How Trump is going to save the auto industry
- Thread starter Purdue95Grad
- Start date
I don't have a clue so let's talk about me and then throw in a jab at the media in the back to get a crowd reaction so they won't realize I didn't answer the question.
College educated people are going to vote for this?
I will say it. The tape was cut before he fully answered the question.
I think he was leading up to the part where he saved several auto plants from going to Mexico; I remember one plant had already been announced and rescinded when Trump came in 2017.
What disturbs me is that Kamala says she will reverse what Joe did, and the media believes her despite the fact that, as a Senator, she was way to the left of Biden. They don't believe Trump, even though a lot of what Harris promises, Trump already did as President.
Here’s the entire answer and I’m four rambling minutes, zero answer. I contend it’s actually worse than what I initially posted.
But please continue with your whataboutism.
Does the media really believe her or are they just posturing/lying to get her elected.
Here is Trump answering the question.
Trump says he'd put 100% tariff on every car imported from Mexico if he’s elected
Despite warnings that domestic consumers would pay more and a lack of specifics about how his plans would work.
Now go find one of Harris answering the question on why the Democrats didn’t close the border sooner or why crime is up or how she is going to improve the economy.
He didn’t answer the question. A 100% tariff is not an answer. Not a realistic one anyway. That’s his go to for anything, which is an indication that he has no idea wtf he’s talking about.Here is Trump answering the question.
Trump says he'd put 100% tariff on every car imported from Mexico if he’s elected
Despite warnings that domestic consumers would pay more and a lack of specifics about how his plans would work.fortune.com
Now go find one of Harris answering the question on why the Democrats didn’t close the border sooner or why crime is up or how she is going to improve the economy.
And then of course you go right to whataboutism to try to deflect away from his non-answer.
Meanwhile in liberal utopia...
The bottom line is that in 2016, the media said that Trump couldn't energize the economy, better secure the border, or stop International wars and skirmishes. And by golly, he did it!
The bottom line is you’re deflecting, but cute response anyway.
I have witnessed and analyzed Presidential campaigns since 1960. It is incredible how candidates make dessert mirages seem attainable. Bush took me in because of Cheney, but was he better than Kerry or Gore? Obama's "Hope and Change" was a disaster, but then again, so were McCain and Romney. These seven people did what the Global Corporation and the Military-Industrial Complexes told them.
ABC, NBC, and ABC used to interview Trump continually to build ratings. The networks' political analysts would warp what I heard live. This hatred by twisting convinced me to endorse Trump, but I was skeptical about whether he could fulfill his boasts.
My cute response meant to say that Kamala has made campaign promises that directly conflicted with her previous actions.
Trump makes a point and then breaks off to emphasize his point better. He can ramble and sometimes does not come full circle with his answer. However, I found that he got more campaign promises done than any other President I know, even though, at times, he went around leftfield to accomplish his promise. For example, Mexico paid millions to better secure our border.
Mmm hmm, speaking of rambling…..what does any of this have to do with the topic of this thread? He talked for four minutes when he was asked the question and didn’t answer a thing. If you need four paragraphs to defend him, he’s doing it wrong and you’re in a cult.
You cannot engage in debate. Nothing but childish insults and name-calling.
You made a random post that was totally unrelated to the topic of the thread and weren’t replying to anyone. Just what were you debating?
He didn't stop the war in Afghanistan. But no new wars!
He'll stop all wars in one day and it will be easy.
No, I was replying to your post: " A 100% tariff is not an answer. Not a realistic one anyway. That’s his go to for anything, which is an indication that he has no idea wtf he’s talking about."
It appears you're having a hysterical over-reaction to an insignificant, trivial issue.
You are right. I ramble, and I do that to ensure everyone understands my point.
Trump is allowed to ramble because he does not have to explain what he may or may not do. The concise point is that he already did it before China unleashed the Wuhan Flu. From 2017 to 2019, Trump kept and GREW good-paying jobs in America.
Thank you. That is a tremendous compliment, but Vance made three mistakes in the debate. 1. Vance did not push back on the lie that Walz said, where Trump and he considered Project 2025, and Trump and he have already denied it. 2. Vance did not push back on the repeated lie that Trump killed the bi-partition border bill; the bill was useless if they just reinstated Trump's 94 Executive Orders. The bill also was tied to Foreign Aid Pork. The two Senators who brought the bill voted no to the adjusted bill, and several Democrats voted against it, too. 3. I would have stressed that Biden/Harris's easing of sanctions on Russia and Iran gave them billions, Russia was able to invade Ukraine, and Iran was able to fund Hamas, the Hoodies, and Hezbollah; 4. Harris had a far-left voting record as a Senator and Marxist ideas when she ran for President in 2020. She is now campaigning on moderate ideas that she will NEVER follow if they place her in office. We should all be scared if, God forbid, this happens.
Gee, I dunno, then maybe he should have just said that instead of four plus minutes of rambling nonsense?
And if you have to ramble or pivot to a non sequitur to make a point, you’re doing it wrong.
