Smith

[TopSecretBoiler]

I actually started to respond but this may be the worst troll attempt I've ever seen.

K. good work! like most Purdue coverage !!!

 

[northside100]

Like what?

Another example, I listened to the first half of their Washington game recap from the Sleepers guys (I'm a glutton for punishment) and it was a prime example of how they use sensational and simplistic takes. It's not necessarily wrong, but less than what I'd consider intellectually honest.

Their takes include that TKR is a bad defender, evidenced by Osobor going for 28 on 8 of 9 shooting, and that MP came in with a bad game plan and was thoroughly outcoached in the first half. Exactly what I'd expect uneducated fanboys to say. I couldn't stomach to listen to the second half of their recap but I'm sure they were just as simplistically complementary of Purdue's performance in the second half.

 

[boilerzz]

Another example, I listened to the first half of their Washington game recap from the Sleepers guys (I'm a glutton for punishment) and it was a prime example of how they use sensational and simplistic takes. It's not necessarily wrong, but less than what I'd consider intellectually honest.

Their takes include that TKR is a bad defender, evidenced by Osobor going for 28 on 8 of 9 shooting, and that MP came in with a bad game plan and was thoroughly outcoached in the first half. Exactly what I'd expect uneducated fanboys to say. I couldn't stomach to listen to the second half of their recap but I'm sure they were just as simplistically complementary of Purdue's performance in the second half.

Does Lenny work for Sleepers?

 

[DwaynePurvis00]

Another example, I listened to the first half of their Washington game recap from the Sleepers guys (I'm a glutton for punishment) and it was a prime example of how they use sensational and simplistic takes. It's not necessarily wrong, but less than what I'd consider intellectually honest.

Their takes include that TKR is a bad defender, evidenced by Osobor going for 28 on 8 of 9 shooting, and that MP came in with a bad game plan and was thoroughly outcoached in the first half. Exactly what I'd expect uneducated fanboys to say. I couldn't stomach to listen to the second half of their recap but I'm sure they were just as simplistically complementary of Purdue's performance in the second half.

Good lord. “Had a bad game plan”. What are they on? We missed a ton of shots we usually hit and they hit some they don’t and they weee only up 8. Osobor was 4/17 from 3 and I’d still let him shoot wide open. There weee a couple times where he was wide open and we had a guy turn (cox) and start to run at him to cover the ball (what’s he supposed to do) and then realize, “ah scouting report says this guy is NOT a good shooter” and he basically ran away from him to allow him to shoot 😂

I’m sure Osobor will go 4/30 rest of season and paint will allow him to shoot it again if we run into them somehow.

What crazy is we shot so bad from 3 but still beat them and just dominated second half with out hitting 3s. It helps Washington is bad, but their floor also sucks.

 

[TopSecretBoiler]

The literally predicted we'd struggle in the first half and win by double digits. So sensitive!

 

[Ihaveswag29]

Another example, I listened to the first half of their Washington game recap from the Sleepers guys (I'm a glutton for punishment) and it was a prime example of how they use sensational and simplistic takes. It's not necessarily wrong, but less than what I'd consider intellectually honest.

Their takes include that TKR is a bad defender, evidenced by Osobor going for 28 on 8 of 9 shooting, and that MP came in with a bad game plan and was thoroughly outcoached in the first half. Exactly what I'd expect uneducated fanboys to say. I couldn't stomach to listen to the second half of their recap but I'm sure they were just as simplistically complementary of Purdue's performance in the second half.

Eh having a take that you don’t agree with isn’t the same as being sensational for viewers. I don’t agree with the take regarding osabor either, but that doesn’t mean it was sensational.

 

[Ihaveswag29]

Good lord. “Had a bad game plan”. What are they on? We missed a ton of shots we usually hit and they hit some they don’t and they weee only up 8. Osobor was 4/17 from 3 and I’d still let him shoot wide open. There weee a couple times where he was wide open and we had a guy turn (cox) and start to run at him to cover the ball (what’s he supposed to do) and then realize, “ah scouting report says this guy is NOT a good shooter” and he basically ran away from him to allow him to shoot 😂

I’m sure Osobor will go 4/30 rest of season and paint will allow him to shoot it again if we run into them somehow.

What crazy is we shot so bad from 3 but still beat them and just dominated second half with out hitting 3s. It helps Washington is bad, but their floor also sucks.

I actually agree with their take on having a bad game plan in the first half. We were clearly caught off guard with their crazy hard hedge and it killed our rhythm without a counter in the first half.