ADVERTISEMENT

How many players on Purdue could start for the final four teams?

He could play for many teams because once you get into the half court game and get it to him it’s over you can’t run the whole game even the pros can’t do that
 
Great atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.

Zach would start for anyone.
 
Great atheletes on these teams. I say one, Edey, and he could not start for Connecticut, because he would mess up their flow.
As somebody else said, he's literally a better version of Clingan. They just have 4 other guys that can shoot the 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Do Dah Day
UConn loss to both St John’s and Seton hall during the year. So I’ll turn the question around. How would UConn done if they played in the big ten?
 
Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.

Zach would start for anyone.
Teams just don't start guys that average 3.8 points, 2.9 rebounds and 2.4 assists in 25 minutes a game. Or a guy who shoots 32% from the field, 27.7% from 3 and is a below average free throw shooter (66% career).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Teams just don't start guys that average 3.8 points, 2.9 rebounds and 2.4 assists in 25 minutes a game. Or a guy who shoots 32% from the field, 27.7% from 3 and is a below average free throw shooter (66% career).
Is your theory that coaches primarily rely on per game stats when determining whether they want a player on their team or how to distribute minutes?
 
Is your theory that coaches primarily rely on per game stats when determining whether they want a player on their team or how to distribute minutes?
No.. They just don't play guys that can't score.

You see in basketball, the team that scores the most points wins the game. So if you have a guy playing significant minutes that can't score points, it hurts your chances of winning,

That's my theory.
 
Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.

Zach would start for anyone.

Too many role players, not enough natural athletic scorers.

CMP continues to believe in guys like Mason Gillis, Ethan Morton and before that SS, Dakota & even PJT. Guys that can and did get you wins over average teams, and well scouted good teams they are used to playing, but absolutely get you nowhere in March over elite teams or even athletic teams they are not used to playing, as their scoring disappears.

And yes as those frosh get older, I hope they are more consistent scorers. But is Loyer athletic enough to be a dominant scorer when Rs key on him?? Don't think so. Might be a good 3rd option guy though. Trouble is who is the consistent 2nd option??
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: A. Ness
As somebody else said, he's literally a better version of Clingan. They just have 4 other guys that can shoot the 3.

Yep, They successfully used the transfer portal to make sure they had a deep team beyond their 3 core guys.

Don't think that is the philosophy here?
 
Tough to start a true freshman on a final four team, much less two. Caleb, Mason and Ethan could start so long as you needed them to be role players and not stars. The problem with this year's Purdue team is that they didn't have a consistent second option on offense. Yes, different guys would step up at different times but you didn't have a Cline compliment to Carsen's alpha or a clear 1,2,3 like the baby boilers.

Zach would start for anyone.
Morton isn't starting on any FF team. Or any E8 team....or any S16 team.
Morton is a Painter favorite because he's just like Painter was as a player. Probably spends a ton of time in the film room, probably talks to Painter a lot in 1 on 1 coaches office discussions, etc. But he is extremely limited athletically. He'd be much better off at the D2 level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clankhan
Morton isn't starting on any FF team. Or any E8 team....or any S16 team.
Morton is a Painter favorite because he's just like Painter was as a player. Probably spends a ton of time in the film room, probably talks to Painter a lot in 1 on 1 coaches office discussions, etc. But he is extremely limited athletically. He'd be much better off at the D2 level.
100% Agree
 
Too many role players, not enough natural athletic scorers.

CMP continues to believe in guys like Mason Gillis, Ethan Morton and before that SS, Dakota & even PJT. Guys that can and did get you wins over average teams, and well scouted good teams they are used to playing, but absolutely get you nowhere in March over elite teams or even athletic teams they are not used to playing, as their scoring disappears.

And yes as those frosh get older, I hope they are more consistent scorers. But is Loyer athletic enough to be a dominant scorer when Rs key on him?? Don't think so. Might be a good 3rd option guy though. Trouble is who is the consistent 2nd option??

Yeah I hate when Painter believes in guys like Dakota who were on the AllB1G defense team and 2nd team all conference shooting 40+% from 3. Really held us back from winning a lot of games
 
Yeah I hate when Painter believes in guys like Dakota who were on the AllB1G defense team and 2nd team all conference shooting 40+% from 3. Really held us back from winning a lot of games
That's one way to look at it. But what about the others?
 
Yeah I hate when Painter believes in guys like Dakota who were on the AllB1G defense team and 2nd team all conference shooting 40+% from 3. Really held us back from winning a lot of games

I clearly said Dakota won games. Against average teams and teams well scouted that he was used to....because he was smart team player with an incredible basketball iq..

But I also said too many of those average to non athletic guys leave you home in March....and that team had too many non athletic guys.

See the difference?
 
That's one way to look at it. But what about the others?

Sasha was won of the best shooters in the B1G almost his entire career. PJT wasn't great, but who on the roster was better? You are acting like Painter didn't try to get better players and/or stubbornly played PJ over Ja Morant or something.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: clankhan
I clearly said Dakota won games. Against average teams and teams well scouted that he was used to....because he was smart team player with an incredible basketball iq..

But I also said too many of those average to non athletic guys leave you home in March....and that team had too many non athletic guys.

See the difference?
Did i even respond to you? No. And Dakota played in the NBA... so he wasn't athletic?

That senior season was completely derailed by an injury, not a team that was just "too athletic". That TT team was pretty athletic, but they were also a really good team who got to play a Purdue team who didn't have their key offensive piece.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerAndy
Sasha was won of the best shooters in the B1G almost his entire career. PJT wasn't great, but who on the roster was better? You are acting like Painter didn't try to get better players and/or stubbornly played PJ over Ja Morant or something.

No that is because he just recruited good solid guys that fit his system. But while doing so, failed to recruit enough elite athletiscm.

Just like he made it a priority to recruit shooters, and did that well.....one can also make it a priority to recruit athletes which other than CE, Ivey and a couple of others, has not been his priority.

There needs to be a balance and hasn't been....thus the March losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
UConn loss to both St John’s and Seton hall during the year. So I’ll turn the question around. How would UConn done if they played in the big ten?
Well enough to get in ..And if your under a ten seed.
You can win it all...Conference championship much more meaningless in today's game..
 
  • Like
Reactions: clankhan
About the same or better than they did in Big East. The difference is that when UConn had their mid-season swoon, their coach was able to get them back on track heading to the tournament. Great coach and leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clankhan
Hurley has done a nice job of reinventing himself at UConn. He used to be a maniac on the sidelines and he realized and has admitted it was a distraction to his teams. He's much more under control now and has established himself as one of the best coaches in the country. He has it rolling there now and they should be solid for years to come.
 
I clearly said Dakota won games. Against average teams and teams well scouted that he was used to....because he was smart team player with an incredible basketball iq..

But I also said too many of those average to non athletic guys leave you home in March....and that team had too many non athletic guys.

See the difference?
non-athletic guy= high basketball IQ.

We always hear about this high bb IQ guys on the roster...sure hasn't translated into success in March.
 
No.. They just don't play guys that can't score.

You see in basketball, the team that scores the most points wins the game. So if you have a guy playing significant minutes that can't score points, it hurts your chances of winning,

That's my theory.
Sorry, forgot who you were, I shouldn't have taken the bait and acknowledged your response. I have no desire to try to educate on the fact that scoring more points than your opponent involves both offense and defense or on things like usage rate. Keep looking at ppg.
 
Did i even respond to you? No. And Dakota played in the NBA... so he wasn't athletic?

That senior season was completely derailed by an injury, not a team that was just "too athletic". That TT team was pretty athletic, but they were also a really good team who got to play a Purdue team who didn't have their key offensive piece.

-- Yes you did respond to me.

Dakota had just enough athletiscm to sit at the end of an NBA bench for a brief cup of coffee.

But mainly thanks for keeping track of excuses as to why CMP lost to another lower seeded team in March. Happens so often we get confused as to the "proper reason" he lost in a given year. Thanks for straightening us out. LOL 😀
 
Last edited:
-- Yes you did respond to me.

Dakota had just enough athletiscm to sit at the end of an NBA bench for a brief cup of coffee.

But mainly thanks for keeping track of excuses as to why CMP lost to another lower seeded team in March. Happens so often we get confused as to the "proper reason" he lost in a given year. Thanks for straightening us out. LOL 😀
And I would actually even argue that Dakota being on a roster had absolutely nothing to do with his athleticism, but his shooting ability and also due to how nba offenses are run today.
 
-- Yes you did respond to me.

Dakota had just enough athletiscm to sit at the end of an NBA bench for a brief cup of coffee.

But mainly thanks for keeping track of excuses as to why CMP lost to another lower seeded team in March. Happens so often we get confused as to the "proper reason" he lost in a given year. Thanks for straightening us out. LOL 😀

Looking at the wrong post that responded to clankham or whomever.

Making an NBA roster requires a certain level of athleticism that is more than enough to constitute an "athletic" player in college. I'm not making excuses, the 2017 team with PJ/Dakota didn't get beat because they lacked athleticism. They were athletic at 4 of 5 positions against TT. PJ was the worst athlete for Purdue.

I get you're hurt personally by Matt Painter, but it would behoove you most likely to just stop posting. You are worse than a woman.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: clankhan
Carsen Edwards, and Jaden Ivey were on our team for 4 of our last 5 tourney's. If having NBA talent and quickness got you a final four then last years team would have gone there. We had at least 3 NBA draft picks on our roster.....

This year we are getting another fast shot creator in Colvin, and supposedly Heide is super athletic as well. This year was supposed to be a rebuild year as we lost most of our offensive production from the year before. We literally lost every starter from a top 5 team, and somehow became a top 5 team again.

Choking in the Tourney the last few years has been brutal, but I don't see how that is from roster construction with arguably the best talent we have had in decades on our roster during that time. Maybe the baby boilers were more talented but it's not by much if they were.

Again this year we had 5 new starters, two of which were true freshmen. 4 of those 5 absolutely choked in the tourney but man did they exceed every expectation that was in front of them at the beginning of the season. Coach gets plenty of the blame for not having the guys ready for the big dance, but I'm not sure how you coach clanking 21 wide open 3's off the rim when the entire rest of the season at least 1/3 of those go down. These weren't contested shots, they were wide open warmup type shots.......
 
All of the FF teams had more than one guy who could consistently get and make their own shot. Purdue normally has one or zero. Hell, most have a guy off the bench who can do so,

With the unique abilities of Edey, maybe having one guy who can do so will be enough. Plus, when his outside shot is falling, the space that creates can help Loyer get to the hoop and finish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
Looking at the wrong post that responded to clankham or whomever.

Making an NBA roster requires a certain level of athleticism that is more than enough to constitute an "athletic" player in college. I'm not making excuses, the 2017 team with PJ/Dakota didn't get beat because they lacked athleticism. They were athletic at 4 of 5 positions against TT. PJ was the worst athlete for Purdue.

I get you're hurt personally by Matt Painter, but it would behoove you most likely to just stop posting. You are worse than a woman.
"Worse than a woman"? Men are empowered to make dumb posts too. Look no further than this board.

Have an issue with women?
 
I get you're hurt personally by Matt Painter, but it would behoove you most likely to just stop posting. You are worse than a woman.

Check my posting history. You are as far off base here about my opinion about CMP as you are off on how athletic Purdue was/is. Not a good day for you.

And for all my lady friends out there, shame on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clankhan
You think they would have been good in the NCAA if they had to play a big ten schedule?
Big east was just as tough if not better than the B1G this year. UConn would have won the B1G this year. I would love to have UConn in the B1G. Maybe it would force some of coaches to step up their game. UConn would have dominated our conference this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT