Chump Guilty on all 34 Felony Charges: Tonight, Faux News is going to have a meltdown.

[BuilderBob6]

@BNIBoiler @JBoiler23 @Katscratch Dude, Trump new nothing about the payments. Cohen told his own lawyer that he didn't believe Daniels' story that Trump slept with her, but paid her off just to make it go away.

Besides those facts that Cohen lied about in court, even if Trump did know about it, it's not a crime.

Here are the facts straight out of Cohen's lawyers mouth. I suggest you watch them all. I linked the video to each instance where he was able to talk. It's damning to the testimony of Cohen.

View embedded media

And this

View embedded media

And here is where it comes out that Cohen didn't believe Daniels but decided to take care of the issue on his own.

View embedded media

Costello was not Cohen’s lawyer. Talk about getting your facts straight lol. You think a person’s lawyers can testify as to what his client said to him?

Costello had been Rudy’s lawyer and was only an advisor to Cohen, inserted in the process to benefit trump and protect his interests, much like other trump enemies like Cassidy Hutchinson…….in which they tried to get her to follow her actual lawyers instruction which would help trump. Costello was trumps bag man. His accusations are completely tainted.

 

[BuilderBob6]

Dude, Stormy previously said she did not sleep with Trump, with these words:

"The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence in 2006, 20011, 2016, 2017 and now again in 2018. I am not denying this affair because I was paid “hush money” as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened. "

Yet you believe her now?

And you believe Cohen, who admitted in the testimony he stole 60k from Trump because he thought he deserved it - adding to his convictions for lying.

You know about the NDA right?

Apparently not. There’s pertinent info you left out or just didn’t find in your exhaustive headline search.

Now is when you try to reverse course and squirm to salvage your post.

 

[BuilderBob6]

 

[Riveting-]

You know about the NDA right?

Apparently not. There’s pertinent info you left out or just didn’t find in your exhaustive headline search.

Now is when you try to reverse course and squirm to salvage your post.

Yes, but did it require her to do anything more than just stay silent?

(How is that on the Bagram Bob squirming scale?)

 

[BuilderBob6]

@BNIBoiler @JBoiler23 @Katscratch Dude, Trump new nothing about the payments. Cohen told his own lawyer that he didn't believe Daniels' story that Trump slept with her, but paid her off just to make it go away.

Besides those facts that Cohen lied about in court, even if Trump did know about it, it's not a crime.

Here are the facts straight out of Cohen's lawyers mouth. I suggest you watch them all. I linked the video to each instance where he was able to talk. It's damning to the testimony of Cohen.

View embedded media

And this

View embedded media

And here is where it comes out that Cohen didn't believe Daniels but decided to take care of the issue on his own.

View embedded media

I never said it was a crime. I said they are facts.

Why did they pay the money if trump didn’t sleep with here. Why was there an NDA? Before you go there, has trump presented any evidence Stormy was extorting him?

 

[Riveting-]

View embedded media

The entire Fox network made that prediction, or a specific person at Fox? Can you understand the difference?

Noble Prize winner and lib icon Paul Krugman of NYT predicted the market would plummet if Trump won in 2016. Just the opposite, if I recall. I don't recall anyone saying the "NYT predicted that".

He also predicted in 1998 the internet's impact on the economy will turn out to be no greater than that of the fax machine. Yet there he is, still writing for the NYT.

I welcome squirming by you as opposed to your usual hiding.

 

[BuilderBob6]

Yes, but did it require her to do anything more than just stay silent?

(How is that on the Bagram Bob squirming scale?)

What did she agree not to disclose?

She claimed she was pressured to sign.
“Daniels has said that, although the letter was not true, she signed it under pressure from her representatives, who warned that her life could become “hell in many different ways” if she did not sign it. “

 

[BuilderBob6]

The entire Fox network made that prediction, or a specific person at Fox? Can you understand the difference?

Noble Prize winner and lib icon Paul Krugman of NYT predicted the market would plummet if Trump won in 2016. Just the opposite, if I recall. I don't recall anyone saying the "NYT predicted that".

He also predicted in 1998 the internet's impact on the economy will turn out to be no greater than that of the fax machine. Yet there he is, still writing for the NYT.

I welcome squirming by you as opposed to your usual hiding.

I just posted a tweet. I didn’t say the network was in agreement on it.
It’s no different than when one guy on MSNBC says something and you jackoffs claim the entire Democratic Party agrees feels the same way.

 

[Riveting-]

What did she agree not to disclose?

She claimed she was pressured to sign.
“Daniels has said that, although the letter was not true, she signed it under pressure from her representatives, who warned that her life could become “hell in many different ways” if she did not sign it. “

You are the one who said she had a nondisclosure agreement, but now you are asking me what was in it? It probably said that for 130k, she could not go around saying she had sex with Trump. That would not mean she had sex with him, if she were shaking him down, only that she could not make that claim.

She had a story to sell, whether true or not, for which she could make much more than 130k - which would be motivation for her story to change:

Stormy Daniels' salacious affair story keeps changing because encounter never happened, Trump team claims

Trump defense attorneys on Thursday said Stormy Daniels’ story about an alleged salacious affair with the former president keeps changing because the encounter never happened.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Riveting-]

I just posted a tweet. I didn’t say the network was in agreement on it.
It’s no different than when one guy on MSNBC says something and you jackoffs claim the entire Democratic Party agrees feels the same way.

Give me one example where I have said anything like that. I think the dems are just as incoherent and inconsistent in their range of views as the repubs, so I would never make such a dumb statement.

 

[Riveting-]

Here is the senior legal analyst at CNN making what I think are several salient points about this case. I am sure he is not speaking for all of CNN, judging from the intelligence of his comments in a New York mag article (which I cannot access, so I can only use quotes from the link, but I have not heard them disputed by anyone as being false).

I predict this guy will be gone from CNN by the end of the year for going against the lib narrative on this case.

"Plenty of prosecutors have won plenty of convictions in cases that shouldn’t have been brought in the first place," he continued. "'But they won' is no defense to a strained, convoluted reach unless the goal is to 'win,' now, by any means necessary and worry about the credibility of the case and the fallout later."

The CNN legal guru then noted that Bragg ran for office by "touting his Trump-hunting prowess" in the deeply blue county. Honig, who noted Bragg and Trump attorney Todd Blanche are both his friends and former colleagues, also said Bragg regularly made false claims about Trump on the campaign trail.

CNN legal guru says New York Trump prosecutors 'contorted the law,' case was 'unjustified mess'

CNN's Elie Honig wrote a scathing analysis that said New York prosecutors "contorted the law in an unprecedented manner" to ensnare former President Trump.

www.foxnews.com

 

[BuilderBob6]

You are the one who said she had a nondisclosure agreement, but now you are asking me what was in it? It probably said that for 130k, she could not go around saying she had sex with Trump. That would not mean she had sex with him, if she were shaking him down, only that she could not make that claim.

She had a story to sell, whether true or not, for which she could make much more than 130k - which would be motivation for her story to change:

Stormy Daniels' salacious affair story keeps changing because encounter never happened, Trump team claims

Trump defense attorneys on Thursday said Stormy Daniels’ story about an alleged salacious affair with the former president keeps changing because the encounter never happened.

www.yahoo.com

I pointed out a fact you obviously didn’t know…….that is a crucial piece of info if you’re going to discuss the topic. But you don’t gaf, just jump in without knowing we’d you’re talking about.

I’m asking why there would be a NDA? You don’t have to know the answer, it’s a question of logic. Why would she be asked to sign one if nothing happened?

Why doesn’t trump sue her if the story is false? If she is shaking him down? Surely he would have some kind of evidence. Has he made that claim?
He sues everybody. He loves the courts as long as they side with him.

 

[TheGunner]

Ffs. And the reason has nothing to do with the facts of the case? It’s just about party?

I’m not continuing this with someone who has the objective reasoning of a front row trump rally attendee.

Play this in your echo chamber

Bragg’s thrill kill in Manhattan could prove short-lived on appeal

The Trump trial is a target-rich environment for an appeal.

thehill.com

 

[Riveting-]

I’m asking why there would be a NDA? You don’t have to know the answer, it’s a question of logic. Why would she be asked to sign one if nothing happened?

As I said, because she might have been shaking him down right before the election. People do that to wealthy people, right? That was a good time to do it. Sure, Trump could have sued her for lying later, having lost the election, but his top priority was to defeat the corrupt HC.

Likewise, why did Bragg bring this case now when the FEC and his pred, Cy Vance, had previously passed on it? Because this was a good time to do it - right after Trump announced he was running again.

 

[Riveting-]

I’m asking why there would be a NDA? You don’t have to know the answer, it’s a question of logic. Why would she be asked to sign one if nothing happened?

btw, gaf guy, that is not what you asked. This is what you asked:

"What did she agree not to disclose?" Not why.

Try to pay attention to whatever you think you are trying to say. It is not easy, I am sure, but give it a try.

 

[BuilderBob6]

btw, gaf guy, that is not what you asked. This is what you asked:

"What did she agree not to disclose?" Not why.

Try to pay attention to whatever you think you are trying to say. It is not easy, I am sure, but give it a try.

There’s the squirm.

What did she agree not to disclose?
Why would there be a NDA?

Answer to both. She slept with him.
Just go away dumbass.

 

[BuilderBob6]

As I said, because she might have been shaking him down right before the election. People do that to wealthy people, right? That was a good time to do it. Sure, Trump could have sued her for lying later, having lost the election, but his top priority was to defeat the corrupt HC.

Likewise, why did Bragg bring this case now when the FEC and his pred, Cy Vance, had previously passed on it? Because this was a good time to do it - right after Trump announced he was running again.

So Donald J Trump was shook down by a pornstar. And did NOTHING about it except pay her money and have her sign an NDA. He didn’t fight back. ROFL. Are we talking about Donald J Trump? That’s what you believe? What WILL you do? Your favorite tough guy, who goes looking for a fight every time he opens his mouth and will sue somebody for looking at him sideways, rolls over like a dog for Stormy Daniels.
Pretzel squirming. You people will delude yourselves into believing anything Donald tells you.

The case was active LONG before trump announced his candidacy. But you don’t know that either.

That said, I’ve already posted they wouldn’t have done this to anybody else and used some creative methods to make the law work for them in this case. But just ignore that. It will ruin your whole opinion of me.

 

[mediaexpert]

Nice guy like trump? Trump is many things. I’ve never heard him called a nice guy. Wow.

The NY Advisory Board on Judicial Ethics determined the work of the judges daughter was not grounds for recusal. I’m sure you have a problem with them too since they are from NY.

I have no problem with trump calling for the recusal. I do have a problem with trump going on and on about the daughter in public. She becomes a target for the MAGA crazies. It has been shown time and time again that public officials and their families who don’t do as trump demands have been harassed and threatened.

When the motion was denied trump should just STFU about it. But he has no self control and believes he is right about everything. This idiot cost himself 80 million simply because he wouldn’t shut up lol.

I lived in the projects in NYC and was later a body guard, so I hung out with celebrities. I was being facetious, someone in commercial real estte in the City is not a nice guy. They will **** anything they can including clients, partners and vendors. Nevertheless, I love hearing Trump's speeches because a lot of his puffing is funny, but the main thing is he makes good points. He also did an incredible job from 2017-2019. The BEST!

If your daughter had to inspect one of your buildings and those in charge say that is fine, if your daughter has integrity she would recluse herself and from reading your posts I believe she has the integrity to do so. Since the Judge won't, I would continue to shout it to the rooftops.

As far as the $85,000,000 fine the judge gave Trump. You may think Trump is an idiot, but this should make you vote for him, even if you do not like him personally, I have been to Berdorff's and every person who lives or works in Manhattan knows it is impossible to rape anyone there. If a well known celebrity walkes in, everyone sees green. If Trump cleared his throat, a sales lady would be there to ask if he needed anything. Even more so, if Trump walked to a dressing room, they would follow and there, he would also be greeted by an attendent.

These trials are blatant political persecutions. If they happened in N Korea, Iran, Russia, or China; everyone would be screaming. What is Trump's politcal platform? When President, Trump energized the economy, Trump secured the border, Trump orchestrated the Abrahanic Accords and brought world peace. What is Biden's platform? Trump has been indicted on 86 counts. The Globalist Corporations control the Swamp and now it looks like they own the DOJ. Since they own the media, please do not let them scare you into not voting for Trump. Our country needs to be turned around and IMO Trump is the only one with a thick enough hide to do it.

 

[Riveting-]

There’s the squirm.

What did she agree not to disclose?
Why would there be a NDA?

Answer to both. She slept with him.
Just go away dumbass.

That's the answer for the simple minded, which would be you, gaf guy.

 

[Riveting-]

So Donald J Trump was shook down by a pornstar. And did NOTHING about it except pay her money and have her sign an NDA. He didn’t fight back. ROFL.

Trump did do something, gaff guy. He paid her off to keep her mouth shut so it wouldn't be in the news during the election. Suing her would have had the opposite effect. Is that too complicated for you?

Are we talking about Donald J Trump? That’s what you believe? What WILL you do? Your favorite tough guy, who goes looking for a fight every time he opens his mouth and will sue somebody for looking at him sideways, rolls over like a dog for Stormy Daniels.

He wanted to win the election, gaffer. It was a higher priority for him than suing a porn star. Geesh.

Pretzel squirming. You people will delude yourselves into believing anything Donald tells you.

The case was active LONG before trump announced his candidacy. But you don’t know that either.

You are naive enough to think they would have brought the case if Trump were not running again? They could have brought it years earlier. Why didn't they?

That said, I’ve already posted they wouldn’t have done this to anybody else and used some creative methods to make the law work for them in this case. But just ignore that. It will ruin your whole opinion of me.

I didn't ignore it, but I wanted to help you come to a more intelligent understanding of the case since you obviously needed the help.

 

[Boilermaker03]

I have no problem with trump calling for the recusal. I do have a problem with trump going on and on about the daughter in public. She becomes a target for the MAGA crazies. It has been shown time and time again that public officials and their families who don’t do as trump demands have been harassed and threatened.

Yeah I agree. Those MAGA crazies are known for burning, looting and killing. Don't want to get them going. Err... wait, I think I have the wrong group here.

 

[Boilermaker03]

Costello was not Cohen’s lawyer. Talk about getting your facts straight lol. You think a person’s lawyers can testify as to what his client said to him?

LMAO!!! Yes he was. Cohen waved attorney client privilege, which is why Costello was able to say what he did.

Costello had been Rudy’s lawyer and was only an advisor to Cohen, inserted in the process to benefit trump and protect his interests, much like other trump enemies like Cassidy Hutchinson…….in which they tried to get her to follow her actual lawyers instruction which would help trump. Costello was trumps bag man. His accusations are completely tainted.

Costello says he has documents to prove otherwise. Should be pretty easy to prove he was lying if he doesn't. Since he was testifying in Congress, lying there is a major crime. Do you really think he'd go there and lie if he didn't have proof that he was telling the truth? You just can't handle the fact that you've bought into lies.

"When Cohen began cooperating with federal prosecutors, he denied Costello ever represented him. But the emails Costello sent to Cohen show talk about being “on your team” and sometimes are marked as attorney-client privileged. “Did Michael Cohen write back and say, hey, wait a second, you’re not my lawyer?” Bove asked. “No,” Costello responded."

 

[Boilermaker03]

I never said it was a crime. I said they are facts.

Why did they pay the money if trump didn’t sleep with here. Why was there an NDA? Before you go there, has trump presented any evidence Stormy was extorting him?

Well, you obviously didn't watch the links I post of Costello testifying to why Cohen paid Daniels if you're asking that question.

 

[TwinDegrees2]

How is he going to be acquitted? The trial is over and he was convicted on 34 felony counts.

Acquittal at the next appeal.

 

[JBoiler23]

Acquittal at the next appeal.

And, just so we're clear, if he's NOT acquitted on appeal, does that mean the appeal will have been rigged, too?

 

[TwinDegrees2]

And, just so we're clear, if he's NOT acquitted on appeal, does that mean the appeal will have been rigged, too?

He has to get out of Manhattan on the appeal. If in Manhattan, he might be screwed.

 

[BNIBoiler]

He has to get out of Manhattan on the appeal. If in Manhattan, he might be screwed.

There are 6 black women among the pool of appellate court judges in Manhattan. Chump is toast!

 

[JBoiler23]

He has to get out of Manhattan on the appeal. If in Manhattan, he might be screwed.

So Manhattan appellate judges are not capable of being impartial?