http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jun/29/fact-checking-2016-clinton-trump/
One candidate was FAR ahead of the others in mostly false and pants on fire (60%, over half---78% if you add in "mostly false" to the other two) with more of the latter then all of the other candidates combined.
One candidate had over half of their claims rated as true, and only 13% of their claims rated as pants on fire.
So some on this board label the second candidate as the big liar, and the first candidate has 78 percent of their statements rated as mostly false, false, or pants on fire.
I'm sure Politifact is part of the regressive left though.
One candidate was FAR ahead of the others in mostly false and pants on fire (60%, over half---78% if you add in "mostly false" to the other two) with more of the latter then all of the other candidates combined.
One candidate had over half of their claims rated as true, and only 13% of their claims rated as pants on fire.
So some on this board label the second candidate as the big liar, and the first candidate has 78 percent of their statements rated as mostly false, false, or pants on fire.
I'm sure Politifact is part of the regressive left though.