on his name and did drugs and didn’t pay his taxes. BUT TO THIS POINT there is zero evidence Joe got paid. All these hearings are big on accusations but empty on facts.

Evidence that trump stored documents insecurely, hid them from the government, lied about giving them all back, showed them to people who had no clearance, and obstructed the investigation into retrieving them is damning, at best.

Just stay in your bubble.
There’s tons of evidence, but no one on the left wants to hear it or do anything about it. Tony Bobulinski has all the evidence on Biden. You and your friends on the left refuse to acknowledge his knowledge on the “Big Guy”.
 
The common end point being what? The Hunter/OJ connection? Or was it just a transparent test of my political affiliation? I’m sure you expected me to think OJ was innocent because you paint me as a flaming liberal.
Your next independent thought will be your first. You see everything through a right/left political prism.
Not a Hunter/OJ connection but for lefty libs (take for example, BNI) believing, without question, anything and everything the liberal media tells them, despite what the actual facts say.
Don't forget, I'm somewhat socially liberal (pro choice. Don't care if two dudes get married), so I'm not all right all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
There’s tons of evidence, but no one on the left wants to hear it or do anything about it. Tony Bobulinski has all the evidence on Biden. You and your friends on the left refuse to acknowledge his knowledge on the “Big Guy”.
Blah blah. Don’t want to hear it? You just called me a liberal and I’m here asking.

If Tony has all the evidence, why isn’t Comer using that evidence to file articles of impeachment? He made his accusations years ago. The WSJ looked into his evidence and said there’s nothing there. He said he would do any interviews but has refused the requests of news media. LIBERAL news media.

You are calling accusations evidence. You have drawn conclusions from accusations, just like a loyal MAGA should.
 
Oh, I get you on this topic. A blind man could see it.

Thanks for yet another laugh with your latest comical post. Abrams, and his nonthinking readers like you, is trying to equate routine corruption charges against low level hacks (Cox, Petersen, Gillum) most people have never heard of with the FBI's corrupt Russian Collusion Hoax against a President and the FBI's coverup of the Hunter Laptop to sway a presidential election.

What is next from you in your ongoing comedy routine? How about some more on how Ukraine is a democracy - or how closing Bagram air base before our people were out was not the decision of an idiot?
 
Thanks for yet another laugh with your latest comical post. Abrams, and his nonthinking readers like you, is trying to equate routine corruption charges against low level hacks (Cox, Petersen, Gillum) most people have never heard of with the FBI's corrupt Russian Collusion Hoax against a President and the FBI's coverup of the Hunter Laptop to sway a presidential election.

What is next from you in your ongoing comedy routine? How about some more on how Ukraine is a democracy - or how closing Bagram air base before our people were out was not the decision of an idiot?
You might want to stick with arguing with me. Abrams is way out of your league.

Neither he or I said anything about equating the level of crimes that are/were prosecuted among the parties.
Is that another of your looney beliefs of how the system is supposed to work? Equal levels and numbers of FBI prosecutions between the parties?

Right now, your party is breaking laws and rules on a historic level under trump and are being held to account. Eastman and Rudy are on deck. You want a list of those in and around the Trump administration that have been indicted? Is you argument that ALL of them are politically motivated? Nobody was guilty of the crimes they were charged with?

As for the laptop, it WOULD have swayed the election if the FBI announced the laptop investigation before the election…….just as it likely did with the Hillary announcement before the ‘16 election. Your Hunter argument is essentially saying the FBI should have announced the Russia investigation of Trump before the ‘16 election. That would have at least been about a CANDIDATE and not a candidate’s son.

Btw, how’s that Hunter investigation going anyway?
 
Abrams is way out of your league if didn't understand he was trying to equate prosecutions of low-level dem hacks with efforts to undermine a president and sway a presidential election.

It appears the Hunter investigation, which is really a Joe investigation despite what you have been told by the regime media, seems to moving forward despite efforts by corrupt DOJ/FBI leadership to withhold info.

It could be made a lot easier and save taxpayers a lot of money if the Bidens would simply explain what they did to earn millions from foreign entities, per Dept of Treasury banking records. Why doesn't Joe make that happen if he is innocent as he claims?
 
Abrams is way out of your league if didn't understand he was trying to equate prosecutions of low-level dem hacks with efforts to undermine a president and sway a presidential election.

It appears the Hunter investigation, which is really a Joe investigation despite what you have been told by the regime media, seems to moving forward despite efforts by corrupt DOJ/FBI leadership to withhold info.

It could be made a lot easier and save taxpayers a lot of money if the Bidens would simply explain what they did to earn millions from foreign entities, per Dept of Treasury banking records. Why doesn't Joe make that happen if he is innocent as he claims?
Because people don’t usually make the effort or feel required to disprove accusations that have no basis in fact or evidence to back up the accusations you ignorant toad. Jfc

Why don’t the republicans actually get some facts and PROVE THE CASE?

Why hasn’t trump done EXACTLY WHAT you are saying Joe should do in ANY of the accusations against him?

This is lamest argument one could make. Prove to me you’re innocent of my unfounded accusation or it means you’re guilty. That’s all your dumbass has left to argue.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Because people don’t usually make the effort or feel required to disprove accusations that have no basis in fact or evidence to back up the accusations you ignorant toad. Jfc

Why don’t the republicans actually get some facts and PROVE THE CASE?

Why hasn’t trump done EXACTLY WHAT you are saying Joe should do in ANY of the accusations against him?

This is lamest argument one could make. Prove to me you’re innocent of my unfounded accusation or it means you’re guilty. That’s all your dumbass has left to argue.
Maybe they didn't cover this on msnbc, which would not be surprising, but here is a strong basis in evidence:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Blah blah. Don’t want to hear it? You just called me a liberal and I’m here asking.

If Tony has all the evidence, why isn’t Comer using that evidence to file articles of impeachment? He made his accusations years ago. The WSJ looked into his evidence and said there’s nothing there. He said he would do any interviews but has refused the requests of news media. LIBERAL news media.
Maybe because he knows they wouldn't report on it honestly.
You are calling accusations evidence. You have drawn conclusions from accusations, just like a loyal MAGA should.
This reminds me of just about everything they've said about Trump. Remember all of that "evidence" they had on him about Russia Russia Russia? Apparently they didn't have the evidence otherwise we would have seen it. YET, you believed he was guilty. Just like a loyal TDS person would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
Maybe because he knows they wouldn't report on it honestly.

This reminds me of just about everything they've said about Trump. Remember all of that "evidence" they had on him about Russia Russia Russia? Apparently they didn't have the evidence otherwise we would have seen it. YET, you believed he was guilty. Just like a loyal TDS person would.
Just remember, the Mueller report did not exonerate Chump.
 
Busy looking up 'exoneration', fauxgrad, and trying to figure out how to answer my question - or have you gone into hiding again? If the latter, say hello to Bob.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herrli
Did not exonerate Trump of what, fauxgrad?

What do you think the meaning of exoneration is?
Totally clear Chump of all changes or allegations. The Mueller report did not do that. At the press conference to announce the Mueller report findings, Attorney Gen. Barr appeared to be more like Chump’s defense attorney than the attorney general. You have a short memory. Or is it selective?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Busy looking up 'exoneration', fauxgrad, and trying to figure out how to answer my question - or have you gone into hiding again? If the latter, say hello to Bob.
I believe you are dodging my question. You still haven’t told me how to get from the Purdue Student Union to the Stewart Center building. Now who is a fauxgrad? You most likely have to look that up.
 
Last edited:
Blah blah. Don’t want to hear it? You just called me a liberal and I’m here asking.

If Tony has all the evidence, why isn’t Comer using that evidence to file articles of impeachment? He made his accusations years ago. The WSJ looked into his evidence and said there’s nothing there. He said he would do any interviews but has refused the requests of news media. LIBERAL news media.

You are calling accusations evidence. You have drawn conclusions from accusations, just like a loyal MAGA should.
Who do you think the "Big Guy" is?
 
Lest we forget, on this day in 1969 a drunk Teddy Kennedy left his pregnant (?) mistress, Mary Jo Kopechne, to drown after he drove into the Chappaquidick. The two tiered system was on display as Teddy walked away, she died, and Ted was never charged. Interestingly no autopsy was held. Kennedys, Clintons, and Bidens all go untouched. Guess you're a fool if you enter politics as anything other than a wealthy Democrat.
 
Blah blah. Don’t want to hear it? You just called me a liberal and I’m here asking.

If Tony has all the evidence, why isn’t Comer using that evidence to file articles of impeachment? He made his accusations years ago. The WSJ looked into his evidence and said there’s nothing there. He said he would do any interviews but has refused the requests of news media. LIBERAL news media.

You are calling accusations evidence. You have drawn conclusions from accusations, just like a loyal MAGA should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Totally clear Chump of all changes or allegations. The Mueller report did not do that. At the press conference to announce the Mueller report findings, Attorney Gen. Barr appeared to be more like Chump’s defense attorney than the attorney general. You have a short memory. Or is it selective?
Just as I thought. You have no idea what exoneration means re the Mueller report.

There were no charges against Trump. You are just once more spewing forth rubbish you heard on urban radio. Admit it.
 
I believe you are dodging my question. You still haven’t told me how to get from the Purdue Student Union to the Stewart Court building. Now who is a fauxgrad? You most likely have to look that up.
I don't recall a Stewart Court building, but what does that have to do with you demonstrating so much ignorance on this forum, as I have proven about you repeatedly, that you cannot possibly be a Purdue grad?

See the post immediately above for yet another example.
 
Just as I thought. You have no idea what exoneration means re the Mueller report.

There were no charges against Trump. You are just once more spewing forth rubbish you heard on urban radio. Admit it.
There were no charges against Chump because Mueller could not prove it. Does not mean that he did not do any thing wrong. The Boneman likes to bring up OJ Simpson. OJ was found innocent by a jury. That does not mean that OJ did not commit those crimes.
 
Do you have a problem with "10% for the Big Guy"?
If it’s true, absolutely. If he was paid on any of these deals Hunter while he was VP, prosecute him. Personally I think if he was paid when he wasn’t in office it’s pretty slimy too but not against the law as I understand it.

But here’s the thing. Read slowly so you can understand AND retain this. This is what someone said was said. In an email or whatever. That’s it. I know you reallyreallyreally want it to be true. But there is zero evidence Joe got paid. Rudy looked for it for a year a half. When Barr was still a trump stooge, he investigated it. His copilot during that time, Lev Parnas, apparently sent a letter yesterday to the committee saying this is all BS.

As of now, there is nothing. But right wing media is HUNTERHUNTERHUNTER everyday. Your soul sister MTG actually held up nude photos of Hunter in the US House of Representatives today. Classy. Just what we expect from our elected officials. Doing the people’s business. She thinks like you do. Because Hunter is a scumbag, his Dad must be guilty.

The sad thing is, you and your party are acting EXACTLY like the dems did on RussiaRussiaRussia…….except there was a ton more evidence with that investigation. You’re no better than the people you have vilified for years. You have NO proof, but that doesn’t stop you. Just like trump.
 
If it’s true, absolutely. If he was paid on any of these deals Hunter while he was VP, prosecute him. Personally I think if he was paid when he wasn’t in office it’s pretty slimy too but not against the law as I understand it.

But here’s the thing. Read slowly so you can understand AND retain this. This is what someone said was said. In an email or whatever. That’s it. I know you reallyreallyreally want it to be true. But there is zero evidence Joe got paid. Rudy looked for it for a year a half. When Barr was still a trump stooge, he investigated it. His copilot during that time, Lev Parnas, apparently sent a letter yesterday to the committee saying this is all BS.

As of now, there is nothing. But right wing media is HUNTERHUNTERHUNTER everyday. Your soul sister MTG actually held up nude photos of Hunter in the US House of Representatives today. Classy. Just what we expect from our elected officials. Doing the people’s business. She thinks like you do. Because Hunter is a scumbag, his Dad must be guilty.

The sad thing is, you and your party are acting EXACTLY like the dems did on RussiaRussiaRussia…….except there was a ton more evidence with that investigation. You’re no better than the people you have vilified for years. You have NO proof, but that doesn’t stop you. Just like trump.
Thanks for the TDS Update Bob!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bonefish1
There were no charges against Chump because Mueller could not prove it. Does not mean that he did not do any thing wrong. The Boneman likes to bring up OJ Simpson. OJ was found innocent by a jury. That does not mean that OJ did not commit those crimes.
OJ was not found innocent. Again, you disprove your claim of being a Purdue grad.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT