ADVERTISEMENT

IU did not deserve to be in CFP. Great article by USA Today

Only IU and SMU got "garbage touchdowns?" Damn you're grasping at any straw you can find.
  • How many garbage touchdowns did Oregon get when they were down 34-0 in the second half?
  • Was Georgia's only touchdown a second half garbage touchdown? They were down by 17 at the time. They never got within one score thereafter.
  • Tennessee garbage touchdown? They scored to turn a 42-10 deficit into a 42-17 loss.
  • As you said, SMU's only touchdown turned a 38-3 game into a 38-10 loss.
At least IU's last touchdown, with under a minute left, gave IU a chance at a two point conversion + onside kick recovery to get the ball to tie. They didn't get the conversion, but IU's 1-5% chance of tying the game in the last minute was (slightly) better than Oregon, Tennessee, SMU, or Georgia's 0% chance.

Yet IU is the team that was more outmatched than others? Nope.

PS: I know that Purdue is a science-based, not literature oriented school, but you spelled INDIANA wrong again. Almost like some Chinese factory worker would by mistake. Do you live in Indiana? If so, you're gong to have trouble with mail/package deliveries if you cannot even figure out how to spell the name of the state you live in.
Grasping??

Dude, you are here and defending 2 losses to the ranked opponents you played.

Georgia down 20-10 in the 3rd with 9:36 to play.
IU down 27-3 in the 4th with 4:50 to play.

You really can't compare the 2......just stop.
 
Is this thread still going on?

IU gamed the first year in a new system by buying a horrendous non conference schedule and got lucky with a very favorable conference slate. Also they benefitted from a rare weak SEC. Kudos to them.

But the results of the playoffs haven't given them any decent wins all of a sudden. In fact, it just supports the fact that 8 is closer to the right number than 12. 1-4 earned their way in by winning conferences. 5-8 are the final four teams. 9-12 got put out of misery pretty easily in the first round.
 
Is this thread still going on?

IU gamed the first year in a new system by buying a horrendous non conference schedule and got lucky with a very favorable conference slate. Also they benefitted from a rare weak SEC. Kudos to them.

But the results of the playoffs haven't given them any decent wins all of a sudden. In fact, it just supports the fact that 8 is closer to the right number than 12. 1-4 earned their way in by winning conferences. 5-8 are the final four teams. 9-12 got put out of misery pretty easily in the first round.
Meme Reaction GIF by Robert E Blackmon
 
Grasping??

Dude, you are here and defending 2 losses to the ranked opponents you played.

Georgia down 20-10 in the 3rd with 9:36 to play.
IU down 27-3 in the 4th with 4:50 to play.

You really can't compare the 2......just stop.
It was 20-10. It was also 20-3. Notre Dame still dominated Georgia and it happened in the same way they did Indiana. By controlling the line of scrimmage. Georgias offensive line was overpowered just like Indiana's. It has actually been theme in games all playoff. Penn State vs SMU and Boise State. Ohio State vs Tennessee and Oregon. That's been the difference in all of those games. Shows the importance of a great offensive line.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Poprudy
And IU played against Notre Dame with a quarterback playing on an unrepaired torn ACL. Teams deal with this kind of stuff the best they can. Hard to believe you and others are now making excuses like that for why ND was able to beat Georgia.

IU is your rival but had a great year. The entire college knows that IU football sucked? The whole college footbal world, both media and coaches, thought IU was deserving of their coach getting national coach of the year. The nation-wide selection committee thought the team was worthy of being in College Football Playoffs.

It would be like an IU fan disparaging Purdue's Final Four run with Edey. Yes, UConn was better. But Purdue had an incredible year and earned what and where they got. Full stop. It would take some ridiculous mental gymnastics to think otherwise, and I sure don't think otherwise. Same goes for this year's IU Football team.
IU fans did disparage Purdue's run, all you had to do was read one of their message boards. I guess you didn't because you spend all of your time here trying to validate IU's rise to football greatness. LOL. BTW there is no comparing IU buying an entire team to Edey that was a scholarship athlete recruited by Purdue and playing his entire career at Purdue. IU bought out UL and had the weakest schedule in the Big Ten and brought in a whole new team and coach. It worked. Won't work again. You caught your lightning in a bottle and used it up. You'll have a decent record again next year against another weak ass schedule, after that you'll slide back into mediocrity. If IU had played Purdue's schedule you would have had 4 losses and everyone would have talked about how much IU had improved and watched as they got waxed in a bowl game. Instead they watched you get waxed in the playoff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting
IU bought out UL and had the weakest schedule in the Big Ten and brought in a whole new team and coach. It worked. Won't work again. You caught your lightning in a bottle and used it up.

You'll have a decent record again next year against another weak ass schedule.
Solid job of stating that:
  1. IU Football is already toast going forward, and then
  2. Contradicting yourself to explain away IU Football doing well next year.
All in one post! Finishing by loading up on the future excuses for IU Football winning 7-10 games next season? Nothing like planning ahead.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: z_one
They need a banner for that in Ass Hall.
The worst program in history handed you your worst loss in history this year.

By the way, Indiana’s only two loses were to two final four teams at their place.

I think they did alright this year.
 
It was 20-10. It was also 20-3. Notre Dame still dominated Georgia and it happened in the same way they did Indiana. By controlling the line of scrimmage. Georgias offensive line was overpowered just like Indiana's. It has actually been theme in games all playoff. Penn State vs SMU and Boise State. Ohio State vs Tennessee and Oregon. That's been the difference in all of those games. Shows the importance of a great offensive line.
They didn’t dominate them . I’m fact georgia outscored ND 10-3 for 39 of the 40 minutes as ND scored 17 of them in a 60 second segment of game time. Heck georgia had more offensive yards than ND by 50+. Georgia had a lot of unfortunate plays, fumble before half, dropped pass, dumb penalty on 4th down, even a walkon QB on street clothes getting in the way. And until the final drive Georgia had about 100 more offensive yards. How is that being dominated?

Meanwhile until garbage time ND had about 250 more yards than Indiana.

But don’t let facts get in the way.
 
And yet Georgia was in the game until almost the end with their backup QB.

Indiana was out of it at opening kickoff and scored two meaningless touchdowns against the backups to make it seem closer than it was.

So yes, the cartoon is correct and only people who don't understand sports don't get it.
They were so far out of it they even punted in the 4th to avoid further embarrassing themselves. The game was over at that point and even the coach that wins knew it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awthomps
They didn’t dominate them . I’m fact georgia outscored ND 10-3 for 39 of the 40 minutes as ND scored 17 of them in a 60 second segment of game time. Heck georgia had more offensive yards than ND by 50+. Georgia had a lot of unfortunate plays, fumble before half, dropped pass, dumb penalty on 4th down, even a walkon QB on street clothes getting in the way. And until the final drive Georgia had about 100 more offensive yards. How is that being dominated?

Meanwhile until garbage time ND had about 250 more yards than Indiana.

But don’t let facts get in the way.
Simplify it for them.

With a 1:30 to go in both games, what was the score.
 
Solid job of stating that:
  1. IU Football is already toast going forward, and then
  2. Contradicting yourself to explain away IU Football doing well next year.
All in one post! Finishing by loading up on the future excuses for IU Football winning 7-10 games next season? Nothing like planning ahead.
I guess my saying IU playing a weakass schedule next year didn't adequately express my thoughts of how much disdain I have for IU's path to mediocrity? LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBG
Not third quarter or 'almost over' scores. Here's some actual 'played the whole game-final' scores. And all from the past two months:

images
images



images
images
images



Feel free to keep posting about how final scores aren't the ones that matter most.

.
 
Last edited:
They didn’t dominate them . I’m fact georgia outscored ND 10-3 for 39 of the 40 minutes as ND scored 17 of them in a 60 second segment of game time. Heck georgia had more offensive yards than ND by 50+. Georgia had a lot of unfortunate plays, fumble before half, dropped pass, dumb penalty on 4th down, even a walkon QB on street clothes getting in the way. And until the final drive Georgia had about 100 more offensive yards. How is that being dominated?

Meanwhile until garbage time ND had about 250 more yards than Indiana.

But don’t let facts get in the way.
Yea that's one way to spin a team getting dominated 🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting
I guess my saying IU playing a weakass schedule next year didn't adequately express my thoughts of how much disdain I have for IU's path to mediocrity? LOL
IU's schedule next year will likely be top 25-ish or better. Three cupcakes to start, but then it includes at Penn State, at Iowa, at Oregon, at Maryland, at what I would suppose you all will project will be a greatly improved Purdue team, and home against Wisconsin, Illinois, MSU, and UCLA. Seven to ten wins would be outstanding for a historically bad P5 program and would not be "mediocre."
 
Last edited:
IU's schedule next year will likely be top 25-ish or better next year. Three cupcakes to start, but then it includes at Penn State, at Iowa, at Oregon, at Maryland, at what I would suppose you all will project will be a greatly improved Purdue team, and home against Wisconsin, Illinois, MSU, and UCLA. Seven to ten wins would be outstanding for a historically bad P5 program and would not be "mediocre."
That is much improved. There are 4 games on that schedule I would say would have been harder than your biggest win this year (home vs Michigan (Oregon, Iowa, PSU, il) and at MD and home vs WI would be in that same tier. Indianas team this year probably goes 7-5 with that schedule. I do think that is still mediocre for big ten standards as it would be a 4-5 big ten record. But going to a decent bowl game for indiana would be great. I would take 7-5 next year for sure!
 
He played the whole season with a torn all and was second team all big ten. Don’t pretend like he was handicapped in their game.
Yeah, he played well vs. most of the lower tier teams on their schedule. I wouldn't give the ACL tear an excuse when losing to better teams/programs.

I didn't find anything confirming when the actual tear took place or how long he's had it.

Oregon proves the point that good teams can win against top teams but also get manhandled vs those same teams. IU not so much......
 
  • Like
Reactions: z_one and POTFHBTFU
Yeah, he played well vs. most of the lower tier teams on their schedule. I wouldn't give the ACL tear an excuse when losing to better teams/programs.

I didn't find anything confirming when the actual tear took place or how long he's had it.

Oregon proves the point that good teams can win against top teams but also get manhandled vs those same teams. IU not so much......
He has torn it 3 times, most recently in august. In 2017 sindelar played a substantial part of the season on a torn acl and played some of his best football. Broc Thompson played on a shredded knee only to be bowl game mvp and then retired.

All are remarkable feats but indiana is making this out to be like they were handicapped. They still had a stellar performance from him and no one would have even known he was hurt. His coaches didn’t even know he kept it from them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: z_one and Poprudy
It’s not that uncommon. Purdue had a qb who started for us for a near year and he played great. It’s not miraculous, lol.
Lead a team to 11-2, a playoff appearance and one of the probably the Top 10 QBs in the nation... Yea that's miraculous.
 
Lead a team to 11-2, a playoff appearance and one of the probably the Top 10 QBs in the nation... Yea that's miraculous.
The miracle is IU buying an entire new team and buying a pud schedule to get to the playoffs. It is a miracle that people didn't see through the record for what it was. They won't be fooled again. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBG
Lead a team to 11-2, a playoff appearance and one of the probably the Top 10 QBs in the nation... Yea that's miraculous.
Dude it was a partial tear and it was so minimal the coaching staff never even noticed. I bet if everyone had an mri on the team at the end of every season you would probably see a lot of partial tears. It’s a feel good story but not a miracle
 
  • Like
Reactions: z_one and BBG
Dude it was a partial tear and it was so minimal the coaching staff never even noticed. I bet if everyone had an mri on the team at the end of every season you would probably see a lot of partial tears. It’s a feel good story but not a miracle
He just really, really, really wants you to believe that IU was something special. No signature wins, no B1G title, an embarrassing playoff performance. It was their one year where the stars aligned and they choked in the spotlight. Miracle, yeah no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: z_one
The miracle is IU buying an entire new team and buying a pud schedule to get to the playoffs. It is a miracle that people didn't see through the record for what it was. They won't be fooled again. LOL

He just really, really, really wants you to believe that IU was something special. No signature wins, no B1G title, an embarrassing playoff performance. It was their one year where the stars aligned and they choked in the spotlight. Miracle, yeah no.

This is absolutely unequivocally awesome.

You guys need to post WAY more about IU Football and their 11-2, College Football Playoff, top 20 ranked season.

Oh, and while you are at it, PLEASE post more about IU’s high-priced “bought” team full of MAC and Sun Belt conference 💰 billionaires 💰 and how IU Football either has no chance of being good again, or about how their schedule will always be unworthy in your expert opinions.

MORE MORE MORE!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 to 0
This is absolutely unequivocally awesome.

You guys need to post WAY more about IU Football and their 11-2, College Football Playoff, top 20 ranked season.

Oh, and while you are at it, PLEASE post more about IU’s high-priced “bought” team full of MAC and Sun Belt conference 💰 billionaires 💰 and how IU Football either has no chance of being good again, or about how their schedule will always be unworthy in your expert opinions.

MORE MORE MORE!!!
Before the season it seemed many here felt Purdue was as good or better than IU because Indiana only brought in mid major talent. We see how well that all worked out.
 
This is absolutely unequivocally awesome.

You guys need to post WAY more about IU Football and their 11-2, College Football Playoff, top 20 ranked season.

Oh, and while you are at it, PLEASE post more about IU’s high-priced “bought” team full of MAC and Sun Belt conference 💰 billionaires 💰 and how IU Football either has no chance of being good again, or about how their schedule will always be unworthy in your expert opinions.

MORE MORE MORE!!!
Who said anything about buying a roster lol, you crazy man.

And you criticizing people here for being obsessed with indiana when you were here on a Purdue board NYE posting through midnight. and you are complaining about our obsession of iu on a Purdue board. LMFAO, you can’t make this up.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: z_one and Poprudy
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT