ADVERTISEMENT

Trump's Jewish problem

I

I've said before here what Biden has done right and done wrong. Just because I don't jump everytime one of you wants an answer has nothing to do with the subject. It's just you avoiding the topic and trying turn it around on me. You sound like Jr freedom when you post that shit.
Yes @BSIT don’t POST THAT SHIT
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BSIT
I

I've said before here what Biden has done right and done wrong. Just because I don't jump everytime one of you wants an answer has nothing to do with the subject. It's just you avoiding the topic and trying turn it around on me. You sound like Jr freedom when you post that shit.
Avoiding the topic?
 
You've actually avoided two. The tread topic. . ....and in the reply where you claimed irony was about trump being an irrelevant has-been politician.
I’ve alluded to both but will clearly address both:
Trump has family members who are Jewish and did a lot for Israel not the least was moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem which officially recognized the capital of Israel. After all of this, American Jews still vote primarily Democrat. Trump has a good argument in this matter. Regarding BiBi, he should shut up and not criticize him

Trump being irrelevant/relevant in the GOP. Trump has yet to declare and may get entangled in legal issues that may prevent him from running in 2024. Furthermore, Trump is losing some of his popularity. He is still a big force but all you need to do is look at is his attendance at his recent rallies. Many Republicans will be taking the same approach as the VA GOP Governor winner by non acknowledgment acknowledgment. Many Republicans hope there’s an alternative to Trump that will have same policies without the personal drama. That’s why I’m pulling for my man Pence.

Now since I answered both of your questions, answer mine about what Biden has done right in office?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
I’ve alluded to both but will clearly address both:
Trump has family members who are Jewish and did a lot for Israel not the least was moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem which officially recognized the capital of Israel. After all of this, American Jews still vote primarily Democrat. Trump has a good argument in this matter. Regarding BiBi, he should shut up and not criticize him

Trump being irrelevant/relevant in the GOP. Trump has yet to declare and may get entangled in legal issues that may prevent him from running in 2024. Furthermore, Trump is losing some of his popularity. He is still a big force but all you need to do is look at is his attendance at his recent rallies. Many Republicans will be taking the same approach as the GOP Governor winner by non acknowledgment acknowledgment. Many Republicans hope there’s an alternative to Trump that will have same policies without the personal drama. That’s why I’m pulling for my man Pence.

Now since I answered both of your questions, answer mine about what Biden has done right in office?
Good luck , Bob bitches constantly but never has any answers . He has to be one of the most useless people that is sucking air, granted look who his hero is and explains a lot
 
I need someone I can trust with the keys to the store.

When a candidate lies......for more than a year.......about the results of an election and convinces almost all his followers to believe the same, our democracy is in peril. When he calls and pressures state SOS's to find votes for him, refuses to honor subpoenas and orders his people to do the same, prefers and admires TRUE socialist and authoritarian leaders to allied leaders, makes temporary appointments all across the government so he can control them, all bets are off.

When he DEMANDS HIS VP VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION SO HE CAN RETAIN POWER, I don't want that man anywhere near the WH. What it is it about that specific point that you don't get? How are you remotely ok with that? If he will do that in broad daylight, what is he capable of behind the scenes? Answer please.
Too bad much of what you post here isn't true. The MSM tried to make it true, but they cut up phone calls and edited things to push this little narrative you're regurgitating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
I guess we have extremely different takes on the points you made and on those events you describe, which is where the MSM and the mess it has made comes into play. You recite the same misconstrued and exaggerated talking points that Chris Chomo and Don Lemon spew on the air so I’m not sure why I’d expect you to understand the facts any differently than you do. How many passes do you give these clowns before realizing they’re lying to you? Seriously, just look at their track records. I guess it boils down to different perspectives on a certain set of facts that have been blurred and muddied by the MSM.
And one of those asshats lost their jobs...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrcrist
Dammit could you, just once, actually address what I said? The media did not have anything to do with trump and his attempt to force Pence to VIOLATE the constitution and keep him in the WH. This has NOTHING to do with the media.

Same shit everytime. We can't think for ourselves .....while trump controls your entire party.

Trump DID THIS. There's no media spin. Real facts that came from his own mouth, his own actions.

What is your "take" if mine is all media generated? Did trump not want Pence to VIOLATE the constitution?
No, the media has it in your head that Trump did those things, when in reality he didn't. NOTHING Trump asked Pence to do was in violation of the constitution. In fact there was precedent. You're shitty ass lying news media will never tell you that little tid bit.
 
Oh how cute, you'll wait. He doesn't have the power to send it back to the states. He opens the results and announced them. Besides, the states had lawfully ratified their results and submitted them. There was no lawful reason to question them.......even if he had the power.

If he had acted as trump wanted he would have violated the duties he had in the electoral process under the constitution.

You done waiting?
This right here shows you don't know what the F you're talking about.
 
Last edited:
You mean where the constitution says you CAN'T do something? Are you serious?

It states the process to be followed. If you make up your own elections rules, you are violating it.

How far down this road are you going to go to keep from saying what trump tried to do was wrong?
Sending it back to the states is NOT making up your own results. He wouldn't be creating results, he'd be asking the states to take another look. AGAIN, it's not unconstitutional and there is precedent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrcrist
@BuilderBob6 Read this.

I know about all that. Congress made their objections. They voted. The states certified their results.
Sending it back to the states is NOT making up your own results. He wouldn't be creating results, he'd be asking the states to take another look. AGAIN, it's not unconstitutional and there is precedent.
The states had already certified their results. He has no authority to send them back. What reason would he have for doing so? The courts said to? No. The constitutional procedures said to? No. The only reason is because trump wanted him to. That's it. What legal or constitutional basis would Pence have for sending the results back to the states?
 
No, the media has it in your head that Trump did those things, when in reality he didn't. NOTHING Trump asked Pence to do was in violation of the constitution. In fact there was precedent. You're shitty ass lying news media will never tell you that little tid bit.
Mediamediamedia. Broken freakin records. There was a law enacted after the precedent......unless you have something new.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
Too bad much of what you post here isn't true. The MSM tried to make it true, but they cut up phone calls and edited things to push this little narrative you're regurgitating.
The mediamediamedia cut up the phone calls? Lol. Are you serial man? Raffensberger testified to what happened, wrote a damn book. Did trump not say he only needed them to find 11k votes? The media made that up? Or that's really just an innocent statement......or a joke? That's it, he was just joking.

I'm sure you have a whack job YouTube conspiracy video teed up to prove your point.
 
The mediamediamedia cut up the phone calls? Lol. Are you serial man? Raffensberger testified to what happened, wrote a damn book. Did trump not say he only needed them to find 11k votes? The media made that up? Or that's really just an innocent statement......or a joke? That's it, he was just joking.

I'm sure you have a whack job YouTube conspiracy video teed up to prove your point.
You would know, BuilderBob6. You’re the one writing a book about TRUMP and his journey as president told from the viewpoint of an angry white guy who donated to the Lincoln Project!!
 
You would know, BuilderBob6. You’re the one writing a book about TRUMP and his journey as president told from the viewpoint of an angry white guy who donated to the Lincoln Project!!
Bob sounds like he is about to stroke out today. I do so enjoy the humor he unwittingly provides on here
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SKYDOG
Again, point to the specific language that prohibits electors from going back to the states for reconsideration or whatever you want to call it. You do realize if something isn’t addressed in the constitution it reverts back to the states don’t you? If trump called for the election to be overturned by pence then yea that would be wrong. If he asked that he send them back to the states to be reconsidered and the discrepancies addressed, then no.
You mean although the constitution and the Electoral Count Act specifically address what the role of the VP is in the certification process.......and that the states have to certify the results, WHICH THEY DID, you're saying because those documents DIDN'T SAY WHAT COULDN'T BE DONE, it's therefore ok to do whatever hasn't been spelled out in the documents. So Congress could just take a vacation on January 6th instead of certifying......the Constitution doesn't prohibit it right? Couldn't Biden just abolish the republican party? Constitution doesn't say he can't. A stupid argument.

Ha. This IS addressed in the Constitution. Your scenario is not.......as a million other scenarios aren't either. You do realize that if the VP sent the votes back to the states, that would be the federal government overstepping their role. The second highest elected federal government official would be deciding that CERTIFIED electoral votes from the states didn't count. They want the states to have a do over. Do the states keep doing it until the federal government approves? Doesn't that put the feds in charge of the election?

All this with no courts agreeing with trump. All states certified the election. What would be the reason for ignoring the law and the constitution........other than the sitting president saying it was rigged? Does the constitution say "The VP may send the votes back to the states if the losing candidate doesn't agree with the results"?
 
I know about all that. Congress made their objections. They voted. The states certified their results.

The states had already certified their results. He has no authority to send them back. What reason would he have for doing so? The courts said to? No. The constitutional procedures said to? No. The only reason is because trump wanted him to. That's it. What legal or constitutional basis would Pence have for sending the results back to the states?
Wrong. There were objections as needed. It was up to Pence to take the next necessary step and he didn't.
 
Mediamediamedia. Broken freakin records. There was a law enacted after the precedent......unless you have something new.
Jesus, are you intentionally being dense? The law was followed and Pence dropped the ball. It was up to him and he didn't have the balls to do it. In the end, the result may not have changed, but Pence had the right to make the move and he chose not to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
The mediamediamedia cut up the phone calls? Lol. Are you serial man? Raffensberger testified to what happened, wrote a damn book. Did trump not say he only needed them to find 11k votes? The media made that up? Or that's really just an innocent statement......or a joke? That's it, he was just joking.

I'm sure you have a whack job YouTube conspiracy video teed up to prove your point.
idontgiveafvck what Raffensberger had to say. I listened to the ENTIRE phone call. The media lied about it. Wouldn't surprise me if he lied too to get a book deal. Like that never happens...

Yes he did say he needed to find 11k votes, but nowhere near in the context that the media spun it into. He didn't ask Raffensberger to cheat. There were supposed missing votes and Trump wanted them found. He believed that there were enough votes in the missing tally's that would change the count in his favor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
The mediamediamedia cut up the phone calls? Lol. Are you serial man? Raffensberger testified to what happened, wrote a damn book. Did trump not say he only needed them to find 11k votes? The media made that up? Or that's really just an innocent statement......or a joke? That's it, he was just joking.

I'm sure you have a whack job YouTube conspiracy video teed up to prove your point.
I went back to listen to the phone call and in the first two minutes (I'm going to summarize) he said that his people felt that there were at least 100,000-200,000 forged signatures on votes. Then he goes on to say that they had close to 50,000 people that reported that they went to vote and was told they couldn't because they supposedly already voted. This is just a SMALL amount of the phone call. He wanted these sort of things looked in to. They may or may not have panned out into anything, but that is why he called. He didn't ask him to overturn the votes fraudulently. He wanted the votes to be proper in which he felt they were way off. Again, he may or may not have been correct, but that was the gist of the call.
 
@BuilderBob6 Listen for yourself. This is NBC news so don't freak out about it being YouTube like some of the other morons on here. He goes through a list of issues they believe happened. So, later in the phone call when he says he wants to find 11,800 votes, he's talking about within the issues that he mentioned. NOT trying to get the election illegally overturned.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: SKYDOG
Ahh, BullShIT, you’re nothing if not consistent, trotting out the tired tds trope when you know it’s not even applicable. Tell you what, buddy, why don’t you clean your own house first and then maybe we can talk.

And lol at Mike Pence. Yeah, good luck with that. I mean many of your fellow Republican voters wanted him dead on 1/6. Yup, seems wise to think he’s got any kind of chance now.

Oh and as for joe and his policies. Yep, happy with infrastructure. It will bring some much needed improvements especially to areas that have been neglected. I’m happy with the covid response (although I think at home test kits should be free and we should be sharing vaccine information with the rest of the world). The virus is still raging because of the unvaccinated; we can only ask nicely so much.

I’m disappointed that BBB didn’t pass, but I can see why. That it hinged on one person who got 270k votes in his state is bothersome, but maybe it can be parsed down. It was a popular proposal and would have been a net positive on the economy, if one believes Goldman Sachs.

But please, do keep telling me I have TDS, bsit. All you bring with you is your salt deduction as your lone talking point, so I can see why you have to go to your one trick pony insult bag and think “boy I sure owned him” when you say someone has TDS. Lol.
Have you seen the Bill? All of it? Don’t buy their bull.
 
You mean where the constitution says you CAN'T do something? Are you serious?

It states the process to be followed. If you make up your own elections rules, you are violating it.

How far down this road are you going to go to keep from saying what trump tried to do was wrong?
Come on Bob. Read your second sentence. You said that with a straight face?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT