ADVERTISEMENT

FEMA running out of money?

I'd agree with FISA and the Patriot Act. I wouldn't call the military budget spending bad though. Not necessarily good either. Military is a necessary evil and there were concerns that prior administrations had been neutering it.
So you’re saying that with familiarity of the peace dividend promise? When we spent 300 billion annually during the Cold War because of course that would allow us to eventually spend only 100 million. Just like world war 1 was the war to end all wars right? What a bunch of bullshit.

Not bad? Do you work for Exxon? Lol
 
The problem is with all these "NEW" needs illegal immigrants create, well should we more accurately say, that Biden/Harris created, each costing billion$. These NEW expenses put a tremendous burden on Govt being able to do it's normal obligations in the future that Americans expect......like....
💰 Emergency Response
It's not only a tremendous burden, it's flat-out illegal. ". . . no money can be paid out of the Treasury unless it has been appropriated by an act of Congress. . . ."
 
There are a high number that are. In the tens of thousands for each category.
Quite the coincidence. But you don't watch Fox News right?

 
That is an absurd lie. Just three days ago, a Missouri judge blocked yet another student loan cancellation by Biden.
That's not the Supreme Court (you can tell because the article is about a Missouri judge), nor is it blocking the same forgiveness program that the Supreme Court blocked (you can tell because the plan in question doesn't provide $10,000-$20,000 in forgiveness to all Federal student loan holders justified under the HEROES Act), nor is it something that the Biden admin is doing in defiance of the Supreme Court (you can tell because, again, this ruling is in regards to a different program AND because the Supreme Court hasn't ruled--or even taken up a case--about this one). Hope this helps!
 
The data has been post on this site before, not by me even...

Here is over 13,000 murderers that we even know of. Then you have rapists and pedophiles with just as many if not more.

There are a couple possibilities here.

1. You're a liar and know this isn't true but are stating it as fact.
2. You saw reports that fit your position so you simply accepted them. Your news sources did no more reporting because they too only care about news that matches their politics. Since you don't watch any news outside your echo chamber, you're not aware the numbers were misrepresented.

3. You believe whatever trump tells you. Going with that one.

 
That's not the Supreme Court (you can tell because the article is about a Missouri judge), nor is it blocking the same forgiveness program that the Supreme Court blocked (you can tell because the plan in question doesn't provide $10,000-$20,000 in forgiveness to all Federal student loan holders justified under the HEROES Act), nor is it something that the Biden admin is doing in defiance of the Supreme Court (you can tell because, again, this ruling is in regards to a different program AND because the Supreme Court hasn't ruled--or even taken up a case--about this one). Hope this helps!
I'll let you quibble about details. "The Biden administration has now cumulatively forgiven $168.5 billion in federal student loan debt for 4.75 million borrowers."

 
I'll let you quibble about details. "The Biden administration has now cumulatively forgiven $168.5 billion in federal student loan debt for 4.75 million borrowers."

Details? I think the only detail that matters in this case is that the Biden admin is, in fact, NOT defying the Supreme Court as was claimed. But, move the goalposts all you want to try to make it look like I argued that student loans hadn't been forgiven at all, when I clearly didn't. You called me a liar and have now posted two articles as proof of that claim that simply do not support it in any way. This second one, in fact, completely confirms what I said in my "details" about the plan that was blocked, so thanks for that.
 
Last edited:
The data has been post on this site before, not by me even...

Here is over 13,000 murderers that we even know of. Then you have rapists and pedophiles with just as many if not more.


Ol' Bob must have nothing but comic books for his reading library......the dude is not well read....

Post in thread 'Finally some truth about the border' https://purdue.forums.rivals.com/threads/finally-some-truth-about-the-border.250176/post-3810212

The source is this admin ICE data....which gives us #4.... the truth......Ol Bob's showing himself not well read. & is only able to parrot what lib media tells him LOL 🤡
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Ol' Bob must have nothing but comic books for his reading library......the dude is not well read....

Post in thread 'Finally some truth about the border' https://purdue.forums.rivals.com/threads/finally-some-truth-about-the-border.250176/post-3810212

The source is this admin ICE data....which gives us #4.... the truth......Ol Bob's showing himself not well read. & is only able to parrot what lib media tells him LOL 🤡
Lol. You didn't read the news that came out later either did you.

Those figures were not from the Biden admin.........a little cussing for you.........dumbass.

From my link.

The new figures released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) do show some 13,000 non-citizens convicted of homicide were on its records and not in its custody.

However, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees ICE, said the figures cover a period of many years, and include migrants who entered the US under the Trump presidency and previous administrations.

The DHS said: "The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this [Biden-Harris] administration.

I do love it so when you do exactly as you accuse others of doing and make a complete ass of yourself. Oh, and you also jumped the gun without waiting for all the info to come out.
 
However, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees ICE, said the figures cover a period of many years, and include migrants who entered the US under the Trump presidency and previous administrations.

The DHS said: "The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this [Biden-Harris] administration.

I do love it so when you do exactly as you accuse others of doing and make a complete ass of yourself. Oh, and you also jumped the gun without waiting for all the info to come out.

Usually when you respond with crude name calling you lost the argument. And you are consistent here, keeping your streak alive. Lol

Nowhere in the B03 post you responded to, nor my post.... does it say the data is only from Biden admin.

The point in both posts were dangerous people have been let in.....which you denied the numbers posted by B03.
🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Details? I think the only detail that matters in this case is that the Biden admin is, in fact, NOT defying the Supreme Court as was claimed.
The only detail that matters is that the Biden administration has now cumulatively forgiven $168.5 billion in federal student loan debt for 4.75 million borrowers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Would you rather spend 80 billion to enable strength by deterrence or give Ukraine 173 billion?
Well,it depends on where we spend the 80 billion. It would only meet Biden's approval if the recipient had already bankrolled the Bidens thru Hunter's expertise much like on the Ukraine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quix0te
How are they taking all our jobs if they're sitting in hotel rooms?
I doubt ALL 11 MM are still sitting in hotel rooms…if they aren’t in hotel rooms, where are they Bob?

I’m guessing at least 40% are still in hotel rooms.
 
The only detail that matters is that the Biden administration has now cumulatively forgiven $168.5 billion in federal student loan debt for 4.75 million borrowers.
Ok, but that wasn't the original claim, so the fact that's true doesn't make me a liar, as you accused me of being, when I said the Biden administration has not "ignored the law of the Supreme Court." Agreed?
 
I'll say it: "I don't really care about Ukraine." There, do you feel better now?
Ukraine is not an ally nor a strategic partner.
As I said previously, it Russia taking over Ukraine means a larger threat to the region, you would think that Germany, France, Poland, Italy, etc would be the one's providing the most assistance, not the US.

If China invades Taiwan, do we go to war with China?

So you're saying you don't think Russia is a larger threat to the region, given that the Germany isn't providing more. Putin went into Georgia, the Crimea, and now the rest of Ukraine. Do you base your opinion on your interpretation of Germanys funding? You don't see what's right in front of your face?

Germany has given the most aid to Ukraine of any European country.


"Germany is Ukraine's biggest supporter in Europe in terms of military aid. "

That would seem to imply Germany is kinda worried given your criteria for being worried. Care to try some other BS argument? You don't live in Germany. You haven't lived in a country that was under communist rule. You have no idea what the Germans think.
 
Ok, but that wasn't the original claim, so the fact that's true doesn't make me a liar, as you accused me of being, when I said the Biden administration has not "ignored the law of the Supreme Court." Agreed?
The Biden administration has now cumulatively forgiven $168.5 billion in federal student loan debt for 4.75 million borrowers. Agreed?
 
The Biden administration has now cumulatively forgiven $168.5 billion in federal student loan debt for 4.75 million borrowers. Agreed?
Acknowledging I haven't looked up the number myself to confirm, yes, agreed. And at no point did I deny it. So, was that your way to dodge so you wouldn't have to admit that you were unjustified in accusing me of lying? Because I already said "that's true" in my previous post, thus there was no reason for you to ask a question for which I had already provided an answer.
 
If China invades Taiwan, do we go to war with China?

I don't know. I do know that despite all the half assed conclusions that the world sees Biden as weak because he screwed up a withdrawal from a 20 year old war, withdrawing support from Ukraine and handing the keys to Russia will be viewed as real weakness by China and could very well embolden them to invade Taiwan. As usual, Trump is complaining that they should pay us to protect them from China and that they took all of our microchip business.
To be clear, the trump admin did continue military aid to Taiwan but that was mostly due to the China hawks in his admin and congress. His comments since being out of office signal a change in policy is coming if elected.
 
So you’re saying that with familiarity of the peace dividend promise? When we spent 300 billion annually during the Cold War because of course that would allow us to eventually spend only 100 million. Just like world war 1 was the war to end all wars right? What a bunch of bullshit.

Not bad? Do you work for Exxon? Lol
WTF are you talking about? I was referring to our military in the sense that we had a need to update much of our equipment. That's what I remember complaints about when it was claimed that other presidents were cutting funding.
 
Quite the coincidence. But you don't watch Fox News right?

WTF. I give you one link for a Fox report and you are questioning that I don't watch Fox?

Pro tip: If you google something and hardly anyone other than Fox is reporting on it. Guess what comes up.
 
There are a couple possibilities here.

1. You're a liar and know this isn't true but are stating it as fact.
2. You saw reports that fit your position so you simply accepted them. Your news sources did no more reporting because they too only care about news that matches their politics. Since you don't watch any news outside your echo chamber, you're not aware the numbers were misrepresented.

3. You believe whatever trump tells you. Going with that one.

I'm a liar? Did you not watch the video? The numbers given are from a report from the director of ICE. You're acting like Trump, me and Fox completely made this up. Even AFTER you gave a link that reports that the numbers given by the ICE director could be even worse than suggested.
 
Deference? Lol.

Who were we deterring in Iraq? It was a lie. People try to memory hole it but it was. Are you one of those people who defends the war on terror?

And if you lie once you’re a liar. Why were we bombing in Yemen? Why do we have 1000 military bases world wide? This is a massive transfer of wealth from the American people. Eisenhower discussed this. And if most Americans knew a lot it they’d be outraged.

I don’t want to give Ukraine or anyone else a dime. I want to invest our money here.

I’m as far left as they come. The real left. Eugene v debs, Jimmy dore, Henry Wallace. But on one side you have a guy who wants to end these wars and bring that money back home. On the other side you have a party that’s tried to put a smiley face on making sure people in Ukraine have pensions. No thank you. To Ukraine or anywhere else
So much you have wrong.
I'll just start by saying that with Trump's sanctions on Iran, Trumps policy to have the EU rely on US oil and NG rather than Russian oil and NG and a strong military, THERE WAS PEACE in Europe and the Middle East.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
This NC disaster is another example of a SLOW, ineffective, awkward bureaucratic Govt. Govt simply does NOTHING WELL

The federal Govt had YEARS to get rural connectivity of people via Internet/phones. See link.

Elan Musk comes in with Starlink and gets things done in 1 week.
🤔🤔

 
I'm a liar? Did you not watch the video? The numbers given are from a report from the director of ICE. You're acting like Trump, me and Fox completely made this up. Even AFTER you gave a link that reports that the numbers given by the ICE director could be even worse than suggested.
I'm a liar? Did you not watch the video? The numbers given are from a report from the director of ICE. You're acting like Trump, me and Fox completely made this up. Even AFTER you gave a link that reports that the numbers given by the ICE director could be even worse than suggested.
I'm not acting like anything. I'm pointing out the numbers are talking about what has happened over a period of decades, during several administrations, not only under the Biden administration.
 
I'm not acting like anything. I'm pointing out the numbers are talking about what has happened over a period of decades, during several administrations, not only under the Biden administration.
Sure, that is probably true, but it's also probably true that a large amount of those numbers came in over the last 4 years simply because of the sheer numbers of illegals that have come in. Even you have to admit that is probably the case. The number of illegal crossings have skyrocketed, thus a much higher likelihood of more criminals.
 
Usually when you respond with crude name calling you lost the argument. And you are consistent here, keeping your streak alive. Lol

Nowhere in the B03 post you responded to, nor my post.... does it say the data is only from Biden admin.

The point in both posts were dangerous people have been let in.....which you denied the numbers posted by B03.
🤡
DHS posted those numbers last Monday. Your post is from Tuesday when you posted numbers from the report. Are you REALLY trying to say you knew the numbers weren't only from the Biden admin? So you knew they weren't but just passed on misleading information? Where in either of your posts did you clarify where the numbers came from? The Fox link doesn't say anything about it. The reporter says over and over these people are "roaming the country". They aren't. Either you thought the numbers were from the Biden admin only or you knew they weren't but chose to pass on misleading info, just like Fox News.

Your point was that dangerous people have been let in for a long time?......but neither of you said anything of the kind. Every day you post about Biden's border disaster but on this one post you meant something different........without saying it. BS. Nice attempt at a recovery.
 
DHS posted those numbers last Monday. Your post is from Tuesday when you posted numbers from the report. Are you REALLY trying to say you knew the numbers weren't only from the Biden admin? So you knew they weren't but just passed on misleading information? Where in either of your posts did you clarify where the numbers came from? The Fox link doesn't say anything about it. The reporter says over and over these people are "roaming the country". They aren't. Either you thought the numbers were from the Biden admin only or you knew they weren't but chose to pass on misleading info, just like Fox News.

It is common knowledge of the well read. Perhaps why you were unfamiliar with?

Your point was that dangerous people have been let in for a long time?......but neither of you said anything of the kind. Every day you post about Biden's border disaster but on this one post you meant something different........without saying it. BS. Nice attempt at a recovery.

🤔🤔Ummm, we both said dangerous people were let in.......that is implied by the #s RAPES, MURDERS by those having the ability to read & understand......thank you for your admission you are not that person, by what I bolded.
 
Sure, that is probably true, but it's also probably true that a large amount of those numbers came in over the last 4 years simply because of the sheer numbers of illegals that have come in. Even you have to admit that is probably the case. The number of illegal crossings have skyrocketed, thus a much higher likelihood of more criminals.
Probably? We don't know that. If the numbers go back decades as they say that's a lot of illegals every year.
 
I don't know. I do know that despite all the half assed conclusions that the world sees Biden as weak because he screwed up a withdrawal from a 20 year old war, withdrawing support from Ukraine and handing the keys to Russia will be viewed as real weakness by China and could very well embolden them to invade Taiwan. As usual, Trump is complaining that they should pay us to protect them from China and that they took all of our microchip business.
To be clear, the trump admin did continue military aid to Taiwan but that was mostly due to the China hawks in his admin and congress. His comments since being out of office signal a change in policy is coming if elected.
Every foreign bad actor has been emboldened by this administration.

Remember the now famous "Don't" quote Biden threatened Iran with about not getting involved in the Israeli conflict? How'd that go?

Biden get's zero respect on the international stage, (he's not respected domestically either though) and Harris would be laughed at as well (which is why Putin supports her over Trump).
 
Every foreign bad actor has been emboldened by this administration.

Remember the now famous "Don't" quote Biden threatened Iran with about not getting involved in the Israeli conflict? How'd that go?

Biden get's zero respect on the international stage, (he's not respected domestically either though) and Harris would be laughed at as well (which is why Putin supports her over Trump).
Yeah, let's make Tehran a parking lot. That would stop all the fighting. Thankfully there are serious people who are looking at the whole picture and not using shotgun diplomacy. A wider Middle East war helps no one.

The world laughs at trump. The only ones that like him are the dictators. You still think Putin supports Harris despite all evidence to the contrary. You are the perfect MAGA.

The world also is afraid of trumps instability........but you and he think that's a good thing. Governing and a foreign policy based in fear is the right way to go in your mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
The world also is afraid of trumps instability........but you and he think that's a good thing.
You'd better believe the NATO laggards are scared shltless about Trump getting re-elected and that is indeed a good thing.


“Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, NATO’s first supreme allied commander Europe, felt strongly that his mission was to get Europeans “back on their military feet” — not for American troops to become the permanent bodyguard for Brussels and Berlin.

“If in 10 years, all American troops stationed in Europe for national defense purposes have not been returned to the United States,” he wrote of NATO in 1951, “then this whole project will have failed.”

“But as leaders of NATO allies gather in Washington on Tuesday for the alliance’s 75th anniversary, some 90,000 U.S. troops are stationed in Germany, Italy, Britain and elsewhere, making up a significant portion of the 500,000 NATO troops on high readiness.”

 
Last edited:
It is common knowledge of the well read. Perhaps why you were unfamiliar with?



🤔🤔Ummm, we both said dangerous people were let in.......that is implied by the #s RAPES, MURDERS by those having the ability to read & understand......thank you for your admission you are not that person, by what I bolded.
Trying to portray me as uniformed doesn't help your BS argument. You appear to be saying that the report that came out a week ago........that the media called shocking and a bombshell, was somehow common knowledge? Wtf are you talking about? Did you know the numbers before they came out and just didn't post them? Did you know they applied to multiple administrations but didn't say so to make Biden look worse? Fox News sure as hell didn't know or just chose not to share in the link that was posted.

This is a failure by several administrations over many years. Gee, if we only had a LAW that specified a consistent policy rather than have each president decide how he would control immigration.
 
Trying to portray me as uniformed doesn't help your BS argument. You appear to be saying that the report that came out a week ago........that the media called shocking and a bombshell, was somehow common knowledge? Wtf are you talking about? Did you know the numbers before they came out and just didn't post them? Did you know they applied to multiple administrations but didn't say so to make Biden look worse? Fox News sure as hell didn't know or just chose not to share in the link that was posted.

This is a failure by several administrations over many years. Gee, if we only had a LAW that specified a consistent policy rather than have each president decide how he would control immigration.

🤔You portray yourself as uniformed. And you do that well!

Your posts are indicative of someone who waits for the MSNBC response to a topic, and then parrots it here.

Whereas, I read the chart as well as footnotes when it came out from ICE.
 
Yeah, let's make Tehran a parking lot. That would stop all the fighting. Thankfully there are serious people who are looking at the whole picture and not using shotgun diplomacy. A wider Middle East war helps no one.

The world laughs at trump. The only ones that like him are the dictators. You still think Putin supports Harris despite all evidence to the contrary. You are the perfect MAGA.

The world also is afraid of trumps instability........but you and he think that's a good thing. Governing and a foreign policy based in fear is the right way to go in your mind.
Yeh, I could care less about Tehran. Flatten it and give it to Israel. Why do you support terrorists?

As for Trump and his foreign policy; what's your explanation for the global stability during his 4 years? Was that just luck and good timing?
How do you explain the global instability under Biden? We currently have 2 wars taking place that the US is involved in and in the case of Russia, we're actually helping to fund their war effort because we have to buy Russian oil (again, due to stupid democrat policies).
 
No, you take out Iran's oil terminals and coastal refineries in the Persian Gulf. This could easily be done with drones and missiles and we have the US Fifth Fleet in the Gulf to keep the Strait of Hormuz open for oil tankers transporting oil from other nations.

Without oil revenue, Iran is toothless.

What's happens to the price of oil? Did you think about that? I guess you would then blame Biden for it.

Typical. Can't see past your nose. Radical actions like this can have severe consequences. But at least MAGA dupes will feel better because we acted tough.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT