a rigged dncSo Trump Tower was being wire tapped! Imagine that.
wiretapping political opponents
bravo facists. bravo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a rigged dncSo Trump Tower was being wire tapped! Imagine that.
Don't really care that they tapped Trump Tower, what I'm upset about is the Dems lied about doing it and denied it. Of course the MSM bit hook line and sinker into the Trump is telling fibs on his tweets again.so it's ok if it happens to someone else, just not "me" .
sounds like ssdd in politics.
if they were against these practices, it would make sense. but they are not.
The Ds will deny their complicity, and the DOJ and FBI should be taken to task for this unlawful behavior.Pretty brutal for the FBI. I can see why DOJ didn't want it released. Unbelievable behavior.
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/read-the-gop-memo/2746/
Don't really care that they tapped Trump Tower,
a rigged dnc
wiretapping political opponents
bravo facists. bravo.
The "Deep State" was in full effect with these actions.
Horseshit. It’s the Ds under Obama who flouted the law at every turn.
Horseshit. It’s the Ds under Obama who flouted the law at every turn.
oh republicans aren't citizens anymore. got it.democrats target republicans.
republicans target american citizens.
These FBI agents committed treason. They should be fired, tried, and if found guilty, either jailed or executed.Well....is anyone going to talk about the damn thing?
just weaponizing the DOJ to rig an election. ho hum.Well....is anyone going to talk about the damn thing?
oh republicans aren't citizens anymore. got it.
what office did carter page hold?huh?
ill specify I guess if needed.
democrats(politicians) target republicans(politicians).
republicans(politicians) target american citizens.
a position under an aspiring politician?what office did carter page hold?
exactly...because the democrats really defended snowden fiercely and came down hard on james clapper for lying about it....OH WAIT...lola position under an aspiring politician?
just a semantics argument?
there could be various counter examples to a joking/ broad statement.
how about...it seems that some are only concerned with constitution abuse based on political party
republicans have talked tough on democrat improprieties. unfortunately they showed their actual level of concern on surveillance and the 4th amendment based on their recent votes.
exactly...because the democrats really defended snowden fiercely and came down hard on james clapper for lying about it....OH WAIT...lol
exactly...because the democrats really defended snowden fiercely and came down hard on james clapper for lying about it....OH WAIT...lol
Well....is anyone going to talk about the damn thing?
Willfully ignorant - slurping up the left-wing Kool-Aid. Trey Gowdy did see the FISA applications and he helped write the memo.There's nothing to talk about cause it literally revealed nothing on its own . It's clearly written very carefully to try to make it sound like something bigger than it actually is. Without hardly ANYONE (including Congressional Republicans who voted to release it) having actually seen the FISA application, we don't know what was left out. FISA applications aren't based on 1 thing, and they have to be signed off by multiple people - and have to be argued in front of a judge. This warrant was renewed 3 times by a federal judge - each time you have to present new evidence to show that the warrant is serving its purpose.
The funny thing is this memo also proved what Republicans had been crying all about - the Russia investigation was started because of good old George Pop spilling the beans to an Australian government official that called the FBI.
I believe that you believe this. Sheep are easily misled.Willfully ignorant - slurping up the left-wing Kool-Aid. Trey Gowdy did see the FISA applications and he helped write the memo.
The FISA applicants misled (withheld information) from the FISA judge on multiple occasions. That, in and of itself, is a criminal offense for each time it was done (at least 3). The information used to get the warrant was tainted - it was a purely political piece of crap, generated on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC (paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC; written by disgraced foreign agent Christopher Steele, using garbage (mis)information supplied by Russian agents) used by those favoring a Clinton presidency to get a warrant and to smear the Trump campaign in July 2016 (4-5 months before the election). The Ds (and James Comey and McCabe) knew the information in the Russian dossier was crap, but they used it anyway.
You want to talk about a "Constitutional Crisis" and about Russian collusion? Can you come up with a more blatant case than this? It's obvious - the Russian collusion was by the Ds, not the Trump campaign. The Mueller investigation is built on a house of cards - a pack of lies.
And you watch - more information is coming out. We've only seen 15% of what is going to come out. The Ds, Obama Administration, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Mueller, FBI folks are going to have a lot of explaining to do.
The sheep are people like you who slurp up the bile published and "reported"in places like the WaPo, Mother Jones, Vox, Huffington Post, Salon, Newsweek, Morning Joe, CNN....I believe that you believe this. Sheep are easily misled.
The sheep are people like you who slurp up the bile published and "reported"in places like the WaPo, Mother Jones, Vox, Huffington Post, Salon, Newsweek, Morning Joe, CNN....
It doesn't seem to matter to you how much evidence comes out, you won't believe it because you don't want to. You couldn't possibly admit that Trump was right all along.
What I wrote in the second paragraph has been corroborated now.
I believe that you believe this. Sheep are easily misled.
hahahahahahaThere's nothing to talk about cause it literally revealed nothing on its own . It's clearly written very carefully to try to make it sound like something bigger than it actually is. Without hardly ANYONE (including Congressional Republicans who voted to release it) having actually seen the FISA application, we don't know what was left out. FISA applications aren't based on 1 thing, and they have to be signed off by multiple people - and have to be argued in front of a judge. This warrant was renewed 3 times by a federal judge - each time you have to present new evidence to show that the warrant is serving its purpose.
The funny thing is this memo also proved what Republicans had been crying all about - the Russia investigation was started because of good old George Pop spilling the beans to an Australian government official that called the FBI.
No, more will be coming out in the upcoming weeks. You watch - wait a minute, you'll just ignore all that comes out anyway because it doesn't fit your Progressive worldview.It actually hasn't. Hannity told you 15% has been uncovered and you lap it up.
Hi, Region Boiler here, who would be a reliable news source?The sheep are people like you who slurp up the bile published and "reported"in places like the WaPo, Mother Jones, Vox, Huffington Post, Salon, Newsweek, Morning Joe, CNN....
It doesn't seem to matter to you how much evidence comes out, you won't believe it because you don't want to. You couldn't possibly admit that Trump was right all along.
What I wrote in the second paragraph has been corroborated now.
Lock in the quote. I want to check back in a few weeks to see what comes outNo, more will be coming out in the upcoming weeks. You watch - wait a minute, you'll just ignore all that comes out anyway because it doesn't fit your Progressive worldview.
Wall Street Journal?Hi, Region Boiler here, who would be a reliable news source?
do you dispute the report? the texts? that comey was leaking to the press? that the dems funded steele? what exactly is the issue here?Hi, Region Boiler here, who would be a reliable news source?
They will try, even though there is strong evidence they are absolutely wrong.do you dispute the report? the texts? that comey was leaking to the press? that the dems funded steele? what exactly is the issue here?
WSJ is a bit of a paradox. The editorial board is definitely pro Trump but they report print stories from both sides, not afraid to go against the Trump grain.Wall Street Journal?
Wall Street Journal?
do you dispute the report? the texts? that comey was leaking to the press? that the dems funded steele? what exactly is the issue here?
Why was the dossier put together? Who paid for it?A "report" would imply it's based on fact. The "memo" has already been shown to be twisted in fact.
My question to you: If a "dossier" put together by a well respected former spy had information that was corroborated by intelligence agencies, does it make it any less factual? Does a bear shit in the woods? No matter who paid for it, it can still be verified.
THis well respectedA "report" would imply it's based on fact. The "memo" has already been shown to be twisted in fact.
My question to you: If a "dossier" put together by a well respected former spy had information that was corroborated by intelligence agencies, does it make it any less factual? Does a bear shit in the woods? No matter who paid for it, it can still be verified.
This "well respected former spy" was also desperate stop Trump from becoming President according to the meme. Yes the Dossier could be true but Mueller has had a blank check and almost a year and nothing to show for it. You Dems keep hoping to find something but it has been a year and basically nothing. The Republican point is that there was not enough evidence to warrant a special counsel. The FBI basically misrepresented and overhyped the DOSSIER to the FISA court and made the case and against Trump stronger that it really was. If these accusations are true then some in the FBI and DOJ should be charged for crimes of their own. The Mueller operation should be shut down since it was based on false information. This Mueller investigation has caused all sorts of problems and should be shut down.A "report" would imply it's based on fact. The "memo" has already been shown to be twisted in fact.
My question to you: If a "dossier" put together by a well respected former spy had information that was corroborated by intelligence agencies, does it make it any less factual? Does a bear shit in the woods? No matter who paid for it, it can still be verified.
Exactly, it's the epitome of the legal term "The fruit of the poisonous tree", used in the United States to describe evidence that was obtained illegally. The logic of the terminology is that if the source (the "tree") of the evidence or evidence itself is tainted, then anything gained (the "fruit") from it is tainted as well.THis well respected
This "well respected former spy" was also desperate stop Trump from becoming President according to the meme. Yes the Dossier could be true but Mueller has had a blank check and almost a year and nothing to show for it. You Dems keep hoping to find something but it has been a year and basically nothing. The Republican point is that there was not enough evidence to warrant a special counsel. The FBI basically misrepresented and overhyped the DOSSIER to the FISA court and made the case and against Trump stronger that it really was. If these accusations are true then some in the FBI and DOJ should be charged for crimes of their own. The Mueller operation should be shut down since it was based on false information. This Mueller investigation has caused all sorts of problems and should be shut down.