ADVERTISEMENT

DOGE has already cancelled over $1 BILLION in government DEI contracts.

Hey all you Indiana MAGAts!

How do you feel about Indiana Senator, Marine Vet, and Trump-era RNC Senatorial chair Todd Young?

Because Vice President Musk just targeted him as a “Deep State Puppet.”

His crime? Daring to question the motivations of Putin’s home girl Tulsi Gabbard.

You just can’t make this stuff up.
 
Hey all you Indiana MAGAts!

How do you feel about Indiana Senator, Marine Vet, and Trump-era RNC Senatorial chair Todd Young?

Because Vice President Musk just targeted him as a “Deep State Puppet.”

His crime? Daring to question the motivations of Putin’s home girl Tulsi Gabbard.

You just can’t make this stuff up.
Yeah ain’t it a shame the Republicans don’t stick together like the Democrats.
 
Yeah ain’t it a shame the Republicans don’t stick together like the Democrats.
200.gif
 
Yeah ain’t it a shame the Republicans don’t stick together like the Democrats.
You know the irony for me is remembering my deceased brother-in-law that ran for state congress as a dem many years ago stating that he wished the dems would stick together more like the repubs. That was close to 40 years ago. ;)
 
Great job, Elon!

Department of Government Efficiency @DOGE

Through 1/29/2025, 85 DEIA related contracts totaling ~$1B have been terminated within the Dept. of Ed, GSA, OPM, EPA, DoL, Treasury, DoD, USDA, Commerce, DHS, VA, HHS, State, NSF, NRC, NLRB, PBGC, USAID, RRB, SSA, SBA, BLM, CFPB, NPS, and NOAA.

Let's add to this with this


and especially this

 
  • Like
Reactions: Quix0te and SKYDOG
Hey all you Indiana MAGAts!

How do you feel about Indiana Senator, Marine Vet, and Trump-era RNC Senatorial chair Todd Young?

Because Vice President Musk just targeted him as a “Deep State Puppet.”

His crime? Daring to question the motivations of Putin’s home girl Tulsi Gabbard.

You just can’t make this stuff up.
Sounds like it's time for your TDS booster shot. I heard they're coming out with a MDS shot as well. You might want to look into it.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like it's time for your TDS booster shot. I heard their coming out with a MDS shot as well. You might want to look into it.
Nice. When presented with a fact your response is fact free middle school name calling.

I know that (and whattaboutisms) are all you've got so I'm not surprised that's your go-to.
 
Nice. When presented with a fact your response is fact free middle school name calling.

I know that (and whattaboutisms) are all you've got so I'm not surprised that's your go-to.
Too many things going on and can't state why I'm questionable on Young since he has been one I haven't thought about for some time.
 
Too many things going on and can't state why I'm questionable on Young since he has been one I haven't thought about for some time.
It's because Young sees all the professional intel on Tulsi Gabbard and decided to express his values and conscience. That is confusing when a guy acknowledges reality and won't bend to Trump sycophants.

And now he'll join in some statement that all is well, and again there will be another vivid example to all that Trump doesn't know what he's doing. Gabbard is a big fan of Edward Snowden and Bassar Assad for crissakes. There apparently is a limit, even for those that want to get elected in a Trump-believing primary.
 
It's because Young sees all the professional intel on Tulsi Gabbard and decided to express his values and conscience. That is confusing when a guy acknowledges reality and won't bend to Trump sycophants.

And now he'll join in some statement that all is well, and again there will be another vivid example to all that Trump doesn't know what he's doing. Gabbard is a big fan of Edward Snowden and Bassar Assad for crissakes. There apparently is a limit, even for those that want to get elected in a Trump-believing primary.
This goes back to when he was running and has nothing to do with Tulsi. I'm just drawing a blank because he isn't running and there are a LOT more important things than recalling any concerns over Young. Hope Kash gets done what needs done...

 
It's because Young sees all the professional intel on Tulsi Gabbard and decided to express his values and conscience. That is confusing when a guy acknowledges reality and won't bend to Trump sycophants.

And now he'll join in some statement that all is well, and again there will be another vivid example to all that Trump doesn't know what he's doing. Gabbard is a big fan of Edward Snowden and Bassar Assad for crissakes. There apparently is a limit, even for those that want to get elected in a Trump-believing primary.
Been a while, but found the following and it may have been as simple as Stutzman's better understanding of the crisis at the border which for years I've had a concern.

"Young's victory is significant for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

CNN reports that McConnell's super PAC, as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, pumped money into the Indiana race in a bid to defeat Stutzman, who McConnell fears is a second coming of Cruz, and another threat to his authority.


Stutzman has been a leader of the Tea Party in the House since he joined Congress."

"Young introduced himself to voters with his service in the military. Stutzman described himself as a small business owner.

Both men said they would repeal the Affordable Care Act. Both anti-abortion conservatives expressed a commitment to protecting the unborn.

Stutzman says the U.S. should build a wall on the country's border with Mexico.

"I believe that we have other issues just besides economic issues at the border," Stutzman said. "We have human trafficking, we have drug trafficking problems, and all of these are hitting our country in a dramatic way. I believe we have to know who's coming in and out of this country."

When asked if he agrees, Young didn't answer directly.


"It's going to take an amalgam of different factors I learned from my time in the U.S. Marine Corps, but it is essential during a time of war that we continue to keep that southern border safe from terrorists coming in," he said.

When asked about the country's spending on defense, both point to conservative budgets. Stutzman says he'd make sure military spending is as its highest point. Young says he'd support additional funding for next-generation equipment.

Both men claimed victory in the debate. Whose message resonates with voters remains to be seen on May 3."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
Been a while, but found the following and it may have been as simple as Stutzman's better understanding of the crisis at the border which for years I've had a concern.

"Young's victory is significant for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

CNN reports that McConnell's super PAC, as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, pumped money into the Indiana race in a bid to defeat Stutzman, who McConnell fears is a second coming of Cruz, and another threat to his authority.


Stutzman has been a leader of the Tea Party in the House since he joined Congress."

"Young introduced himself to voters with his service in the military. Stutzman described himself as a small business owner.

Both men said they would repeal the Affordable Care Act. Both anti-abortion conservatives expressed a commitment to protecting the unborn.

Stutzman says the U.S. should build a wall on the country's border with Mexico.

"I believe that we have other issues just besides economic issues at the border," Stutzman said. "We have human trafficking, we have drug trafficking problems, and all of these are hitting our country in a dramatic way. I believe we have to know who's coming in and out of this country."

When asked if he agrees, Young didn't answer directly.


"It's going to take an amalgam of different factors I learned from my time in the U.S. Marine Corps, but it is essential during a time of war that we continue to keep that southern border safe from terrorists coming in," he said.

When asked about the country's spending on defense, both point to conservative budgets. Stutzman says he'd make sure military spending is as its highest point. Young says he'd support additional funding for next-generation equipment.

Both men claimed victory in the debate. Whose message resonates with voters remains to be seen on May 3."
Appreciate that - it's a good description of actual words from the candidates at the time

FWIW, when Young stated "It's going to take an amalgam of different factors I learned from my time in the U.S. Marine Corps, but it is essential during a time of war that we continue to keep that southern border safe from terrorists coming in," in my opinion he was spot on.

Because the vast majority of illegal immigrants don't get into the US by swimming, tunneling, or walking into the US. Unless you'd like to cancel all tourist and family visitation visas it's going to take an amalgam of different factors to improve the situation.

So you compared the statements of two candidates on improving enforcement of immigration and national security. ANSWER ME THIS, which one had a better resume for best understanding viable, logical solutions?
  • The one with
    1. no college degree whose
    2. non-government experience was as a small town farmer (an admirable profession), or
  • The one who was
    1. a cum laude graduate of the US Naval Academy, has
    2. an MBA from the University of Chicago,
    3. led a military intelligence department,
    4. has a law degree and
    5. was the head of the Federalist Society in law school,
    6. was a professor of public affairs, and
    7. worked both as a lawyer and
    8. a government service delivery improvement consultant.
For me? Todd Young not trusting Tulsi Gabbard is incredibly notable. It is generally a very good idea to trust people like Todd Young who have a resume that allows them to know what the hell they're talking about.
 
Provided for those of you who dont know that 'USAID' is a CIA (deep state) front-group. On the outside, its a so-called "aid organization". Its REAL purpose is to work behind the scenes to overthrow democratically elected governments in Central and South America (staging/sponsoring coups, installing a puppet dictator). Trump is making very dangerous enemies.
Now I know this may come as a surprise to some of you that get your news from corporate media like cnn or fox.
 
Provided for those of you who dont know that 'USAID' is a CIA (deep state) front-group. On the outside, its a so-called "aid organization". Its REAL purpose is to work behind the scenes to overthrow democratically elected governments in Central and South America (staging/sponsoring coups, installing a puppet dictator). Trump is making very dangerous enemies.
Now I know this may come as a surprise to some of you that get your news from corporate media like cnn or fox.
relative to the government spending I have a Libertarian lean . A little diddy below-

Officials are shutting down a federal agency called the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) with President Donald Trump’s blessing, Elon Musk said today.

“He agreed we should shut it down,” Musk said during a live session on the social media platform X, after saying he had spoken with Trump about the agency.

“It became apparent that its not an apple with a worm it in,” Musk said. “What we have is just a ball of worms. You’ve got to basically get rid of the whole thing. It’s beyond repair.”

Musk added in a post on X: “We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.”

Here’s what to know about Trump’s unfolding shake-up at USAID.

What Is USAID?

Established in 1961, USAID manages the distribution of U.S. aid and other financial assistance to foreign nations.

The agency’s initiatives include humanitarian response to natural disasters worldwide, global health initiatives, climate and environmental programs, and an array of others related to economics, governance, and education.

In 2023, the most recent year with full data available, USAID distributed around $36.8 billion in global aid, roughly half of all foreign aid the U.S. distributed.

For Republicans, USAID is a prime example of government waste; many criticize it for lacking transparency and oversight in how it spends its nearly $50 billion budget.

Democrats are more supportive of the agency, championing it as a life-saving source of international assistance.

Its international objectives put USAID as an institution in direct contradiction to Trump’s foreign policy aims—which emphasize focusing taxpayer spending domestically.

What’s Happening at the Agency?

On day one, Trump signed an executive order placing a 90-day moratorium on all U.S. foreign aid disbursements to allow for a reevaluation of whether those payments align with U.S. interests.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio later allowed certain humanitarian aid to continue in the interim.

Between 800 and 900 contractors from the Global Health and Humanitarian Assistance bureaus have already been fired.

Other employees have been laid off as well, with the administration citing efforts by these employees “designed to circumvent the president’s executive orders.”

Trump said on Feb. 2 that the agency “has been run by a bunch of RADICAL LUNATICS and we’re getting them out … and then we’ll make a decision.” [delete]

Additionally, the agency’s website has gone dark, while USAID’s official X account was also deleted.

Republicans have long been critical of USAID. Now, Trump’s allies are making a dedicated push to dismantle the agency.

“USAID is a criminal organization,” said Elon Musk, a top political ally to Trump, in a post on X. “Time for it to die.”

Others, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), have pointed to its grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is at the center of theories about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Others simply see the foreign aid as largely a waste of taxpayer money with too little oversight.

Merger With State

Outlets are reporting that USAID is on track to be rolled into the State Department, in a significantly scaled-down capacity.

Trump is reported to be planning an executive order that would do just that, but Trump and his allies have been tight-lipped about specifics.

Conservatives in Washington have long discussed the idea of merging the two organizations, with the idea being presented in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025.

House Foreign Affairs Chairman Brian Mast (R-Fla.) seemed to verify that Trump was inclined to go in this direction, saying in a Feb. 2 appearance on CBS that USAID “is likely to be going to be rolled more closely under Secretary Rubio.”

He said he would support getting rid of USAID entirely, but made clear that the Trump administration had not made a final decision on how to go about it.

Thus, specifics about this merger remain uncertain.

Democrats Raise Legal Challenges

Democrats, longtime supporters of the agency, have already pushed back against Trump’s reported plan, saying that such an executive order would be illegal.

While it was created in 1961 via an executive order by President John F. Kennedy, the agency has been codified into law through Congress—raising constitutional questions about whether Trump has the legal power to dissolve the agency unilaterally without an act of Congress.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a Jan. 31 post on X that the agency was “established in law to further our national security and spread hope.”

He said that dissolving USAID would be “illegal and against our national interests.”

Others referenced the ongoing fight for the developing world between the U.S., China, and Russia, arguing that aid disbursements handled by USAID serve U.S. geopolitical interests.

—Joseph Lord and Zachary Stieber

BOOKMARKS

Panama President José Raúl Mulino said on Sunday that his country will not renew its memorandum of understanding with China to be a part of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), The Epoch Times’ Algdra Fredley reported. It comes amid escalating threats from Trump to assert a claim over the Panama Canal.

Trump pushed back on criticisms of his tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico, calling them a “necessary solution.” Emel Akan reported on the administration’s response to criticisms of tariff policies, which Trump has positioned as essential to restoring U.S. industry and manufacturing.

Even after being given the green light to return to their homes after fire hazards, many Los Angeles residents face difficult decisions on whether to do so, Beige Luciano-Adams reported. Many family’s homes lie in safe zones—but are surrounded by devastation, including dangerous ash.

Undersea cables crisscross the world’s waterways, connecting nations with power, natural gas, and ready internet access. They’re also endangered by China.

Andrew Thornebrooke covered four major incidents involving China cutting these undersea cables.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT