For all of the Democrats who think Trump is “in it for himself”
- Thread starter TheGunner
- Start date
Now you have Democrats coming out and saying they will not certify the election if Trump wins. CONTINUING their trend of election denial. I see you've completely ignored me when I wrecked your narrative on this subject.
Well that’s what I’m already seeing from some folks who were there. Then again, not really the brightest group of people.
But again, I’ll wait for you to piece it all together because I know you’re going to once you fit your new tinfoil hat.
Then who's to blame? It was his rally.
The guy was a trump supporter. He's blaming the sheriff who's also a trumper. Then he released the guy on 5k bond. Makes perfect sense.
I don't know. I don't have the information from the Bus company as to why they did what they did. Until we know that, we don't have all the facts now do we?
I don’t watch ANY cable news or news talk.
All I need to do to completely understand Trump is to watch…
…
…
Trump.
Probably want to treat posters as individuals, not a monolith.
Because I have repeatedly said that Biden is not cognitively capable of being President any longer. The guy is 81 for crissakes.
No, we don't know. We do know the trump campaign arranged the buses to take people to the event. I think it's fair to say they were responsible for getting people back to their cars.
Did anybody stick around to make sure that happened?
Rumors are that the buses couldn't find fuel. Also rumors they weren't paid..........which happens with these rallies far too often.
Trump is always saying he deserves apologies. Has he made any today? Has the campaign said ANYTHING?
Well I'm not posting rumors and I suggest we don't go that route. We don't know because we don't know.
The concern in my view is that Harris is on video bragging about her work to see that convicts get taxpayer-funded sex change operations - to further the 'agenda'.
That is a horrible policy to anyone with common sense, so I expect you to say you are in favor of it.
Would be a complete crap thing to support.
I’m not saying she has or hasn’t supported something related to that, but all I’ve seen is a spliced Trump campaign ad that takes a bunch of short sound clips to make it seem that way.
Is there any legit, unedited content to that effect?
Lol. I'm going to bookmark this for future use.
I posted the rumors and called them such. MAGA posts rumors here all the time and portrays them as facts, just like trump does.
What part of....
"My values have not changed"
didn't you understand?
The great horror in the above statement....is that it is true.
From the article.....
"Harris was asked if, as president, she would use “executive authority to ensure that transgender and non-binary people who rely on the state for medical care – including those in prison and immigration detention – will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care.”
Harris replied, “Yes.”"
Last edited:
I did and didn’t see it. That’s why I asked what you were relying on besides that spliced Trump campaign ad.
Thanks-spot on accurate.
That’s a terrible use of tax dollars. Period. Would she do that as President now that she’s had to run to the middle for the general election? Hopefully not.
The Vice Puppet has agreed to appear on Fox News on Wednesday with Bret Baier.
Very surprised given her fear of interviews for the first 80 days or so of the campaign. I think this may be a sign of desperation based on how her Obama handlers think the campaign is going.
Yawn.
1. Your only choices are “hiding in basement because she’s losing” or “doing interviews because she’s losing.”
2. Her current title is “Vice President.” Yet you alternate between “puppet” or “completely responsible for any and all policies and world problems” depending on your biased need to justify.
So transparent and so ridiculous.
I never said she was hiding because she was losing, but because she struggles with answering questions without a teleprompter or extensive practice in repeating what the handlers tell her to say.
An example was when she was on the 'view' and couldn't think of anything she would have done differently from our worst president since LBJ.
I am not saying she is coming out of hiding because she is losing, but because her handlers must think she is losing - or else why would she? What other reason is there for her to suddenly change strategy in the last few weeks.
Fair enough.
My problems with her are policy-based. I think she’s a pretty strong public speaker, including extemporaneously.
