Great atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
could take Clingan's spotGreat atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.Great atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
As somebody else said, he's literally a better version of Clingan. They just have 4 other guys that can shoot the 3.Great atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
And drive and get their own shot.As somebody else said, he's literally a better version of Clingan. They just have 4 other guys that can shoot the 3.
Teams just don't start guys that average 3.8 points, 2.9 rebounds and 2.4 assists in 25 minutes a game. Or a guy who shoots 32% from the field, 27.7% from 3 and is a below average free throw shooter (66% career).Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.
Zach would start for anyone.
Is your theory that coaches primarily rely on per game stats when determining whether they want a player on their team or how to distribute minutes?Teams just don't start guys that average 3.8 points, 2.9 rebounds and 2.4 assists in 25 minutes a game. Or a guy who shoots 32% from the field, 27.7% from 3 and is a below average free throw shooter (66% career).
No.. They just don't play guys that can't score.Is your theory that coaches primarily rely on per game stats when determining whether they want a player on their team or how to distribute minutes?
Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.
Zach would start for anyone.
That proves how good of a coach Paint is, doesn't it?Great atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
As somebody else said, he's literally a better version of Clingan. They just have 4 other guys that can shoot the 3.
Morton isn't starting on any FF team. Or any E8 team....or any S16 team.Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.
Zach would start for anyone.
A good regular season coach, but bad in the post season.That proves how good of a coach Paint is, doesn't it?
100% AgreeMorton isn't starting on any FF team. Or any E8 team....or any S16 team.
Morton is a Painter favorite because he's just like Painter was as a player. Probably spends a ton of time in the film room, probably talks to Painter a lot in 1 on 1 coaches office discussions, etc. But he is extremely limited athletically. He'd be much better off at the D2 level.
Too many role players, not enough natural athletic scorers.
CMP continues to believe in guys like Mason Gillis, Ethan Morton and before that SS, Dakota & even PJT. Guys that can and did get you wins over average teams, and well scouted good teams they are used to playing, but absolutely get you nowhere in March over elite teams or even athletic teams they are not used to playing, as their scoring disappears.
And yes as those frosh get older, I hope they are more consistent scorers. But is Loyer athletic enough to be a dominant scorer when Rs key on him?? Don't think so. Might be a good 3rd option guy though. Trouble is who is the consistent 2nd option??
That's one way to look at it. But what about the others?Yeah I hate when Painter believes in guys like Dakota who were on the AllB1G defense team and 2nd team all conference shooting 40+% from 3. Really held us back from winning a lot of games
Yeah I hate when Painter believes in guys like Dakota who were on the AllB1G defense team and 2nd team all conference shooting 40+% from 3. Really held us back from winning a lot of games
That's one way to look at it. But what about the others?
Did i even respond to you? No. And Dakota played in the NBA... so he wasn't athletic?I clearly said Dakota won games. Against average teams and teams well scouted that he was used to....because he was smart team player with an incredible basketball iq..
But I also said too many of those average to non athletic guys leave you home in March....and that team had too many non athletic guys.
See the difference?
Sasha was won of the best shooters in the B1G almost his entire career. PJT wasn't great, but who on the roster was better? You are acting like Painter didn't try to get better players and/or stubbornly played PJ over Ja Morant or something.
Well enough to get in ..And if your under a ten seed.UConn loss to both St John’s and Seton hall during the year. So I’ll turn the question around. How would UConn done if they played in the big ten?
non-athletic guy= high basketball IQ.I clearly said Dakota won games. Against average teams and teams well scouted that he was used to....because he was smart team player with an incredible basketball iq..
But I also said too many of those average to non athletic guys leave you home in March....and that team had too many non athletic guys.
See the difference?
Don’t forget post “entry passing”, I was assured that’s an extremely important skill to possess.non-athletic guy= high basketball IQ.
We always hear about this high bb IQ guys on the roster...sure hasn't translated into success in March.
On Painters criteria list for a play, entry passing is probably much higher than "ability to create own shot"Don’t forget post “entry passing”, I was assured that’s an extremely important skill to possess.
No doubt.On Painters criteria list for a play, entry passing is probably much higher than "ability to create own shot"
Sorry, forgot who you were, I shouldn't have taken the bait and acknowledged your response. I have no desire to try to educate on the fact that scoring more points than your opponent involves both offense and defense or on things like usage rate. Keep looking at ppg.No.. They just don't play guys that can't score.
You see in basketball, the team that scores the most points wins the game. So if you have a guy playing significant minutes that can't score points, it hurts your chances of winning,
That's my theory.
Did i even respond to you? No. And Dakota played in the NBA... so he wasn't athletic?
That senior season was completely derailed by an injury, not a team that was just "too athletic". That TT team was pretty athletic, but they were also a really good team who got to play a Purdue team who didn't have their key offensive piece.
On Painters criteria list for a play, entry passing is probably much higher than "ability to create own shot"
And I would actually even argue that Dakota being on a roster had absolutely nothing to do with his athleticism, but his shooting ability and also due to how nba offenses are run today.-- Yes you did respond to me.
Dakota had just enough athletiscm to sit at the end of an NBA bench for a brief cup of coffee.
But mainly thanks for keeping track of excuses as to why CMP lost to another lower seeded team in March. Happens so often we get confused as to the "proper reason" he lost in a given year. Thanks for straightening us out. LOL 😀
-- Yes you did respond to me.
Dakota had just enough athletiscm to sit at the end of an NBA bench for a brief cup of coffee.
But mainly thanks for keeping track of excuses as to why CMP lost to another lower seeded team in March. Happens so often we get confused as to the "proper reason" he lost in a given year. Thanks for straightening us out. LOL 😀
You think they would have been good in the NCAA if they had to play a big ten schedule?Well enough to get in ..And if your under a ten seed.
You can win it all...Conference championship much more meaningless in today's game..
"Worse than a woman"? Men are empowered to make dumb posts too. Look no further than this board.Looking at the wrong post that responded to clankham or whomever.
Making an NBA roster requires a certain level of athleticism that is more than enough to constitute an "athletic" player in college. I'm not making excuses, the 2017 team with PJ/Dakota didn't get beat because they lacked athleticism. They were athletic at 4 of 5 positions against TT. PJ was the worst athlete for Purdue.
I get you're hurt personally by Matt Painter, but it would behoove you most likely to just stop posting. You are worse than a woman.
I get you're hurt personally by Matt Painter, but it would behoove you most likely to just stop posting. You are worse than a woman.
Big east was just as tough if not better than the B1G this year. UConn would have won the B1G this year. I would love to have UConn in the B1G. Maybe it would force some of coaches to step up their game. UConn would have dominated our conference this year.You think they would have been good in the NCAA if they had to play a big ten schedule?