ADVERTISEMENT

IU Good for Them

Those good folks might want to avoid the thread titled “IU Good for Them.”
Or otherwise they might learn about such relevant trivia as the first two years of a walk-on at JMU.

Why are you and the others even on a Purdue football forum if not to strut about and wet your clownpants in arrogance ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: z_one
Or otherwise they might learn about such relevant trivia as the first two years of a walk-on at JMU.

Why are you and the others even on a Purdue football forum if not to strut about and wet your clownpants in arrogance ?
army le GIF
 
You are confusing the 'internet' with a Purdue football forum. If you look it up, you will find that they are not the same. Even 95 could tell you that. In fact, that could be 95 in your meme.
 
I think OSU wins, but I think IU competes. Unlike us.
On Game Day yesterday Saban and Davis (I think) said if IU gets waxed by OSU, that with their 100TH RATED SCHEDULE they won’t make the playoffs! But after all the losses yesterday by other « so-so » Top 20 teams IU’s odds went way up
 
On Game Day yesterday Saban and Davis (I think) said if IU gets waxed by OSU, that with their 100TH RATED SCHEDULE they won’t make the playoffs! But after all the losses yesterday by other « so-so » Top 20 teams IU’s odds went way up
People complain about the schedule but I'm pretty sure Michigan had a super weak schedule as well. And I find hilarious when talking heads say "Every other top 25 team would be undefeated too." As if Bama hasn't lost to a mediocre Vandy. Tennessee lost to Arky. BYU lost to Kansas. Notre Dame lost to Northern Illinois. Miami lost to Virginia Tech. Ole Miss lost to Kentucky. Kansas State lost to Houston. Colorado lost to Nebraska. Washington State lost to New Mexico. Louisville lost to Stanford. Tulane lost to Oklahoma. That only leaves a few teams who have proved they can beat every mediocre team on their schedule.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT