ADVERTISEMENT

Two tiered justice system

Boilermaker03

All-American
Gold Member
Oct 5, 2004
10,129
4,741
113
Valparaiso, IN
I totally agree there's a two tiered system. One for D's and one for everyone else.

Trump gets charged felonies for misdemeanors and Hunter gets misdemeanors for felonies.

Hunter blatantly avoids taxes in the dumbest ways and gets away from paying the fines, and then you have ol Joe telling everyone else to just pay their fair share.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: SKYDOG and tjreese
I totally agree there's a two tiered system. One for D's and one for everyone else.

Trump gets charged felonies for misdemeanors and Hunter gets misdemeanors for felonies.

Hunter blatantly avoids taxes in the dumbest ways and gets away from paying the fines, and then you have ol Joe telling everyone else to just pay their fair share.
Hunter didn’t have to pay fines?
What misdemeanors did trump commit?
You’re saying lying on a gun permit and failing to pay taxes are more serious than obstructing Justice and lying to federal authorities about classified documents?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: herrli
Hunter didn’t have to pay fines?
What misdemeanors did trump commit?
You’re saying lying on a gun permit and failing to pay taxes are more serious than obstructing Justice and lying to federal authorities about classified documents?
No. He avoided jail time when similar and like cases in both situations have resulted in jail time. And his actions do not qualify for the “pre-trial” diversion under the DOJ’s 6 requirements for PTD. He was simply not eligible. Do your homework please. But the biggest issue is what several career IRS agents (and FBI IIRC) have stated is that the DOJ slow walked the 2013 and 2014 tax year investigations to go past the statute of limitations. These years included the Burisma payments. The IRS agent went into great detail of the tax evasion and fraud Hunter committed. You think that for any normal citizen the IRS would drag out a case involving millions in unclaimed income and felony charges and then “oops looks like we waited too long. Our bad.”

You kept talking about they been investigating Hunter for 5 years and nothing. I am sure if there was something there we’d know already.” Now we know from decorated career federal employees it was on purpose to make the charges legally dismissed. What? Pod Save America didn’t inform you of this?

And as for classified docs. Biden had them from his Senate days. Which means he stole them from a SCIF. He had no authority to have possession of these docs ever outside that facility. Where’s that outrage Mr. “Death of Democracy”?
 
Hunter didn’t have to pay fines?
What misdemeanors did trump commit?
You’re saying lying on a gun permit and failing to pay taxes are more serious than obstructing Justice and lying to federal authorities about classified documents?
FYI, it’s also a felony under US Code to posses crack cocaine. As well as brandish a firearm under the influence of said controlled substance. You think if you had videos of yourself on the internet possessing large amounts of narcotics and committing offenses listed under Chapter 8 of US Code 21 you’d face zero penalties. Instead of regurgitating talking points tell me where and why Chapter 8 of US Code 21 does not apply to the Predident’ son?
 
FYI, it’s also a felony under US Code to posses crack cocaine. As well as brandish a firearm under the influence of said controlled substance. You think if you had videos of yourself on the internet possessing large amounts of narcotics and committing offenses listed under Chapter 8 of US Code 21 you’d face zero penalties. Instead of regurgitating talking points tell me where and why Chapter 8 of US Code 21 does not apply to the Predident’ son?


Must be true!
 
No. He avoided jail time when similar and like cases in both situations have resulted in jail time. And his actions do not qualify for the “pre-trial” diversion under the DOJ’s 6 requirements for PTD. He was simply not eligible. Do your homework please. But the biggest issue is what several career IRS agents (and FBI IIRC) have stated is that the DOJ slow walked the 2013 and 2014 tax year investigations to go past the statute of limitations. These years included the Burisma payments. The IRS agent went into great detail of the tax evasion and fraud Hunter committed. You think that for any normal citizen the IRS would drag out a case involving millions in unclaimed income and felony charges and then “oops looks like we waited too long. Our bad.”

You kept talking about they been investigating Hunter for 5 years and nothing. I am sure if there was something there we’d know already.” Now we know from decorated career federal employees it was on purpose to make the charges legally dismissed. What? Pod Save America didn’t inform you of this?

And as for classified docs. Biden had them from his Senate days. Which means he stole them from a SCIF. He had no authority to have possession of these docs ever outside that facility. Where’s that outrage Mr. “Death of Democracy”?
Prosecutions for lying on a gun application are rare, and are usually filed when combined with other more serious charges.

Charges from the IRS are usually for tax evasion, not for simply not paying your taxes.

But I don’t care either way. Charge Hunter with those crimes.

Weiss just made yet another statement saying contradicting what the IRS officials said.


As I have said, somebody is lying. I don’t know if the IRS guys got their information second hand, but clearly something is off. But you only believe those that say what you want to here.

As far as the Biden docs, you are wrong again. Not all classified docs have to be viewed in a SCIF. There are several levels of classified documents. How do you not know that? As far as I know, the classification level of those documents have not been released as the investigation is still ONGOING by yet another trump appointed US attorney. For someone who is always accusing others of not knowing or misrepresenting the facts you don’t seem to mind doing it yourself. Why can’t you wait until the SC gives us his findings?
 
Prosecutions for lying on a gun application are rare, and are usually filed when combined with other more serious charges.

Charges from the IRS are usually for tax evasion, not for simply not paying your taxes.

But I don’t care either way. Charge Hunter with those crimes.

Weiss just made yet another statement saying contradicting what the IRS officials said.


As I have said, somebody is lying. I don’t know if the IRS guys got their information second hand, but clearly something is off. But you only believe those that say what you want to here.

As far as the Biden docs, you are wrong again. Not all classified docs have to be viewed in a SCIF. There are several levels of classified documents. How do you not know that? As far as I know, the classification level of those documents have not been released as the investigation is still ONGOING by yet another trump appointed US attorney. For someone who is always accusing others of not knowing or misrepresenting the facts you don’t seem to mind doing it yourself. Why can’t you wait until the SC gives us his findings?
Trump. Every post you make its Trump's fault. Do you even have a part of an ounce of self respect or the ability to think ?
 
FYI, it’s also a felony under US Code to posses crack cocaine. As well as brandish a firearm under the influence of said controlled substance. You think if you had videos of yourself on the internet possessing large amounts of narcotics and committing offenses listed under Chapter 8 of US Code 21 you’d face zero penalties. Instead of regurgitating talking points tell me where and why Chapter 8 of US Code 21 does not apply to the Predident’ son?
You mean you can get prosecuted for doing drugs on video? Really? You’re quoting statutes but making that argument? Lol. Just exactly how would the state prove that the “drugs” in the video are real? You understand how evidence in a trial works, right? Are you a lawyer or just play one on the internet?
 
  • Love
Reactions: herrli
You mean you can get prosecuted for doing drugs on video? Really? You’re quoting statutes but making that argument? Lol. Just exactly how would the state prove that the “drugs” in the video are real? You understand how evidence in a trial works, right? Are you a lawyer or just play one on the internet?
You didnt mention Trump once! Progress man, I am proud of you! I love the last line though. Are you really a fool or do you just play one on the internet?
 
Prosecutions for lying on a gun application are rare, and are usually filed when combined with other more serious charges.

Charges from the IRS are usually for tax evasion, not for simply not paying your taxes.

But I don’t care either way. Charge Hunter with those crimes.

Weiss just made yet another statement saying contradicting what the IRS officials said.


As I have said, somebody is lying. I don’t know if the IRS guys got their information second hand, but clearly something is off. But you only believe those that say what you want to here.

As far as the Biden docs, you are wrong again. Not all classified docs have to be viewed in a SCIF. There are several levels of classified documents. How do you not know that? As far as I know, the classification level of those documents have not been released as the investigation is still ONGOING by yet another trump appointed US attorney. For someone who is always accusing others of not knowing or misrepresenting the facts you don’t seem to mind doing it yourself. Why can’t you wait until the SC gives us his findings?
"Somebody is lying"......Umm, I'm leaning towards the stripper banging crack head.
 
Last edited:
As I have said, somebody is lying. I don’t know if the IRS guys got their information second hand, but clearly something is off. But you only believe those that say what you want to here.
Pot meet kettle.
As far as the Biden docs, you are wrong again. Not all classified docs have to be viewed in a SCIF. There are several levels of classified documents.
As far as I know, you always have to view classified docks in a SCIF if you're a Senator or the like.
 
Pot meet kettle.

As far as I know, you always have to view classified docks in a SCIF if you're a Senator or the like.
I’m the only one acknowledging that the DOJ and the IRS agents seem to have legitimate arguments. According to you and Joe and others, Garland and Weiss are clearly lying and the IRS agents are the only ones who could possibly be telling the truth.


You don’t know what you’re talking about. Why don’t you look it up? Low level classified documents, for instance those labeled “confidential “, don’t have to be viewed in a SCIF.
 
I’m the only one acknowledging that the DOJ and the IRS agents seem to have legitimate arguments. According to you and Joe and others, Garland and Weiss are clearly lying and the IRS agents are the only ones who could possibly be telling the truth.
Your savior Joe could simply instruct the FBI, IRS, etc to release all the related info to prove his innocence. Then those fed entities could direct their resources to other critical activities, like finding more things to charge Trump with.

Why doesn't Joe do that for the good of the nation, do you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
I’m the only one acknowledging that the DOJ and the IRS agents seem to have legitimate arguments. According to you and Joe and others, Garland and Weiss are clearly lying and the IRS agents are the only ones who could possibly be telling the truth.


You don’t know what you’re talking about. Why don’t you look it up? Low level classified documents, for instance those labeled “confidential “, don’t have to be viewed in a SCIF.
But they have to be observed don't they? Not just anyone in government can go view classified documents willy nilly.
 
Prosecutions for lying on a gun application are rare, and are usually filed when combined with other more serious charges.

Charges from the IRS are usually for tax evasion, not for simply not paying your taxes.

But I don’t care either way. Charge Hunter with those crimes.

Weiss just made yet another statement saying contradicting what the IRS officials said.


As I have said, somebody is lying. I don’t know if the IRS guys got their information second hand, but clearly something is off. But you only believe those that say what you want to here.

As far as the Biden docs, you are wrong again. Not all classified docs have to be viewed in a SCIF. There are several levels of classified documents. How do you not know that? As far as I know, the classification level of those documents have not been released as the investigation is still ONGOING by yet another trump appointed US attorney. For someone who is always accusing others of not knowing or misrepresenting the facts you don’t seem to mind doing it yourself. Why can’t you wait until the SC gives us his findings?
Prosecutions for lying on a gun application are rare, and are usually filed when combined with other more serious charges.

Charges from the IRS are usually for tax evasion, not for simply not paying your taxes.

But I don’t care either way. Charge Hunter with those crimes.

Weiss just made yet another statement saying contradicting what the IRS officials said.


As I have said, somebody is lying. I don’t know if the IRS guys got their information second hand, but clearly something is off. But you only believe those that say what you want to here.

As far as the Biden docs, you are wrong again. Not all classified docs have to be viewed in a SCIF. There are several levels of classified documents. How do you not know that? As far as I know, the classification level of those documents have not been released as the investigation is still ONGOING by yet another trump appointed US attorney. For someone who is always accusing others of not knowing or misrepresenting the facts you don’t seem to mind doing it yourself. Why can’t you wait until the SC gives us his findings?
If you don’t know if the IRS agent got his info second hand it shows your utter lack of knowledge. The man was in the meeting with him. He wrote and email summarizing the meeting that Weiss told the IRS investigation team him he didn’t have any authority. His supervisor who was also in the meeting concurred with the summary.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter...pley-says-he-was-stopped-from-pursuing-leads/

And yes. Hunter evaded millions in taxes. This was the career IRS agents point. Nobody who did that would ever get away with what Hunter did. It would be jail time.
 
I’m the only one acknowledging that the DOJ and the IRS agents seem to have legitimate arguments. According to you and Joe and others, Garland and Weiss are clearly lying and the IRS agents are the only ones who could possibly be telling the truth.


You don’t know what you’re talking about. Why don’t you look it up? Low level classified documents, for instance those labeled “confidential “, don’t have to be viewed in a SCIF.
Both Garland and Weiss lead with their stories under oath to congress. Sure Weiss could have went along for job security and promotional opportunities. Neither expected this Shapley dude to have memorialized the meeting in email and had it concurred by the attendees. Garland is a freaking habitual liar but Weiss is in a jam. He comes clean now and he proves he perjured himself. Records proved he went to DC and LA district for charging and got rejected in both places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
You mean you can get prosecuted for doing drugs on video? Really? You’re quoting statutes but making that argument? Lol. Just exactly how would the state prove that the “drugs” in the video are real? You understand how evidence in a trial works, right? Are you a lawyer or just play one on the internet?
And brandishing an illegal fire arm and soliciting prostitution. Oh he also took photos driving 170 mph. Thats a felony.

And you may want to read about this guy.

https://www.hawaiireporter.com/kaua...posting-video-of-drinking-and-driving-online/
 
Both Garland and Weiss lead with their stories under oath to congress. Sure Weiss could have went along for job security and promotional opportunities. Neither expected this Shapley dude to have memorialized the meeting in email and had it concurred by the attendees. Garland is a freaking habitual liar but Weiss is in a jam. He comes clean now and he proves he perjured himself. Records proved he went to DC and LA district for charging and got rejected in both places.
How is Garland a habitual liar? As opposed to trump? You have evidence that Garland is a habitual liar right?

Weiss and Garland are lying but the IRS agents are telling the truth. That’s your argument.

Weiss has agreed to meet with the House Judiciary committee. Why don’t you wait and see what happens before you decide who is telling the truth? Or is that not in your partisan DNA?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: herrli
How is Garland a habitual liar? As opposed to trump? You have evidence that Garland is a habitual liar right?

Weiss and Garland are lying but the IRS agents are telling the truth. That’s your argument.

Weiss has agreed to meet with the House Judiciary committee. Why don’t you wait and see what happens before you decide who is telling the truth? Or is that not in your partisan DNA?
Didn’t you forget to mention lying Biden?

18gM.gif
 
Your savior Joe could simply instruct the FBI, IRS, etc to release all the related info to prove his innocence. Then those fed entities could direct their resources to other critical activities, like finding more things to charge Trump with.

Why doesn't Joe do that for the good of the nation, do you think?
Still trying to think of a reason, @BuilderBob6 ?

Similarly, why doesn't he order the FBI, the world's greatest crime-fighting agency, to keep investigating the WH cocaine bag until they solve it?
 
Still trying to think of a reason, @BuilderBob6 ?

Similarly, why doesn't he order the FBI, the world's greatest crime-fighting agency, to keep investigating the WH cocaine bag until they solve it?
Waiting for the next Trump story for everyone to forget about this. They know who did it, but the public will never officially know.
 
Still trying to think of a reason, @BuilderBob6 ?

Similarly, why doesn't he order the FBI, the world's greatest crime-fighting agency, to keep investigating the WH cocaine bag until they solve it?
The SS has stated there were no fingerprints, no DNA, and video surveillance showed nothing. So now you don’t trust the SS either?

As to your previous stupid question, you’re demanding the government prove Weiss’ innocence? Is that what you’re asking? Is that how it’s supposed to work? What “related info”?

Weiss is reportedly going to appear before the House Judiciary. Can you wait and see how that goes?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: herrli
The SS has stated there were no fingerprints, no DNA, and video surveillance showed nothing. So now you don’t trust the SS either?

As to your previous stupid question, you’re demanding the government prove Weiss’ innocence? Is that what you’re asking? Is that how it’s supposed to work? What “related info”?

Weiss is reportedly going to appear before the House Judiciary. Can you wait and see how that goes?
Good lord you are either the blindest, dumbest, unawarest, or just idiot on the face of the earth and likely all of the above.
 
The SS has stated there were no fingerprints, no DNA, and video surveillance showed nothing. So now you don’t trust the SS either?
The FBI has far better investigative capabilities than the SS, which is part of the completely convoluted Dept of Homeland Security. Why wouldn't your savior Joe want the very best agency to crack this case and end the suspicion of intelligent people of yet another coverup, clearing any doubts about his son and his daughter (the one who wrote that Joe took showers with her when she was a child).
As to your previous stupid question, you’re demanding the government prove Weiss’ innocence? Is that what you’re asking? Is that how it’s supposed to work? What “related info”?

My previous 'stupid question' (aka a 'Bob question') was about your savior Joe, not about Weiss. Joe could order all fed agencies (FBI, CIA, IRS, Treasury, etc) to release all info about any purported crimes he committed involving influence peddling while he was VP, to prove to Americans he is not the corrupt hack intelligent people believe he is - and vindicate your love for him.
 
The FBI has far better investigative capabilities than the SS, which is part of the completely convoluted Dept of Homeland Security. Why wouldn't your savior Joe want the very best agency to crack this case and end the suspicion of intelligent people of yet another coverup, clearing any doubts about his son and his daughter (the one who wrote that Joe took showers with her when she was a child).
The FBI did the analysis of the bag of coke Einstein.

Now is when you ignore your uninformed question and say how the FBI is on Hunter’s side and rigged the results.
 
The FBI has far better investigative capabilities than the SS, which is part of the completely convoluted Dept of Homeland Security. Why wouldn't your savior Joe want the very best agency to crack this case and end the suspicion of intelligent people of yet another coverup, clearing any doubts about his son and his daughter (the one who wrote that Joe took showers with her when she was a child).
Purported crimes? That means alleged. You want Joe to prove he didn’t commit the crimes that have zero basis in fact because the MAGA goons in congress are making accusations. No evidence. None. Either you’re too stupid to know the rules of evidence or you think the rules are different for your opponents. This is gibberish.

Why don’t you get your tickets now for the next rally and you can bond with those who think like you.

 
Purported crimes? That means alleged. You want Joe to prove he didn’t commit the crimes that have zero basis in fact because the MAGA goons in congress are making accusations. No evidence. None. Either you’re too stupid to know the rules of evidence or you think the rules are different for your opponents. This is gibberish.

Why don’t you get your tickets now for the next rally and you can bond with those who think like you.

I think she meant 'Brain Dead'.
 
The SS has stated there were no fingerprints, no DNA, and video surveillance showed nothing. So now you don’t trust the SS either?

As to your previous stupid question, you’re demanding the government prove Weiss’ innocence? Is that what you’re asking? Is that how it’s supposed to work? What “related info”?

Weiss is reportedly going to appear before the House Judiciary. Can you wait and see how that goes?
I'm shocked (not really) that you believe this (actually, I don't think you believe it. You are basically saying "well, this is what the SS said, so that's that". While at the same time smirking because you know it's BS).
Do you think if it were some sort of very small weapon or other 'dangerou' item, that they'd get to the bottom of it?
 
The FBI did the analysis of the bag of coke Einstein.

Now is when you ignore your uninformed question and say how the FBI is on Hunter’s side and rigged the results.
Did the fbi do the analysis of the visitors log and the video recordings?
 
Purported crimes? That means alleged. You want Joe to prove he didn’t commit the crimes that have zero basis in fact because the MAGA goons in congress are making accusations. No evidence. None. Either you’re too stupid to know the rules of evidence or you think the rules are different for your opponents. This is gibberish.

Why don’t you get your tickets now for the next rally and you can bond with those who think like you.

No evidence? There is Treasury Dept evidence that large sums of money went from China, Romania and Ukraine to a series of shell corporations to end up with various members of the Biden family. Joe could instruct his attorneys, the IRS, the FBI, and anyone else with knowledge of what those shell corps did to earn that money to come forward, provide information and testify.

Don't you want the truth to come out? A president can make that happen - unless he doesn't want to truth to come out.
 
I'm shocked (not really) that you believe this (actually, I don't think you believe it. You are basically saying "well, this is what the SS said, so that's that". While at the same time smirking because you know it's BS).
Do you think if it were some sort of very small weapon or other 'dangerou' item, that they'd get to the bottom of it?
Sounds like you don’t know what you believe.

I don’t think it’s BS. Hunter wasn’t there. The logistics are pretty freakin simple.

I’m disappointed they didn’t find out who it was. I have no reason to believe they are lying. What do they have to gain if it wasn’t Hunter?

You don’t trust any government institution that doesn’t see things your way……..unless your party is in the WH. I get it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
Sounds like you don’t know what you believe.

I don’t think it’s BS. Hunter wasn’t there. The logistics are pretty freakin simple.

I’m disappointed they didn’t find out who it was. I have no reason to believe they are lying. What do they have to gain if it wasn’t Hunter?

You don’t trust any government institution that doesn’t see things your way……..unless your party is in the WH. I get it.
Let me ask you a serious question: Do you think OJ murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend?

Not what the court said, but what do you believe?
 
Let me ask you a serious question: Do you think OJ murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend?

Not what the court said, but what do you believe?
Why are you changing the topic?

Your comments and the questions you’re asking aren’t serious?

I believe OJ absolutely did it. No doubt. Do I get a Christmas card now?
 
Why are you changing the topic?

Your comments and the questions you’re asking aren’t serious?

I believe OJ absolutely did it. No doubt. Do I get a Christmas card now?
The Bonenman always deflects and brings up the OJ trial to insinuate that OJ was acquitted because of his so called black privilege.
 
Why are you changing the topic?

Your comments and the questions you’re asking aren’t serious?

I believe OJ absolutely did it. No doubt. Do I get a Christmas card now?
I wasn't changing the subject, it was all intertwined with a common end point.

But, At least we find common ground on that topic. Good job.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT