ADVERTISEMENT

Arizona admits that nearly 100,000 non-citizen 'voters' wrongly listed on voter rolls amid lawsuit

tjreese

tjreese

All-American
Gold Member
Sep 27, 2008
25,670
23,925
113
Surely not?
We have it from all the Dems in Congress that all but 3, voted against funding our Govt this week with the SAFE act attached to the CR.....that this is just not a problem.
 
Boiler Buck said:
Surely not?
We have it from all the Dems in Congress that all but 3, voted against funding our Govt this week with the SAFE act attached to the CR.....that this is just not a problem.
Click to expand...
illegal voting no doubt has went on for years, but is on steroids now. The last election produced some very unusual data and many understand some of the reasons how. Unfortunately, too many cower when the "racist" is thrown their way. Ensuring US citizens that are legal to vote is fair to all races. Not doing so is not! We had too many cower when the wall was attacked for being racist instead of the reality for the necessity to not only vet the people, but to control just how many are let in.

The dems want power and control and are a fundamental need for the "progressives" which are the dems of today. When you believe that you are capable of understanding all that needs understood and any failure to impact positively your theories was just poor leadership of something else that needs changed for a redo, it is understandable. This has went on for hundreds of years. Today we have almost 50% of the workers in the USA being paid by the government and many believe their self interest is in the government as a result. We truly are at a time of tipping the scales. Everyone has an island of knowledge and some islands are larger than others, but all are dwarfed by what they don't know. If that last sentence is true, which it is...the implication is that in so many things an evolutionary understanding more often than not results in a more positive direction and therein lies the conservative versus the progressive thoughts towards solutions many times...a comparison between the constrained and unconstrained visions.

The quote below has been repeated by Kamala several times in different places, but has been used before her use.

One of Karl Marx's many aphorisms addresses the social, educational, and fiscal disparities of classes; he believed the root of all evil was capitalism. Marx argued that the only solution was equity, a social construct that ensures equal outcomes, however low the common denominator must be set to achieve them. Only by abandoning capitalism and embracing equity can a society and its people, according to Karl Marx, "move forward into a future unburdened by what has been."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting and Boiler Buck
tjreese said:
Do we believe the 1.1 million in Texas and the 100,000 in Arizona are the only places or other places haven't just looked?

justthenews.com

Arizona admits that nearly 100,000 non-citizen 'voters' wrongly listed on voter rolls amid lawsuit

Non-citizens lawfully residing in Arizona “shouldn’t be registered to vote” since they are labeled as non-citizens on their driver’s licenses, Former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright said.
justthenews.com justthenews.com
Click to expand...
Finding and fixing mistakes (and in the Arizona instance, went on for over four administrations, fyi) is not evidence of fraud. It’s evidence of checks and balances working (albeit slowly). I get that none of this will penetrate your tightly-wrapped-with-tinfoil head but I do admire the reach you’re making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
tjreese said:
illegal voting no doubt has went on for years, but is on steroids now. The last election produced some very unusual data and many understand some of the reasons how. Unfortunately, too many cower when the "racist" is thrown their way. Ensuring US citizens that are legal to vote is fair to all races. Not doing so is not! We had too many cower when the wall was attacked for being racist instead of the reality for the necessity to not only vet the people, but to control just how many are let in.

The dems want power and control and are a fundamental need for the "progressives" which are the dems of today. When you believe that you are capable of understanding all that needs understood and any failure to impact positively your theories was just poor leadership of something else that needs changed for a redo, it is understandable. This has went on for hundreds of years. Today we have almost 50% of the workers in the USA being paid by the government and many believe their self interest is in the government as a result. We truly are at a time of tipping the scales. Everyone has an island of knowledge and some islands are larger than others, but all are dwarfed by what they don't know. If that last sentence is true, which it is...the implication is that in so many things an evolutionary understanding more often than not results in a more positive direction and therein lies the conservative versus the progressive thoughts towards solutions many times...a comparison between the constrained and unconstrained visions.

The quote below has been repeated by Kamala several times in different places, but has been used before her use.

One of Karl Marx's many aphorisms addresses the social, educational, and fiscal disparities of classes; he believed the root of all evil was capitalism. Marx argued that the only solution was equity, a social construct that ensures equal outcomes, however low the common denominator must be set to achieve them. Only by abandoning capitalism and embracing equity can a society and its people, according to Karl Marx, "move forward into a future unburdened by what has been."
Click to expand...

Aphorism.....got to watch using words that are outside the rubicon of normal discourse on here. Confuses simple folk. Lol

I used "sciolism" describing an individuals views on here the other day, and he told me to use spell check first when responding. Got a great laugh out of the irony of that statement.

Anyway, your last paragraph reveals the truth about K2. She is a big govt Marxist. Equity is key to them. Equality of opportunity is, well.....not so important or relevant.
 
Purdue95Grad said:
Finding and fixing mistakes (and in the Arizona instance, went on for over four administrations, fyi) is not evidence of fraud. It’s evidence of checks and balances working (albeit slowly). I get that none of this will penetrate your tightly-wrapped-with-tinfoil head but I do admire the reach you’re making.
Click to expand...

Say a public company files 15ish years of incorrect financial statements but catches this year. Is that company's controls working?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Purdue95Grad said:
It’s like you didn’t read what I wrote.

It also is not an indication of fraud, which is what’s being implied.
Click to expand...

I read it, and you said it's "evidence of checks and balances working (albeit slowly)".

1. Checks and Balances generally refers to different governmental bodies keeping others from getting too much power.

2. In my scenario, is the control working if it takes 15+ years to find and fix the problem?

3. If a non-US citizen votes, it is a fraudulent vote. And for what other purpose than voting, would a person register to vote?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting, SKYDOG and Boiler Buck
Hausta01 said:
I read it, and you said it's "evidence of checks and balances working (albeit slowly)".

1. Checks and Balances generally refers to different governmental bodies keeping others from getting too much power.

2. In my scenario, is the control working if it takes 15+ years to find and fix the problem?

3. If a non-US citizen votes, it is a fraudulent vote. And for what other purpose than voting, would a person register to vote?
Click to expand...
I don’t disagree that it took too long to find it and in this case, definitely didn’t work timely. But the premise, given who wrote it, is that it’s proof of a rigged system, when it’s not.
 
tjreese said:
Do we believe the 1.1 million in Texas and the 100,000 in Arizona are the only places or other places haven't just looked?

justthenews.com

Arizona admits that nearly 100,000 non-citizen 'voters' wrongly listed on voter rolls amid lawsuit

Non-citizens lawfully residing in Arizona “shouldn’t be registered to vote” since they are labeled as non-citizens on their driver’s licenses, Former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright said.
justthenews.com justthenews.com
Click to expand...
Pretty funny how your thread title--and the article headline--doesn't come close to accurately representing the article content, given that it doesn't, at any point, say there are 100,000 non-citizens who are registered.
 
Last edited:
Purdue95Grad said:
Finding and fixing mistakes (and in the Arizona instance, went on for over four administrations, fyi) is not evidence of fraud. It’s evidence of checks and balances working (albeit slowly). I get that none of this will penetrate your tightly-wrapped-with-tinfoil head but I do admire the reach you’re making.
Click to expand...
What I most enjoy about your posts are your inability to extract the concepts that someone presents (even without a lot of math) and then follow up with a personal attack on the poster.
 
JBoiler23 said:
Pretty funny how your thread title--and the article headline--doesn't come close to accurately representing the article content, given that it doesn't, at any point, say there are 100,000 non-citizens who are registered.
Click to expand...
Not sure what is funny? No words deleted...presented as is. Texas and AZ...Georgia... and every state has the potential for fraud enough to throw some elections and if not on a national level, certainly in a state or district level. Fraud is real and until we know how large it is by eliminating it, or almost eliminating it, we will never know. What is more funny is that libs on the whole don't want a secure election and repubs do...that says all that needs said about the two sides and what is going on.
 
tjreese said:
What I most enjoy about your posts are your inability to extract the concepts that someone presents (even without a lot of math) and then follow up with a personal attack on the poster.
Click to expand...
Calling a conspiracy theorist a conspiracy theorist isn’t a personal attack, tj. You know this, of course, but you just feel the need to try to project away from your personal attacks on here as well.
 
I believe the AZ supreme court just let them back in to vote for Nat election only. Can't vote for state & local though as the court said it is against AZ State law for unverified perhaps likely noncitizens to vote
 
tjreese said:
Do we believe the 1.1 million in Texas and the 100,000 in Arizona are the only places or other places haven't just looked?

justthenews.com

Arizona admits that nearly 100,000 non-citizen 'voters' wrongly listed on voter rolls amid lawsuit

Non-citizens lawfully residing in Arizona “shouldn’t be registered to vote” since they are labeled as non-citizens on their driver’s licenses, Former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright said.
justthenews.com justthenews.com
Click to expand...
Of course not. It's been happening all over. Especially in swing states. I post about this quite some time back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and Boiler Buck
tjreese said:
Not sure what is funny? No words deleted...presented as is. Texas and AZ...Georgia... and every state has the potential for fraud enough to throw some elections and if not on a national level, certainly in a state or district level. Fraud is real and until we know how large it is by eliminating it, or almost eliminating it, we will never know. What is more funny is that libs on the whole don't want a secure election and repubs do...that says all that needs said about the two sides and what is going on.
Click to expand...
It's about the article headline, which doesn't represent the article content (not super surprising from a right-wing conspiracy rag like Just the News), and which you copy-pasted without correcting or commenting on the fact that the article doesn't say there are 100,000 non-citizens who are registered in Arizona. I give JTN a tiny bit of credit for the article itself apparently being accurate, but since they know lots of people just read headlines (or maybe also the summary, which also misrepresents that the article isn't actually talking about non-citizens), it's clear to me they knew what they were doing when using the headline they did.
 
JBoiler23 said:
It's about the article headline, which doesn't represent the article content (not super surprising from a right-wing conspiracy rag like Just the News), and which you copy-pasted without correcting or commenting on the fact that the article doesn't say there are 100,000 non-citizens who are registered in Arizona. I give JTN a tiny bit of credit for the article itself apparently being accurate, but since they know lots of people just read headlines (or maybe also the summary, which also misrepresents that the article isn't actually talking about non-citizens), it's clear to me they knew what they were doing when using the headline they did.
Click to expand...
Were you this upset when the Clinton campaign took fake evidence to the FBI that a Trump tower computer was communicating with Russia? I'm guessing no.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back