Hazell and Walters did not use their HS contacts at Purdue to recruit/portal against us. They weren't good coaches, but they didn't use their Purdue contacts to damage our program.
Last edited:
Gorin flips to L'Ville ?
- Thread starter PaBoiler78
- Start date
I am not defending Brohm, because I could care less about him anymore. I am sure Louisville probably offered more than we did.
In today's environment of NIL and Portal, there is no loyalty anymore. I don't remember which coach said it in an interview, but they said money is the first question that recruits and transfers ask him now and really is the main question most ask. Sure, there are some that inquire about other things I am sure, but college sports are just a business now plain and simple.
No, Louisville did not offer him more. Purdue paid Brohm to recruit/portal against us.
You heard it here first, folks. Purdue is the only program allowed to go after recruits they want. How dare a coach use preexisting connections to recruit at his new job?! I’m sure you’re not hypocritical at all and are fuming that Odom had no “loyalty” to UNLV, and I’m guessing you fully expect him to not call a former contact if they have a good player he would like to recruit.
While Brohm did good when at Purdue, it was pretty obvious that he wasn't long term. When he left he took a few players but Walters has left the program in terrible shape, worst part is how bad the image of Purdue football is in some players heads. Odom is gonna need a few years to get things corrected, he did well at UNLV, i really feel the man will do well, just gonna take some time
Yeah I am not sure the program has ever been in worse shape and am not surprised it is hard to get players to come here. Like you I think Odom will get it sorted.. but it could take 4 years and I hope the fanbase is ready for that. Anything sooner is a miracle honestly.
It could take 4 years. But a more realistic question would be how good do you actually believe Purdue will be in 4 years? I see this year as being a down year for usc and Washington. I believe usc Washington and Oregon will always be better than Purdue. I believe PSU, OSU and Michigan will always be better than Purdue. So in 4 years I see the best Purdue can aspire to be is at best 7th place. And to be in 7th place, Purdue will have to beat out Iowa, uw, Nebraska and ucla. And if he can’t, then that’s 11th place. Is that what you consider a successful season? Is that what you hope for? Odom seems better equipped to handle the job over Walters! But are we going to be happy watching our team finish between 7-11th place every year and realistically no hope of ever being better?
As an IU fan who saw our complete rebuild last year, I saw that the vast majority of portal acquisitions of note are done and signed by now. Signing almost all of a teams incoming portal kids by the end of January allows every new player to work into the team culture far, far earlier; especially important because football is very much a game of team coordination and system repetition.
Faithful schmaithful….
The problem is that Purdue has made spectacularly AWFUL choices when deciding who would follow a successful football coach:
Jim Young ( bumblin’, stumblin’ Leon Burnett and a parade of crap until Tiller;
Joe Tiller (Danny “dial tone” Hope and a parade of crap until Brohm);
Jeff Brohm (not on the level of of the other two, but a marked improvement; followed by the historic disaster that was CRW)
Hopefully Odom marks a resurgence for this program.
Odom will be better than Walters. I’m not so sure how Brohm would do against USC, Oregon, Washington and UCLA . My guess is he would annually lose to 3 of 4 of those schools. I believe this was a down year for Washington. My belief is that Brohm would disappoint his fans and we would become an annual 4 -5 win team under Brohm and he’d be fired after 2 years.
Something that has not been talked about very much is the BIG10 expansion plan to add two more member schools. It appears Miami and FSU will remain in the ACC for the foreseeable future. But if the BIG 10 were to add 2 more schools, They would not be cream puffs! They would be big time powerhouse schools much like Texas A&M and Tennessee. (I’m not saying those 2 schools would be the ones, but they would be teams much like them). And the addition of two schools would drop Purdue further down in the standings. I have never seen Purdue being a big recruiting football magnet. So how would they ever be better than a PSU or Oregon or usc? The answer is, they never will. Their lone hope is to be as good as Iowa, msu and uw. 7th-10th place. Is that acceptable? Would any elite coach come to Purdue with those expectations? Would Deon sanders come to Purdue? Would Purdue want Deon sanders? Or his type of person to be their coach? Would Purdue hire a coach with a shady reputation? Would they shell out $10 million for a coach? And if they spent $10 mil for a coach would their be any money left for nil funds? Or for that matter would they have to cut a sport like baseball or golf just to pay a football coach?
Something that has not been talked about very much is the BIG10 expansion plan to add two more member schools. It appears Miami and FSU will remain in the ACC for the foreseeable future. But if the BIG 10 were to add 2 more schools, They would not be cream puffs! They would be big time powerhouse schools much like Texas A&M and Tennessee. (I’m not saying those 2 schools would be the ones, but they would be teams much like them). And the addition of two schools would drop Purdue further down in the standings. I have never seen Purdue being a big recruiting football magnet. So how would they ever be better than a PSU or Oregon or usc? The answer is, they never will. Their lone hope is to be as good as Iowa, msu and uw. 7th-10th place. Is that acceptable? Would any elite coach come to Purdue with those expectations? Would Deon sanders come to Purdue? Would Purdue want Deon sanders? Or his type of person to be their coach? Would Purdue hire a coach with a shady reputation? Would they shell out $10 million for a coach? And if they spent $10 mil for a coach would their be any money left for nil funds? Or for that matter would they have to cut a sport like baseball or golf just to pay a football coach?
If they are unwilling to buy a roster, then it won’t matter how much they pay a coach or who it is.
Not fully true.
But yes if we won’t pay $10mil plus we won’t sniff the playoff.
It was clear you could give Walters $30million and he’d still be ****ing clueless.
But give a good coach $5-10mil here he can be as successful as Purdue has been in the past…and that’s all we ask!
