ADVERTISEMENT

Where are the riots

vinsar

True Freshman
Mar 26, 2007
581
501
93
When we riot do we start at Best Buy or Target? I’ve never done this before. TIC 😁

kinda funny how there haven’t been any burning of buildings, destroying small businesses, looting, destroying police cars, killings...
 
When we riot do we start at Best Buy or Target? I’ve never done this before. TIC 😁

kinda funny how there haven’t been any burning of buildings, destroying small businesses, looting, destroying police cars, killings...
The mob won! All is well with the world now and all it took was submitting and voting Democrat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and vinsar
Sure did and if they didn’t they act like a bunch of thugs. Maybe we can gets some tips from the libs on how we should resist....Marxist manual?
#TheResistance started yesterday just in case you missed it. An illegitimate and racist president was elected in a sham election. He must be impeached immediately for his shady ties with foreign adversaries. This is how the game is played and he’s not my president, that’s for sure!
 
No riots, only hundreds of "super spreader events", which are now called "joyful celebrations".

biden-celebration-1-e1604808800638.png
40fa1d542d9dbe47b7b3d8a22b9794f6de27d80f.jpg

7746510_110720-wls-lakeview-election-dance-img.jpg
 
Keep in mind red states have the highest crime rates in the USA. Facts matter. Thanks for tears.
 
When we riot do we start at Best Buy or Target? I’ve never done this before. TIC 😁

kinda funny how there haven’t been any burning of buildings, destroying small businesses, looting, destroying police cars, killings...

Were there riots when Trump won?

Do you guys even try to make logical comparisons or do you just hear a buzzword and then hammer it to death.

Emails!
Benghazi!
Socialism!
Dementia!
Puppet!
Riots!

If you are going to try and be cute and make some kind of point/comparison at least try and think if what you are comparing are both apples
 
Were there riots when Trump won?

Do you guys even try to make logical comparisons or do you just hear a buzzword and then hammer it to death.

Emails!
Benghazi!
Socialism!
Dementia!
Puppet!
Riots!

If you are going to try and be cute and make some kind of point/comparison at least try and think if what you are comparing are both apples

Thats right peaceful protests. I was mislead. So do you think if Biden lost we would see your liberal peaceful protests?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bethboilerfan
They don’t have any. It’s just deranged talking points that they believe without question.

Deranged is another one of your key post words. You left out brainwashed, stupid....help me out, you have a few more brilliant comebacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
Lol, "fraud voters." Produce an iota of evidence. I keep seeing, "they're saying that there's fraud," being used as evidence. That's called hearsay, and is not evidence.

Do you think all mail in ballots were legit? No way there could be fraud?
 
The mob won! All is well with the world now and all it took was submitting and voting Democrat.

just wait until they lose the run off Senate elections in January...all of the abortion rights fanatics will be back out with vengeance
 
Do you think all mail in ballots were legit? No way there could be fraud?
I am going on record saying that there's no massive conspiracy to commit voter fraud that would have a material effect on the outcome of the election. Please think about the scale of such an operation, and keeping it secret. It's never happened before and assuredly didn't happen in 2020.
 
I am going on record saying that there's no massive conspiracy to commit voter fraud that would have a material effect on the outcome of the election. Please think about the scale of such an operation, and keeping it secret. It's never happened before and assuredly didn't happen in 2020.
I wouldn't call it a conspiracy but there was a National effort to change the rules with regard to mail in votes.
Many law suits were filed by the Democratic party with State Supreme Courts to change the existing requirements when the State Legislatures refused to do so. The challenge by the Trump campaign is the State Supreme Courts have no jurisdiction to change the rules, per the US Constitution the State Legislatures have complete authority over the State Election rules.
The US Supreme Court stepped in and mandated the States in question separate the votes that didn't meet the original state voting requirements for such things as meeting the original vote receipt date requirements and vote authenticity.
The problem is the Democratic controlled inner city caucuses kept counting the votes and have now made it impossible to distinguish which votes actually met the original, State Legislature mandated requirements.
This fact is getting completely lost in the MSM narrative.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Monkey Pox
I wouldn't call it a conspiracy but there was a National effort to change the rules with regard to mail in votes.
Many law suits were filed by the Democratic party with State Supreme Courts to change the existing requirements when the State Legislatures refused to do so. The challenge by the Trump campaign is the State Supreme Courts have no jurisdiction to change the rules, per the US Constitution the State Legislatures have complete authority over the State Election rules.
The US Supreme Court stepped in and mandated the States in question separate the votes that didn't meet the original state voting requirements for such things as meeting the original vote receipt date requirements and vote authenticity.
The problem is the Democratic controlled inner city caucuses kept counting the votes and have now made it impossible to distinguish which votes actually met the original, State Legislature mandated requirements.
This fact is getting completely lost in the MSM narrative.
I believe the only state in question like that is Pennsylvania and even there, you are distorting the situation.

For the Philadelphia area for example, they have been separating the ‘late’ arrivals and it’s not clear if they are even included in the results posted so far. I’ve seen estimates of between 5 and 10k votes in TOTAL in PA that fall into this category.

The SCOTUS order over the weekend was to ensure all precincts followed the rules to separate the votes because not all had positively confirmed they were doing so.

It’s also worth noting that SCOTUS chose not to intercede in the matter in the weeks before the election. The most common belief now is they are waiting to see the total # and if it would even matter before they consider the case on it’s merits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
When we riot do we start at Best Buy or Target? I’ve never done this before. TIC 😁

kinda funny how there haven’t been any burning of buildings, destroying small businesses, looting, destroying police cars, killings...
Well they are still demonstrating in Portland. Some idiots were outside of an ICE office yelling fo ICE to come out and fight. I would love to have a ringside seat for that one. It would be fun watch watch.

Portland celebrates Biden win with illegal street racing, crowds outside ICE chanting 'come out and fight'
https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-biden-celebrations-street-racing-ice-chanting-come-out-and-fight
 
I believe the only state in question like that is Pennsylvania and even there, you are distorting the situation.

For the Philadelphia area for example, they have been separating the ‘late’ arrivals and it’s not clear if they are even included in the results posted so far. I’ve seen estimates of between 5 and 10k votes in TOTAL in PA that fall into this category.

The SCOTUS order over the weekend was to ensure all precincts followed the rules to separate the votes because not all had positively confirmed they were doing so.

It’s also worth noting that SCOTUS chose not to intercede in the matter in the weeks before the election. The most common belief now is they are waiting to see the total # and if it would even matter before they consider the case on it’s merits.
This is a tricky situation for the SC. Do they step in and basically overturn an election because votes were cast that didn't meet the individual states legal requirements.
The problem IMO, is the SC didn't agree with the Trump campaign to not allow State Governors and State Justices to make decisions that they couldn't legally make. And there are more States involved than just PA.
The cat is out of the bag, the mail in votes, whether legal or not have been counted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bethboilerfan
This is a tricky situation for the SC. Do they step in and basically overturn an election because votes were cast that didn't meet the individual states legal requirements.
The problem IMO, is the SC didn't agree with the Trump campaign to not allow State Governors and State Justices to make decisions that they couldn't legally make. And there are more States involved than just PA.
The cat is out of the bag, the mail in votes, whether legal or not have been counted.
Please show any evidence of states other than PA in this case. I have not seen any.

Again — those votes in question in PA have not even been included in the counts to date per a report this AM.
 
Yes there were. And several far left cities boarded up parts of their downtown, in case riots happened after this election. Biden won, so there weren't riots.


Everyone knows that lefties, libs and snowflakes are the part of no impulse control. If something doesn't go your way, someone says something you disagree with or someone believes differently than you, then the only logical response in their little minds is to lash out with riots, looting, burning (and calling everyone a racist).
 
Well they are still demonstrating in Portland. Some idiots were outside of an ICE office yelling fo ICE to come out and fight. I would love to have a ringside seat for that one. It would be fun watch watch.

Portland celebrates Biden win with illegal street racing, crowds outside ICE chanting 'come out and fight'
https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-biden-celebrations-street-racing-ice-chanting-come-out-and-fight

I'm thinking about retiring, moving to Portland, and dedicating my time to beating up soy boys. I mean, seriously....eventually you get to the point where you quit F'ing around and start kicking some a$$ to get the message through.
 
When we riot do we start at Best Buy or Target? I’ve never done this before. TIC 😁

kinda funny how there haven’t been any burning of buildings, destroying small businesses, looting, destroying police cars, killings...
sometimes the simple explanation works. Cities have more people. This makes it easier to congregate spontaneously. More people with high emotions congregating, the higher the chances of random spontaneous violence erupting. Those riots are a function of population density, not character or idealogy. Wildfires are more likely to start in locations with lots of dry vegetation. They don't occur in deserts with sparse vegetation
 
sometimes the simple explanation works. Cities have more people. This makes it easier to congregate spontaneously. More people with high emotions congregating, the higher the chances of random spontaneous violence erupting. Those riots are a function of population density, not character or idealogy. Wildfires are more likely to start in locations with lots of dry vegetation. They don't occur in deserts with sparse vegetation

That's the most lefty lib excuse and attempt at justification if there ever was one!
Congratulations sir. You win the award today!
 
That's the most lefty lib excuse and attempt at justification if there ever was one!
Congratulations sir. You win the award today!
perhaps that's the difference between us. I tend to look for systemic things that explain mass behavior and don't default to deficiencies at individual levels. I just refuse to believe there is a mass difference between a group of humans and another group. Individuals are of course unique and different, and often there are legit differences in priorties. But largely, I genuinely believe there's no fundamental difference between people. So when I observe widespread differences in behavior, I look for more systemic explanations. What about the overall system as is, makes people react to it this way? And often there is some systemic explanation that largely explains why a behavior is rampant.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Riveting
perhaps that's the difference between us. I tend to look for systemic things that explain mass behavior and don't default to deficiencies at individual levels. I just refuse to believe there is a mass difference between a group of humans and another group. Individuals are of course unique and different, and often there are legit differences in priorties. But largely, I genuinely believe there's no fundamental difference between people. So when I observe widespread differences in behavior, I look for more systemic explanations. What about the overall system as is, makes people react to it this way? And often there is some systemic explanation that largely explains why a behavior is rampant.
Then would you say, with the utmost humility, that you are an expert on systemic racism and could thus explain it so that all the deplorables can understand it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
perhaps that's the difference between us. I tend to look for systemic things that explain mass behavior and don't default to deficiencies at individual levels. I just refuse to believe there is a mass difference between a group of humans and another group. Individuals are of course unique and different, and often there are legit differences in priorties. But largely, I genuinely believe there's no fundamental difference between people. So when I observe widespread differences in behavior, I look for more systemic explanations. What about the overall system as is, makes people react to it this way? And often there is some systemic explanation that largely explains why a behavior is rampant.

I think when you get a certain segment of the population that has been told by their political leaders that they are victims of an unfair and unjust society, that everything is rigged against them, that without government intervention, that they won't and can't succeed, then you end of with that segment that feels justified and even encouraged, by those same political leaders, to rebel, resist and react.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT