These guys have been playing serious games with serious people.
what the hell are you talking about?
These guys have been playing serious games with serious people.
you are telling me you know more than I about Cuonzo's commitment tweets. surely that makes you some sort of expert no?
why would I assume you, a purdue fan, have any idea what he tweets when he gets a commitment as head coach of Cal? are you are crazy person? a stalker? his brother?[/QUOT
Dude you're so lost. I never said a thing about his "tweets".
Yeah I'm a stalker. Zo was a very popular player during a pretty significant period at Purdue. Zo is the perfect example of what we consider to be a Boiler. I can assure you that almost all of this board and many of the IU fan lurkers here, know more about Zo then you seem to judging by your posts. I would be willing to bet many here have been following Zo since around or before the time you were born.
This was his recruiting pitch. could be an indication he just got a commitment from someone. he tweets things like this when he gets commitments.
Once again. I think it's cute how you act like an expert on Zo as a Cal fan following tweets compared to the audience your taking to. That was my original point. I can't help it if your logic of trying to out type me made you believe I was claiming to have access to something as out of reach as Zo's Twitter feed and that I was some sort of expert on the matter.What did I say that indicated that I felt I knew "Zo" on a personal level more than anyone here or knew anything more than the type of things he tweets when he has a commitment as head coach of my alma mater? Please do share these mysterious posts by me that I have not seen that indicate I feel I have some deep understanding of "Zo's" heart and soul.
Once again. I think it's cute how you act like an expert on Zo as a Cal fan following tweets compared to the audience your taking to. That was my original point. I can't help it if your logic of trying to out type me made you believe I was claiming to have access to something as out of reach as Zo's Twitter feed and that I was some sort of expert on the matter.
When you came here trying to tell Purdue fans what Zo means by his tweets. It's up there, go read it. You came here to try and rub landing Biggie in our faces, posters gave you reasons as to why your logic isn't sound, then you start all of the, "his tweets mean this", and "are you some sort of stalker for still follow Zo" logic.Once again. Please direct me to the post where I indicated I was an expert on "Zo."
When you came here trying to tell Purdue fans what Zo means by his tweets. It's up there, go read it. You came here to try and rub landing Biggie in our faces, posters gave you reasons as to why your logic isn't sound, then you start all of the, "his tweets mean this", and "are you some sort of stalker for still follow Zo" logic.
Why don't you impress us with some basketball knowledge? I am happy with what Purdue returns without Caleb. I als think with our team as is and Cal even if they land Biggie, that Purude still has a better season and would win head to head. Now you tell me what adding your stud class does for your team and why I am wrong.
gotcha. I was originally responding to the original poster who seemed to think tv ratings / exposure should factor into his decision.
That's what I thought. You have nothing. Good luck this year. You've got a good coach. maybe if you grow up and pay attention you may learn something. Sadly going to other boards trolling while claiming to not be a troll is gonna hold you back a bit.Wow. That's some insane level logic. Get help.
Tell that to the many players that never get a lottery pick. If you don't get that u ain't likely to get jack squat in NBA. 25 or so McDonalds AA's - 29 1st rnd picks. 14 big money. Competing worldwide for those slots, and NBA scouts definitely want exposure. If you want to join a gang and be one of the gang on a team Cali and blend in, disappear, be friends. Put that in front of whatchya could have been as a local hero. Lebron James played that card in H.S. Granted, a phenom, the home crowd goes a long way in publicizing yoe status. It creates a huge following. Glenn Robinson played that card too. Or go to Cal and be someplace that ain't gonna matta in the long-run as your NBA prospects dwindle day by day. I mean why want to be a king in your castle? Why want that? Why not go to the furthest spot in any direction on the continent to play for an unproven school for an unproven coach, and to play in the pitiful pac. Sounds like a good move to me.
That's what I thought. You have nothing. Good luck this year. You've got a good coach. maybe if you grow up and pay attention you may learn something. Sadly going to other boards trolling while claiming to not be a troll is gonna hold you back a bit.
If Zo gets Biggie, he will let you know without having to use cryptic tweets that only you understand. Until then, you may want to refrain from bragging about it here. We will be fine with or without him.
if he's not going to the NBA, I'd certainly suggest going to Cal over Purdue.
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandr...ges/rankings/national-universities/top-public
and btw cal and purdue have the same number of current nba players.
Those rankings are a joke. Tell that to UNC who handed out fake degrees. Its the same books its the same stuff. You ask anyone in the real world, they'll take a Purdue guy over Cal.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Purdue Class of 2019: Average GPA 3.57 Sat 1269
Cal Class of 2019: Average GPA 4.18 Sat 1394
You are embarrassing us. Cal is a great school. I agree US News is a poor ranking service, but let's not act like assess, here and start talking about how they favor Cal because they are "liberal." That assertion makes little sense.
Purdue is among the top Engineering schools in the world and trying to use gpa stats as part of an argument is just proof that person has no leg to stand on.I've done pretty well with my Purdue engineering degree. Anyone who trolls posting USnews rankings clearly doesn't know what they're talking about. Cal is a phenomenal school, no denying that. But rankings in terms of what you desire to study, and the reputation that program has is far more important.
Moreover, why is discussion of academic even an issue here? Most of the things these athletes major in anyway isn't going to get them a real job unless they go to graduate school. And where you got your undergrad degree really only matters if you're going to look for employment right after. If you're going to major in basket weaving 101, it doesn't matter where you get your degree.
I'm a proud Purdue alum, and some dude trolling about how Cal is ranked higher isn't going to change the value of my degree.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Purdue Class of 2019: Average GPA 3.57 Sat 1269
Cal Class of 2019: Average GPA 4.18 Sat 1394
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Purdue Class of 2019: Average GPA 3.57 Sat 1269
Cal Class of 2019: Average GPA 4.18 Sat 1394
Purdue is among the top Engineering schools in the world and trying to use gpa stats as part of an argument is just proof that person has no leg to stand on.
Dude, seriously??
PUR and CAL are both great schools with long histories of great academics.
I mean, you can bag-on and degrade about 80% of P5 schools vs Cal academics, but Purdue is not one of those in that 80%. We are known the world over for being one of the greatest ENG, TECH, AG, etc etc etc etc schools in the history of mankind! Purdue aka "The cradle of Astronauts", for example. Academically, we're both great.
This thread got real dumb real quick.
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering-doctorate
sorry buddy. welcome to the majors
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering-doctorate
sorry buddy. welcome to the majors
Yeah, sorry to you too! You do realize that the US News methodology has been questioned by some pretty solid sources. They tend to focus way more on student to faculty ratio that may or may not be indicative of the quality of education. Since Purdue is one of, if not the biggest, Engineering schools they probably rank poorly in that one important category. The WSJ did a report on where recruiters focus their energy and Cal Berkeley wasn't even close to Purdue.http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering-doctorate
sorry buddy. welcome to the majors
Or one of Cal's campus janitors.Is Droski even an ENG? We could be dealing with a Cal General Studies major here.
Or one of Cal's campus janitors.
Yeah, Derek Willis' years with cal sure have been transformational. Obviously there is draw to UK but he doesn't really develop much talent outside of his top 25/30 recruits.Swanigan is #19 according to Rivals. UK has Skal who's like #10 or something who is a center. I'm not sure who they have at PF next year, but I would guarantee Swanigan would get major minutes. Look at how many bigs they had last year and all of them saw good minutes. Was it 35 a game? No. But they also had 3 or 4 bigs. If they have 2 next year, Swanigan will get lots of minutes and a chance to play with some really talented kids.
Also, Cal does a very good job of developing the players he has. I just don't think it's going to be as easy to see a dramatic difference in just one year. To insinuate that he doesn't develop them much is a little crazy, if you ask me. It's not going to look like JJ here at Purdue or Oladipo at IU because they were in college for a long time.
To say UK isn't good place for him is nonsense. He'll be showcased all year with UK who plays in a weak conference, a ton of their games are on national television and they will almost certainly make the NCAA Tournament. UK would be just as good of a place for him as any other.
He's on the all academic SEC team. So that's probably why he's being kept around. Helps the GPA plus he will most likely graduate on time which wouldn't hurt Cal in the long run. There are parents of blue chip kids out there who realize that a degree will yield benefits when they have spent any NBA money they earn. Especially in light of the fact that most pro athletes are broke within 3 years of leaving the game.Yeah, Derek Willis' years with cal sure have been transformational. Obviously there is draw to UK but he doesn't really develop much talent outside of his top 25/30 recruits.
if he's not going to the NBA, I'd certainly suggest going to Cal over Purdue.
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandr...ges/rankings/national-universities/top-public
and btw cal and purdue have the same number of current nba players.
By my math last year Purdue had 20 of its 31 regular season games on the big 10 network. So 11 on national networks. (from the purdue website)
Cal had 19 of it's 31 games on the pac-12 network. So 12 on national networks.
I'm not seeing a whole lot of difference exposure wise.
When's the last time you actually watched a west coast basketball game?