This is just you speaking for yourself. I believe you're on the record saying similar things about gays and lesbians.........that they gave a mental disorder. It obviously follows than you feel the same about the trans community. Religious minorities are not your bag. I guess you're ok with color as long as they are MAGA. Those attitudes correlate with a '50s version of women but who knows.
I have no idea what you said or why you said it. However, due to your confusion I'll attempt to clear your mind. Gays, lesbians, tranny's and even those that act like cats and such are "abnormal" and do a mental disorder. I'm unsure what you call a religious minority to help you with that and those that are intelligent whether colored or not are okay, and....I can correlate the shootings in Chicago with abortions in New York which the Pearson Product Correlation Moment would show.
Of course you do. You believe non heterosexuals have a mental disorder, just like Q believes.
We agree. Kinzinger is a patriot and a hero.
Riveting, it's the same double standard as the N-word. You say it, you're a racist monster. Rap artist says it, no problem.
Not exactly. NAACP leadership throughout the years said that they kept “Colored” in the name out of respect for the history and the founders of organization.
Would you agree, Bob, that non-heteros are incompatible with evolution, which is how many people including me believe that life advanced on this planet?
If he really did, he would not have joined the fake J6 committee and allowed himself to be a useful idiot for Pelosi.
I am certain that science has proven that homosexuals can have children.
No, but I am guessing gays have far fewer children that straights such that they should have dropped out of the gene pool over thousands of years.
Oh lord. While that is true, we were discussing biological children. Do I need to explain to you how human reproduction works? Hint: it's not when a mommy and daddy wish really hard and a stork drops a blanket-wrapped bundle on the porch.
What's NAACP stand for? Have you filed a complaint against them for their name?
I believe that many democrats in general have a mental disorder...even if they no longer consider it a mental disorder such as neurosis or cradle to the grave control. Not sure how Islam compares to Christianity in general...lot of countries aren't Christian. I don't consider a religion that started 600 years later than Christianity, that was not predicted , but copied prayer beads and held Mary in higher esteem than Fatima and only grew by the sword a serious religion...not to mention the incapability with the constitution and death to the infidels. You have no idea on so much Bob, but you leap to labeling those that you disagree with or can't understand what they say...how do you know my relatives don't have people of some color other than white in them...and part of the homosexual community? How many dog houses do you want to bet? Lastly, sorry you don't understand correlation and its relevance.
Wait....what? Did you just say homosexuals can have children? Do you mean as in 'giving birth', not children through adoption?
colored was a word used in this thread as in people of "color" and your calling me racist has no basis in reality. Perhaps you forget that I admire Thomas Sowell who happens to be black although it isn't the color that I love...it is his brain which you can't understand it appears
Colored is a word used in this thread by racists. Like the rest of us you appear to be seasoned. You should know full well that since the 60s calling someone colored is a racial slur. You say that it’s used in this thread to say people of color. Then say “People of color”.
do you not understand that people of color are colored merely by the exact words...and none of that means anything as far as racism. Your denigrating Thomas Sowell is much more racist than me liking him for his brilliance. You don't believe that this smart man is "black enough" and I don't care that he is a black man, because he is smart and I admire his brilliance. You see, I look for thought, not color in the world I live which is the opposite of your approach. You see black and white and I see those not very bright and those that are...and a degree doesn't automatically put one on one side of the ledger as we should all know here
Man you have a strange way of looking at stuff. Also, you must live in a bubble. No uses the word “colored” anymore other than racists. Plus you should know that it is a slur.
Obviously "slavery" is NOT race based. All races have enslaved their own race as well as other races. It is about vulnerability to be enslaved as history has shown for thousands of years
You, the Boneman for sure, and others need to enroll in a local community college and take some history classes.
Why? Does every living creature have to procreate for evolution to work? Do you believe homosexuality is genetically transmitted?
I think you're mixing up the concept of slavery and racism.
So you think a few hundred years ago that had someone brought Asians to the northern states to sell to teh southern states that the southern states wouldn't use Asians as they did blacks? The scientist you mention as racist is separate from slavery. It is entirely possible to be racist or not to be racist and still enslave people as a result of their vulnerability to be sold as slaves. I've mentioned before, and it never soaked in, that people enslaved their own race as a result of vulnerability and this has went on for thousands of years. All slaves whether bought or taken as a result of direct war were owned by those that bought or "took" and were subject to anything the owners wanted as they were all property that was owned.
But, wiithout black Africans selling their fellow black Africans into slavery, the transatlantic slave trade wouldn't have existed. It wasn't about race, it was about economics and supply/demand, in this case the SnD was for human labor. No white Europeans went onto African soil and rounded up a group of blacks, put them in shackles and force marched them onto a ship.
Nope, I told y’all several times the transatlantic slave trade was based on chattel slavery. Which was race based and hatred towards the blacks. When slavery was over in 1865, if it wasn’t about race then why after reconstruction all hell breaks loose with the birth of Jim Crow, the KKK and other white supremacy groups? Compared to other forms of slavery in history. US slavery was based purely on white supremacy.
No, there is no homosexuality gene as my son-in-law who did DNA research told my sister when asked. That is not to imply that all men have the same characteristics in masculinity or that women have the same level of femininity. Even the four temperaments (Sanguine, Phlegmatic, Choleric, and Melancholic) are altered by personality and do not define the total person as people share in different dosages the four temperaments.
Every time y'all post y'all prove your racist ways. Then have the nerve to try an educate a black man about slavery in the US is unreal. We've been through this several times.
How about if the white Europeans didn't have a demand for black Africans the transatlantic slave trade would not exist. The black Africans that were sold to the Europeans were basically prisoners of war of the winning African tribe during war. So naturally they are either going to kill them or sell them to the Europeans for money, weapons, supplies what ever. Some of these tribal losers in battle were tortured to death.
So, you agree that the enslavement of black Africans was a function of an economic engine, not racism? The supply of African slaves provided by their fellow black Africans filled a need in the supply chain which was labor.
