I have no late, personal understanding on Brian, but would be shocked if he went to play somewhere else. Matt was fully aware his minutes last year would be hard to find...and then you add injuries. I suspect he graduates, gets married and has a good job...and again this is my "guess" without any recent personal reason for my stance.
definitely a 5 point spread. I don't keep up with the rules, but it used to be that the hand and the ball where considered one, but the wrist is something else. It happened too quick and what we saw from Braden driving the ball, I just assumed it was 2 pts.
"Top 20ish" Boilers to a Loosier means the Boilers are a real top 10.
I've watched the video at 4:38-4:39 and never found contact...it has to be seen, not guessed. That said it is hard to explain why the shot was so short since I couldn't see Giccari get a finger on the shot. So if there was a foul on Giccari, that still doesn't explain the shot being so short because if a foul happened...it was very soft and not enough to explain the ball falling so short.
As I see it again, I still believe there was some contact to Rice's left elbow, but I don't see as much now as I saw last night live. From the reverse (original) angle you couldn't see it at all.
I think he’s dating Chicoine who’s now at Louisville and just a Jr. You might be correct, might want to start on the graduate degree while earning a little NIL cash, I would think there’s schools like a Valpo where he could get a great grad degree while playing some minutes.
It's not really that complicated. He's been out of the rotation for several weeks now. Painter goes with 9 and he's settled on that. What I was interested to see was whether he was going to give Burgess a couple of minutes considering the foul trouble but he went with Heide, who at least got a key putback.
Don't worry the next hire will be fired as well.
It is a cool story.
Myles’ defense is better, but not quite as good as the 2 freshmen, so not sure if he ever starts here.
Painter said post game both blocking fouls on TKR were definitely fouls and TKR must do better here.
That's cuz he has class. What would Brad Underwood say?
Four points. Harris got zero ball. The bodies touched but it was minimal and partly due to Rice leaning in being off balance. I think the trajectory change was initiated by Rice, maybe thinking to pass or indecisive?
Well I haven't reached out to get a feel since it really isn't my business and so anything I would type would be a guess and not one with any information for a basis
If you break down the film, Rice's hands when he goes up are not placed to shoot the ball. Both are on the side of the ball. He then twists his hands at the last second to shoot. Brian on the other site commented after running back and forth the tape many times and agrees that he sees no foul. I have no idea how to explain it being so short...certainly a foul on a shot wouldn't cause it...because "if" there was a foul it was soft. Not sure if the movement of the hands resulted in some slip or what happened. It doesn't matter Purdue had no homecourt advantage in this game.
Well we know kind of agree. No matter why or how, the trajectory change or weird direction was initiated by Rice. Maybe the refs saw that as well.
Nobody breaks down the game better than Robbie.
Hearing rumblings that it’s going to be Chris Beard, Brad Stevens and Bruce Pearl to make a super staff.
when Leal and Galloway are what you're playing you're not going to win many games. Neither would be a starter at any major program other than IU.
Purdue said goodbye to Mason Gillis in large part to enable Cam and Myles to have more prominent roles .
Yes he's a role player. We have three main cogs, everyone else is a role player including Furst.
Don’t believe so, he said they needed TKR to be better and for him to stay on floor.
Yes. He said that because he has class and he's not going to rip the refs in a press conference. That's my point. Yes, Trey needs to be better. But that was a weak call and I'm sure in the moment MP didn't like the call.
I was drunk and passed out by that time.@boilerzz ...... not &*^%in tired yet!
just walked in the house and see Szelc is doing the Rutger's game. Did Purdue last night and out west the night before...
I always preferred to state that ALL players are role players, but some players role's are more expanded than others. It is more accurate IMO.
just walked in the house and see Szelc is doing the Rutger's game. Did Purdue last night and out west the night before...
So Edey was a role player?
Yes, Zach was not expected to handle the ball adn bring it up. He was not expected to break presses. Zach was not expected to defend the best perimeter play or jam the ball. Zach's role was different. Zach's role was to rebound, defend the rim, set high screens and roll down the lane and seal his man for a short jump hood or back his player down. His role was different than other players, but he had a role and was more expanded than some. EVERY player on a team has a role. Some are more expanded than others. Some are givers and others takers. Some defend the best perimeter player. Those with "expanded" roles are those that have a more free reign to do more things. Braden's role is much different than any other player on the team. Trey's role is different than Braden's.
