he'll have his opportunities next year for sure. Wish Cincy would have taken Moorhead instead of the Adam Sandler look a alike.Looks like Fleck overplayed his hand. Cincinnati job has been filled. There are not jobs left.
he'll have his opportunities next year for sure. Wish Cincy would have taken Moorhead instead of the Adam Sandler look a alike.
No reason to expect them to tank though...may not be as good as this year, but, should still be good...and, if real good again, he will have his choice of jobs likely.If WMU tanks next year, not so sure.
True, but on the flip side, there may be a lot more P5 jobs open, which could make it more of a seller's market than this year was.He may not tank next year but 9-3 won't make him near the commodity he was this offseason.
He wasn't a real commodity this year. Else why would he have been passed up so much? Smoke and mirrors, man.He may not tank next year but 9-3 won't make him near the commodity he was this offseason.
He wasn't a real commodity this year. Else why would he have been passed up so much? Smoke and mirrors, man.
We don't really know what he passed on and what passed on him.
He's a great young coach and he will be fine getting a big job soon.
First- He is newly married and newly divorced with kids. Maybe he doesn't want to move to Oregon??? Or Texas or Cincinnati. Maybe he wasn't offered by Purdue. IDK
If he considers the money at Cincinnati to be similar to what his raise is and the likely hood of success to be the same for next year then why go there? Why leave your kids to go there? Maybe he's a family man and not a self centered ego maniac. IDK but there's a lot that goes into huge life changes that we all think are so easy but these guys are people with family's and problems just like the rest of us.
We don't really know what he passed on and what passed on him.
His ex and kids are in St Louis, so not like they are local in Kzoo.He's a great young coach and he will be fine getting a big job soon.
First- He is newly married and newly divorced with kids. Maybe he doesn't want to move to Oregon??? Or Texas or Cincinnati. Maybe he wasn't offered by Purdue. IDK
If he considers the money at Cincinnati to be similar to what his raise is and the likely hood of success to be the same for next year then why go there? Why leave your kids to go there? Maybe he's a family man and not a self centered ego maniac. IDK but there's a lot that goes into huge life changes that we all think are so easy but these guys are people with family's and problems just like the rest of us.
The only opening that it was reported that wanted to interview him was Cincy. All the other openings, the media brought him up as a candidate, but supposedly no one tried to contact him for the opening. So he sounds like he sure got passed over to me.
Bobinski is quoted by JC that he " never even talked to that individual" regarding the rumor that he had taken the job. I'll find the article by Baird and link it.You don't think we ever had contact with his camp?
The only opening that it was reported that wanted to interview him was Cincy. All the other openings, the media brought him up as a candidate, but supposedly no one tried to contact him for the opening. So he sounds like he sure got passed over to me.
Here is the article.You don't think we ever had contact with his camp?
Here is the article.
http://www.jconline.com/story/sport...due-ad-mike-bobinski-search-daniels/95194026/
'Bobinski didn't mention Fleck by name Friday, but said, "not only did I not hire him, I had never spoken to that individual. I had never seen him."'
That's a pass, for sure. And who would put that out there and for what reason but for misinformation? Smoke and mirrors, man. Smoke and mirrors.
Like Tom Herman this year...He may not tank next year but 9-3 won't make him near the commodity he was this offseason.
Bobinski is quoted by JC that he " never even talked to that individual" regarding the rumor that he had taken the job. I'll find the article by Baird and link it.
I'll ask again. You don't think Fleck's camp ever heard from Purdue?
Sure, they probably did. But just because Purdue reached out doesn't make someone a commodity. Spack "heard" from Purdue. Was he a commodity?I'll ask again. You don't think Fleck's camp ever heard from Purdue?
Sure, they probably did. But just because Purdue reached out doesn't make someone a commodity. Spack "heard" from Purdue. Was he a commodity?
I could buy that. Perhaps he wasn't interested in Purdue, and had his sights higher. He may have said no to Baylor early in the process too. Its possible he was hoping for a P5 coaching domino effect where Texas and Oregon poaches a P5 coach each and so on and so on, whereby a job opens up he Fleck may "fit" better. But it didn't work out that way because the 5 open P5 programs hired G5 HCs and a P5 DC, just not G5 Fleck.I'm just pointing out that just because he didn't get a job at a particular place doesn't mean that he wasn't wanted somewhere. The truth is none of us know what went on behind the scenes at any of these schools, let alone all of them.
I'll tell you what I believe, and it is only a guess. But I'd guess that Bobinski absolutely reached out to Fleck's agent or someone. I'd be upset if we found out he didn't. Why wouldn't you consider him?
And since I believe that there was some sort of contact there (note that Bobinski denied talking to Fleck which I believe but that doesn't prohibit him from having inquired to his agent or someone else) I would guess that Fleck either wasn't at all interested or wouldn't operate on our timetable and we kept moving on. Doesn't mean he was on the top of our list. Doesn't mean we wanted him over Brohm. It just means that he was probably on a list of potential candidates and none of us know where he might have ranked had both sides advanced further along in the discussions.
At any rate, that's my thinking. I don't think you can take the fact that he appears to be headed back to WMU as evidence that nobody wanted him. Frankly, that doesn't make much sense.
The LSU job should be open again in 1-2 years.
It could also be that Purdue didn't like what the agent/representative had to say and decided to pass.I'm just pointing out that just because he didn't get a job at a particular place doesn't mean that he wasn't wanted somewhere. The truth is none of us know what went on behind the scenes at any of these schools, let alone all of them.
I'll tell you what I believe, and it is only a guess. But I'd guess that Bobinski absolutely reached out to Fleck's agent or someone. I'd be upset if we found out he didn't. Why wouldn't you consider him?
And since I believe that there was some sort of contact there (note that Bobinski denied talking to Fleck which I believe but that doesn't prohibit him from having inquired to his agent or someone else) I would guess that Fleck either wasn't at all interested or wouldn't operate on our timetable and we kept moving on. Doesn't mean he was on the top of our list. Doesn't mean we wanted him over Brohm. It just means that he was probably on a list of potential candidates and none of us know where he might have ranked had both sides advanced further along in the discussions.
At any rate, that's my thinking. I don't think you can take the fact that he appears to be headed back to WMU as evidence that nobody wanted him. Frankly, that doesn't make much sense.
What makes you think that? He was successful at USC and should have been hired permanently over Steve Sarkasian. He stabilized LSU after Les Miles was fired. He's markedly better than our most recent hires.
It could also be that Purdue didn't like what the agent/representative had to say and decided to pass.
There is no reason to think ND wouldn't take Fleck if the job were open, afterall look at the hires since Holtz: Davie/no experience, Willingham/Only MSU, Weis/no experience. These guys make Fleck look like their kind of guy. The seasoned highly sought after coaches always turn ND down because they don't want to be under fire every time they don't win the championship.No reason to expect them to tank though...may not be as good as this year, but, should still be good...and, if real good again, he will have his choice of jobs likely.
Some rumor him to be holding out for ND...which seems like a bit of a longshot, but, he will still be in demand likely...and, even if he isn't, not like his gig at Western Michigan is the worst job in the world...Chris Petersen was at Boise for a long time before he moved on and took what was apparently his dream job...others have done the same.
Fleck was in a position to be selective...he selected to remain at WMU...if ever a guy felt comfortable betting on himself, I am confident that Fleck is that guy...will wait to see what happens now.
Look before you leap. ticLooks like Fleck overplayed his hand. Cincinnati job has been filled. There are not jobs left.
Sounds like he wasn't there first choice as it has been reported Morehead turned them down.Look before you leap. tic
I agree, I initially wanted Fleck, but the more I started to watch WKU and Brohm, I switched my preference. I like that Brohm is at least in control of the offense, so you pretty much know what you are getting there and I fear Fleck is far more dependent on his coordinators, so makes those hires more crucial and staff turnover can have a bigger impact. Obviously both methods can be successful, I just like having a HC who is more hands on, on at least one side of the ball for long term stability.Fleck is heading to Mnny so I guess we'll get to see if we got the better end of the deal when we go against them. Personally I think we did, but we'll see.
WWMT-3 out of Kalamazoo was reporting this morning that Fleck took the Minnesota job. Rumor for contract I've heard is $21M over 6 years.
Different subject but Claeys' statement about being proud of his boycotting players is so stupid that it was grounds for dismissal in itself.