Our somewhat slow paced offense will get a wake up call when the boys from Bama come to town , we are going to have to play some defense and speed up to keep up. Boiler up
They're getting "better" on D, but still a ways to go. I think we'll take some lumps (maybe bad losses) against good teams early. BS loose ball handling going to be a problem if it keeps showing up. Play them again later.Our somewhat slow paced offense will get a wake up call when the boys from Bama come to town , we are going to have to play some defense and speed up to keep up. Boiler up
Our somewhat slow paced offense will get a wake up call when the boys from Bama come to town , we are going to have to play some defense and speed up to keep up. Boiler up
They're getting "better" on D, but still a ways to go. I think we'll take some lumps (maybe bad losses) against good teams early. BS loose ball handling going to be a problem if it keeps showing up. Play them again later.
Slow pace? We're averaging 84 ppg. Against not garbage competition.
Friday will be a good litmus test. The thing is, if you think we haven't looked that good so far, neither has Alabama. They had to hold off not only McNeese last night, but also Arkansas State, who lost 17 games last year. I haven't watched more than a couple minutes of their games, but it's clear that they're still figuring things out too.
I'm putting the spread at Purdue -1.5 Friday. We shall see.
I’d be shocked to see us favored…but let’s see.Slow pace? We're averaging 84 ppg. Against not garbage competition.
Friday will be a good litmus test. The thing is, if you think we haven't looked that good so far, neither has Alabama. They had to hold off not only McNeese last night, but also Arkansas State, who lost 17 games last year. I haven't watched more than a couple minutes of their games, but it's clear that they're still figuring things out too.
I'm putting the spread at Purdue -1.5 Friday. We shall see.
it'll be a great test for our guys , but if we shoot well, rebound, and keep TO's to a minimum, they'll be alright. At the very least it'll serve as great experience that should help down the road. So let them come to townOur somewhat slow paced offense will get a wake up call when the boys from Bama come to town , we are going to have to play some defense and speed up to keep up. Boiler up
You know a lot more about setting odds then I do. I will be very surprised if Alabama isn't favored by a few points.Slow pace? We're averaging 84 ppg. Against not garbage competition.
Friday will be a good litmus test. The thing is, if you think we haven't looked that good so far, neither has Alabama. They had to hold off not only McNeese last night, but also Arkansas State, who lost 17 games last year. I haven't watched more than a couple minutes of their games, but it's clear that they're still figuring things out too.
I'm putting the spread at Purdue -1.5 Friday. We shall see.
Agree Jacobsen in particular with his shot blocking created some hesitation in the lane by all. As for the freshman, I remember some freshmen that played in a November tournament and kicked butt a couple years ago ....Yes only had 10 TOs last night, but should have been 6 with those just careless head scratchers.
I agree we need to get better on D. Some small steps are there. Colvin an example last night. This Jacobsen deal is a bigger set back than many think. Alot of coaching to instill the will to box out in these guys by Jan. conf season.
I almost hope we don't shoot lights out and beat AL. I think they might??
But long term, hate to say it, I prefer a thrashing by AL. It would help the coaches get their attention on boxing out and interior D....both which are sub par.
even and L there wouldn’t be the end of the world. I mean remember last year."We better play better Friday or Purdue will kick our tails.
Bama probably. Marquette…they haven’t really been that great. Obviously can beat us but I don’t expect us to lose to themI am far less concerned about our pace than I am about defense. We have youth struggles that will get ironed out as the season progresses.
My biggest concern is the number of unforced errors. Smith launching a pass to Loyer, who wasn't looking, is a prime example.
I expect two losses in a row.
Rebounds per game
Purdue: 34 (just over 7 offensive)
Bama: 47 (13 offensive
Well, on the flip side, you could say they’ve missed a lot of shots so…that’s why they have high rebounding numbers 🫣 😂Looks like that's the game right there.
Can we compete on the boards? For us, just getting close to them in perhaps a 40R game will be a great stride.
But AL looks like an old Mich State Team that just kills you in the glass, and keeps wearing you down via shots on goal where you are playing D all night.
Yeah, if they out-rebound us by 13 it’s gonna be a long night.Looks like that's the game right there.
Can we compete on the boards? For us, just getting close to them in perhaps a 40R game will be a great stride.
But AL looks like an old Mich State Team that just kills you in the glass, and keeps wearing you down via shots on goal where you are playing D all night.
I amazed Bama shooting is so low %Will be interesting how the teams will shoot from 3…
Purdue is hitting just about 44% on 10 makes on ~24 attempts a game through 3 games. 54% overall from the field and 70% from FT.
Bama shooting 30% on just over 8 made 3s a game on ~ 28 attempts a game. 49% from the field overall and 67% overall from FT.
other stats (avg per game) — >
Rebounds per game
Purdue: 34 (just over 7 offensive)
Bama: 47 (13 offensive
Assists:
Purdue: 20
Bama: ~17
Turnovers:
Purdue: 13
Bama: 12
Steals:
Purdue: 6
Bama: 6
Blocks:
Purdue: 3
Bama: ~5
Maybe we have a 3 night Loyer Smith Colvin CoxLooks like that's the game right there.
Can we compete on the boards? For us, just getting close to them in perhaps a 40R game will be a great stride.
But AL looks like an old Mich State Team that just kills you in the glass, and keeps wearing you down via shots on goal where you are playing D all night.
Bring on the Berg ! Cmon BergYeah, if they out-rebound us by 13 it’s gonna be a long night.
Bama -2 is my guessSlow pace? We're averaging 84 ppg. Against not garbage competition.
Friday will be a good litmus test. The thing is, if you think we haven't looked that good so far, neither has Alabama. They had to hold off not only McNeese last night, but also Arkansas State, who lost 17 games last year. I haven't watched more than a couple minutes of their games, but it's clear that they're still figuring things out too.
I'm putting the spread at Purdue -1.5 Friday. We shall see.
Good info. Pretty close competition too. Here are the opponents and Kenpom ranking:Will be interesting how the teams will shoot from 3…
Purdue is hitting just about 44% on 10 makes on ~24 attempts a game through 3 games. 54% overall from the field and 70% from FT.
Bama shooting 30% on just over 8 made 3s a game on ~ 28 attempts a game. 49% from the field overall and 67% overall from FT.
other stats (avg per game) — >
Rebounds per game
Purdue: 34 (just over 7 offensive)
Bama: 47 (13 offensive
Assists:
Purdue: 20
Bama: ~17
Turnovers:
Purdue: 13
Bama: 12
Steals:
Purdue: 6
Bama: 6
Blocks:
Purdue: 3
Bama: ~5
Maybe we have a 3 night Loyer Smith Colvin Cox
+1 - now we NEED him to step up.Bring on the Berg ! Cmon Berg
Not sure an athletic Alabama team is a good matchup for Berg, he’s slow.Bring on the Berg ! Cmon Berg
I’ll predict Alabama -3I’d be shocked to see us favored…but let’s see.
This is the time you find out those things. Many said the same about Zach in his early years. Yes, he's older, but still hasn't seen the floor much at any advanced level of hoops. He doesn't seem so mechanical when you watch drills of him so I suspect like a lot of newbies things are happening very quickly for him on the floor. he's not played nearly enough to be past that and playing relaxed and free and not over thinking specific situations and where I'm supposed to be when X man goes corner, ect ect.Not sure an athletic Alabama team is a good matchup for Berg, he’s slow.
Take a lot of 3pt shots and you get a lot of long bounces outside of the lane. It would make sense they have more rebounds and possessions with as many missed shots from deep as they have.Well, on the flip side, you could say they’ve missed a lot of shots so…that’s why they have high rebounding numbers 🫣 😂
Well I was hoping he get in the way , no one was to sure about Edey either, they still aren't despite 2 nopy.Not sure an athletic Alabama team is a good matchup for Berg, he’s slow.
I doubt you see the same team Friday that you will see in February. This is a new team. Give them time to grow.I see this game as being a great forecast for the season. I don’t see playing small ball being successful against the top teams.
I also don’t see Berg as being anything more than a supporting role player