ADVERTISEMENT

Summer Practice Started Today

LOL. If Benter is that good then Painter should not have used a redshirt. Colvin and Heide transferred due to the way Painter utilized them on offense. There were many times last year Smith was reluctant to pass the ball to Colvin. And against Houston, second half, Colvin and Heide scored 16 of our 29 points. Let that sink in.
How Painter used them? I was sorry to see Myles go, but Braden was hesitant to pass to Myles because he knew if he did, the shot would go up and Myles did not shoot it well last year. If you're saying they needed to be in a situation with more PT, I agree, but if you're implying they were mis-used, I think those guys have to look in the mirror first.
 
Offensively, I don't think it really matters. Purdue will be an elite offensive team, no matter the rotations. I think the big 3 are locked in and will be even better this year, which is really terrifying for any opponent fanbase. We have plenty of complementary talent and experience to go along with them. The key to this season's success will be how Purdue can improve on defense and rebounding.
 
As we all know, you're much kinder than I am. I just don't see two guys who have started games and played in a NC being concerned about a kid who is redshirting, but I agree that overall team depth and limited opportunities to play bigger roles were likely the driving factor.
You make it sound like a redshirt makes you less of a player. You might be surprised to learn a top 10 player a 2nd team all American redshirted. Did other players look at TKR with less respect because he redshirted? And before anyone says he was injured it was a broken finger. Painter recruits to fill rolls and yes Jack was recruited to fill the roll held by Fletch the 3. Playing time isn't won in games it is won in practice. Did Myles see Benter as a challenger of course as well as Harris and Cox. Painter after every season meets with the players one on one and tells them what he see's going forward. With Myles there was no path for success this year. That had to be because he was behind more than one player. Cam was wanted but not as a starter because Daniel being back meant he had to compete with TKR at the 4 yes, the redshirt so did redshirt players effect Myles and Cam leaving clearly. I wish them both well, but I felt like it was time to cut and run. Not picking on you for your opinion I just don't agree.
 
LOL. If Benter is that good then Painter should not have used a redshirt. Colvin and Heide transferred due to the way Painter utilized them on offense. There were many times last year Smith was reluctant to pass the ball to Colvin. And against Houston, second half, Colvin and Heide scored 16 of our 29 points. Let that sink in.
I did appreciate both players, but their opportunity in that half was in large part due to what Houston was taking away. I would classify it more as an anecdote. Both are replaceable and I like the depth that Purdue has at both positions.
 
You make it sound like a redshirt makes you less of a player. You might be surprised to learn a top 10 player a 2nd team all American redshirted. Did other players look at TKR with less respect because he redshirted?
I think you’re projecting a bit with that redshirt statement. My redshirt statement was intended to indicate that I find it hard to believe that Myles was very worried about a kid with no college playing experience. Completely agree, that doesn’t mean that Jack can’t be a great player at some point or even that he couldn’t have beaten out Myles.

Obviously you’re welcome to disagree, but I’m pretty confident that Myles was more worried about 1) Fletch taking all the minutes he can handle and 2) MP’s preference to have two other ball handlers out there with Fletch (CJ and Gicarri), than he was about Jack.
 
I think you’re projecting a bit with that redshirt statement. My redshirt statement was intended to indicate that I find it hard to believe that Myles was very worried about a kid with no college playing experience. Completely agree, that doesn’t mean that Jack can’t be a great player at some point or even that he couldn’t have beaten out Myles.

Obviously you’re welcome to disagree, but I’m pretty confident that Myles was more worried about 1) Fletch taking all the minutes he can handle and 2) MP’s preference to have two other ball handlers out there with Fletch (CJ and Gicarri), than he was about Jack.
The point is that even though Benter has no college game experience, Myles played against him ever day and knew what he was up against. At a time when we all expected Myles to start cementing his role on the team, playing time at his position(s) was becoming more, not less questionable.

One article mentioned that Benter is very aggressive, fighting under the basketball against Purdue's bigs for rebounds -- and comes away with his share. Painter loves that, and we rarely saw that from Myles.
 
Last edited:
The point is that even though Benter has no college game experience, Myles played against him ever day and knew what he was up against. At a time when we all expected Myles to start cementing his role on the team, playing time at his position(s) was becoming more, not less questionable.

One article mentioned that Benter is very aggressive, fighting under the basketball against Purdue's bias for rebounds -- and comes away with his share. Painter loves that, and we rarely saw that from Myles.
I get the argument.

If Jack comes in and plays major minutes this year I’ll concede him as a factor in Myles’ decision. It won’t be the first time I’ve been wrong.

I personally think Jack will be a nice player at Purdue but expect relatively minor minutes for him this season, which would support the view that Myles wasn’t worried about him (although I concede that there’s not a direct 1:1 correlation there either way).
 
I get the argument.

If Jack comes in and plays major minutes this year I’ll concede him as a factor in Myles’ decision. It won’t be the first time I’ve been wrong.

I personally think Jack will be a nice player at Purdue but expect relatively minor minutes for him this season, which would support the view that Myles wasn’t worried about him (although I concede that there’s not a direct 1:1 correlation there either way).
I don't think it was Myles decision in fact I know it wasn't.
 
LOL. If Benter is that good then Painter should not have used a redshirt. Colvin and Heide transferred due to the way Painter utilized them on offense. There were many times last year Smith was reluctant to pass the ball to Colvin. And against Houston, second half, Colvin and Heide scored 16 of our 29 points. Let that sink in.
Holy cherry picking Batman!
 
I don't think it was Myles decision in fact I know it wasn't.
Obviously, you don't have to elaborate if you don't want to, but I can read that one of two ways 1) MP and staff went beyond telling Myles that he had to compete for minutes and suggested or outright told him it was time to pack up or 2) Rosie was the one calling the shots on where Myles plays next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boileratthebeach
Obviously, you don't have to elaborate if you don't want to, but I can read that one of two ways 1) MP and staff went beyond telling Myles that he had to compete for minutes and suggested or outright told him it was time to pack up or 2) Rosie was the one calling the shots on where Myles plays next season.
He shot 31% from 3 while challenging Fletch for minutes 44%. The kid was recruited to play a wing 31% from deep on a team built to have at least 3 shooters on the court won't work. After 2 full years of opportunity IMO, he didn't raise his game to an elite level. If as reported and I know it's true Jack is as good as Fletch from 3 why would he see the court in a shooter's role? Rosie can blame his poor performance on Painter not running enough plays for him, but he shot 41-131 from 3 just 38 less attempts than Fletch and more than anyone other than Smith and Loyer. He got his chance, and he didn't deliver! You can't play a shooters role when you can't shoot. I haven't seen anyone say he was a better shooter than Jack or CJ. I have but don't need inside info on why he left only Paint and Myles know what was said. But the term of don't let the door hit you where the lord split, you comes to mind. I get it he is a Purdue legacy, and fans tend to view his game with rose colored glasses the numbers don't lie. I have never seen or heard Rosie was trying to call the shots personally I would doubt that ever happened.
 
He shot 31% from 3 while challenging Fletch for minutes 44%. The kid was recruited to play a wing 31% from deep on a team built to have at least 3 shooters on the court won't work. After 2 full years of opportunity IMO, he didn't raise his game to an elite level. If as reported and I know it's true Jack is as good as Fletch from 3 why would he see the court in a shooter's role? Rosie can blame his poor performance on Painter not running enough plays for him, but he shot 41-131 from 3 just 38 less attempts than Fletch and more than anyone other than Smith and Loyer. He got his chance, and he didn't deliver! You can't play a shooters role when you can't shoot. I haven't seen anyone say he was a better shooter than Jack or CJ. I have but don't need inside info on why he left only Paint and Myles know what was said. But the term of don't let the door hit you where the lord split, you comes to mind. I get it he is a Purdue legacy, and fans tend to view his game with rose colored glasses the numbers don't lie. I have never seen or heard Rosie was trying to call the shots personally I would doubt that ever happened.
I don't think anyone disagrees his and Heide's playstyle just didn't fit here. I don't think either are spot shooters that Painter wanted to fold in. I think both would do better in an offense that prioritizes fast break opportunities and drives to the basket, not a team that has a lot of post up, inside out play like we do. No criticisms of anyone needs to happen. Just weren't fits that worked for either the team or the players despite what I am sure was everyone's best efforts.
 
I don't think anyone disagrees his and Heide's playstyle just didn't fit here. I don't think either are spot shooters that Painter wanted to fold in. I think both would do better in an offense that prioritizes fast break opportunities and drives to the basket, not a team that has a lot of post up, inside out play like we do. No criticisms of anyone needs to happen. Just weren't fits that worked for either the team or the players despite what I am sure was everyone's best efforts.
We didn't play that style last year. It was all PnR, off ball movement, Drive and dish, etc. There were some post ups for TKR, but he isn't big enough to do it effectively so it was usually a PnR and a shot from just inside the free throw line or a pass out for 3.

The year before was definitely a post related play style, but we had Edey then......
 
We didn't play that style last year. It was all PnR, off ball movement, Drive and dish, etc. There were some post ups for TKR, but he isn't big enough to do it effectively so it was usually a PnR and a shot from just inside the free throw line or a pass out for 3.

The year before was definitely a post related play style, but we had Edey then......
Strongly disagree that Trey isn’t big enough to post up effectively, but the rest is spot on. Last year‘s offense didn’t look much like the two previous years.
 
He shot 31% from 3 while challenging Fletch for minutes 44%. The kid was recruited to play a wing 31% from deep on a team built to have at least 3 shooters on the court won't work. After 2 full years of opportunity IMO, he didn't raise his game to an elite level. If as reported and I know it's true Jack is as good as Fletch from 3 why would he see the court in a shooter's role? Rosie can blame his poor performance on Painter not running enough plays for him, but he shot 41-131 from 3 just 38 less attempts than Fletch and more than anyone other than Smith and Loyer. He got his chance, and he didn't deliver! You can't play a shooters role when you can't shoot. I haven't seen anyone say he was a better shooter than Jack or CJ. I have but don't need inside info on why he left only Paint and Myles know what was said. But the term of don't let the door hit you where the lord split, you comes to mind. I get it he is a Purdue legacy, and fans tend to view his game with rose colored glasses the numbers don't lie. I have never seen or heard Rosie was trying to call the shots personally I would doubt that ever happened.
Good post. I'm somewhat putting word in you mouth, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like Myles may have gone into that meeting with MP saying something like 'I need to be featured more' and coach said something like 'that's not going to happen and you need to play better to stay in the rotation'. Fan fiction on my part with the conversation, but I can see that being the gist of it.

Completely agree that Myles simply didn't shoot well enough to provide what was needed.
 
Strongly disagree that Trey isn’t big enough to post up effectively, but the rest is spot on. Last year‘s offense didn’t look much like the two previous years.
I guess a better way of saying it is TKR isn't effective at 1970's style post up's like Edey was. Edey could move his man 6-8 feet closer to the basket by backing into him. Edey could take the double and play through it. TKR doesn't do that. He can go a couple dribbles inside, but he isn't moving his man a ton, and if he waits for the double he is likely passing it back out.

TKR's post play is quick under and up moves using speed and agility to put his body and non shooting arm between the defender and the ball. It's extremely effective as long as he does it quick (obviously he put up a ton of points), but if he gets bogged down he isn't backing his man up or playing well through the double. It happens but it wasn't our go to last year for obvious reasons.
 
I guess a better way of saying it is TKR isn't effective at 1970's style post up's like Edey was. Edey could move his man 6-8 feet closer to the basket by backing into him. Edey could take the double and play through it. TKR doesn't do that. He can go a couple dribbles inside, but he isn't moving his man a ton, and if he waits for the double he is likely passing it back out.

TKR's post play is quick under and up moves using speed and agility to put his body and non shooting arm between the defender and the ball. It's extremely effective as long as he does it quick (obviously he put up a ton of points), but if he gets bogged down he isn't backing his man up or playing well through the double. It happens but it wasn't our go to last year for obvious reasons.
More versatile and less physically dominant for sure.
 
I don't think anyone disagrees his and Heide's playstyle just didn't fit here. I don't think either are spot shooters that Painter wanted to fold in. I think both would do better in an offense that prioritizes fast break opportunities and drives to the basket, not a team that has a lot of post up, inside out play like we do. No criticisms of anyone needs to happen. Just weren't fits that worked for either the team or the players despite what I am sure was everyone's best efforts.
I think their styles fit but their games were not making the jump that Painter expected....IMO.

I think they both showed moments of brilliance and sheer talent but obviously not consistent enough to challenge starting minutes and with Cox/Harris emergence as true freshmen, minutes were going to be tough to come by.

Side note, can we talk about how big and physically ready West looks? We talk about having big physical guards for deep runs - we might have that in him.....all the video and clips so far, Painter did it again.
 
I think their styles fit but their games were not making the jump that Painter expected....IMO.

I think they both showed moments of brilliance and sheer talent but obviously not consistent enough to challenge starting minutes and with Cox/Harris emergence as true freshmen, minutes were going to be tough to come by.

Side note, can we talk about how big and physically ready West looks? We talk about having big physical guards for deep runs - we might have that in him.....all the video and clips so far, Painter did it again.
Agree on West, Beef. Oldboiler has been excited about him for quite some time. I just don’t see how he gets much action this year…unless he can beat out gicarri or CJ for some mins!
 
T
I think their styles fit but their games were not making the jump that Painter expected....IMO.

I think they both showed moments of brilliance and sheer talent but obviously not consistent enough to challenge starting minutes and with Cox/Harris emergence as true freshmen, minutes were going to be tough to come by.

Side note, can we talk about how big and physically ready West looks? We talk about having big physical guards for deep runs - we might have that in him.....all the video and clips so far, Painter did it again.
The thing about Antione the first time I watched a full game I thought this kid is physical without fouling he was a slightly build sophomore then. Yes, Painter was on him that long. And then this year he showed up 10-15lbs of muscle heavier. When his team went to zone, he played the 5 slot even though he wasn't the tallest. Kid has great hops for 6.3 and you nailed it he is physical and capable of putting up a triple double any night. I have seen it countless times his team needs a spark, and he drops back-to-back three's I call that clutch. He is going to be a good PG maybe Great. I know Painter wanted Cam to stay because he said so but playing back up minutes behind an All American what are we talking about 6-8 per.
 
I think their styles fit but their games were not making the jump that Painter expected....IMO.

I think they both showed moments of brilliance and sheer talent but obviously not consistent enough to challenge starting minutes and with Cox/Harris emergence as true freshmen, minutes were going to be tough to come by.

…..Last year‘s offense didn’t look much like the two previous years.
Well said.

All it takes is an honest look at how the “featured guy spotlight” has regularly and consistently changed for CMP’s teams over the years — to realize how inaccurate the trite, lazy argument that “Painter’s style doesn’t suit (insert name here)” is!

All the best to Myles and Cam in finding what they want, but at the end of the day, neither one was good enough to capitalize on a golden opportunity, and neither one is remotely close to irreplaceable.

CMP is far from perfect, but IMO the backhanded shots at how he runs this program are beyond tiresome at this point,
 
Well said.

All it takes is an honest look at how the “featured guy spotlight” has regularly and consistently changed for CMP’s teams over the years — to realize how inaccurate the trite, lazy argument that “Painter’s style doesn’t suit (insert name here)” is!

All the best to Myles and Cam in finding what they want, but at the end of the day, neither one was good enough to capitalize on a golden opportunity, and neither one is remotely close to irreplaceable.

CMP is far from perfect, but IMO the backhanded shots at how he runs this program are beyond tiresome at this point,
This. Cline, Ivey, and Carsen had completely different games, but all were shining stars under Painter. So what made Myles' talent so unique that Painter couldn't let him show his juice?
 
Seems like dropping out. Probably a safety issue.
Selfishly, this may be good for Purdue if Omer is able to get over to join the team quickly. At this point, I'm not sure that he needs more high-level international experience. Getting in the gym with the team and starting to pick up the system may be more valuable in his case.
 
Interesting point since everyone is required to do military service. I wonder if it is within a specific age range that your commitment must be completed.

Not sure what the requirements and exceptions are for Israeli citizens.

I know South Korea has mandatory military service of 18 -21 months before age 35.....it has come up a few times with notable professional golfers when Sangmoon Bae (a two-time winner on the PGA Tour) had to enlist several years ago and then more recently when the Olympics included golf again - earning a medal would provide an exemption.

Man......talk about adding more pressure to the competition for South Koreans.

They added the Asian Games to the list, and Si Woo Kim, and Sungjae Im earned a gold medal to get an exemption recently......Tom Kim and Ben An, however, did not medal at the recent Paris Olympics in 2024, unfortunately. The announcers appeared uncomfortable talking about it, but it was a side story.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerAndy
Not sure what the requirements and exceptions are for Israeli citizens.

I know South Korea has mandatory military service of 18 -21 months before age 35.....it has come up a few times with notable professional golfers when Sangmoon Bae (a two-time winner on the PGA Tour) had to enlist several years ago and then more recently when the Olympics included golf again - earning a medal would provide an exemption.

Man......talk about ading more pressure to the competition for South Koreans.

They added the Asian Games to the list, and Si Woo Kim, and Sungjae Im earned a gold medal to get an exemption recently......Tom Kim and Ben An, however, did not medal at the recent Paris Olympics in 2024, unfortunately. The announcers appeared uncomfortable talking about it, but it was a side story.
One exemption is residing abroad, so one assumes as long as he makes it over here, he won't be signed up for conscription. He probably should find his way over sooner than later before things deteriorate further.
 
  • Like
Reactions: northside100
Israel's military conscription requirements, governed by the Defense Service Law of 1986, mandate compulsory service for most citizens and permanent residents over the age of 18. Here’s a detailed overview based on available information:


Who Must Serve​



Service Duration​



Exemptions​


Exemptions are granted on specific grounds, though some are controversial:


Reserve Duty​


  • After completing mandatory service, most conscripts are eligible for reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) until age 40 for soldiers and 45 for officers. In June 2024, proposals were introduced to extend these limits to 41 for soldiers and 46 for officers, with specialized roles (e.g., doctors, combat reservists) potentially serving until age 50 or 52.
  • Reservists may be called up for training or active duty, typically up to 45 days per year, though this can increase during national emergencies (e.g., the 2023–2024 Gaza conflict saw extensive reserve mobilization).
  • Exemptions from reserve duty may apply for medical reasons, family obligations, or residence abroad. New immigrants may have reduced reserve obligations depending on their age and length of service.

Additional Details​


  • Enforcement and Compliance:
    • Draft evasion is a criminal offense, punishable by fines or imprisonment, though enforcement varies. For example, conscientious objectors may face jail time but can sometimes negotiate alternative service.
    • The 2024 Supreme Court ruling ending blanket exemptions for ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Jews led to increased draft efforts, but compliance remains low, with only a small fraction of the targeted 12,000 Haredi men enlisting by late 2024.
  • Voluntary Service:
    • Exempt groups, such as Arab citizens or ultra-Orthodox Jews, can volunteer. Volunteers may serve in combat or non-combat roles, with some Bedouin and Druze communities having high voluntary enlistment rates.
    • Sherut Leumi (national service) is an alternative for women and some exempt men, involving 1–2 years of work in education, healthcare, or community services.
  • Immigrant Considerations:
    • New immigrants (olim) arriving before age 28 (men) or 27 (women) are typically required to serve, with service length adjusted based on age and family status. For example:
      • Men aged 18–19 serve 36 months (as of July 2024).
      • Women aged 18–19 serve 24 months, or 32 months for combat roles.
      • Immigrants arriving after age 27 may serve 12–20 months or be exempt, especially if married or with children.
    • A one-year acclimation period is often granted before conscription begins.
  • Combat vs. Non-Combat Roles:
    • Conscripts are assigned roles based on physical and psychological evaluations. Combat roles, open to both men and women, require longer training and commitment (e.g., 32 months for women in combat units like artillery or border police).
    • Non-combat roles include intelligence, logistics, or administrative positions, often with shorter training periods.

Key Considerations​


  • Cultural and Political Context: Mandatory conscription is a cornerstone of Israeli society, reflecting the country’s security needs. However, debates over exemptions (especially for Haredi Jews) and gender equality in combat roles remain contentious.
  • Recent Developments: The 2024 extension of mandatory service to 36 months for men and increased reserve age limits reflect heightened security demands due to ongoing regional conflicts.
  • Support for Conscripts: The IDF provides language training for immigrants, psychological support, and integration programs to ease service for diverse populations.
 
Israel's military conscription requirements, governed by the Defense Service Law of 1986, mandate compulsory service for most citizens and permanent residents over the age of 18. Here’s a detailed overview based on available information:


Who Must Serve​



Service Duration​



Exemptions​


Exemptions are granted on specific grounds, though some are controversial:



Reserve Duty​


  • After completing mandatory service, most conscripts are eligible for reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) until age 40 for soldiers and 45 for officers. In June 2024, proposals were introduced to extend these limits to 41 for soldiers and 46 for officers, with specialized roles (e.g., doctors, combat reservists) potentially serving until age 50 or 52.
  • Reservists may be called up for training or active duty, typically up to 45 days per year, though this can increase during national emergencies (e.g., the 2023–2024 Gaza conflict saw extensive reserve mobilization).
  • Exemptions from reserve duty may apply for medical reasons, family obligations, or residence abroad. New immigrants may have reduced reserve obligations depending on their age and length of service.

Additional Details​


  • Enforcement and Compliance:
    • Draft evasion is a criminal offense, punishable by fines or imprisonment, though enforcement varies. For example, conscientious objectors may face jail time but can sometimes negotiate alternative service.
    • The 2024 Supreme Court ruling ending blanket exemptions for ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Jews led to increased draft efforts, but compliance remains low, with only a small fraction of the targeted 12,000 Haredi men enlisting by late 2024.
  • Voluntary Service:
    • Exempt groups, such as Arab citizens or ultra-Orthodox Jews, can volunteer. Volunteers may serve in combat or non-combat roles, with some Bedouin and Druze communities having high voluntary enlistment rates.
    • Sherut Leumi (national service) is an alternative for women and some exempt men, involving 1–2 years of work in education, healthcare, or community services.
  • Immigrant Considerations:
    • New immigrants (olim) arriving before age 28 (men) or 27 (women) are typically required to serve, with service length adjusted based on age and family status. For example:
      • Men aged 18–19 serve 36 months (as of July 2024).
      • Women aged 18–19 serve 24 months, or 32 months for combat roles.
      • Immigrants arriving after age 27 may serve 12–20 months or be exempt, especially if married or with children.
    • A one-year acclimation period is often granted before conscription begins.
  • Combat vs. Non-Combat Roles:
    • Conscripts are assigned roles based on physical and psychological evaluations. Combat roles, open to both men and women, require longer training and commitment (e.g., 32 months for women in combat units like artillery or border police).
    • Non-combat roles include intelligence, logistics, or administrative positions, often with shorter training periods.

Key Considerations​


  • Cultural and Political Context: Mandatory conscription is a cornerstone of Israeli society, reflecting the country’s security needs. However, debates over exemptions (especially for Haredi Jews) and gender equality in combat roles remain contentious.
  • Recent Developments: The 2024 extension of mandatory service to 36 months for men and increased reserve age limits reflect heightened security demands due to ongoing regional conflicts.
  • Support for Conscripts: The IDF provides language training for immigrants, psychological support, and integration programs to ease service for diverse populations.

Did you come to a conclusion from this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldboiler52
Not sure what the requirements and exceptions are for Israeli citizens.

I know South Korea has mandatory military service of 18 -21 months before age 35.....it has come up a few times with notable professional golfers when Sangmoon Bae (a two-time winner on the PGA Tour) had to enlist several years ago and then more recently when the Olympics included golf again - earning a medal would provide an exemption.

Man......talk about ading more pressure to the competition for South Koreans.

They added the Asian Games to the list, and Si Woo Kim, and Sungjae Im earned a gold medal to get an exemption recently......Tom Kim and Ben An, however, did not medal at the recent Paris Olympics in 2024, unfortunately. The announcers appeared uncomfortable talking about it, but it was a side story.
Interesting. As much as I am into golf, I didn't know all of that.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT