http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/396892-mueller-indicts-12-russians-in-2016-dnc-hack
12 more witches found in the witch hunt.
12 more witches found in the witch hunt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/396892-mueller-indicts-12-russians-in-2016-dnc-hack
12 more witches found in the witch hunt.
lol man they are getting so close! milestone day for Mueller/RR*frantic gaslighting narrative adjusting*
“there is no indication that any American was a knowing participant in this activity, and no indication that these efforts altered the vote count in any way.”
soooo was the DNC server really hacked? RR said the emails were obtained through "spearfishing" email scam. Explains why FBI never examined the serverYeah, *this* is the most important takeaway. Not that it directly defies Trump's ongoing skepticism that Russia had anything to do with the hacking, nor his frequent fawning over Putin.
On or about August 15, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, received a request for stolen documents from a candidate for the U.S. Congress. The Conspirators responded using the Guccifer 2.0 persona and sent the candidate stolen documents related to the candidate's opponent.
"there is no allegation in this indictment that Americans knew that they were corresponding with Russians. There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result".Mueller doesn't have anything on Trump because we would have heard about it.
Yep.
On or about August 22,2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, transferred approximately 2.5 gigabytes of data stolen from the DCCC to a then-registered state lobbyist and online source of political news. The stolen data included donor records and personal identifying information for more than 2,000 Democratic donors.
On or about August 22, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, sent a
reporter stolen documents pertaining to the Black Lives Matter movement. The
reporter responded by discussing when to release the documents and offering to
write an article about their release.
The Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, also communicated with U.S. persons about the release of stolen documents. On or about August 15, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, wrote to a person who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, "thank u for writing back ... do u find anyt[h]ing interesting in the docs I posted?" On or about August 17, 2016, the Conspirators added, "please tell me if i can help u anyhow ... it would be a great pleasure to me." On or about September 9, 2016, the Conspirators, again posing as Guccifer 2.0, referred to a stolen DCCC document posted online and asked the person, "what do u think of the info on the turnout model for the democrats entire presidential campaign." The person responded, "[p]retty standard."
On or about June 27, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, contacted a U.S. reporter with an offer to provide stolen emails from "Hillary Clinton's staff." The Conspirators then sent the reporter the password to access a nonpublic, password-protected portion of dcleaks.com containing emails stolen from Victim 1 by LUKASHEV, YERMAKOV, and their co-conspirators in or around March 2016.
"In this indictment". Said it twice. The next one will include American (s). That's what makes a conspiracy Einstein."there is no allegation in this indictment that Americans knew that they were corresponding with Russians. There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result".
This seems like the type of stuff the IC should be preventing and not take almost 2 damn years to find 12 Russians.
Just keeps getting more and more embarrassing for Mueller
In or around September 2016, the Conspirators also successfully gained access to DNC computers hosted on a third-party cloud-computing service. These computers contained test applications related to the DNC's analytics. After conducting reconnaissance, the Conspirators gathered data by creating backups, or "snapshots," of the DNC's cloud-based systems using the cloud provider's own technology. The Conspirators then moved the snapshots to cloud-based accounts they had registered with the same service, thereby stealing the data from the DNC.
Was somebody on here defending the Russians? All of your posts seemed to be directed at someone who was.#FakeNews
Those posts reference Russians interacting with Americans.Was somebody on here defending the Russians? All of your posts seemed to be directed at someone who was.
Was there turbulence for Hillary when she won the primary after the dems stole the election from Bernie?Those posts reference Russians interacting with Americans.
Fasten your seatbelt, there's turbulence ahead.
LOL. Having a bad day?Was there turbulence for Hillary when she won the primary after the dems stole the election from Bernie?
Was somebody on here defending the Russians? All of your posts seemed to be directed at someone who was.
Actually having a better day than most. You seem to think today's news means something more than it does.LOL. Having a bad day?
Roger Stone a close associate of the President and law partner of Paul Manafort has finally remembered that he did have a relationship with Guccifer 2.0 after denying it originally (evidence showed he clearly had contact with Guccifer)."there is no allegation in this indictment that Americans knew that they were corresponding with Russians. There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result".
This seems like the type of stuff the IC should be preventing and not take almost 2 damn years to find 12 Russians.
Just keeps getting more and more embarrassing for Mueller
What does that even mean? "Defending Trump defending the Russians." Trump has said that the Russians had no impact on the election and the AG said exactly that today. You seem to think the Russians hacking the dems emails kept the liberals from going to the polls in Michigan. Better clean up your mess from your premature ejaculation.Well, they were more defending Trump defending the Russians. And also improving relations with the Russians. So, there's that.
Was it widely disseminated that a candidate for U.S. Congress sought help from the Russians? Stolen analytics? A person who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump?Actually having a better day than most. You seem to think today's news means something more than it does.
The AG did NOT say that the Russians had no impact on the election but did say the following:What does that even mean? "Defending Trump defending the Russians." Trump has said that the Russians had no impact on the election and the AG said exactly that today. You seem to think the Russians hacking the dems emails kept the liberals from going to the polls in Michigan. Better clean up your mess from your premature ejaculation.
What does that even mean? "Defending Trump defending the Russians." Trump has said that the Russians had no impact on the election and the AG said exactly that today. You seem to think the Russians hacking the dems emails kept the liberals from going to the polls in Michigan. Better clean up your mess from your premature ejaculation.
Fantasy land"In this indictment". Said it twice. The next one will include American (s). That's what makes a conspiracy Einstein.
My point, which must have went over your head, was that the idiots who believe and have said the Trump campaign is in the clear because any evidence against them would have been leaked by now are dead wrong. Mueller keeps chopping wood and no one knows what's coming next.
Well the diploma in my home office says I did so...You sure you went to Purdue?
The 400-pound mystery man: At the first presidential debate, on Sept. 26, 2016, Trump sought to cast doubt on reports that Russia was behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee — reports since confirmed by the intelligence community.What does that even mean? "Defending Trump defending the Russians." Trump has said that the Russians had no impact on the election and the AG said exactly that today. You seem to think the Russians hacking the dems emails kept the liberals from going to the polls in Michigan. Better clean up your mess from your premature ejaculation.
It's kind of like just because X=1, it does not mean that Y=1. He did NOT say that the Russians had no impact on the election, he just said there was no allegation in the complaint regarding the vote count or influence. He's choosing not to answer that question."There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result."
Yup things could get extremely ugly, like civil war ugly.The danger in all of this is that you can already see there is a large group of people in this country (and on this board) who regularly discount this investigation...and are assumed will scream fake news and corruption if the investigation actually brings indictments to individuals in Trump's inner circle.
The narrative to date has been "they were not that integral to the campaign." Then it was "those charges are for things before the campaign and have nothing to do with collusion." Now it's "Indicting Russians doesn't mean anything."
What happens if Don Jr gets an indictment based on real, tangible evidence? "Still wasn't Donald so Mueller is still a turd."
Trump said this morning that he was going to ask Putin again about interference in the elections.The 400-pound mystery man: At the first presidential debate, on Sept. 26, 2016, Trump sought to cast doubt on reports that Russia was behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee — reports since confirmed by the intelligence community.
“He said he didn’t meddle … I really believe that when he tells me that, he means it”: After meeting with Putin in Asia, Trump spoke at length with reporters and again cast doubt on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.
“He said he didn’t meddle,” Trump said. “He said he didn’t meddle. I asked him again. You can only ask so many times. But I just asked him again, and he said he absolutely did not meddle in our election. He did not do what they’re saying he did.”
“Putin said he did not do what they said he did,” Trump added later. “And, you know, there are those that say, if he did do it, he wouldn’t have gotten caught, all right? Which is a very interesting statement.”
Trump continued: “Every time he sees me, he says, ‘I didn’t do that.’ And I believe — I really believe that when he tells me that, he means it. But he says, ‘I didn’t do that.’ I think he’s very insulted by it, if you want to know the truth. Don’t forget, all he said is he never did that, he didn’t do that. I think he’s very insulted by it, which is not a good thing for our country.”
Are you sure you went to Purdue? You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding basic facts.
What do you want to bet that Putin denies it?
Trump said this morning that he was going to ask Putin again about interference in the elections.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...147E3DB2CED067E5B265147E3DB2CED0&&FORM=VRDGAR
Best response yet.I say wtf. Russia hacked into HRC's computer and was thus able to gain access and hack into the DNC emails through individual computers.
Is this some sort of revelation? Is the FBI going to charge all the individuals from all the other countries that were able to and probably did hack into the unsecure server used by HRC.
If evidence pops up that Russia was behind the release of those emails to wiki leaks than i would say Russia had an influence on the election. However, the emails should have been obtained by the FBI. They were subpoenaed by the FBI and destroyed by HRC. Justice was served imo.
As Tony Soprano used to say, "What are you gonna do?"What do you want to bet that Putin denies it?
Really, there's nothing Trump can do .... according to Trump.